There's something odd about this post...
Can't update game?
1.11 ruined everything?
How?
I downloaded ReinMcDeer's F-15C just fine. Either you're playing a pirated version, or it's just your phone.
image posts are sometimes bugged, Idk. This web likes to do that.
This post feels like one of those cringy complaints, ngl.
actually, there is nothing you can't detect.
if we can detect a transmission far away in the galaxy, why not an aircraft flying directly overhead? Stealth technology doesn't make the aircraft invisible. Stealth delays the detection of the radar.
IFF. I feel like IFF is needed. Why? The AI in SimplePlanes will not engage you unless you lock on or fire on them. It doesn't make any sense when you accidentally dropped a bomb near the USS Beast or accidentally lock on to it after you takeoff from it, and then have the destroyers shooting at you. This would also be great for MP.
Heatseeking missiles. I know I already said this, but I haven't said specifically of what it is capable of.
- Fox code is Fox 2.
- Will have stronger track if the target uses more throttle percentage and if the target uses jet engines.
- Has a very short range of 2 nautical miles (3.704km).
- Does not emit any lock on warnings.
- Turns harder than any missiles in the game.
- Has a short lock on time at about 2 seconds and a wide lock on angle at 45° (almost as twice as the Guardian)
- Only affected by flares and not chaffs. It can be affected by the sun.
- Capable of Fire-and-Forget.
- Has the model of the R-73 or the Python-5.
I wish this feature will be added soon in SimplePlanes.
But then again, it's up to you guys if you want to implement it. All of this sounds complicated to implement and I'm sorry about that.
And this is why we need to have the ability of selecting VTOL nozzles into VTOL engines. Kinda like how the car parts does. Because with VTOL nozzles, you can either have this nice vapor trails, or nice afterburners.
As a wise man once said:
"You're a waste of money!"
ok but fr, This is just the same as begging. It feels like one of those cringy YouTubers who's always telling the viewers to subscribe before this date so I can blah blah blah, just making shit up just so they can get more fame and profit. "SuBsCrIbE NoW oR YoUr dOg WiLl bE TaKen", get the fuck out of my face.
I'm not saying that being positive on a swab test can just be ignored, but really? You're begging for upvotes, for some stupid points, over an actual virus that has caused the world go into lockdown, making economy, stability, and safety go worse? Like bro, that's not how you cure the thing, think logically!
Besides, people don't upvote stuff to something like a shit ass post. They upvote it when they feel like it. They're just not going to upvote every single fucking thing in the world, that'd be exhausting as fuck.
As for anyone else reading this message, I'm sorry, I just couldn't hold this feeling of trying to argue with some stupid ass dude.
as a user who, not long ago reached plat
no it's not worth it.
if you're looking for points, you're being stupid. there's not really any point in grinding points, it's not going to give you any rewards in return whatsoever.
points are kind of just, ratings
if a person has reached platinum, you could expect great quality, or quantity from them. But that is if you're the type to try out people's creation
while me? I'm not that typa person, I just make stuff.
so conclusion?
grinding for points is useless.
The war has ended. Yesterday, at approximately 0800, the Snowstone forces had rebelled against the evil scientist. While the rebellion was happening, our forces gathered and launched an attack at Snowstone. Realizing this danger, the evil scientist tried to run away to sky park where he could hide. Fortunately, the rebellion forces saw him about to run, and captured him. At 1100, our operation began. The rebellion forces knew an attack was coming, as one of their spies was also in the rebelling forces. We dealt massive damage to the enemy. However, soon, the rebellion forces came up to our forces landed near Avalanche Air Base, and told them they rebelled against the enemy. This news spread into the friendly forces, and all attacks stopped at approximately 1300. At 1723, a peace treaty was signed at Yeager Air Base. The war was now officially over with Snowstone losing the war.
AFTERMATH
The Snowstone forces took a big hit on their economy, due to the amounts of resources they needed to gather in order to repair their forces. This caused both Wright, and Krakabloa to help Snowstone rebuilt it's forces by training, rebuilding facilities, repairing damaged runways, and sending multiple equipments. Soon after the peace treaty was signed, the evil scientist was interrogated. As a result, he admitted that he wanted that big explosion that was dropped on the Krakabloan Island by the Wrightian bomber during the Wright-Krakabloan war for a test he tried to conduct. The evil scientist was sentenced to lifetime jail. A possibility of an execution was considered, but rejected due to it being "too evil". As of now, the Snowstone forces is still rebuilding their army. The Snowstone Navy asked for another base to be constructed in the cliffs on the opposite side of Avalanche. The permission to build was granted, and they had started building it.
you can either:
1. tune up the "max" value
This will make slower accelerations, but it also makes the engine much stronger.
2. add a "throttleResponse" in the "Engine" section, and put a number below 1.
This will make the acceleration slower, and it doesn't make the engine stronger.
I'm going to say with my honest opinion, but I think what people forgot most about is that SimplePlanes was not meant to be in-depth like how Flyout is.
This is me speaking as a non-Flyout player, so take this with a little salt.
SimplePlanes nowadays sounded sort of counteractive with what the community brings out. But, for what it is? I say it lives up to it's name. SimplePlanes was made so people understand the general physics to design an aircraft, not to give an in-depth simulation of your design. It serves as a first step in designing an aircraft. Sure, it might not be realistic, but SimplePlanes never was made to be realistic.
Flyout on the other hand, is the sandbox that takes you to the next step. It introduces a lot of physical aspect that you might not have learnt in SimplePlanes. It also challenges your creativity with practicality, as where SimplePlanes was more about how much creative can you be. Unlike SimplePlanes, Flyout is meant with realism in mind. It not only teaches you the basic, but goes a little more in-depth. You can say the same with JNO.
Now to say with the building, it is definitely easier to make stuff in Flyout for lesser parts, but it is a lot easier to understand SimplePlanes' building mechanics. This is, as you said, the exact reason why people can make banger shit in SimplePlanes, outside of planes. I'm not saying Flyout isn't capable of doing this as well, it most definitely is. It's just that since SimplePlanes was never meant to be realistic, it's a much smoother learning curve than trying to learn how to make in Flyout. This, is basically the same point as in the video.
In short? No, SimplePlanes aren't going anywhere, anytime soon. Even after people have gotten a better device for a cheaper price, SimplePlanes won't likely be forgotten to new aviators who wants to test their aircraft building skills. Or even other things.
I like replicating planes in general.
I also like the community.
The dogfights are pretty fun, but they're quite lacking.
Physics makes me go y e s
There's updoots, they fill your dopamine
There's just something about this game and this website that's... Fun. Unlike other sandbox. Where usually it's just plain boredom. With SP, you have all kinds of possibilities to discover. It's honestly beautiful.
wait wasn't it destroyed by Mobius 1?
Fun fact: Stonehenge is apparently a thing that plagued ISAF for so long and all it took was a madman with a stealth jet to destroy it, and what did he get? 16 deadpan words
maxVelocityAngleAdjusmentRate is the max amount of how much your missile can turn. As long as it's below or has the same value as Heading, it should be fine.
maxHeadingAngleAdjustmentRate is the max amount of how much your missile can point it's nose at the target. This is basically a limiter to how much your missile can turn.
Example:
-Condition 1:
if you leave the Heading at 50 and the Velocity at 60, the missile will not turn as hard as it should (60° rate/second). Instead it will limit it's turn (50° rate/second).
-Condition 2:
If you put the Heading to 60 and the Velocity to 60, it will have 60° rate/second, most likely every time.
-Condition 3:
If you put the Heading to 80 and the Velocity to 60, you will have a missile that tries to turn very hard, but it will not change it's direction above 60° rate/second. Kind of like how aircrafts do PSMs. But since it's powered with a rocket booster, it won't be too slow. This is the one I usually use for high capable missiles, like the AIM-9X or the Python-5.
Now, keep in mind that I haven't tested if the turn rate of the missiles are the exact same rate that I have put, simply because I do not wanna go and put a flight computer in missiles just to prove this. And that is exactly why we need at least replays. If can, tacviews.
If you don't already know, Tacview is a feature in DCS where it works as a replay, and also an observation view. It lets you see the exact turn rates, speed, altitude, it's range to other crafts, G-forces pulled, and maybe more stuff. Idrk, I haven't played DCS, but I do watch them. Oh, also they have trails for every single aircraft. Although unlike replays, it's pretty much colorless. As a map for the ground and terrains, and the aircrafts are colored depending which team the aircraft is on.
depends.
don't ask other people, ask yourself. do you still want to do this? if yes then don't (and also that's stupid because you're just looking for clout), if no, then do whatever the fuck you want, nobody's stopping like real bruh
exactly why I have been using undo buttons everytime I make a mistake
never once I complained about undo buttons
"it's not broken, just outdated" is the best way of describing what the undo button is
by the way if I remember correctly, editing texts don't count as a step
reading at the comments below my comment and checking it out myself, I can say that you need to change your attitude.
"i'M a GiRL", does that matter in a website about building planes? Yeah, like people are gonna treat you like a queen. This is one of the behaviours you need to change.
Are you 12? If yes, get out of here.
This is simpleplanes.com, goddamit. Nobody cares about bitches, people just care about making good planes.
Majority of your comments are either stating you're a girl, or spamming. My question is, why? I'm still 14 and I don't think we need a psychiatrist to prove that your attitude is incorrect.
So if you want people to care about you, make planes. Stop that attitude, and grow up.
You can watch the tutorial here
For mobile players, open the dev console, type in //MainCamera>Camera.set_depth 10 to hide your instrument. you can also change the FoV to make it look nicer by inserting the //MainCamera>Camera.set_fieldOfView 30 (or any number that will feel comfortable). Take the screenshot, and follow the tutorial.
Improved control surfaces.
first things first, wing-like edit shape. usually, the shape of the control surface follows the shape of the wing. What does this means? This means if you make a delta shaped wing, you'll get a triangular control surface. And if you make a square shaped wing, you'll get a square control surface. It's just so annoying to have those.
It kinda just makes building easier and it also makes less part counts.
But then again, it's up to you guys because I just realized that this sounds like I forced you to do it.
nop, tires are not braking by default (though I wish there was an option to activate that in game, aside from using a switch that has the input of "Brake")
try using overload and putting the value of "brakeTorque" to 0
I don't get the whole point of this drink, it kills people apparently?
eh might as well try it out just to see if it's real or not He was never to be heard again.
There's something odd about this post...
+18Can't update game?
1.11 ruined everything?
How?
I downloaded ReinMcDeer's F-15C just fine. Either you're playing a pirated version, or it's just your phone.
image posts are sometimes bugged, Idk. This web likes to do that.
This post feels like one of those cringy complaints, ngl.
actually, there is nothing you can't detect.
+11if we can detect a transmission far away in the galaxy, why not an aircraft flying directly overhead? Stealth technology doesn't make the aircraft invisible. Stealth delays the detection of the radar.
IFF. I feel like IFF is needed. Why? The AI in SimplePlanes will not engage you unless you lock on or fire on them. It doesn't make any sense when you accidentally dropped a bomb near the USS Beast or accidentally lock on to it after you takeoff from it, and then have the destroyers shooting at you. This would also be great for MP.
+11Heatseeking missiles. I know I already said this, but I haven't said specifically of what it is capable of.
+11- Fox code is Fox 2.
- Will have stronger track if the target uses more throttle percentage and if the target uses jet engines.
- Has a very short range of 2 nautical miles (3.704km).
- Does not emit any lock on warnings.
- Turns harder than any missiles in the game.
- Has a short lock on time at about 2 seconds and a wide lock on angle at 45° (almost as twice as the Guardian)
- Only affected by flares and not chaffs. It can be affected by the sun.
- Capable of Fire-and-Forget.
- Has the model of the R-73 or the Python-5.
I wish this feature will be added soon in SimplePlanes.
But then again, it's up to you guys if you want to implement it. All of this sounds complicated to implement and I'm sorry about that.
And this is why we need to have the ability of selecting VTOL nozzles into VTOL engines. Kinda like how the car parts does. Because with VTOL nozzles, you can either have this nice vapor trails, or nice afterburners.
+10Well for one:
+10It's way too off topic.
And two:
It was cringe as hell boi
Have you even read the rules?
uhm these are great suggestions
+10but maybe, just maybe tune down the caps a bit
Ok cool
+9anything I was thinking of saying would've get me a warn on the site so no thank you
But it's cool
As a wise man once said:
+8"You're a waste of money!"
ok but fr, This is just the same as begging. It feels like one of those cringy YouTubers who's always telling the viewers to subscribe before this date so I can blah blah blah, just making shit up just so they can get more fame and profit. "SuBsCrIbE NoW oR YoUr dOg WiLl bE TaKen", get the fuck out of my face.
I'm not saying that being positive on a swab test can just be ignored, but really? You're begging for upvotes, for some stupid points, over an actual virus that has caused the world go into lockdown, making economy, stability, and safety go worse? Like bro, that's not how you cure the thing, think logically!
Besides, people don't upvote stuff to something like a shit ass post. They upvote it when they feel like it. They're just not going to upvote every single fucking thing in the world, that'd be exhausting as fuck.
As for anyone else reading this message, I'm sorry, I just couldn't hold this feeling of trying to argue with some stupid ass dude.
as a user who, not long ago reached plat
+7no it's not worth it.
if you're looking for points, you're being stupid. there's not really any point in grinding points, it's not going to give you any rewards in return whatsoever.
points are kind of just, ratings
if a person has reached platinum, you could expect great quality, or quantity from them. But that is if you're the type to try out people's creation
while me? I'm not that typa person, I just make stuff.
so conclusion?
grinding for points is useless.
cringe
+7ahem
I'm just going to uh
End of the War
The war has ended. Yesterday, at approximately 0800, the Snowstone forces had rebelled against the evil scientist. While the rebellion was happening, our forces gathered and launched an attack at Snowstone. Realizing this danger, the evil scientist tried to run away to sky park where he could hide. Fortunately, the rebellion forces saw him about to run, and captured him. At 1100, our operation began. The rebellion forces knew an attack was coming, as one of their spies was also in the rebelling forces. We dealt massive damage to the enemy. However, soon, the rebellion forces came up to our forces landed near Avalanche Air Base, and told them they rebelled against the enemy. This news spread into the friendly forces, and all attacks stopped at approximately 1300. At 1723, a peace treaty was signed at Yeager Air Base. The war was now officially over with Snowstone losing the war.
AFTERMATH
The Snowstone forces took a big hit on their economy, due to the amounts of resources they needed to gather in order to repair their forces. This caused both Wright, and Krakabloa to help Snowstone rebuilt it's forces by training, rebuilding facilities, repairing damaged runways, and sending multiple equipments. Soon after the peace treaty was signed, the evil scientist was interrogated. As a result, he admitted that he wanted that big explosion that was dropped on the Krakabloan Island by the Wrightian bomber during the Wright-Krakabloan war for a test he tried to conduct. The evil scientist was sentenced to lifetime jail. A possibility of an execution was considered, but rejected due to it being "too evil". As of now, the Snowstone forces is still rebuilding their army. The Snowstone Navy asked for another base to be constructed in the cliffs on the opposite side of Avalanche. The permission to build was granted, and they had started building it.
Sound good?
+7aeugh that teeth
+7блять
you can either:
+71. tune up the "max" value
This will make slower accelerations, but it also makes the engine much stronger.
2. add a "throttleResponse" in the "Engine" section, and put a number below 1.
This will make the acceleration slower, and it doesn't make the engine stronger.
it's that time of the day again
+6I'm going to say with my honest opinion, but I think what people forgot most about is that SimplePlanes was not meant to be in-depth like how Flyout is.
+6This is me speaking as a non-Flyout player, so take this with a little salt.
SimplePlanes nowadays sounded sort of counteractive with what the community brings out. But, for what it is? I say it lives up to it's name. SimplePlanes was made so people understand the general physics to design an aircraft, not to give an in-depth simulation of your design. It serves as a first step in designing an aircraft. Sure, it might not be realistic, but SimplePlanes never was made to be realistic.
Flyout on the other hand, is the sandbox that takes you to the next step. It introduces a lot of physical aspect that you might not have learnt in SimplePlanes. It also challenges your creativity with practicality, as where SimplePlanes was more about how much creative can you be. Unlike SimplePlanes, Flyout is meant with realism in mind. It not only teaches you the basic, but goes a little more in-depth. You can say the same with JNO.
Now to say with the building, it is definitely easier to make stuff in Flyout for lesser parts, but it is a lot easier to understand SimplePlanes' building mechanics. This is, as you said, the exact reason why people can make banger shit in SimplePlanes, outside of planes. I'm not saying Flyout isn't capable of doing this as well, it most definitely is. It's just that since SimplePlanes was never meant to be realistic, it's a much smoother learning curve than trying to learn how to make in Flyout. This, is basically the same point as in the video.
In short? No, SimplePlanes aren't going anywhere, anytime soon. Even after people have gotten a better device for a cheaper price, SimplePlanes won't likely be forgotten to new aviators who wants to test their aircraft building skills. Or even other things.
your plane is vr capable
+6that's it, no other reason
honestly might wanna change those sensitive words.
+6identity theftttt
+6hmm lemme guess
+6labels on some level of alpha and emission?
How have I not upvoted this yet...
+6o m g g u y s !1!11!1!11!1!1!1!1!1!1!1
+6s h o c k i n g d i s c o v e r y!!!1!1!1!11!!!1!!!!!!!1!1!1!!11!
I like replicating planes in general.
+6I also like the community.
The dogfights are pretty fun, but they're quite lacking.
Physics makes me go y e s
There's updoots, they fill your dopamine
There's just something about this game and this website that's... Fun. Unlike other sandbox. Where usually it's just plain boredom. With SP, you have all kinds of possibilities to discover. It's honestly beautiful.
wait wasn't it destroyed by Mobius 1?
+6Fun fact: Stonehenge is apparently a thing that plagued ISAF for so long and all it took was a madman with a stealth jet to destroy it, and what did he get? 16 deadpan words
maxVelocityAngleAdjusmentRateis the max amount of how much your missile can turn. As long as it's below or has the same value as Heading, it should be fine.maxHeadingAngleAdjustmentRateis the max amount of how much your missile can point it's nose at the target. This is basically a limiter to how much your missile can turn.Example:
-Condition 1:
if you leave the
Headingat 50 and theVelocityat 60, the missile will not turn as hard as it should (60° rate/second). Instead it will limit it's turn (50° rate/second).-Condition 2:
If you put the
Headingto 60 and theVelocityto 60, it will have 60° rate/second, most likely every time.-Condition 3:
If you put the
Headingto 80 and theVelocityto 60, you will have a missile that tries to turn very hard, but it will not change it's direction above 60° rate/second. Kind of like how aircrafts do PSMs. But since it's powered with a rocket booster, it won't be too slow. This is the one I usually use for high capable missiles, like the AIM-9X or the Python-5.Now, keep in mind that I haven't tested if the turn rate of the missiles are the exact same rate that I have put, simply because I do not wanna go and put a flight computer in missiles just to prove this. And that is exactly why we need at least replays. If can, tacviews.
If you don't already know, Tacview is a feature in DCS where it works as a replay, and also an observation view. It lets you see the exact turn rates, speed, altitude, it's range to other crafts, G-forces pulled, and maybe more stuff. Idrk, I haven't played DCS, but I do watch them. Oh, also they have trails for every single aircraft. Although unlike replays, it's pretty much colorless. As a map for the ground and terrains, and the aircrafts are colored depending which team the aircraft is on.
+6please confirm that this has been declassified.
+5I'm hopeful for whatever this new project is
+5hope it's goin well for ya'll
what in the 1980000 symbols shit is this
+5depends.
+5don't ask other people, ask yourself. do you still want to do this? if yes then don't (and also that's stupid because you're just looking for clout), if no, then do whatever the fuck you want, nobody's stopping like real bruh
chii had enough and decided to leave again I think Idk why though
+5exactly why I have been using undo buttons everytime I make a mistake
+5never once I complained about undo buttons
"it's not broken, just outdated" is the best way of describing what the undo button is
by the way if I remember correctly, editing texts don't count as a step
:o
+5kawaii
neko kawaii :D
now make it horizontally spin
puts free bird solo guitar as bgm
look guys the burner is green
+5greer.
@BBCP117
+5not really
if I'm being honest it's probably just some trolls on the internet that just took it too far
happy bday and gbye
+5@X99STRIKER
+5I told you not to. Now get out of my sight.
...Is what I would've said if I was so mean and don't understand how humor works.
no.
+5Oh wow
+5Honestly I dunno what to say, it's just impressive
reading at the comments below my comment and checking it out myself, I can say that you need to change your attitude.
+5"i'M a GiRL", does that matter in a website about building planes? Yeah, like people are gonna treat you like a queen. This is one of the behaviours you need to change.
Are you 12? If yes, get out of here.
This is simpleplanes.com, goddamit. Nobody cares about bitches, people just care about making good planes.
Majority of your comments are either stating you're a girl, or spamming. My question is, why? I'm still 14 and I don't think we need a psychiatrist to prove that your attitude is incorrect.
So if you want people to care about you, make planes. Stop that attitude, and grow up.
@BeastHunter
+5Read the actual tag, this is what happens when you don't read the actual tag.
Guy a certified 9 year old.
+5Can we all agree?
Couldn't you just, you know, make one yourself?
+5You can watch the tutorial here
+5For mobile players, open the dev console, type in
//MainCamera>Camera.set_depth 10to hide your instrument. you can also change the FoV to make it look nicer by inserting the//MainCamera>Camera.set_fieldOfView 30(or any number that will feel comfortable). Take the screenshot, and follow the tutorial.Improved control surfaces.
+5first things first, wing-like edit shape. usually, the shape of the control surface follows the shape of the wing. What does this means? This means if you make a delta shaped wing, you'll get a triangular control surface. And if you make a square shaped wing, you'll get a square control surface. It's just so annoying to have those.
It kinda just makes building easier and it also makes less part counts.
But then again, it's up to you guys because I just realized that this sounds like I forced you to do it.
shut up
+4Idk why I'm telling you to shut up but fr
chill myguy
I see Eagle.
+4I updood.
I see we have one thing in common :D
Алиса Тадано Зелезнакова
+4アリサタダノゼレスニャコバ
Idk, very cool
nop, tires are not braking by default (though I wish there was an option to activate that in game, aside from using a switch that has the input of "Brake")
+4try using overload and putting the value of "brakeTorque" to 0
oh no
+4looks like @DeezDucks has dissapeared due to his ill intent of leaking classified documents
I don't get the whole point of this drink, it kills people apparently?
+4eh might as well try it out just to see if it's real or not
He was never to be heard again.