I might enter, but it's unlikely, as I'm not too interested in public transport. You may want to specify that it must be a land vehicle if you don't want ships and airliners. Other than that, I like this challenge. Very similar to my template. Nice challenge logo.
@RailfanEthan you might be interested in this one.
I will consider accepting it when I start judging. Still, I advise playing it safe and somehow improving this build with a few extra parts to get it to 150.
@FLYGUY101 I don't have a problem with that. I just won't rate it. However, you can save the whole thing as a subassembly and paste it onto a "new build" cockpit.
@Grandmaster I know what huey is. It's latest version, UH-1Y, is the best multirole helicopter US has ever made.
Indeed, retiring Kiowa looks like a bad decision. It was a great low-cost scout, perfect for frontline scouting, anti-tank action, and convoy support.
@Grandmaster I have basically created Aerospatiale SA-342 and added an optoelectronics mast, which isn't unique to OH-58 I think. UH stands for Utility Helicopter. I'm glad you like it.
This entry doesn't seem to fit the challenge requirements (minimum of 150 parts). While that could be due to the cockpit still being attached to the challenge logo, I advise checking the part count of the system itself.
@Hiluks1 since you've said camera isn't your own, you should credit the guy who made it in description. I do believe you made the rest yourself, so it's acceptable.
@SubXTribe this doesn't seem to be a copy of the system you linked. Enough things are done differently, and even the shape of the base is different. Also, the one you linkes is smaller.
@Flyoneplays feel free to. However, don't expect a reply from that account, as they only use it to post stock planes. You can use contact button at the bottom of the page to send your complaints to developers via email.
Your entry does not fit the challenge. Missiles are from BogdanX's SCUD and you should credit him for them. Also, this is a mixed system, not a pure air defence system. And it is unrealistically overarmed.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@SledDriver like Squirrel, I too have never insulted you. I'm just doing what I'm supposed to do. I even though we're on good terms. Anyway, since you have invited me to issue you a strike, you have been issued a strike for hostile behavior shown in the comment section of this post. I have archived this page as it is now, just in case you change your mind.
@SledDriver stating an opinion against someone is a targeted attack. Do it again, and I will be more than happy to issue you your second strike. Do understand that I am not a part of this conversation. I'm just following moderator guidelines and making sure rules are being followed.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@ColonelStriker it is not a requirement. However, it is advisable if you are making a missile system.
Good. Hopefully, I won't forget to rate it.
No problem @GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD
I might enter, but it's unlikely, as I'm not too interested in public transport. You may want to specify that it must be a land vehicle if you don't want ships and airliners. Other than that, I like this challenge. Very similar to my template. Nice challenge logo.
+3@RailfanEthan you might be interested in this one.
I will consider accepting it when I start judging. Still, I advise playing it safe and somehow improving this build with a few extra parts to get it to 150.
@Mmdben no problem buddy.
@RamboJutter no problem.
@FLYGUY101 I don't have a problem with that. I just won't rate it. However, you can save the whole thing as a subassembly and paste it onto a "new build" cockpit.
@Grandmaster what's your bad? Your comments below are perfectly reasonable.
@Grandmaster I know what huey is. It's latest version, UH-1Y, is the best multirole helicopter US has ever made.
Indeed, retiring Kiowa looks like a bad decision. It was a great low-cost scout, perfect for frontline scouting, anti-tank action, and convoy support.
@Grandmaster I have basically created Aerospatiale SA-342 and added an optoelectronics mast, which isn't unique to OH-58 I think. UH stands for Utility Helicopter. I'm glad you like it.
@grizzlitn no problem.
+1@yellow8041 yes.
This entry doesn't seem to fit the challenge requirements (minimum of 150 parts). While that could be due to the cockpit still being attached to the challenge logo, I advise checking the part count of the system itself.
Your post has been removed. You have been issued a strike for repeatedly making the same offense.
@Leehopard it flies much better. Thanks for the feedback. I've added a link to your fix to description.
@Hiluks1 since you've said camera isn't your own, you should credit the guy who made it in description. I do believe you made the rest yourself, so it's acceptable.
+1@SubXTribe this doesn't seem to be a copy of the system you linked. Enough things are done differently, and even the shape of the base is different. Also, the one you linkes is smaller.
@Flyoneplays feel free to. However, don't expect a reply from that account, as they only use it to post stock planes. You can use contact button at the bottom of the page to send your complaints to developers via email.
@CRJ900Pilot thanks.
@WarHawk95 literally Gazelle with conventional tail rotor.
@DeathStalker627 I'm glad you like it.
@belugasub @Destroyerz117 @BlackhattAircraft thanks.
@AerialFighterSnakes here's the public upload. I have improved performance a little too.
Your post has been removed as spam. Please keep posts of this kind in the forum section.
Do not use mods to falsely advertise a build. Thumbnails must show the build you have made.
@Partman I'm glad to have helped.
There's a lot of stuff you can do with Overload. I suggest bookmarking the page linked in that forum for future use.
@Ratakis you download this post, delete everything except the cockpit, and build your build. When you post, it'll be a successor.
Depends. Are farts good or bad energy?
+4@Ratakis this challenge is not requesting replicas. Your entry wouldn't have to be a real system. It just can't be an unrealistic overpowered system.
@FLYGUY101 XML edited parts are allowed.
Great build. I like the fact that I can see engines through the intakes.
+3Your entry does not fit the challenge. Missiles are from BogdanX's SCUD and you should credit him for them. Also, this is a mixed system, not a pure air defence system. And it is unrealistically overarmed.
+3@WHISKY12 that's great.
@Supernovaboss504 it's fine. I haven't started judging yet. I'll start judging on the 1st.
Your post has been removed for bypassing successor system.
+1Simply removing a few parts isn't enough change for the build to be acceptable. Your post has been removed as a copy.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@14ROVI considers abusing mod powers
+6@14ROVI no you're not :)
+1@Notaleopard some old moderators decided they don't want to moderate anymore, as they no longer have the time for SP.
+2@SledDriver like Squirrel, I too have never insulted you. I'm just doing what I'm supposed to do. I even though we're on good terms. Anyway, since you have invited me to issue you a strike, you have been issued a strike for hostile behavior shown in the comment section of this post. I have archived this page as it is now, just in case you change your mind.
+4@SledDriver stating an opinion against someone is a targeted attack. Do it again, and I will be more than happy to issue you your second strike. Do understand that I am not a part of this conversation. I'm just following moderator guidelines and making sure rules are being followed.
@SledDriver the intent of that "child" was clearly to provoke RailfanEthan. Any word is a curse if used in the right context.
@Pietro I'm glad you do.
+2No problem.
@TheFlyingDerp so do I. Thanks for participating.
@BlueWolfFury it's fine. Just don't do it again. Somebody always recognises a good build they've seen.
@Brields95 try these.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.