Profile image

North American XF2J-2 Charger

34.5k GhostHTX  1.1 years ago
Auto Credit Based on LieutenantSOT's 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED]

Bit of an oddity, this. Not British, either… Sorry, chaps - not sure whats come over me…

My entry for this awesome challenge that more of you out there should bloody well participate in.

The North American XF2J-2 Charger.

She strikes a resemblence to her stablemates the F-86 Saber and the FJ Fury from the front, no? She also houses a complicated combined powerplant in the rear fuselage - a low bypass turbojet, augmented by contra-rotating unducted fans. Sort of like an aeronautical mullet. Business in the front and wacky as you like in the rear…

I believe she is within the rules of the competition? She should also be fully operative by VR.

Have a look at the instructions, too - all the blurb you could ever need is there.

Thanks and enjoy!

PS! No - I bloody well didnt spell "NAVY" wrong. The Naval Air Test Center (NATC) is where prototypes like this would be evaluated, innit?

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor 1946 Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED]
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 48.8ft (14.9m)
  • Length 39.1ft (11.9m)
  • Height 13.8ft (4.2m)
  • Empty Weight 13,043lbs (5,916kg)
  • Loaded Weight 15,583lbs (7,068kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.259
  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.16
  • Wing Loading 42.7lbs/ft2 (208.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 364.9ft2 (33.9m2)
  • Drag Points 2684

Parts

  • Number of Parts 355
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 1,711
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @GhostHTX good job, I'm surprised I got over 70 considering the fact I couldn't make it go above 500, much better plane then mine! (Little side note but if you're wondering why all my "I"s are uppercase it's because I on accident saved it as uppercase so it automatically turns uppercase)

    one year ago
  • Profile image

    this is a cursed frankenplane of US naval fighters... I LOVE IT!!

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image

    Note: I gave you 3 points for the requirements to even it out, as I believe this deserves more points, and to even it out because my grading scale is bad at making better looking planes get a better score lol

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,792 Kazin

    @GhostHTX I'd definitely like to say the flight characteristics are very fun too!! Nice and agile, but not too fast (I love that), and this is really one of my favorite aircraft now becuase of the prop placement.

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.5k GhostHTX

    @LieutenantSOT ding ding ding ding! We have a winner!

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    And yep! You got me lmao. You definitely learned my style

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @GhostHTX Hey no worries! This is absolutely splendid dude!
    Probably lol! It's all good though! You are in first!
    .
    Also, is the mistake that it says "XF2J-1" on the plane in the picture, but XF2J-2 on the title and release?

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.5k GhostHTX

    @LieutenantSOT No worries! Im happy to have lots of comments (for once). As for the speed - yeah… I might have gotten a bit carried away with the drag reduction. I think making her a bit more draggy would solve the speed issue. She is bloody good fun to fly, though, and Im glad you like her (that was the plan 😁).

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Also, forgot to add this, and I am so sorry I'm filling up your comment section lol, I'll delete some of these if you want to, but I loved the cockpit and all the little details, its awesome!

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    I try getting the test done asap so my lazy ass doesn't postpone it and so you don't have to wait XD

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Alright! Time for the grade!
    I'll put my reasonings and comments afterwards, but alas, here we are!
    .
    Speed: 9/10
    Maneuver: 10/10
    Realism: 13/15
    Requirements: 23/30
    Carrier: 15/15
    Tactical: 10/10
    Looks: 5/5
    Opinion: 5/5
    Total: 90/100


    Reasonings:
    Alright, now for the speed, I will get to this more in a minute, but it is amazing! Surprisingly fast 'lil guy, and it suits great speed for the punch!
    Maneuverability I had no discrepancies with, she flies great, and is very smooth and realistic, actually
    Realistically, it looks real, and it flies real, but the idea of an inducted turbofan in the mid 40s is the only reason I deducted 2 points. Don't get me wrong, I love all of this and I adore it, but I have to grade fairly
    Now the Requirements are your greatest deduction... here's why: Everything is up to par and amazing except, ironically, the speed. The maximum speed for a "pure jet" allowed is 550 knots (1019 kilometers/hour for you), and honestly this is borderline because I know that this is supposed to be a pure jet technically, as it is an inline inducted fan, but I also have to call this a propfan on par with the requirements, which brings it down to 500 knots, or 926 kmh. Anyways, I spent 5 minutes in a climb roughly 3 degrees above the horizon line, and I managed to accelerate until I reached 601 knots, where it peaked, which is roughly 1113 kmh, quite a bit above the limit. But, because it is below the speed of sound, I will still allow it, albeit with a deduction of points to make up for this, and it still places you far ahead in first anyways, and I doubt anyone will come as high
    Carrier needs no explanation, she works beautifully and landings are great
    Tactically, I love the pylons, and it can carry a great load and still land and fly fine
    Looks... hot damn shes gorgeous
    My Opinion is that I love it!! This is exactly what I was hoping people would submit, cool custom designs that feature this era, and you did it! That's a real challenge, I could have told you to make any aircraft from a large war, like say WW2, and you could pick a plane, but I gave you requirements and you still made a beautiful design that suits the needs. Congrats! You are in first place mate
    And on that note, these grades will be subject to change and as of right now you are the vision for how I will grade other planes as they hopefully continue to come in! Have a good day, mate! And thanks again! (Totally didn't save the aircraft to mess around with it later)

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.5k GhostHTX

    @LieutenantSOT Yeah! I looked at the XF15C to get ideas as to how the markings / colourscheme would look. The NATC was new to me so I googled it. I thought it would be perfect for a prototype.

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @GhostHTX ofc!!

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    And ayyy I love the NATC! I put that on my XF15C-1, bit then realized that I also put NAVY on it... 😅

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.5k GhostHTX

    @LieutenantSOT Thanks! I really appreciate it!

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    I will grade it here in a minute. I love this! This is legitimately what I was hoping for with this challenge 😂
    I'm so happy. This is awesome

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    This is freaking amazing!!
    Firstly, after careful consideration,
    .

    Approved

    +1 1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.5k GhostHTX

    Bonus points to the man, woman, person, camera, tv that spots the mistake in the picture / title.

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.5k GhostHTX

    @Kazin Fr fr no 🧢. Seriously, though - thanks! Im actually amazed it has so few parts myself. Especially since there is a working cockpit, flaps, custom landing gear and custom canopy. I really appreciate the upvote and comment 🙏🏻

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,792 Kazin

    This is actually really cool for such low parts, I'm gonna enjoy this fr💯 Thank you!

    +1 1.1 years ago