@KerlonceauxIndustries bruh 30 upvotes just gone that I’m not sure I’ll get back. I’m runnning out of salt shakers here.
there needs to be a downvote button
Lol “deceleration umbrella”.
Or a Twin "zwilling" style fighter (think f-82)
@ThomasRoderick last pic is from the synergy website. I didn't do that fluid analysis. Although I am aiming to be an aerospace something in the future.
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck cause rip my computer that's why. Honestly I'll let someone else do that if they want.
Although if you want to get REALLY anal, the E4 variant didn’t have the cannon firing through the hub. Those were not introduced until the F variants .
What would be a lot cool would be if it had colors. You could put a pretty neat paint job on it to make it look "sciencey"!
Fantastic job on the top profile!
The name is longer than the actual plane! Plane is ahem ONLY half a kilometer long!
Bruh much salt.
@wafafet21 I made the airfoil shape, then duplicated it many times. Then I made a fuselage part that had the diameter I wanted. Lastly I rotated and nudged the airfoil sections together using the perimeter of the large fuselage as a guide.
Avro-roe row your boat...
Is there such a thing as a too long desc?
Do you want High altitude fighter?
Dont forget to set the doors to zero collision too. It may help with the rotation. I have this same problem come up all the time. My build I'm doing now worked fine but I tested it halfway through the build process and it had magically attached itself to another part. Also be careful, the smaller (or thinner) you make a part the more finicky it will get.
@JohnnyBoythePilot hmmmm I wonder why.......
@Freerider2142 yeah boi go for it
I can’t begin to understand how mind numbing it must have been to do that intake! Absolute mad lad.
Seems familiar for some reason... can’t think of why...
@Mustang51 I'll keep ya in mind. It could be a while tho... hope you have plenty of patience to spare!
@Mustang51 That sounds like a build request to me :)
@BaconRoll kewl. Who are ur friends with who have their own countries? Do any of them mind being made as vanadias enemies/rivals/competitors?
Ok so I have many questions.
1. Country is Vanadia correct?
2. Is this country large or small? Large industrial capacity y/n?
3. Who is the leader and what position do they occupy (pres, prime min, monarchy, etc)?
4. What era is your air force looking for? Current gen (f22), older gen (Vietnam/ Korea) next gen (sumthin spacey)?
5. What allies does this country have? Enemies?
@XjayIndustrys my next version will be even nicer.
These fly over my house all the time. (I live just north of the CG training center)
No desc + me = very confused.
@Tengam “Kolibri” is German. You are thinking of “Colibri” which is French. Both do mean the same thing however.
Very good for an early build. Keep it up!
mebbe I will make a chassis...
lol it looks very cartoony!
As someone who is obsessed with WWII style aircraft some advice I can give you that the main landing gear is too far back. Putting it closer to the leading edge would look much better. Or alternatively make it a tricycle landing gear arrangement.
So is this what you wanted @CRJ900Pilot ?
@sheepsblood eh I’ve seen worse. There wasn’t as much effort in the flight model as there would have normally.
@AerialFighterSnakes it’s those composite structures my dood.
@EternalDarkness owO. Thks btw.
@EternalDarkness this one plz
@WIZARD2017 the v-3 mortar/cannon that was bombed by lancaster's using the grand slam bomb.
@WIZARD2017 except it did/does exist and you can find pics of it with a quick google search??
no custom gear?
lol "poor part efficiency". Aint' seen nuthin yet!
Yeah i've found that a good tank is always a little parts heavy.
Just a few criticisms. First, the wing roundel is facing the wrong way. The top most point of the star should be pointed forward. The tips of the props need to either be painted yellow or white. The wheels are also way too shiny. There is also some collisions on the landing gear when retracting and extending. Other than that that this is pretty nice.