Uncreative, uninteresting to me. Interesting to others, maybe, but I don't get it.
I say that because it seems that me being Platinum and a long time player, and NOT having a complete mastery of FT makes me unworthy of existence on this site to some. Everyone builds differently, after all.
I'm genuine and sick of people like you.
V
@Axartar I'd add new ranks, not something way out there and hyper specific.
Points can reward things other than pure skill, as SimplePlanes isn't entirely about technical skill. Frankly, making it so would betray the game's title completely.
@jamesPLANESii Yeah, I've always found scrolling on shorts uncomfortable. I don't like it choosing what plays. I'll watch shorts from recommendations, but never scroll.
Y'know, if that's considered "normal" there, that place needs one of two things:
A) A cleansing
B) Eradication
Absolutely none of what SGB is remotely acceptable in a developed society, and the trends in whatever "community" they may be from are nowhere near a valid excuse.
This isn't something you merely apologize for an go on like normal after, you better do some serious self-reflection on how the hell you ever got a point in your life you figured that was acceptable.
This incredibly short time scale is the kicker. No way to work within that unless you already have significant experience in this type of aircraft (and time to devote to SP).
An no, I legitimately do not know who you are. A lot happens on this site and there are a lot of people here.
And yet people accuse me of main-character syndrome.
@Strucker Not a public craft, I take it?
Personal attacks can be hard to shake. Looks like a challenge? What's worse is they went out of their way to be an asshole. The usual solution to a bad challenge entry is to just... ignore it.
The only case I'd go after someone for low quality is if they've been playing long enough that they really should know better (e.g. inability to use custom corners on fuselage in the most basic ways, SP 101 stuff), but I'd never phrase it so insultingly.
If something doesn't meet standards, and it warrants discussion, perhaps the adjectives should be left at the door.
... I swear I know the rough answer...
Eh, just take it from one of the VR stock craft. That's where I got the first FT text components I ever adapted.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say {AmmoName}, but I could be wrong. Strings might not be considered values on their own, I can't remember. They haven't been the focus of my efforts to learn FT.
9
+2Oof
+2That blue can’t hide your silver smell
+2@Zero0Two2 So is that just some sort of protective coating then?
+2@Mod Firing squad's musket jammed again?
+2I know the feeling...
The design is dogshit (affectionate)
+2A Thingamajig, even.
+2Doohickey detected
+2hell tyes
+2good rvgb
+2gpoof ;prf
good loir8c\
goodfol9rh
good lod
good lord
Uncreative, uninteresting to me. Interesting to others, maybe, but I don't get it.
+2I say that because it seems that me being Platinum and a long time player, and NOT having a complete mastery of FT makes me unworthy of existence on this site to some. Everyone builds differently, after all.
I'm genuine and sick of people like you.
V
@WisconsinStatePolice Evil and intimidating police cruiser
+2Here's hoping I was one of the exceptions, because the exceptions get remembered!
+2:)
@Axartar I'd add new ranks, not something way out there and hyper specific.
+2Points can reward things other than pure skill, as SimplePlanes isn't entirely about technical skill. Frankly, making it so would betray the game's title completely.
@jamesPLANESii Yeah, I've always found scrolling on shorts uncomfortable. I don't like it choosing what plays. I'll watch shorts from recommendations, but never scroll.
+2Side note, 1130kph TAS at 60m with 76% fuel.
+2@UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA Change your profile picture to a swastika. A Nazi swastika.
+2This is not history, the Russian flag is the symbol of a regime that is currently committing war crimes against a sovereign country.
Any supporter of Russia is an enemy. Are you an enemy?
+2@PlaneFlightX
No single line so succinctly sums up the SimplePlanes experience as this.
+2From a hotwheels car to a battleship, at it's core it's still a toy.
@SupremeDorian Aw, c'mon, this looks dapper!
+2Alternatively...
@jamesPLANESii It's actually egg shaped.
+2The core is best served scrambled.
HANK!
+2DON'T PUT AN EXTRA R IN FURY!
HANK!
The Boeing 787 is a caricature of modern airliners.
+2I'll fork you up
+2@keiyronelleavgeek566 Todd 2.
+2?
+2Eugh
+2@keiyronelleavgeek566 Todd.
+2GOOD LORD WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THERE
+2Dragged to hell for making their digital planes too big.
+2Get those mfs out of the spaced armour they gonna get crushed by the turret
+2Y'know, if that's considered "normal" there, that place needs one of two things:
+2A) A cleansing
B) Eradication
Absolutely none of what SGB is remotely acceptable in a developed society, and the trends in whatever "community" they may be from are nowhere near a valid excuse.
This isn't something you merely apologize for an go on like normal after, you better do some serious self-reflection on how the hell you ever got a point in your life you figured that was acceptable.
This incredibly short time scale is the kicker. No way to work within that unless you already have significant experience in this type of aircraft (and time to devote to SP).
+2Gonna have to wait for the next one to hatch :/
+2HOW THE FUCK IS THIS HOW I FIND OUT
+2@32 do it no balls
+2An no, I legitimately do not know who you are. A lot happens on this site and there are a lot of people here.
+2And yet people accuse me of main-character syndrome.
too spICY TOO SPICY
+2Feels like it needs a bottle...
+2@IFVuser This is the most BS game of bingo
+2Only god can help this thing
+2ah beans
+2For?
+2Let me specify. I've known about the engines for a bit. That it took off I did not know.
+2Good job.
+2Let me guess, it’s a fuel tank with high capacity and zero mass scale?
+2@Strucker Not a public craft, I take it?
+2Personal attacks can be hard to shake. Looks like a challenge? What's worse is they went out of their way to be an asshole. The usual solution to a bad challenge entry is to just... ignore it.
The only case I'd go after someone for low quality is if they've been playing long enough that they really should know better (e.g. inability to use custom corners on fuselage in the most basic ways, SP 101 stuff), but I'd never phrase it so insultingly.
If something doesn't meet standards, and it warrants discussion, perhaps the adjectives should be left at the door.
@Strucker Wow, that's rude. There's a difference between not sugarcoating and being a prick. That was definitely the latter.
+2... I swear I know the rough answer...
+2Eh, just take it from one of the VR stock craft. That's where I got the first FT text components I ever adapted.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say {AmmoName}, but I could be wrong. Strings might not be considered values on their own, I can't remember. They haven't been the focus of my efforts to learn FT.
Man, SP prototype footage was jank.
+2Jundroobles pls release