also thank you for all the wishes
I tend to have a very mild reaction to big events in real life, and my birthday is no different. So it's not that I'm ungrateful about people wishing me a happy birthday. It's just that I can't say more.
either case ask me questions, please I long for social interaction
@LunarEclipseSP
I get the appeal of accident compilations, I can't exactly say that they're boring, it's just oversaturated.
considering how short-form video content has been the main entertainment media for the past several years, it's easy to see as to why people want to post YouTube Shorts rather than full blown 10 or so minute videos. they're easy to make, easy to upload, and it doesn't take so much of your attention span. but the easier the market is to get into, the more competition there's going to be, and I believe that's what's happening here.
I mean, if we're talking repetitive, most of the lower end of YouTube videos tend to be repetitive anyway
also, majority of the people who does these aren't really avid aviation fans, and what makes headlines when it comes to aviation? Accidents.
I'm not saying we shouldn't stop making air accident recreations, I'm saying that as far as it goes, we can't really blame the majority for putting videos up like these as they're one of the most common themes that is brought up as aviation is mentioned.
measures you can do against it? stop posting these types of content, ignore them, and start posting something creative.
@BORISQWERTYXDTM
please read the description before I get unnecessarily defensive.
I would like to not be unnecessarily defenesive because on top of it being stupid, it is cringe.
@LTHank
Unfortunately they won't come anytime soon, as I had mistakenly deleted my SimplePlanes data and will have to redo the changes made, which likely is going to take a bit of time.
I'm sorry to dissapoint.
@deutschFELLA
for the records
this is not miku
there is a distinction between miku and fubuki, please do not group them into the same category (out of respect)
@PhantomBoltSP
I will not automatically tag you in future builds. I don't do that.
If you want to be notified, leave a notice on the Teaser posts continuing forward. A simple "T" will notify you.
give it a break, this game's practically 10 years old, it's physics engine is bound to be outdated
like bacon said, this game's just kinda like this and if you want to build something, you'll have to find a way to work with SP, not force SP to work with you
the correct terminology for this isn't EOTS, it's Off-Boresight, or alternatively HMCS (Helmet Mounted Cueing System/Sight).
EOTS, short for Electro-Optical Targeting System is a system that basically functions as like a radar, but instead of relying on radar waves, they're reliant on Optical Sensors, like cameras of various sorts. The most common examples being IRST and TV Cameras.
also there's a better way to do this than having to sacrifice the 1st cockpit part, so your instruments don't have to fumble around, but it does require a bit more technicality and complicated funky trees.
the way you do it is almost the same way as you do in this tutorial, but replace the 1st cockpit part with the 2nd cockpit part, and copy-paste the same TGT_POS_Local variables on PlanariaLab's 1 Part Hud, with slightly changed content on the code, and then use that variable to essentially activate and deactivate a missile's activation group. You can find it on a couple of people's builds including, though I doubt limited to my T/F-44B, and PUMPKINSIDD's J-36.
I don't want to bother typing out the entire tutorial here, so if you want to learn how you can probably go ahead and ask me on Discord, it's where I'm most active in.
@Kikikokikomarumaru15000
thanks, but I've found a better console command and I've been using it ever since
and, no, there can be only so much jetfuel sniffing creature in one community that the rest refuses to delve into because they've got other people to do it
@TheCommentaryGuy
if we're going there, I might as well say that the whole landing gear assembly is innacurate
but I won't, landing gears are a pain in the arse to figure out anyway and it's like a really slight oversight so I won't bother to mention it
I'm doing this again
buh (I'm sorry in advance)
intake doesn't appear to be moveable
no camber, understandably
the antennae on top of the vertical stabilizer is supposed to not be symmetrical on the mudhen, with the right one being the smaller one
missing an antenna on the right side of the elevator mount (minute detail, understandable)
the LANTIRN pod has an incomplete set
while the AN/AAQ-14 is present, the AN/AAQ-13 isn't
engine looks a bit too spaced out, is it just me?
regardless, tis' epiq
if I may, I'm going to add a little bit of input on details you may have missed for the F-15J, just because I'm a little goober that can't go a little away without the urge to judge the accuracy of an f15 modelling so uh, I'm sorry in advance
the F-15J had a symmetrical antenna on both of the tail, this one didn't (understandably so)
no wing camber but understandable
front antenna close to the radome actually needed to be taller
bit of a wrong nozzle model but good lord I can understand why you wouldn't want to model it
otherwise this aircraft is very epique this one actually made me realize the protrusion at the back of the F-15 was actually longer for the J than the C
One issue I particularly have over mirroring is connections. When a part is mirrored, it sets it's connections to Auto-Reconnect. But oddly enough, if you just attach the part and nudge it away then mirror it, it stays connected to the same part.
It feels incredibly inconsistent, and completely frustrating.
@RB107
I was trying to figure out whether you mean example of a song, or an artist but eh I suppose I thought too much about it
as @froge said, the artist is Yon. YonKaGor is his full username. My most favorite example of his song is one called "Linger in the Rain", his latest single. Take a listen to it, it's pretty good.
I wasn't even mentioned about this?
+1could've warned me in advance ngl
gun looks too small to be the M256 if I'm being honest, especially the bore evacuator
+1@SchmooveBrain
pink is pretty solid if you can blend it with other colors
@hpgbproductions
👍Umazing
@rexzion
to what
@Graingy
if you give me one I would
@MasAgus
+1やあ、ありがとう
@SchmooveBrain
either 2 of the base colors, as in black or white
anything that blends in with both well is also pretty good
also thank you for all the wishes
I tend to have a very mild reaction to big events in real life, and my birthday is no different. So it's not that I'm ungrateful about people wishing me a happy birthday. It's just that I can't say more.
either case ask me questions, please I long for social interaction
@rexzion
may I ask why
@Graingy
oh no what am I going to do
I guess I'm miserable now
horuned
+1@LunarEclipseSP
+1I get the appeal of accident compilations, I can't exactly say that they're boring, it's just oversaturated.
considering how short-form video content has been the main entertainment media for the past several years, it's easy to see as to why people want to post YouTube Shorts rather than full blown 10 or so minute videos. they're easy to make, easy to upload, and it doesn't take so much of your attention span. but the easier the market is to get into, the more competition there's going to be, and I believe that's what's happening here.
I mean, if we're talking repetitive, most of the lower end of YouTube videos tend to be repetitive anyway
+1also, majority of the people who does these aren't really avid aviation fans, and what makes headlines when it comes to aviation? Accidents.
I'm not saying we shouldn't stop making air accident recreations, I'm saying that as far as it goes, we can't really blame the majority for putting videos up like these as they're one of the most common themes that is brought up as aviation is mentioned.
measures you can do against it? stop posting these types of content, ignore them, and start posting something creative.
oh lord why is it so
squishedayo wadup
+1@BORISQWERTYXDTM
please read the description before I get unnecessarily defensive.
I would like to not be unnecessarily defenesive because on top of it being stupid, it is cringe.
great,
+3more reference material for me
@Cerdd
+1kind of a krill issu....
@Cerdd
+1omg so rude!!! block u now!!!!
@LTHank
everything? likely not.
most things? yes.
@RishantYT747fan
no.
@LTHank
Mention it in the Teaser forum.
@LTHank
Unfortunately they won't come anytime soon, as I had mistakenly deleted my SimplePlanes data and will have to redo the changes made, which likely is going to take a bit of time.
I'm sorry to dissapoint.
@deutschFELLA
+3for the records
this is not miku
there is a distinction between miku and fubuki, please do not group them into the same category (out of respect)
@PhantomBoltSP
I will not automatically tag you in future builds. I don't do that.
If you want to be notified, leave a notice on the Teaser posts continuing forward. A simple "T" will notify you.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1@froge
give it a break, this game's practically 10 years old, it's physics engine is bound to be outdated
like bacon said, this game's just kinda like this and if you want to build something, you'll have to find a way to work with SP, not force SP to work with you
the correct terminology for this isn't EOTS, it's Off-Boresight, or alternatively HMCS (Helmet Mounted Cueing System/Sight).
+11EOTS, short for Electro-Optical Targeting System is a system that basically functions as like a radar, but instead of relying on radar waves, they're reliant on Optical Sensors, like cameras of various sorts. The most common examples being IRST and TV Cameras.
also there's a better way to do this than having to sacrifice the 1st cockpit part, so your instruments don't have to fumble around, but it does require a bit more technicality and complicated funky trees.
the way you do it is almost the same way as you do in this tutorial, but replace the 1st cockpit part with the 2nd cockpit part, and copy-paste the same
TGT_POS_Localvariables on PlanariaLab's 1 Part Hud, with slightly changed content on the code, and then use that variable to essentially activate and deactivate a missile's activation group. You can find it on a couple of people's builds including, though I doubt limited to my T/F-44B, and PUMPKINSIDD's J-36.I don't want to bother typing out the entire tutorial here, so if you want to learn how you can probably go ahead and ask me on Discord, it's where I'm most active in.
@Kikikokikomarumaru15000
>>guiscript.set_uienabled true | falseit works perfectly
@Kikikokikomarumaru15000
thanks, but I've found a better console command and I've been using it ever since
and, no, there can be only so much jetfuel sniffing creature in one community that the rest refuses to delve into because they've got other people to do it
peak
+1ap deflector? let's see how you deflect this tungsten 105 subcaliber round
@TheCommentaryGuy
+1if we're going there, I might as well say that the whole landing gear assembly is innacurate
but I won't, landing gears are a pain in the arse to figure out anyway and it's like a really slight oversight so I won't bother to mention it
@PUMPKINSIDD
noooo
I'm doing this again
buh (I'm sorry in advance)
intake doesn't appear to be moveable
no camber, understandably
the antennae on top of the vertical stabilizer is supposed to not be symmetrical on the mudhen, with the right one being the smaller one
missing an antenna on the right side of the elevator mount (minute detail, understandable)
the LANTIRN pod has an incomplete set
while the AN/AAQ-14 is present, the AN/AAQ-13 isn't
engine looks a bit too spaced out, is it just me?
regardless, tis' epiq
@PUMPKINSIDD
wah?
@PaperPlaneHasDream
I'm here to yap
also I'm not sure about the longer protrusion thing, I'll look more into it later I suppose
if I may, I'm going to add a little bit of input on details you may have missed for the F-15J, just because I'm a little goober that can't go a little away without the urge to judge the accuracy of an f15 modelling so uh, I'm sorry in advance
+1the F-15J had a symmetrical antenna on both of the tail, this one didn't (understandably so)
no wing camber but understandable
front antenna close to the radome actually needed to be taller
bit of a wrong nozzle model but good lord I can understand why you wouldn't want to model it
otherwise this aircraft is very epique
this one actually made me realize the protrusion at the back of the F-15 was actually longer for the J than the C
@dabestsock
looks like someone didn't pay attention to the description.
@dabestsock
how dare what
@Object775blyat
I don't remember myself.
One issue I particularly have over mirroring is connections. When a part is mirrored, it sets it's connections to Auto-Reconnect. But oddly enough, if you just attach the part and nudge it away then mirror it, it stays connected to the same part.
+2It feels incredibly inconsistent, and completely frustrating.
–non-aircraft is allowed
+2–but has to make it flyable
in other words, has to be an aircraft.
@IMCI
+1dm gw, kirim link invit di dm gw.
@RB107
I was trying to figure out whether you mean example of a song, or an artist but eh I suppose I thought too much about it
as @froge said, the artist is Yon. YonKaGor is his full username. My most favorite example of his song is one called "Linger in the Rain", his latest single. Take a listen to it, it's pretty good.
@RB107
what example?
@IMCI
+1beuh
punya discord kg? gw males suruh nyebarin nomor disini
mostly jpop and a rather obscure Indonesian artist
+3@IMCI
+1masuk grup spid gk?
nomr w dsitu