I just discovered that, using the rotator setup you figured out for you camera operated turret(range set to 10°, InputControler min & max set to 0.1) but using targetHeading & targetElevation as the input, you can make work an auto-aim turret, but without the enormously complex funky trees coding that all other auto-aim systems uses, aka, a auto-aim system that anyone can make. I might even make a post about this.
I would like point out a small issue that's kinda annoying. The rotators & hinges tend to have a wobbling problem when you start using them on big things, upscaled or not, be it on slightly unusual things like mechs, or more normal things like ships or cranes. IF there is a way to remedy that with this maintenance update, that'd be nice. If not then hopefully it can be prevented in SP2
@SupremeDorian please forgive the @, but I just remembered this one detail that is actually sorta significant to the aforementioned problem.
Edit, a day later: I forgot to mention that the wobbling occurs on both ends, aka if the base is big(upscaled or not), the part the joint is moving will wobble like it's really big, even though it's not.
@RestlessGalaxies
To ease the strain, I suggest maybe doing a plane a day. It would draw out the final results, but it should theoretically make for a less stressful judging.
@SupremeDorian
"The goal wasn't to create a perfect 1:1 replica", heck, the original USS Beast is actually bigger then any existing aircraft carriers(go figure it's called the Beast).
@SupremeDorian
What about drag from huge builds.this? I've found, from personal experience, that even a relatively simplistic Massive craft will have massive lag if I don't essentially disable drag on every part of said massive-but-simple creation. Could something be done in SP2 that will in some way reduce the lag from drag created by huge builds, or at the very least, a function that can disable drag for an entire build?
Unopposed under crimson skies, immortalized over time, their legend will rise. And their foes can't believe their eyes, believe their size, as they fall. And the Dreadnoughts dread nothing at all.
@MonsNotTheMonster
As regards the designer, I don't think it was originally conceived that people would try and make really big things. I have to wonder if that will be different in SP2.
@RB107
A suggestion that might help with not killing a phone: when you start building, set the first fuselage block you use to CalculateDrag to false, along with any and all subsequent parts. This really reduces lag, since drag seems to take up a bit of processing power.
Fun fact: my brute force method of disabling the turrets is making a location right between them, when spawning a cockpit with a bomb above it in that spot. When the bomb drops, it takes out the turrets
The name for a character of mine, that has long since since gotten a different one. I've thought a few times of changing it, but frankly, I probably won't anytime soon.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
For the swarming issue, I tent to make simple enemy aircraft with a low processing cost, so you can spawn a ton of them and it won't cause too much lag.
As for the lack of a gun reticle, this might offer a way to solve that issue(notice the third screenshot).
@LunarEclipseSP
Technically the blues and yellows are on the same side, so definitely blues are enemies. But the way I see it, and I'd suggest you let others know of this, all the yellows are actively attacking, Omitters and Compilers are defending already conquered areas, and Observer Zero is the leader of all operations, occasionally taking part in attacks if she feels like there's not too much risk for herself.
I am pleased to see SimplePlanes getting a revamp. I only ask a few things.
1. A part that allows the creation of custom guided weapons, as while the adaptation of missiles into guided bombs/drones does work, is isn't perfect, and can even cause glitches.
2. Will the multiplayer mode be able to be disabled(I was always satisfied with just spawning A.I opponents)?
3. Will, at the very minimum, the Overload and Fine Tuner mods be carried over to the new SimplePlanes(adapted to work with it of course)?
I just discovered that, using the rotator setup you figured out for you camera operated turret(range set to 10°, InputControler min & max set to 0.1) but using
+6targetHeading&targetElevationas the input, you can make work an auto-aim turret, but without the enormously complex funky trees coding that all other auto-aim systems uses, aka, a auto-aim system that anyone can make. I might even make a post about this.@AndrewGarrison
+6When is the next update coming out?
I would like point out a small issue that's kinda annoying. The rotators & hinges tend to have a wobbling problem when you start using them on big things, upscaled or not, be it on slightly unusual things like mechs, or more normal things like ships or cranes. IF there is a way to remedy that with this maintenance update, that'd be nice. If not then hopefully it can be prevented in SP2
@SupremeDorian please forgive the @, but I just remembered this one detail that is actually sorta significant to the aforementioned problem.
+5Edit, a day later: I forgot to mention that the wobbling occurs on both ends, aka if the base is big(upscaled or not), the part the joint is moving will wobble like it's really big, even though it's not.
@FlyingPatriot
Yes, but, how??
Show us how you did is, please. 🙂
+5Add an option to fuselage blocks(block, hollow, and inlet) editor that lets us make custom front and back shapes(Triangles, hexagons, SR-71 etc..).
+5@RestlessGalaxies
+4To ease the strain, I suggest maybe doing a plane a day. It would draw out the final results, but it should theoretically make for a less stressful judging.
My plane is nearly ready.
+4It's time everyone find out what Skypark can really do. >:)
+4Yeeeess! Someone points out that low part count doesn't mean low quality.
+4@StinkyRice
+3I mean real life, physical models. Though your project has inspired me to revive a long dead project of mine.
How interesting.
+3@SupremeDorian
+3"The goal wasn't to create a perfect 1:1 replica", heck, the original USS Beast is actually bigger then any existing aircraft carriers(go figure it's called the Beast).
@SupremeDorian
+3What about drag from huge builds.this? I've found, from personal experience, that even a relatively simplistic Massive craft will have massive lag if I don't essentially disable drag on every part of said massive-but-simple creation. Could something be done in SP2 that will in some way reduce the lag from drag created by huge builds, or at the very least, a function that can disable drag for an entire build?
I actually really like spam.
+3@Wasifhero3
How's your plane going? I'm going through hell putting in all the functionality of mine.
Also, @RestlessGalaxies, do you know the kind of pain trying to implement a G-limiter brings?
+3@MAPA
+3@001
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
Do a house. If aircraft and tanks can race, why not buildings?
+3@pancelvonat
+3Actually, the quintuplane did exist in real life, only with a different wing arrangement.
@Ian_Yashima
+3How on earth did you make the shield strong enough to resist missiles??
@Ku
+3Is it possible you could show me how to make the FT guided weapons?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+2Indeed, Siren War is in the same collective universe as Monarchii Wars. Also, who are these "Scourge"?
Unopposed under crimson skies, immortalized over time, their legend will rise. And their foes can't believe their eyes, believe their size, as they fall. And the Dreadnoughts dread nothing at all.
+2@MonsNotTheMonster
+2As regards the designer, I don't think it was originally conceived that people would try and make really big things. I have to wonder if that will be different in SP2.
Very interesting. 👍
I have a few projects that have been suffering from the dreaded procrastination. As the Silver Wolf's badge says it, "Let's finish this".
+2Perhaps you could make more stock hulls for other types of warships.
+2So, the Sirens are now operating in space. This changes things.
+2@SuperSuperTheSylph
+2Me, Skypark, who already has land-based mechs That don't sound like a bad idea.
@RB107
+2A suggestion that might help with not killing a phone: when you start building, set the first fuselage block you use to
CalculateDragtofalse, along with any and all subsequent parts. This really reduces lag, since drag seems to take up a bit of processing power.Interesting.
+2Fun fact: my brute force method of disabling the turrets is making a location right between them, when spawning a cockpit with a bomb above it in that spot. When the bomb drops, it takes out the turrets
+2hiss
Pollen, my nemesis.
+2Skypark is ready for war.
Something new and terrible is about to be unleashed.
+2@WisconsinStatePolice
+2I do plan on releasing some content that'll show the drones aren't bright enough to do something like that(especially one).
Maybe a relatively normal building doing something completely abnormal(also, I've got two anomalies on the way).
+2I'm kinda liking this lineup of anomalies(now I'm wanting to join in). 👍
+2Hmm, I've never made the first upvote before. 🤔
+2The name for a character of mine, that has long since since gotten a different one. I've thought a few times of changing it, but frankly, I probably won't anytime soon.
+2Wait, so true and false are inputs?
+2This is inspiring me.
+2Impressive.
+2@TheUltimatePlaneLover
For the swarming issue, I tent to make simple enemy aircraft with a low processing cost, so you can spawn a ton of them and it won't cause too much lag.
As for the lack of a gun reticle, this might offer a way to solve that issue(notice the third screenshot).
+2Alright, for real, what on earth are you trying to comment?
+2@LunarEclipseSP
+2Technically the blues and yellows are on the same side, so definitely blues are enemies. But the way I see it, and I'd suggest you let others know of this, all the yellows are actively attacking, Omitters and Compilers are defending already conquered areas, and Observer Zero is the leader of all operations, occasionally taking part in attacks if she feels like there's not too much risk for herself.
How did you make the energy wings???
+2defiant scoff - Tester
Expect Purifier, Omitter, Compiler, & Observer Zero in the near future.
+2I'm considering getting back into mecha building, especially since IanYashima is gone. I always yearned to make mecha like his.
+2I am pleased to see SimplePlanes getting a revamp. I only ask a few things.
+21. A part that allows the creation of custom guided weapons, as while the adaptation of missiles into guided bombs/drones does work, is isn't perfect, and can even cause glitches.
2. Will the multiplayer mode be able to be disabled(I was always satisfied with just spawning A.I opponents)?
3. Will, at the very minimum, the Overload and Fine Tuner mods be carried over to the new SimplePlanes(adapted to work with it of course)?
@Majakalona @TheUltimatePlaneLover
+2Gleipnirs, gentlemen(aka giant flying thermobaric weapon systems).
Yeah, Kvochur's bell leaves you pretty vulnerable to guns.
+2@FOXHOUND26 @MonarchiiwithastolenMG
Is is weird that this war has become has confusing as real ones?
+2