He most likely resigned due to personal issues. He did the same on the SimpleRockets website, the SRC, and presumably SPBC, though him leaving SPBC was more because it was really toxic than anything else. Just give him space.
One thing to also keep in mind about SR2, is that it is overshadowed by its big brother, KSP. Meanwhile SP for the most part doesn't have any competition other than SR2.
So like middle mouse button but for camera placement? Will it be key bindable?
By default all of the gizmos are bound to the 1, 2, 3, and 4 keys on your keyboard. The camera tool makes the camera behave in exactly the same way as normal, except if you click and drag on a part nothing will happen and your camera will pan or rotate as if you clicked on empty space.
@JBPAviation this seems fine, but it would probably be best if you avoid using the SimplePlanes logos to avoid any confusion about this being an official Jundroo thing
@LunarEclipseSP that's actually not the reason YarisHatchback was banned; they were given a temporary ban on their main account for unrelated reasons, and so YarisHatchback was given the same ban.
.
Also, I'm going to ask all of you to stop fighting each other like this. If you cannot get along, block each other and stop interacting.
It was auto-removed for manual review after being reported a bunch of times for being a copy. It seems to be transformative enough compared to the original to warrant staying up as it adds significant functionality that wasn't previously present (controlled flight), so I'm re-approving it. Apologies for that.
.
@Rjenteissussy @StockPlanesRemastered Whether or not somebody tells you not to make successors of their crafts is largely irrelevant in the eyes of moderation. Generally it would be more respectful to comply with their wishes and that is another matter on its own, but as long as people are following the successor rules (crediting the creator/not bypassing the auto credit, and changing the craft in some relatively meaningful way besides just repainting it) they are free to upload successors of other peoples' crafts however they see fit.
Taking this post as a brief opportunity to make some commentary:
.
I removed a few posts just now that aim to make fun of roleplayers. However you feel about the influx of roleplay posts (personally I just wish they were more diligent about tagging them properly instead of just using the announcement tag), creating forum posts to make fun of other people on the site isn't okay.
The stick rotation makes this feel way nicer to fly and isn't something I've seen in my (admittedly quite limited right now) experience with SPVR before.
.
Normally I don't think we tend to feature posts that are successors to another person's build, but I'm opting to make an exception for this one as I feel it goes above and beyond to change the original craft and make a fun experience in VR.
@11qazxc We'll have chat channels in the SP2 discord eventually. It's set up the way it is for now to give us some breathing room before things explode.
@Tetrodotoxin Yes, maybe that's true, but I'm inclined to believe it's simply symbolism in this case. We can't just remove someone's profile picture because someone thinks it's hate speech. Again, we spoke to the person the profile picture belongs to, and another person for good measure. Neither have any reason to lie about it.
@YubukiShimada In that case, I have removed them as a contributor. I will also have a discussion with the other moderators on whether this mod itself is considered high effort enough to warrant a post on the mods page.
Post removed as it is no longer April Fools' day and as such violates the misleading thumbnail rule. For obvious reasons, you will not receive a strike.
While it is true that there's a lot of rather talentless stuff out there, there is still some great music if you look hard enough. An example that comes to mind is TOOL's Fear Inoculum album that came out last year.
How about adding something like "Hi! Nice build! Flies really well!" before your question?
Rather than answer his question you instead decided to completely dismiss it and essentially told him you compliment you instead without considering if he actually thinks it's deserving of those compliments.
As a moderator on the SR2 site I feel I should share my own thoughts on this matter:
I don't think permission should be required to make a successor to someone's craft, nor is it up to the original creator to decide if a successor post is enough of an "improvement" to stay up unless a moderator specifically says otherwise. The rules state this:
It is okay to download someone else's airplane, make some tweaks, and re-upload a new variation.
In fact, the original designer may even receive bonus points.
However, if your variation does not offer any improvements over the existing airplane, then it may be removed.
As you may have noticed, nowhere does it say you need any permission. Yes, it's nicer to ask, but that's just a courtesy and not a requirement. If you feel offended over a successor post then, sorry, but that's not really the uploader's problem. It is up to the moderators to decide if a post should be removed, not the original creator of said post. If you think a post violates the rules, please report it rather than try to take matters into your own hands.
Somebody mentioned this to me yesterday and I hadn't really looked into it much because I had assumed it was a different issue I already knew about, but I realize it's something different now. I'll bring this up with Andrew, sorry about that!
I have access to the edit history of your bio, but not the raw markdown stuff, so I'd only really be able to help get you the text back and not the formatting, links, or image embeds.
@EternalDarkness Yeah, the improvements to the mod notes are really nice. They're actually readable without making my eyes bleed now.
+4He most likely resigned due to personal issues. He did the same on the SimpleRockets website, the SRC, and presumably SPBC, though him leaving SPBC was more because it was really toxic than anything else. Just give him space.
+4One thing to also keep in mind about SR2, is that it is overshadowed by its big brother, KSP. Meanwhile SP for the most part doesn't have any competition other than SR2.
+4@BOSSentinel the second drag visualizer gif? that would be mine :)
+3@Graingy
By default all of the gizmos are bound to the 1, 2, 3, and 4 keys on your keyboard. The camera tool makes the camera behave in exactly the same way as normal, except if you click and drag on a part nothing will happen and your camera will pan or rotate as if you clicked on empty space.
+3This unfortunately doesn't fly very well (moving the center of mass forward a little bit helps), but I like the design
+3@JBPAviation this seems fine, but it would probably be best if you avoid using the SimplePlanes logos to avoid any confusion about this being an official Jundroo thing
+3@LunarEclipseSP that's actually not the reason YarisHatchback was banned; they were given a temporary ban on their main account for unrelated reasons, and so YarisHatchback was given the same ban.
+3.
Also, I'm going to ask all of you to stop fighting each other like this. If you cannot get along, block each other and stop interacting.
@Graingy we will talk about physics in due time
+3It was auto-removed for manual review after being reported a bunch of times for being a copy. It seems to be transformative enough compared to the original to warrant staying up as it adds significant functionality that wasn't previously present (controlled flight), so I'm re-approving it. Apologies for that.
+3.
@Rjenteissussy @StockPlanesRemastered Whether or not somebody tells you not to make successors of their crafts is largely irrelevant in the eyes of moderation. Generally it would be more respectful to comply with their wishes and that is another matter on its own, but as long as people are following the successor rules (crediting the creator/not bypassing the auto credit, and changing the craft in some relatively meaningful way besides just repainting it) they are free to upload successors of other peoples' crafts however they see fit.
@Cadvalto please don't randomly tag people who didn't ask to be tagged
+3ultrakill flesh prison
+3hello :)
+3:( really sorry to hear about all that. I hope you're able to find good help and get better
+3Taking this post as a brief opportunity to make some commentary:
+3.
I removed a few posts just now that aim to make fun of roleplayers. However you feel about the influx of roleplay posts (personally I just wish they were more diligent about tagging them properly instead of just using the announcement tag), creating forum posts to make fun of other people on the site isn't okay.
nope
+3The stick rotation makes this feel way nicer to fly and isn't something I've seen in my (admittedly quite limited right now) experience with SPVR before.
+3.
Normally I don't think we tend to feature posts that are successors to another person's build, but I'm opting to make an exception for this one as I feel it goes above and beyond to change the original craft and make a fun experience in VR.
accidentally spent way longer than I intended flying this thing around in first person. very nice
+3@Graingy kerosene
+3@11qazxc We'll have chat channels in the SP2 discord eventually. It's set up the way it is for now to give us some breathing room before things explode.
+3@temporaryplanetester possibly
+3mod settings? more like.. uh.. mod settings
+3@Tetrodotoxin Yes, maybe that's true, but I'm inclined to believe it's simply symbolism in this case. We can't just remove someone's profile picture because someone thinks it's hate speech. Again, we spoke to the person the profile picture belongs to, and another person for good measure. Neither have any reason to lie about it.
+3@YubukiShimada In that case, I have removed them as a contributor. I will also have a discussion with the other moderators on whether this mod itself is considered high effort enough to warrant a post on the mods page.
+3It's possible that maybe people just like different things, and that they don't need your or anyone else's approval to do so. Just a thought.
+3Post removed as it is no longer April Fools' day and as such violates the misleading thumbnail rule. For obvious reasons, you will not receive a strike.
+3Ignore the last link, I didn't realize it would make you download it. Now, peak efficiency
+3I'll be honest, J-10 is probably one of my favourite planes
+3@FrostyYeti no idea who tagged it because it wasn't me
+3While you're here, check out Flyout. It's an upcoming aircraft building game.
+3Ask the moderators and we can write one for you, free of charge. Just look at this happy customer!
+3Want to find out first-hand?
+3@TanksWorldwide What about the old menu that was just copied over from SR1?
+3@Mostly I'm silver now :)
+3I pinned it site-wide, and apparently that pins it to some places that aren't intentional.
+3While it is true that there's a lot of rather talentless stuff out there, there is still some great music if you look hard enough. An example that comes to mind is TOOL's Fear Inoculum album that came out last year.
+3ENEMY AC-130 ABOVE!!
+3I've edited the title to remove the expletive. Please read the rules.
+3@robloxweponco It's not toxic. Some people just feel ignored for whatever reason.
+3@asteroidbook345 I think the minimum point threshold for upvotes only applies to airplane posts.
+3@SledDriver
Rather than answer his question you instead decided to completely dismiss it and essentially told him you compliment you instead without considering if he actually thinks it's deserving of those compliments.
+3@UFNNICF5TF That's not racist. Plenty of other places have english-only rules to make them easier to moderate.
+3Please, no more mask posts. They're just spammy at this point.
+3As a moderator on the SR2 site I feel I should share my own thoughts on this matter:
I don't think permission should be required to make a successor to someone's craft, nor is it up to the original creator to decide if a successor post is enough of an "improvement" to stay up unless a moderator specifically says otherwise. The rules state this:
As you may have noticed, nowhere does it say you need any permission. Yes, it's nicer to ask, but that's just a courtesy and not a requirement. If you feel offended over a successor post then, sorry, but that's not really the uploader's problem. It is up to the moderators to decide if a post should be removed, not the original creator of said post. If you think a post violates the rules, please report it rather than try to take matters into your own hands.
+3Quick, everyone mass upvote all of Andrew's posts!
+3how to use italics?
+3Somebody mentioned this to me yesterday and I hadn't really looked into it much because I had assumed it was a different issue I already knew about, but I realize it's something different now. I'll bring this up with Andrew, sorry about that!
+2@RailfanEthan worms
+2I have access to the edit history of your bio, but not the raw markdown stuff, so I'd only really be able to help get you the text back and not the formatting, links, or image embeds.
+2@Kyster58 Yep it'll be on mobile. Our plan is to release the mobile version in 2026.
+2