@ItzzsilversXid 肘赢复活赛回来了！（Automatically play "see you again"）
Welcome back, bro. Regarding your question, it's because I successfully won a challenge and received over 30 votes.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I previously believed that this aircraft could have the same maneuverability as the T-3, but later I found out that in actual machine gun dogfights, the angle of attack of this aircraft was between 18 and 25 degrees, at the edge of stall, making it a bit difficult to control. Moreover, the excessively high angle of attack results in worrying energy storage and a significant decrease in speed during turns.
After modification, the angle of attack of this aircraft was maintained at around 15 to 18 degrees, but its maneuverability decreased. This resulted in it being bitten by all other planes except for crushing the fighter bomber in the dogfight of the same class fighter jet as me.
To be honest, this aircraft will stall sooner or later after further modifications. Then I decided to refer to how the US Air Force and Navy modified the F-5E and FA-18E with wing shapes similar to theirs. It was found that the original design concept of the former was low wing area and high wing load. From my observation, wing load is a very important parameter in SP, and the lower the maneuverability, the better. This design makes it difficult to expand the wing area of this aircraft, and the F18E's maneuverability upgrade mainly focuses on increasing the wing area.
And this aircraft has a small volume, making it difficult to support more significant modifications. So I think the design of this aircraft determines that its upper limit of maneuverability is insufficient.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover F-33J. Received, thank you.
Regarding the warning you raised to me, thank you for your reminder. In fact, this is indeed a hassle, and I have been making modifications for a long time. But don't worry too much, even at this stage, its maneuverability is comparable to the T-3.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover When I first saw this plane, I couldn't evaluate it, because I didn't know where to roast first.
Actually, the most important issue is still about rolling. Although this aircraft cleverly uses a cylinder as the control surface and adjusts its speed to 100%, there are still issues with delayed control, which can easily cause excessive rolling and significantly reduce the aircraft's pointing ability.
There is also an issue with the air intake. To be honest, this air intake seems strange to me because the upward opening of the intake has a problem of insufficient air intake during large maneuvers. I have only seen this design on B2 bombers and some bizarre aircraft.
The other issues are relatively easy to handle, and in a nutshell, the potential is very high, far from reaching its limit. If there is really no idea, you can refer to the upgrade content of FA-18E.
By the way, after I complete the renovation, what model should I name it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I am currently planning modifications to the F-33A. I noticed that you seem to be planning an upgrade as well, but there is no way to start. I remember when this plane was first released, I forgot to express my opinion. Is it still possible to make up for it now?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I am glad to hear that, thanks bro. But in fact, this was a long time ago unfinished work because I was very busy at that time. The original plan was to build an AI fighter jet, and I had already made it, but I didn't have time to save it, so I had to cancel it.
Bro, I just finished my college entrance examination and now I feel a bit unfamiliar with this game. So I want to modify this plane to get familiar with it
To be honest, manufacturing missiles is much easier than manufacturing fighter jets, all you need to do is change the XML. This is actually very unfair to fighter jets. I think you can either dismantle both missiles and only engage in machine gun dogfights; Or you can unify the missile types and decoy of both sides
…Leaving aside the PZL153 itself, what do you mean by the comparison of fighter jets? In fact, the reasons summarized are all missiles, not fighter jets themselves?
@STEAMYcrosby Wait a minute, bro. To ensure the fairness of the competition, I should also be eligible to see your plane. But I found one of them, and where are the two planes?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yeah, bro, and your A-40C is also excellent! To be honest, The T-3 has a large number of weapon characteristics, which was learned from the A-40C.
Actually, The success of T3 is not achieved overnight, but rather through continuous learning and accumulation over the past year, which has been transformed into my own skills. This is certainly an epic victory, but it's not yet a time for pride. I still need a long time to learn more. Perhaps in a challenge next year, we can see another "T-3" stand out.
@TheMouse Um... I'm sorry, I've never read his article before. In fact, I have also heard about it and tried to find it, but I did not find it.
My idea originated from @GabrielSatori , and I have been following his articles.
I am very happy because this is the first time I have achieved first place in a challenge. I have been very busy lately, but I am still imagining how to make the challenge more interesting.
@Someonefun Because I'm reading a novel... not this
Actually, I have been trying to make new weapons recently, but I gave up due to experimental failure. Plus, I've been quite busy lately, so I haven't posted it yet
em…
By the way, regarding the challenge I previously raised. I really don't have time lately because the college entrance examination will be in two weeks. I will be able to show it to you in about half a month.
I am improving Lackey (which are also variants of the Intimidator) and I am currently stuck because I am not sure what weapons to equip a small mass-produced drone with.
@ItzzsilversXid I'm sorry to hear that.
+1@ItzzsilversXid 肘赢复活赛回来了！（Automatically play "see you again"）
Welcome back, bro. Regarding your question, it's because I successfully won a challenge and received over 30 votes.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I previously believed that this aircraft could have the same maneuverability as the T-3, but later I found out that in actual machine gun dogfights, the angle of attack of this aircraft was between 18 and 25 degrees, at the edge of stall, making it a bit difficult to control. Moreover, the excessively high angle of attack results in worrying energy storage and a significant decrease in speed during turns.
After modification, the angle of attack of this aircraft was maintained at around 15 to 18 degrees, but its maneuverability decreased. This resulted in it being bitten by all other planes except for crushing the fighter bomber in the dogfight of the same class fighter jet as me.
To be honest, this aircraft will stall sooner or later after further modifications. Then I decided to refer to how the US Air Force and Navy modified the F-5E and FA-18E with wing shapes similar to theirs. It was found that the original design concept of the former was low wing area and high wing load. From my observation, wing load is a very important parameter in SP, and the lower the maneuverability, the better. This design makes it difficult to expand the wing area of this aircraft, and the F18E's maneuverability upgrade mainly focuses on increasing the wing area.
And this aircraft has a small volume, making it difficult to support more significant modifications. So I think the design of this aircraft determines that its upper limit of maneuverability is insufficient.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover em… Bro, maybe you are right
@TheUltimatePlaneLover F-33J. Received, thank you.
Regarding the warning you raised to me, thank you for your reminder. In fact, this is indeed a hassle, and I have been making modifications for a long time. But don't worry too much, even at this stage, its maneuverability is comparable to the T-3.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover When I first saw this plane, I couldn't evaluate it, because I didn't know where to roast first.
Actually, the most important issue is still about rolling. Although this aircraft cleverly uses a cylinder as the control surface and adjusts its speed to 100%, there are still issues with delayed control, which can easily cause excessive rolling and significantly reduce the aircraft's pointing ability.
There is also an issue with the air intake. To be honest, this air intake seems strange to me because the upward opening of the intake has a problem of insufficient air intake during large maneuvers. I have only seen this design on B2 bombers and some bizarre aircraft.
The other issues are relatively easy to handle, and in a nutshell, the potential is very high, far from reaching its limit. If there is really no idea, you can refer to the upgrade content of FA-18E.
By the way, after I complete the renovation, what model should I name it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I am currently planning modifications to the F-33A. I noticed that you seem to be planning an upgrade as well, but there is no way to start. I remember when this plane was first released, I forgot to express my opinion. Is it still possible to make up for it now?
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover I am glad to hear that, thanks bro. But in fact, this was a long time ago unfinished work because I was very busy at that time. The original plan was to build an AI fighter jet, and I had already made it, but I didn't have time to save it, so I had to cancel it.
+1Bro, I just finished my college entrance examination and now I feel a bit unfamiliar with this game. So I want to modify this plane to get familiar with it
+1@wstu 我高考完了，现在B站回来了
@ThePeruvianQuail I haven't talked much to foreigners and I can't understand your abbreviations
@ThePeruvianQuail ？
@TheMouse Does it mean that the first three can only be tagged?
@ThePeruvianQuail ?
To be honest, manufacturing missiles is much easier than manufacturing fighter jets, all you need to do is change the XML. This is actually very unfair to fighter jets. I think you can either dismantle both missiles and only engage in machine gun dogfights; Or you can unify the missile types and decoy of both sides
…Leaving aside the PZL153 itself, what do you mean by the comparison of fighter jets? In fact, the reasons summarized are all missiles, not fighter jets themselves?
@STEAMYcrosby I know so I ask what is the result
@STEAMYcrosby what?
@STEAMYcrosby Wait a minute, bro. To ensure the fairness of the competition, I should also be eligible to see your plane. But I found one of them, and where are the two planes?
@STEAMYcrosby Fine, I agree. Please remember to tell me the result
em… little A40
@AndrewTheGarrison Um... I think creating a new account would be a bit too troublesome, and you also seem busy. So I chose the first one
+1@TheMouse …
@Someonefun Sorry bro, I don't have time recently. I'm about to take the college entrance examination
+1@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer em… idk too.
@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer ?
@Majakalona Σ(っ °Д °;)っ
+2Bro! I remember you! The earliest T-3 (first place) was the one I asked you to help test!
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yeah, bro, and your A-40C is also excellent! To be honest, The T-3 has a large number of weapon characteristics, which was learned from the A-40C.
+1Actually, The success of T3 is not achieved overnight, but rather through continuous learning and accumulation over the past year, which has been transformed into my own skills. This is certainly an epic victory, but it's not yet a time for pride. I still need a long time to learn more. Perhaps in a challenge next year, we can see another "T-3" stand out.
@TheMouse Um... I'm sorry, I've never read his article before. In fact, I have also heard about it and tried to find it, but I did not find it.
+1My idea originated from @GabrielSatori , and I have been following his articles.
@TheMouse Em... maybe closer to a novel
Oh, by the way. I also plan to serialize a series of articles with T-3 as the main character in July.
+1I am very happy because this is the first time I have achieved first place in a challenge. I have been very busy lately, but I am still imagining how to make the challenge more interesting.
+1First!
@Someonefun 。。。
@Someonefun Did you not notice that the heading displayed on your HUD is opposite to your actual heading?
Not bad, but there are many areas for improvement. For example, your weapon is a bit loose and your cockpit seems to be installed backwards. Come on!
525 parts?
@Someonefun Because I'm reading a novel... not this
Actually, I have been trying to make new weapons recently, but I gave up due to experimental failure. Plus, I've been quite busy lately, so I haven't posted it yet
em…
+1By the way, regarding the challenge I previously raised. I really don't have time lately because the college entrance examination will be in two weeks. I will be able to show it to you in about half a month.
I am improving Lackey (which are also variants of the Intimidator) and I am currently stuck because I am not sure what weapons to equip a small mass-produced drone with.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover A great plane! Especially the new type of missile has given me a completely new inspiration.
+1@LoganTheGameDev He may be right. You can replace its decorative function by making a skirtboard
@Someonefun But I don't think his problem is a problem. He doesn't seem to know how to make cars either
@Someonefun I have never built a tank before
So what's the problem
@Someonefun em… But I not good at this…
There are still some good aspects to airplanes, you can rest assured of that
+1…What can I say… I choose to wait for the other two planes to be released before making a comment.
@Someonefun Sorry to hear that
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I'm glad, but I'm sorry, it's midnight Beijing time now.