Its been in my mind since I saw this build.. i was wondering
What will Jimmy say if out of nowhere, he saw this aircraft carrier with his channel name on it, and HIS NAME in the description
@Monarchii Interesting.. i always noticed that my thumbnails were a bit too dark, now when i compare it to yours, the difference gap is large, or so i thought
@novaskytwt Hey, don't put yourself down
I'm fluttered when you said that I'm your main inspiration (dw its a good thing ❤️)
I know my builds are incredible, but i also do think that other people's build are better than me, but im not bothered by it because i believe my builds are good as it is
FYI, i actually have a bad habit of constantly overthinking over anything
Everyone has their own unique way, and that means you too
.
Pardon for my grammar, I'm not that good at giving advice anyway
i do notice you used some parts from my tank
but its not big of an issue, some of it.. i "borrowed" from other builds 😁
.
and also i love the interior you made!
@WisconsinStatePolice nah, he bored of staying in the troposphere, he decided to go to exosphere
+3that single chunk of landing gear is enough to turn my phone into an oven
+3bro that sub name can end world's rasicm
+3@orangepant sorry about that, you need to adjust first before launch, I suggest move the launcher a bit up
+3the way that SU just floats away on full afterburner makes me wheezing 😂😂
+2@JBPAviation I mean the description needa bit of organization
+2but the built itself is phenomenal
@IAmSuperCool why is he telling the truth ❤️ 🩹
+2@MonsNotTheMonster i guess it's just a naval variant of the spitfire, stronger landing gear, arrestor hook, folding wings..
+2@Kav @blin1blyat
+2blin, sorry for the part count, i know you're devastated by it
this post itself surpassed the total amount of part count on every build I have
+2I just woke up, and i thought the model kit box was real, in a split second i thought im tweaking
+2@ManManTheWeaponsMan That's something new i have learned today
+2@TheRLAF Whoa, thats neat !
+2Congratulations 🔥 👏
where pic
+2oh well, i guess no pic for me to see then 😔
got hacked and.. lobotomized?
+2that's a deal
Completely out of topic, but why does the thumbnail for this forum loads differently than other official forums
+2Ah.. laggy sites?
+2That explains the.. inactivities on SP that i have seen lately to be honest
Its been in my mind since I saw this build.. i was wondering
+2What will Jimmy say if out of nowhere, he saw this aircraft carrier with his channel name on it, and HIS NAME in the description
@Iloveplanes67 one comment is enough brotato 🙏🙏💔
+2absurd, it doesn't even have a vertical stabilizer
+2im curious by what those German engineers ate to get ideas like this
March 3 ? I'm a day earlier before she was launched
+2Well apart from that this is such a very clean build, and the part count sounds reasonable, too
@DANIELCCCP in that sense I can say i also do not have a GPU since my broke ass can only afford a stock PC
+2@RSH10Thunderbeam its not the windows that is too high, its the seats that's too low
+2damn, 67 parts 😂😂😂
+2@WinsWings i would call it a "plane"
+2y know.. bc its so narrow it looks 2D
@Yuoko yah bc its the 57mm version, u want bigger, go see T-34/85 or its other sisters with larger 'cannons'
+25k pointz moar to PLATINUM
+2@Monarchii Interesting.. i always noticed that my thumbnails were a bit too dark, now when i compare it to yours, the difference gap is large, or so i thought
+2@MetallicBeef6572 no further updates made on the Abrams X yet
+2i will make my way thru this post sneakily.. who knows when i will make a B-1B..
+2(chances of happening = 0.05%)
I think ive seen someone made the V-22 with its folding wing feature but i can't lie this is much more refined
+2@LunarEclipseSP its the same scenario as the MBT-70, both of them are very advanced
+2@THEOKPILOT back in my days it was 6 9
+2it looks like the turret of the Flakpanzer Gepard
+2AKA "All Three Dead" posthumously joked because all the three crew has no seat ejection system
+2so that means they will go down with the aircraft too
Just one question, are there any way to edit the part's health than using XML to do so? I don't really know how to explain it ..
+2Just asking, apart from the new 3D gizmo, does it still retain the normal coordinate-based fine tuner.. thing?
+2holy damn that literally split that Godzilla in half, like a piece of paper!
+2@Ghifar @SuperSuperTheSylph @BOSSentinel thanks for the suggestions yall, seems like Sweden do have unique tanks
+2@Johnnyynf i would like for MP which you can control other's build (of course with the build owner's permission)
+2Hey, dont delete your precious builds
+2There are peoples that actually enjoy your builds, like me
Although.. the part count choked me to death
@novaskytwt Hey, don't put yourself down
+2I'm fluttered when you said that I'm your main inspiration (dw its a good thing ❤️)
I know my builds are incredible, but i also do think that other people's build are better than me, but im not bothered by it because i believe my builds are good as it is
FYI, i actually have a bad habit of constantly overthinking over anything
Everyone has their own unique way, and that means you too
.
Pardon for my grammar, I'm not that good at giving advice anyway
i do notice you used some parts from my tank
+2but its not big of an issue, some of it.. i "borrowed" from other builds 😁
.
and also i love the interior you made!
yay more tanks !
+2@WinsWings for me, my alt account is only for backup, in case something goes wrong with my main acc
+2THE BATTLE CATS MENTIONED 🗣️🗣️🗣️ 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
+2is this what you do after obtaining your main acc back? 💔💔
+2@YarisSedan yang bener 💔
+2@Pl12idk well who didnt?
+2flying 1930s convertible
+2