There's a small group of people who likes non-warfare air assets such as cargo, trainer and the like. So I guess not everyone likes non-warfare thingies
Yo I have a question. I decided to make my bomber nuclear capable like the B-58. And like the B-58, it has a pod for the nuclear bomb. The downside is, you can't put any conventional bombs inside it. Is that fine?
I wonder how would naval warfare works in SP2. Like the CIWS being automated and such. Speaking of which, can we target missiles now? For self defense?
Imma join. I already have an interceptor/bomber in my inventory still wip. Though I have some questions/concerns:
My design was focused on speed, specifically past mach 1 because I used the TU-128 design. Is it okay if I don't include turrets on it? Besides you can just outrun aggressors :v
And about the landing capabilities, I'll include landing chutes and spoilerons which double as airbrakes to help in slowing down.
@GrowAGarden no such thing here in Philippines. Not that I know of. Also, I can't just expulsively spend money on a game. I'd rather buy food first and prioritize my college expenses
I wanna recreate the trains here in Philippines that uses the 1067mm(Three foot 6 Inch for freedom units), and probably make a fictional gas turbine powered train too
There's a lot of players, including me, that will stay on SP1. Though I have a laptop now, it's just a lease from my uncle, so I won't download both sp's on it(If SP2 gets released, I can't afford both just yet lmao) so don't worry ✨
@CorporalWojak yep I'm aware of that. I can't put a carrier capable front gear on it cuz it gets on the way of the intakes. If I use the FA-18 gear, the front nose should look like an FA-18, which defeats the purpose of this look
@SuperSuperTheSylph yep, they're default to fwd, but if you want rwd, you can do so. I'll do a rwd variant of this, but it'll be on the PTC series(taxicab)
@SuperSuperTheSylph
TREN 🗣️
+2Forgot to credit Inuyasha8215 for that Tobu 8000 series EMU in the background. I had to use something to test the GTEL's max speed when hauling
I am not sure if this GTEL is compatible on actual train maps for PC. I am on mobile so ¯\(ツ)/¯
CHONKY BOI EHH 🗣️🗣️
+2There's a small group of people who likes non-warfare air assets such as cargo, trainer and the like. So I guess not everyone likes non-warfare thingies
MR BEANS
+3@KaiSup CALOOCAN BOY 🗣️🗣️🗣️
+2E PAANO KUNG, HINDI 🗣️🗣️🗣️
MOG
+2@NewWorldAerospace oh I forgot lmao. I was on the bus when I commented that xD
+1@NewWorldAerospace restarting should work. I had that bug back then ;-;
+1Kream
+1Did you restart the game?
+1Yo I have a question. I decided to make my bomber nuclear capable like the B-58. And like the B-58, it has a pod for the nuclear bomb. The downside is, you can't put any conventional bombs inside it. Is that fine?
OH YES THE BERKUT 🗣️🗣️🗣️
+2Existential crisis? Yep. I feel that everytime
I wonder how would naval warfare works in SP2. Like the CIWS being automated and such. Speaking of which, can we target missiles now? For self defense?
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph or a Raptor being flown by CJ
+1This is so peak ✨💝
+1Smol goober
+2LARRY
@SuperSuperTheSylph I'll show you a better one: The
SM-6/AIM-174B
+1Now that's what I'm talking about
+2✋😐🤚
@NewWorldAerospace that'll be pretty much a modernized SIAI-Marchetti S211 and near to the BAe Hawk or the Yak-130 since it's an attack/trainer jet
+2NWA FA-50 fr
+1"so don't try to leave because Nathan has installed a very accurate missile system that will shoot you down."
Me, my FA-25 with 4x AN/ALQ-184 and countermeasures set to 999999 ammo:
Also I stand with @Boeing727200F for trains. Trains are cool
+5Comically long barrel
Permission to revive? But with completely different systems and an engine. Or I may include airframe changes :v
+1Hot rod looking ant
+1Imma join. I already have an interceptor/bomber in my inventory still wip. Though I have some questions/concerns:
My design was focused on speed, specifically past mach 1 because I used the TU-128 design. Is it okay if I don't include turrets on it? Besides you can just outrun aggressors :v
And about the landing capabilities, I'll include landing chutes and spoilerons which double as airbrakes to help in slowing down.
@NewWorldAerospace seems like he is. Might be better to block or report that fella, it's a waste of time to engage with him
+1@GrowAGarden no such thing here in Philippines. Not that I know of. Also, I can't just expulsively spend money on a game. I'd rather buy food first and prioritize my college expenses
+1Examine other builds, Try new ways, And literally just build. You'll sharpen your skills as the time goes by
+1Cool tank lookin creatures
+1I wanna recreate the trains here in Philippines that uses the 1067mm(Three foot 6 Inch for freedom units), and probably make a fictional gas turbine powered train too
+3There's a lot of players, including me, that will stay on SP1. Though I have a laptop now, it's just a lease from my uncle, so I won't download both sp's on it(If SP2 gets released, I can't afford both just yet lmao) so don't worry ✨
+2The fuel guzzler-inator
HELLKESKA 🗣️
+3@CorporalWojak yep I'm aware of that. I can't put a carrier capable front gear on it cuz it gets on the way of the intakes. If I use the FA-18 gear, the front nose should look like an FA-18, which defeats the purpose of this look
@CorporalWojak the F-8 and A-5 had the similar setup back in the day. They both had single tire nose landing gear
Absolute Cinema ✋😐🤚
+2AYO 😭🙏
+4F I S H 🐟
+2@YarisSedan hell yeah 🗣️
@Halcyon215 you can adjust the horsepower on it, just look for the engine on xray mode
@Monarchii
THE WHIMSY 🗣️🗣️🗣️✨✨✨🔥🔥🔥
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph yep, they're default to fwd, but if you want rwd, you can do so. I'll do a rwd variant of this, but it'll be on the PTC series(taxicab)
+2@MrCOPTY yes. Smol whels beter
+1Two of the only good things that France has:
+3Dassault Aviation, and French pastries
Also credits to @Monarchii for the office buildings in the background
Honorable Mentions: @SuperSuperTheSylph