Hmm… I don't really get the request… but at least it's before the deadline, so I'll give it a shot.
Speaking of which, TUPL is dropping the A40s… What a shame, my work will probably still be a "T-3" — after all, the T-3 is essentially just existing weapons cobbled together.
But can I really finish everything from theory to practice by July…
I don't quite understand your request. Are you saying that there are too many RP war posts themselves, or that a large number of RP war posts have not appeared in the section they should be in? Because I can't think of anyone who would ask questions in the RP section. Planes/posts related to SimplePlanes roleplay such as wars.
Obviously, there are two people here who have chosen to commit crimes against humanity
·War Crime
Article 8(2)(c)(i) of the Rome Statute
explicitly prohibits "torture or inhuman treatment" regardless of the victim's combatant status.
→ Even if targeting insurgents, acts of torture remain unlawful.
·Crime Against Humanity
If the torture is systematic or widespread (e.g., a public declaration to "eradicate them in the cruelest ways"), it may violate Article 7(1)(f) of the Rome Statute (torture as a crime against humanity).
@TheUltimatePlaneLover em… It may indeed be effective, although the QY-11A has a cruising altitude of 15 meters and will not collide with it, there is still a slight possibility of machine gun interception. After all, the QY-11A subsonic missile was designed without considering breakthrough capability.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I'm not sure if it can change the course of the war, but at least I'm certain of one thing- The code name for anti-ship missiles should be HL (Like HL-1A on NS-1A)
bro, you put the cockpit at the bottom of the ship??!
I said why couldn't I find you during my missile test, it turned out you were submerged in water.
It looks very good, but...
bro, your side air defense looks much more complex than the main air defense. Is it because you converted the coordinate system to prevent errors caused by misalignment of the coordinate system in the self aiming program?
@SuperSuperTheSylph There's no way, if the missile body is too thin, it's difficult to trigger the close range explosion
At least I don't know how to handle it
@UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA At present, it is air to sea and requires some modifications to become sea to sea
Damn it, I forgot to mark here that this is an anti-ship missile
Everything is proceeding within planned parameters, but... completing 1 foundational theory, 7 applied weapon systems, and 9 projects within a month... It sounds challenging, and in reality, it's anything but simple
Hmm... Although our main fleet cannot be produced yet due to unlocked technologies like mobile auto-aiming artillery and ballistic anti-ship missiles,our advanced technology has already completed all theoretical R&D for attack submarines. Perhaps we might be able to roll them off the production line within three days.
Regarding our response... the setting is strong and invincible, and the actual performance may only be a lower level substitute for Shock, identified as not requiring targeting. It's the reaction you want from me, this is real
@TheUltimatePlaneLover The problem is that missile research is not going smoothly. FT missiles have their own limitations, such as not being able to attack enemies with negative proximity rates.
But that's for air-to-air missile.
When you start working with FT, especially practical FT tools, you'll learn to maintain a calm mindset in the face of life's challenges-because fixing bugs is so damn hard!
@UnitedinOne90 @TheUltimatePlaneLover It's okay, I'm already relieved. I'm just not quite used to this situation, but now I should be able to gradually get used to it
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1Hmm… I don't really get the request… but at least it's before the deadline, so I'll give it a shot.
+1Speaking of which, TUPL is dropping the A40s… What a shame, my work will probably still be a "T-3" — after all, the T-3 is essentially just existing weapons cobbled together.
But can I really finish everything from theory to practice by July…
@RarelyCyber That's you!
Welcome back!
+1Happy Birthday 🍰
+1Welcome back, bro!
+1I'm behind your idea; after all, I'm currently specializing in the Funky Tree missile myself.
I don't quite understand your request. Are you saying that there are too many RP war posts themselves, or that a large number of RP war posts have not appeared in the section they should be in? Because I can't think of anyone who would ask questions in the RP section.
+1Planes/posts related to SimplePlanes roleplay such as wars.
@Graingy ?
+1@Christiant2 His Wright City has nothing to do with us
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover bro look at my idea
+1@Lake (Provzolovia - Loyalist)
+1-@Bugati87 (BBU - Neutral)
-@GeneralCorpInc (GCI - Neutral)
Obviously, there are two people here who have chosen to commit crimes against humanity
+1·War Crime
Article 8(2)(c)(i) of the Rome Statute
explicitly prohibits "torture or inhuman treatment" regardless of the victim's combatant status.
→ Even if targeting insurgents, acts of torture remain unlawful.
·Crime Against Humanity
If the torture is systematic or widespread (e.g., a public declaration to "eradicate them in the cruelest ways"), it may violate Article 7(1)(f) of the Rome Statute (torture as a crime against humanity).
@TheUltimatePlaneLover em… It may indeed be effective, although the QY-11A has a cruising altitude of 15 meters and will not collide with it, there is still a slight possibility of machine gun interception.
+1After all, the QY-11A subsonic missile was designed without considering breakthrough capability.
em… "TRASH" rafts? What is it?
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover I'm not sure if it can change the course of the war, but at least I'm certain of one thing- The code name for anti-ship missiles should be HL (Like HL-1A on NS-1A)
+1-@Lake (Provzolovia - Loyalist)
+1-@Bugati87 (BBU - Neutral)
-@GeneralCorpInc (GCI - Neutral)
Even if we are allies of convenience,you remain a valued friend. We will honor our mutual defense obligations.
+1You are our most critical naval asset at present - I will coordinate fully with your operations. You now have authorization to directly request APLA air-launched anti-ship strikes.
@SuperSuperTheSylph It's just a mischievous kid, ignore him.
+1@RB107
Pol Pot.JPG
You're a bit extreme, to be honest
+1bro, you put the cockpit at the bottom of the ship??!
+1I said why couldn't I find you during my missile test, it turned out you were submerged in water.
It looks very good, but...
+1bro, your side air defense looks much more complex than the main air defense. Is it because you converted the coordinate system to prevent errors caused by misalignment of the coordinate system in the self aiming program?
@SuperSuperTheSylph There's no way, if the missile body is too thin, it's difficult to trigger the close range explosion
+1At least I don't know how to handle it
@SuperSuperTheSylph ?
+1@JaxHere (MDA - Loyalist)
+1-@LunarEclipseSP (Snowstone - Loyalist)
-@UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA (URSC - Loyalist)
@TheMouse (MDA Leader - Loyalist)
+1-@Monarchii (The Monarchii - Loyalist)
@SamuelJamesCastor (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1@UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA At present, it is air to sea and requires some modifications to become sea to sea
+1Damn it, I forgot to mark here that this is an anti-ship missile
@UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA ?
+1I don't understand English terminology
@UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA …
+1This missile has the ability to penetrate at a low altitude of 15m and launch terminal jump attacks
@UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA Subsonic anti-ship missiles are inherently easy to intercept
+1But I'm more curious, how did you test it?
@NerfAddict (MDA - Loyalist)
+1-@Boeing727200F (MDA - Loyalist)
-@SuperSuperTheSylph (Diable Defense - Loyalist)
@JaxHere (MDA - Loyalist)
+1-@LunarEclipseSP (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@UnitedinOne90 (Loyalist)
Although I genuinely wish to support my ally, I refuse to jeopardize my own plans for a teammate who does not exist.
+1When he uttered these words, the Antates Military Corps were stunned—Who is Nusion?
+1People's Empire
+1Why can these two words be listed together…
- The speed value is relatively conservative, not as good as M49
- During my testing, I was unable to drive in a straight line normally
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover No, You did plan to use tens of thousands of tanks to carry out the landing at that time, but it was cancelled
+1"They are currently stationed in wright"
+1You mean you're stationed at my base, right?
Everything is proceeding within planned parameters, but... completing 1 foundational theory, 7 applied weapon systems, and 9 projects within a month... It sounds challenging, and in reality, it's anything but simple
+1@RestlessGalaxies I don't quite understand why vector engines should be banned for non realistic reasons, as they are clearly widely used in reality.
+1Hmm... Although our main fleet cannot be produced yet due to unlocked technologies like mobile auto-aiming artillery and ballistic anti-ship missiles,our advanced technology has already completed all theoretical R&D for attack submarines. Perhaps we might be able to roll them off the production line within three days.
+1It's strange, I didn't even receive any notification, why?
+1By the way, nice one bro
Regarding our response... the setting is strong and invincible, and the actual performance may only be a lower level substitute for Shock, identified as not requiring targeting. It's the reaction you want from me, this is real
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore You cut off the function of the most essence... I think it is not as good as track
+1It took us a long time to confirm that it really doesn't have any shock absorbers
Confusing design
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover The problem is that missile research is not going smoothly. FT missiles have their own limitations, such as not being able to attack enemies with negative proximity rates.
+1But that's for air-to-air missile.
When you start working with FT, especially practical FT tools, you'll learn to maintain a calm mindset in the face of life's challenges-because fixing bugs is so damn hard!
Creative
+1Cool!
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover fine
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore thanks! But I will definitely make it in the future, mainly because aerial self sighting is a bit difficult to achieve.
+1@UnitedinOne90 @TheUltimatePlaneLover It's okay, I'm already relieved. I'm just not quite used to this situation, but now I should be able to gradually get used to it
+1