It was me that did it. By signing up to the site you agree to the terms of service, and the terms very clearly state that you must be at least 13 to use this site and its services. This is due to how the law works and there is nothing that can be done about it. Assuming you're actually his brother and not just an alt account (I find that very unlikely given previous experiences) you can tell him to create a new account when he is 13.
imagine how funny it'd be if I featured the Corsair just to spite you all
.
In all seriousness, though, I'd prefer it if you all would stop making posts about it. What can be said has already been said, and if anything you're just making things worse by drawing more attention to it.
Very nice! Being a SR2 moderator originally, I always like when I see a rocket on this site haha. Also, I've gone ahead and made this a successor to the challenge, as requested. @232287168147825
Sorry about that. Some recent website updates have flooded the report queue with over a hundred previously invisible copy reports, so we didn't see this one. The post has been deleted and the user was given a strike.
.
Also, you can delete the comments on your own craft post which is how your comments got deleted.
He most likely resigned due to personal issues. He did the same on the SimpleRockets website, the SRC, and presumably SPBC, though him leaving SPBC was more because it was really toxic than anything else. Just give him space.
One thing to also keep in mind about SR2, is that it is overshadowed by its big brother, KSP. Meanwhile SP for the most part doesn't have any competition other than SR2.
@Graingy The aesthetic quality of the craft is pretty much irrelevant to me when I'm looking through the curation queue, it's mainly based on how usable the craft is in VR, with poor control placement being a common example yes. Other common issues include missing/non-functional controls, missing/non-functional instruments, or certain features intended for immersion on the flatscreen version of the game being included that create a bad experience in VR such as simulated head tilt.
So like middle mouse button but for camera placement? Will it be key bindable?
By default all of the gizmos are bound to the 1, 2, 3, and 4 keys on your keyboard. The camera tool makes the camera behave in exactly the same way as normal, except if you click and drag on a part nothing will happen and your camera will pan or rotate as if you clicked on empty space.
@JBPAviation this seems fine, but it would probably be best if you avoid using the SimplePlanes logos to avoid any confusion about this being an official Jundroo thing
@LunarEclipseSP that's actually not the reason YarisHatchback was banned; they were given a temporary ban on their main account for unrelated reasons, and so YarisHatchback was given the same ban.
.
Also, I'm going to ask all of you to stop fighting each other like this. If you cannot get along, block each other and stop interacting.
It was auto-removed for manual review after being reported a bunch of times for being a copy. It seems to be transformative enough compared to the original to warrant staying up as it adds significant functionality that wasn't previously present (controlled flight), so I'm re-approving it. Apologies for that.
.
@Rjenteissussy @StockPlanesRemastered Whether or not somebody tells you not to make successors of their crafts is largely irrelevant in the eyes of moderation. Generally it would be more respectful to comply with their wishes and that is another matter on its own, but as long as people are following the successor rules (crediting the creator/not bypassing the auto credit, and changing the craft in some relatively meaningful way besides just repainting it) they are free to upload successors of other peoples' crafts however they see fit.
Taking this post as a brief opportunity to make some commentary:
.
I removed a few posts just now that aim to make fun of roleplayers. However you feel about the influx of roleplay posts (personally I just wish they were more diligent about tagging them properly instead of just using the announcement tag), creating forum posts to make fun of other people on the site isn't okay.
The stick rotation makes this feel way nicer to fly and isn't something I've seen in my (admittedly quite limited right now) experience with SPVR before.
.
Normally I don't think we tend to feature posts that are successors to another person's build, but I'm opting to make an exception for this one as I feel it goes above and beyond to change the original craft and make a fun experience in VR.
@11qazxc We'll have chat channels in the SP2 discord eventually. It's set up the way it is for now to give us some breathing room before things explode.
@Tetrodotoxin Yes, maybe that's true, but I'm inclined to believe it's simply symbolism in this case. We can't just remove someone's profile picture because someone thinks it's hate speech. Again, we spoke to the person the profile picture belongs to, and another person for good measure. Neither have any reason to lie about it.
@YubukiShimada In that case, I have removed them as a contributor. I will also have a discussion with the other moderators on whether this mod itself is considered high effort enough to warrant a post on the mods page.
Post removed as it is no longer April Fools' day and as such violates the misleading thumbnail rule. For obvious reasons, you will not receive a strike.
Ban had four strikes so we perma-banned him. WiiMini's ban has been reduced to seven days.
+4It was me that did it. By signing up to the site you agree to the terms of service, and the terms very clearly state that you must be at least 13 to use this site and its services. This is due to how the law works and there is nothing that can be done about it. Assuming you're actually his brother and not just an alt account (I find that very unlikely given previous experiences) you can tell him to create a new account when he is 13.
+4@Gameboi15 Then you can give the key to a friend
+4imagine how funny it'd be if I featured the Corsair just to spite you all
+4.
In all seriousness, though, I'd prefer it if you all would stop making posts about it. What can be said has already been said, and if anything you're just making things worse by drawing more attention to it.
Congrats! :)
+4Very nice! Being a SR2 moderator originally, I always like when I see a rocket on this site haha. Also, I've gone ahead and made this a successor to the challenge, as requested. @232287168147825
+4Damn you really outdid yourself here.
+4Sorry about that. Some recent website updates have flooded the report queue with over a hundred previously invisible copy reports, so we didn't see this one. The post has been deleted and the user was given a strike.
+4.
Also, you can delete the comments on your own craft post which is how your comments got deleted.
@ThePilotDude What an intriguing idea that I might get around to doing someday
+4oh god this got spotlighted
+4Fools, your tiny respirators that aren't even airtight have no use!
+4@EternalDarkness Yeah, the improvements to the mod notes are really nice. They're actually readable without making my eyes bleed now.
+4He most likely resigned due to personal issues. He did the same on the SimpleRockets website, the SRC, and presumably SPBC, though him leaving SPBC was more because it was really toxic than anything else. Just give him space.
+4One thing to also keep in mind about SR2, is that it is overshadowed by its big brother, KSP. Meanwhile SP for the most part doesn't have any competition other than SR2.
+4@Boeing727200F @Graingy The demo and the full game share the same AppData folder, so your saved crafts should carry over when the game is out.
+3SP2 won't be moving to a new website, content for both games will be hosted here
+3He left a little while ago, just didn't really have time to keep being a moderator. He's making trailers for us instead :)
+3@Graingy The aesthetic quality of the craft is pretty much irrelevant to me when I'm looking through the curation queue, it's mainly based on how usable the craft is in VR, with poor control placement being a common example yes. Other common issues include missing/non-functional controls, missing/non-functional instruments, or certain features intended for immersion on the flatscreen version of the game being included that create a bad experience in VR such as simulated head tilt.
+3@Graingy the submarine gif is at 2x the speed it was recorded at for gif compression reasons, FYI
+3@LunarEclipseSP when it came time to make a water showcase I knew I had to use it :)
+3@Graingy If you manage to get past the missiles, an invisible hand will simply throw you back into place :)
+3@BOSSentinel the second drag visualizer gif? that would be mine :)
+3@Graingy
By default all of the gizmos are bound to the 1, 2, 3, and 4 keys on your keyboard. The camera tool makes the camera behave in exactly the same way as normal, except if you click and drag on a part nothing will happen and your camera will pan or rotate as if you clicked on empty space.
+3This unfortunately doesn't fly very well (moving the center of mass forward a little bit helps), but I like the design
+3@JBPAviation this seems fine, but it would probably be best if you avoid using the SimplePlanes logos to avoid any confusion about this being an official Jundroo thing
+3@LunarEclipseSP that's actually not the reason YarisHatchback was banned; they were given a temporary ban on their main account for unrelated reasons, and so YarisHatchback was given the same ban.
+3.
Also, I'm going to ask all of you to stop fighting each other like this. If you cannot get along, block each other and stop interacting.
@Graingy we will talk about physics in due time
+3It was auto-removed for manual review after being reported a bunch of times for being a copy. It seems to be transformative enough compared to the original to warrant staying up as it adds significant functionality that wasn't previously present (controlled flight), so I'm re-approving it. Apologies for that.
+3.
@Rjenteissussy @StockPlanesRemastered Whether or not somebody tells you not to make successors of their crafts is largely irrelevant in the eyes of moderation. Generally it would be more respectful to comply with their wishes and that is another matter on its own, but as long as people are following the successor rules (crediting the creator/not bypassing the auto credit, and changing the craft in some relatively meaningful way besides just repainting it) they are free to upload successors of other peoples' crafts however they see fit.
@Cadvalto please don't randomly tag people who didn't ask to be tagged
+3ultrakill flesh prison
+3hello :)
+3:( really sorry to hear about all that. I hope you're able to find good help and get better
+3Taking this post as a brief opportunity to make some commentary:
+3.
I removed a few posts just now that aim to make fun of roleplayers. However you feel about the influx of roleplay posts (personally I just wish they were more diligent about tagging them properly instead of just using the announcement tag), creating forum posts to make fun of other people on the site isn't okay.
nope
+3The stick rotation makes this feel way nicer to fly and isn't something I've seen in my (admittedly quite limited right now) experience with SPVR before.
+3.
Normally I don't think we tend to feature posts that are successors to another person's build, but I'm opting to make an exception for this one as I feel it goes above and beyond to change the original craft and make a fun experience in VR.
accidentally spent way longer than I intended flying this thing around in first person. very nice
+3@Graingy kerosene
+3@11qazxc We'll have chat channels in the SP2 discord eventually. It's set up the way it is for now to give us some breathing room before things explode.
+3@temporaryplanetester possibly
+3mod settings? more like.. uh.. mod settings
+3@Tetrodotoxin Yes, maybe that's true, but I'm inclined to believe it's simply symbolism in this case. We can't just remove someone's profile picture because someone thinks it's hate speech. Again, we spoke to the person the profile picture belongs to, and another person for good measure. Neither have any reason to lie about it.
+3@YubukiShimada In that case, I have removed them as a contributor. I will also have a discussion with the other moderators on whether this mod itself is considered high effort enough to warrant a post on the mods page.
+3It's possible that maybe people just like different things, and that they don't need your or anyone else's approval to do so. Just a thought.
+3Post removed as it is no longer April Fools' day and as such violates the misleading thumbnail rule. For obvious reasons, you will not receive a strike.
+3Ignore the last link, I didn't realize it would make you download it. Now, peak efficiency
+3I'll be honest, J-10 is probably one of my favourite planes
+3@FrostyYeti no idea who tagged it because it wasn't me
+3While you're here, check out Flyout. It's an upcoming aircraft building game.
+3Ask the moderators and we can write one for you, free of charge. Just look at this happy customer!
+3Want to find out first-hand?
+3