@TheUltimatePlaneLover In fact, I am also modifying my plane. The problem with Mobius is that its weapons are too single (only automatic machine guns), which means that its next version will definitely score more on "weapons" (yes, there will be a second version) and at least improve by about two points. So 41 is actually the lowest possible score I think Mobius will get, which is also the reason why I am very worried, so I am eager to know the score of your plane
I don't know what to say, but OP that go crazy. It has super maneuverability and bomber like weapons, and even drones (although I think this can be improved). This powerful fighter jet, I think, is fully capable of confronting Mobius (Mobius transcends the concept of traditional fighter jets).
@TheMouse Okay, it seems that the score for automatic ejection is already included in the extra. Let me think, I can't make further improvements to the plane, so I can't improve my look score. Other... what kind of weapon can get 9… Try my best.
@TheMouse Due to changes in the situation, besides machine guns and nuclear bombs, I have decided to manufacture a third major weapon. I hope they can get me 39.
By the way, can the automatic ejection system earn extra points?
@TheMouse I have seen that UFO and it is very good, even making me wonder if I should remake a plane. In fact, the author of A40 thinks so. But unfortunately, I really don't have time to improve the T-3 body again. It's already very good, and I can only make improvements to the weapon. I can't even be sure if the high parts weapons I make will satisfy you.
@TheMouse Oh! I am glad to hear this news. In fact, I found that the rotary machine gun I made has a risk of jamming due to its high firing rate, which greatly limits its performance.
@TheMouse em… In fact, I replaced the weapons I used and replaced the cluster bombs with a nuclear bomb. But in order to earn an extra point in the extra, I decided to create an interesting design.
@TheMouse ... I thought cluster bomb would be enough for OP. Okay, I will upload another version. I need to make a special machine gun (although it still doesn't meet the requirements)
@Majakalona em…Sorry," it may sometimes "rubber band" manuever thing"I dont understand what do you mean. Is it severe shaking, stalling, or something else?
I only know that this aircraft will stall at speeds above 1500 kilometers per hour, and this issue has been fixed
@Mousewithamachinegun122 Can I separate the weapons so that you can reinstall them yourself during testing to avoid the issue of the 700 parts upper limit?
I originally wanted to see the specific content of your lore, but I couldn't find any more text. I only know the information provided in your two account profiles
@JuliusCeasor98 ... em... Okay, I won't release the revision. In fact, I have already completed the super modification of this aircraft, but it lacks the permission of the original author. I will keep it as a technical reserve for myself.
If you encounter difficulties in making fighter jets in the future, I may be able to help you.
Oh, there's one more thing. I am also writing my own "lore"
By the way, the prerequisite for China's willingness to export the J-20 fighter jet is that more advanced fighter jets have been put into service on a large scale, and it will take at least another 50 years. Betraying in this situation will not cause any losses to China, it will only result in you losing one life-saving card.
The prototype is good, but the maneuverability of this fighter jet is very poor. It should be because the aircraft is too small, which prevents the wing area from increasing and results in a larger wing load. But the 300 wing load is not very severe, I suggest you replace the full motion canards to improve performance.
How could it be you again. Let me see... why is the center of gravity and lift center of gravity so far apart? Big sweep wings? Small horizontal tail and control surface? Such a large wing load! It's hopeless, why not build a new one.
@GuardianAerospace Bro, I suddenly discovered a problem. Why do we have to argue? The meaning of what I said is "Although the MiG-29 fighter jet is very poor, comparing it to this plane is insulting MiG-29." Do you understand it as something else?
@GuardianAerospace 20 to 30 years in advance, this statement is very correct during the Gulf War. In 2024, I think you may not have woken up. Where did you see this history class again?
@GuardianAerospace You should get rid of simply comparing weapons and equipment to judge the direction of war. This is not a numerical game, otherwise the US military wouldn't have to withdraw from Afghanistan.
@Justanormalindonesianguy2 Okay, bro, I'm glad to hear from you. I have posted a teaser and I would like to wait until one day after I finish writing the manuscript before it can be officially released
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes Thank you, bro. I think I will probably release it today or tomorrow. I haven't seen any similar works on the official website yet.
@Justanormalindonesianguy2 I uploaded my work to the official website the day before yesterday, but I haven't posted it yet because I'm too lazy to write promotional materials. It seems that my laziness is really hard to change
Install a pitch controlled rotator on the engine, and if necessary, install a Yaw controlled rotator. Dual engine can consider adding a Roll.This is the most basic vector engine
@TheUltimatePlaneLover In fact, I am also modifying my plane. The problem with Mobius is that its weapons are too single (only automatic machine guns), which means that its next version will definitely score more on "weapons" (yes, there will be a second version) and at least improve by about two points. So 41 is actually the lowest possible score I think Mobius will get, which is also the reason why I am very worried, so I am eager to know the score of your plane
+1I am looking forward to the final score of this aircraft and hope it can reach 41
+1I don't know what to say, but OP that go crazy. It has super maneuverability and bomber like weapons, and even drones (although I think this can be improved). This powerful fighter jet, I think, is fully capable of confronting Mobius (Mobius transcends the concept of traditional fighter jets).
+1@TheMouse Okay, it seems that the score for automatic ejection is already included in the extra. Let me think, I can't make further improvements to the plane, so I can't improve my look score. Other... what kind of weapon can get 9… Try my best.
+1@TheMouse Due to changes in the situation, besides machine guns and nuclear bombs, I have decided to manufacture a third major weapon. I hope they can get me 39.
+1By the way, can the automatic ejection system earn extra points?
@TheMouse I have seen that UFO and it is very good, even making me wonder if I should remake a plane. In fact, the author of A40 thinks so. But unfortunately, I really don't have time to improve the T-3 body again. It's already very good, and I can only make improvements to the weapon. I can't even be sure if the high parts weapons I make will satisfy you.
+1@TheMouse Oh! I am glad to hear this news. In fact, I found that the rotary machine gun I made has a risk of jamming due to its high firing rate, which greatly limits its performance.
+1@TheMouse em… In fact, I replaced the weapons I used and replaced the cluster bombs with a nuclear bomb. But in order to earn an extra point in the extra, I decided to create an interesting design.
+1@TheMouse I have another question. Can you explain in more detail how to determine OP weapons?
+1@TheMouse ... I thought cluster bomb would be enough for OP. Okay, I will upload another version. I need to make a special machine gun (although it still doesn't meet the requirements)
+1@Majakalona Okay, it seems that the problem is easier than I imagined. Thank you for your help
+1@Majakalona …god. Always or any under special circumstances?
+1@Majakalona em…Sorry," it may sometimes "rubber band" manuever thing"I dont understand what do you mean. Is it severe shaking, stalling, or something else?
+1I only know that this aircraft will stall at speeds above 1500 kilometers per hour, and this issue has been fixed
@Majakalona Thanks man, I really need your help.
+1@GabrielSatori Welcome back. I can't wait to read carefully, but unfortunately, I'm already going to bed. I will check again tomorrow morning
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 Ok…I think the final product may only have 500 more parts
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 Can I separate the weapons so that you can reinstall them yourself during testing to avoid the issue of the 700 parts upper limit?
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 OK thanks
+1em…What does overpowered mean? Simply more powerful weapons and maneuverability?
+1@IQinventory Sorry, I'm referring to the Air Force emblem. In my impression, it is composed of red and yellow
+1A completely symmetrical cockpit…
+1@OPTICJATT Now only you know
+1The fact once again proves that the purpose of Simpleplanes is beyond my understanding
+1事实再一次刷新了我对简单飞机用途的认识
I originally wanted to see the specific content of your lore, but I couldn't find any more text. I only know the information provided in your two account profiles
+1@JuliusCeasor98 ... em... Okay, I won't release the revision. In fact, I have already completed the super modification of this aircraft, but it lacks the permission of the original author. I will keep it as a technical reserve for myself.
+1If you encounter difficulties in making fighter jets in the future, I may be able to help you.
Oh, there's one more thing. I am also writing my own "lore"
By the way, the prerequisite for China's willingness to export the J-20 fighter jet is that more advanced fighter jets have been put into service on a large scale, and it will take at least another 50 years. Betraying in this situation will not cause any losses to China, it will only result in you losing one life-saving card.
+1The prototype is good, but the maneuverability of this fighter jet is very poor. It should be because the aircraft is too small, which prevents the wing area from increasing and results in a larger wing load. But the 300 wing load is not very severe, I suggest you replace the full motion canards to improve performance.
+1很有勇气的简介，爱来自爸爸美国
+1Did you really test fly this plane yourself?
+1I don't think this plane can get enough power to fly
这啥飞机？
+1How could it be you again. Let me see... why is the center of gravity and lift center of gravity so far apart? Big sweep wings? Small horizontal tail and control surface? Such a large wing load! It's hopeless, why not build a new one.
+1@Justanormalindonesianguy2 Thanks bro. I'm not good at making details, so I hardly ever make real airplanes because they can easily deviate too much.
+1@Justanormalindonesianguy2 Thanks bro
+1@GuardianAerospace Bro, I suddenly discovered a problem. Why do we have to argue? The meaning of what I said is "Although the MiG-29 fighter jet is very poor, comparing it to this plane is insulting MiG-29." Do you understand it as something else?
+1@GuardianAerospace 20 to 30 years in advance, this statement is very correct during the Gulf War. In 2024, I think you may not have woken up. Where did you see this history class again?
+1@GuardianAerospace I don't think so. In 2016, China didn't lose in the South China Sea electronic warfare
+1@GuardianAerospace You should get rid of simply comparing weapons and equipment to judge the direction of war. This is not a numerical game, otherwise the US military wouldn't have to withdraw from Afghanistan.
+1@GuardianAerospace How could Russia possibly have the Soviet military system? You're not joking, are you?
+1@GuardianAerospace …Did you learn about it through playing games? When can war be discussed outside of the military system?
+1改完后飞起来也是一抖一抖的…我给你改一下吧，改完直接发官网
+1哥们，你这J10好怪呀，主翼pitch是不是反了
+1@Justanormalindonesianguy2 Okay, bro, I'm glad to hear from you. I have posted a teaser and I would like to wait until one day after I finish writing the manuscript before it can be officially released
+1@LJh1 你光看古文是肯定不知道我在说啥的，那只是应景而已（大概）
+1哥们，歼九是截击机。这是教练九
+1@LJh1 做头瞄，刚开始优势在我，然后出了一个问题，按照那个公式写法，头是歪的。花了几天没解决，才发现是自瞄方法本身的问题。骂街后换了个方法，没成。最后，放弃原先的想法，改成负负得正，完成了工作。
+1@RepublicOfCursedPlanes Thank you, bro. I think I will probably release it today or tomorrow. I haven't seen any similar works on the official website yet.
+1@Justanormalindonesianguy2 I uploaded my work to the official website the day before yesterday, but I haven't posted it yet because I'm too lazy to write promotional materials. It seems that my laziness is really hard to change
+1@Justanormalindonesianguy2 After my lazy cancer ends
+1Install a pitch controlled rotator on the engine, and if necessary, install a Yaw controlled rotator. Dual engine can consider adding a Roll.This is the most basic vector engine
+1I will release the revised version of Su 9 tomorrow evening because I haven't finished writing it's copy yet
+1