35.7k GhostHTX Comments

  • English Electric Lightning F.6 2 months ago

    @Spitfirelad05 Thanks. The Lightning was a beast, for sure. Funny to think that it was developed in the early 50s.

    +1
  • !!CHALLENGE 50s JET DOGFIGHT - FINISHED 4 months ago

    Quick question regarding the hinge / rotator parts - I see they are set up for use as elevators, and that you stipulate using the structural wing only for our builds. Is it allowed to modify the structural wing you require so that it can have control surfaces? And if so, can we use it for flaps, rudder, ailerons and so on (keeping the g-limit you have in the code)?

    +1
  • F-111D Aardvark 2.7 years ago

    VARK VARK VARK VARK!

    +1
  • The 1946 Naval Design Bureau Results [1946 Specifications Challenge Results] 2.8 years ago

    Thanks! A very well run challenge! Looking forward to the next one!

    +1
  • Messerschmitt ME264 v1 Wunderwaffen Challenge 2.8 years ago

    @WinsWings Thank you! Im glad you like it!

    +1
  • Messerschmitt ME264 v1 Wunderwaffen Challenge 2.8 years ago

    @ChiChiWerx Thanks! She rolls really well too, huh?

    I think I finally found my groove in terms of building stuff. I figured that since I hate doing cockpits, why bother? I build primarily for myself anyway… Just build until Im happy and release the damn thing. Thats my motto from now on.

    +1
  • Messerschmitt ME264 v1 Wunderwaffen Challenge 2.8 years ago

    @TASTEinc kein problem, kamerat! Im just happy to be here.

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 2.9 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT ding ding ding ding! We have a winner!

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 2.9 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT No worries! Im happy to have lots of comments (for once). As for the speed - yeah… I might have gotten a bit carried away with the drag reduction. I think making her a bit more draggy would solve the speed issue. She is bloody good fun to fly, though, and Im glad you like her (that was the plan 😁).

    +1
  • North American XF2J-2 Charger 2.9 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT Thanks! I really appreciate it!

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 2.9 years ago

    Ok chief! My entry is in. Løp og kjøp! (As the Norwegians say).

    +1
  • 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 2.9 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT No worries! This looks like a lot of fun. Quick question about the counter rotating props - would you prefer one engine that powers the plane, one engine that is just for decoration (power multiplier set to 0) or 2 engines with a combined power rating below or equal to the challenge limit?

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.2 (Blue Steel) 2.9 years ago

    @1VirtualRealityConversion Not sure I follow you?

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.2 (Blue Steel) 2.9 years ago

    @1VirtualRealityConversion Dropping the nuke? I also have a version with a freefall nuke - Should I stick that up too?

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.2 (Blue Steel) 2.9 years ago

    @1VirtualRealityConversion No worries - its ok to ask. I hope you enjoy?

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.2 (Blue Steel) 2.9 years ago

    @1VirtualRealityConversion Look at the Craft Instructions?

    +1
  • Handley Page Victor B.1a 2.9 years ago

    @LIQUIDconsumer You are too kind.

    +1
  • Soooooooo, does anyone like the Winnipeg jets? 2.9 years ago

    Yes. Yes I do.

    +1
  • Short Belfast C.1 2.9 years ago

    @HoshimachiSuiseiMyBeloved
    ‘Ercules, innit?

    +1
  • HT-58SV-C (Export) 3.0 years ago

    This is really nice. Question - how go you smooth the turret traverse? Mine is all jumpy.

    +1
  • Boeing B-50 D Superfortress 3.2 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick

    I must say - Im very grateful for the plethora of upvotes, old boy. Nice to see someone who appreciates what I do. Sorry I dont always live up to "the rules", however…

    +1
  • BAE Broadsword FGR.1 3.2 years ago

    @Vincent

    Hello old chap. Is there any chance you could arrange it so that this is a successor to this?

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Hrpj7U/OPEN-Swing-Wing-Challenge?showAllComments=true#comment-4156652

    Sorry if its a hassle…

    +1
  • BAE Broadsword FGR.1 3.2 years ago

    Many thanks @Bryan5
    Many thanks @JettStorm

    +1
  • KANSEI DORIFTO!? 3.9 years ago

    Nani?!?!?!

    +1
  • Panavia TORNADO 3.9 years ago

    Holy crap - this is some low part count loveliness.

    +1
  • Pedestal Failure 4.0 years ago

    Dont worry! I remembered ;-) @BeastHunter

    +1
  • Pedestal Failure 4.0 years ago

    • Creator calls his creation a piece of trash.
    • Said piece if trash then gets more than twice the upvotes of my entry…

    This isnt bad, though - you just need to finish it?

    +1
  • Flyfabrikken MYGG-3 4.0 years ago

    @Tang0five Youre too kind. I have to say, though - these new parts are bloomin good fun to build with. Actual landing gear wells! Glass bits!! Cockpits that work! :-)

    +1
  • English Electric Lightning F.1A 4.3 years ago

    Very nice. Pig ugly, but very nice.

    +1
  • Short Stirling B.1 4.3 years ago

    @ALDOCHILLGAMING Hmm - it didnt do that when I built it several years and several versions ago. However, can I recommend gaining more altitude before raising the gear? The nose down thing stops when the gear is fully retracted.

    Thanks for the full caps, though. Makes your post easier to read….

    +1
  • Antonov An-2 Biplane challenge 5.3 years ago

    Appreciate that, komrade! @SonicManiaOVA

    +1
  • BAe Experimental Aircraft Programme (EAP) 6.0 years ago

    very cool, my dear fellow!

    +1
  • BAE AT7 Megalith 6.5 years ago

    Very nice. Reminds me of the BAe Warrior I built for the ground attack challenge you had a while back. Very cool design!

    +1
  • Supermarine Spitfire Mk. IIa 6.6 years ago

    Nope. I built the original and I can state with 100% certainty that this is substantially altered (and improved). @ChiyomiAnzai

    +1
  • Avro Lancaster B.1 6.7 years ago

    I made a grand slam version, a Dam Buster, too. @ShermanFirefly

    +1
  • Lancaster B Mk I 6.8 years ago

    Magnificent. Just really, really awesomely bloody wonderfully great!

    +1
  • W-21A-2 Lykan 7.1 years ago

    5

    The Emperor Protects.

    +1
  • Clipper Mk.1a 7.1 years ago

    1

    +1
  • Can you guess what it is yet? 7.1 years ago

    @MEERKAT978 Wins the five uppdoots. Well played sir.
    The rest of you are heretics and shall be put to the sword and bolter.

    AVE IMPIRATOR!

    +1
  • The Great Galactic War (MARS/1-1) Challenge 7.1 years ago

    So Im guessing a combined rocket/jet propulsion system? Since jets are all well and good on Earth, but not so in vaccum / on Mars?

    +1
  • Supermarine Thunderfire MK1 7.1 years ago

    What heresy is this!?!?!?
    BTW, I like.

    +1
  • Hmm.. Update? 7.2 years ago

    manbeatingdeadhorse.gif

    +1
  • MOJO-Lotus_7(1957)_ISPFOS Challenge 7.2 years ago

    I find this vehicle to be well within the rules. And awesome.

    Your’e in, old boy.

    +1
  • Antonov An-2 Biplane challenge 7.2 years ago

    "Airframe Construction:
    Wings are of an unequal span single bay biplane design, all metal construction, with fabric covering.
    Fuselage is of all-metal stressed skin semi-monocoque construction. Tail is a braced all metal structure with fabric covering. Wing area is 770 square feet total.
    Note: wings have full length leading edge slats and ailerons droop with flap actuation to provide great STOL performance."

    http://www.an2flyers.org/an2specs.html

    I'm pretty sure these guys don't agree with you. Next.

    @Chancey21

    +1
  • Antonov An-2 Biplane challenge 7.2 years ago

    @Chancey21 Again - not for me she doesn't. There is a miniscule auto roll to the left, but nothing that makes her anywhere near un-flyable. As for the COM - she will land and stop within her own length and take off again in not much longer and she holds level flight with very little nose up trim - sorry - I don't see where you're coming from here, mate.

    +1
  • Antonov An-2 Biplane challenge 7.2 years ago

    Thanks! Please do - the more the merrier, komrade! @getorge

    +1
  • Antonov An-2 Biplane challenge 7.2 years ago

    Do it! You know it makes sense! For the Rodina! @BogdanX

    +1
  • Antonov An-2 Biplane challenge 7.2 years ago

    Thanks matey - I dont often add long descriptions, but I thought this one deserved one. @tylerdeveneuxmusic

    +1
  • Antonov An-2 Biplane challenge 7.2 years ago

    @tylerdeveneuxmusic Cheers!

    +1
  • Antonov An-2 Biplane challenge 7.2 years ago

    @Kungfuevan Thanks!

    +1