One issue I particularly have over mirroring is connections. When a part is mirrored, it sets it's connections to Auto-Reconnect. But oddly enough, if you just attach the part and nudge it away then mirror it, it stays connected to the same part.
It feels incredibly inconsistent, and completely frustrating.
@RB107
I was trying to figure out whether you mean example of a song, or an artist but eh I suppose I thought too much about it
as @froge said, the artist is Yon. YonKaGor is his full username. My most favorite example of his song is one called "Linger in the Rain", his latest single. Take a listen to it, it's pretty good.
got question, do mobile players get a chance?
I'm not expecting it, but it would be nice for mobile players to have a bit of look at how the game would perform.
@RestlessGalaxies
see, past me would love a challenge like this
but the me right now can't last more than a week continuing to grind an sp build, especially with how much expectation I build upon myself, but remind me of this challenge when it's out, in case I'm interested.
make the track by yourself. including the suspension, roadwheels, idlers, and the track itself.
though this does require a lot of effort and understanding of the game's physics. potentially a lot of your device's processing power.
I personally wouldn't bother, so I'd just put a lot of wheels on the vehicle.
After the whole ordeal of trying to make this godforsaken MBT work, and finally uploading it to the website, I took a pretty long break. And came back today to try finishing the SPAA I had made from the same hull a while back.
One of the inspirations, well, more like the whole inspiration was from the Type 87, so yeah.
@MartennLockkenn
Thanks for understanding.
I'm sorry if I sounded so arrogant, I can be such a person if I didn't try to control my own emotions. Though your input is very appreciated and will likely be considered.
@MartennLockkenn
I didn't really have any problems with making a custom-built track, I've seen how people do it and I originally thought that I could do my own spin of it.
I couldn't bother with the thought of dealing with too many parts. And no, I do not like using stretched tire parts, so I had to compensate.
While I'm at it, I'm going to touch up on your "improvement", a bit. I'm having a minor superiority issue, so bear with me on this one. Or even just outright ignore it.
There's a couple of reasons why I didn't do the things that you've mentioned in your improvements. First, armor.
This is a largely German based armor vehicle, and germany isn't known for using ERAs. This is ultimately my own preference, but I don't like putting ERAs on my own tank. It looks dirtier on 2nd generations since they weren't initially built with ERAs in mind (duh).
Second, engine input. There's a reason why I did it, and that is to both accomodate for mobile and PC play. Though I'm aware that some mobile players do play with Pitch+Roll on ground vehicles, sometimes one or two person like me will use Throttle+Yaw. So I made it with that in mind.
Third, weight. I wanted this vehicle to be as accurate as possible and I'm aware that it causes issues with SP's physics, mainly with the tires. I found a workaround of this by just increasing the mass of the tires and working around the traction value. I also artificially boosted it to 400% because I wanted it to have more traction to simulate it being a tank track, though that ultimately failed. Was it necessary for SP? No. Was it necessary for accuracy? Yeah.
One issue I particularly have over mirroring is connections. When a part is mirrored, it sets it's connections to Auto-Reconnect. But oddly enough, if you just attach the part and nudge it away then mirror it, it stays connected to the same part.
+2It feels incredibly inconsistent, and completely frustrating.
–non-aircraft is allowed
+2–but has to make it flyable
in other words, has to be an aircraft.
@IMCI
+1dm gw, kirim link invit di dm gw.
@RB107
I was trying to figure out whether you mean example of a song, or an artist but eh I suppose I thought too much about it
as @froge said, the artist is Yon. YonKaGor is his full username. My most favorite example of his song is one called "Linger in the Rain", his latest single. Take a listen to it, it's pretty good.
@RB107
what example?
@IMCI
+1beuh
punya discord kg? gw males suruh nyebarin nomor disini
mostly jpop and a rather obscure Indonesian artist
+3@IMCI
+1masuk grup spid gk?
nomr w dsitu
got question, do mobile players get a chance?
+1I'm not expecting it, but it would be nice for mobile players to have a bit of look at how the game would perform.
@RestlessGalaxies
+2see, past me would love a challenge like this
but the me right now can't last more than a week continuing to grind an sp build, especially with how much expectation I build upon myself, but remind me of this challenge when it's out, in case I'm interested.
I'd like a challenge
+1but I'm busy with another thing and I can't be bothered with making a project that is months due of work
@IFVuser
seems unnecessary.
@IFVuser
+1that's not almost that's half
one gripe I have about this is the wing
+1way too small
but aside from that, great concept
this would've been twice as big if it was to scale
"the rdf lt is good
+1but we like this"
-us army, 1980s
should've went with XM274
+1make the track by yourself. including the suspension, roadwheels, idlers, and the track itself.
+1though this does require a lot of effort and understanding of the game's physics. potentially a lot of your device's processing power.
I personally wouldn't bother, so I'd just put a lot of wheels on the vehicle.
@IFVuser
close, but like I said:
One of the inspirations, well, more like the whole inspiration was from the Type 87, so yeah.
+1@AndrewGarrison
@WNP78
@PhilipTarpley
Thought to let you guys know.
Might Be Relevant Cannon Settings:
Diameter: 7% (35mm)
Velocity: 1150m/s
Reload Rate: 0.0545 seconds
Tracer Spacing: 2
Tracer Length: 0.4
Tracer Color: #FFFFA0FF
goofy ahh car
@AirNK
I'm not saying it isn't one, what I'm really saying is that it's a semi-PEA type of thing.
still, incredible work
quite awesome how this still manages to technically qualify as a PEA.
the ironic thing is that it's actually made somewhat accurately
@MTFUE11
you set both the length and height to the same value.
@SilexPT
sure, go ahead
@MartennLockkenn
Thanks for understanding.
I'm sorry if I sounded so arrogant, I can be such a person if I didn't try to control my own emotions. Though your input is very appreciated and will likely be considered.
@MartennLockkenn
I didn't really have any problems with making a custom-built track, I've seen how people do it and I originally thought that I could do my own spin of it.
I couldn't bother with the thought of dealing with too many parts. And no, I do not like using stretched tire parts, so I had to compensate.
While I'm at it, I'm going to touch up on your "improvement", a bit. I'm having a minor superiority issue, so bear with me on this one. Or even just outright ignore it.
There's a couple of reasons why I didn't do the things that you've mentioned in your improvements. First, armor.
This is a largely German based armor vehicle, and germany isn't known for using ERAs. This is ultimately my own preference, but I don't like putting ERAs on my own tank. It looks dirtier on 2nd generations since they weren't initially built with ERAs in mind (duh).
Second, engine input. There's a reason why I did it, and that is to both accomodate for mobile and PC play. Though I'm aware that some mobile players do play with Pitch+Roll on ground vehicles, sometimes one or two person like me will use Throttle+Yaw. So I made it with that in mind.
Third, weight. I wanted this vehicle to be as accurate as possible and I'm aware that it causes issues with SP's physics, mainly with the tires. I found a workaround of this by just increasing the mass of the tires and working around the traction value. I also artificially boosted it to 400% because I wanted it to have more traction to simulate it being a tank track, though that ultimately failed. Was it necessary for SP? No. Was it necessary for accuracy? Yeah.
@SPsidearm
I see
I mean, truth be told I could make one myself
just didn't bother with it.
@SPsidearm
@PUMPKINSIDD someone asked
belom buka aeh
sabar lah, udah dihidangin aja
@Thydoirito
+1@LowQualityRepublic
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM
+1@CaptainBrayden
@SPsidearm
@BlackGearCompany
+1@SPairforce
@DJRianGamerTheHololiveFan
@PrussianAirlines
+1@B1BLancer
@Antares1
@MrCOPTY
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph
@rorrE
@SilverPanzer
+2@YarisHatchback
@Maluch
I'm curious as to how do you arrange the VTOL nozzles, I'm interested.
+110式戦車 my beloved
+1I suppose I can learn a thing or two from this
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1it's a fictional
oh my god the war is so one sided lmao
+1damnation!!!!!!!
+2salvation!!!!!!!!!!
creation!!!!!!!!!!!
destruction!!!!!
@SPsidearm
still, it'd be false-advertising.
overshot by two parts.
+2cannot be defined as a PEA.
in what world
+1is that a hellcat chassis
bakso nuklir jir
+1the farmer's top choice
holy moly
she's a beauty
the obvious attraction aside,
nice kingtiger. would be a bit dissapointed if you yourself didn't make it though