Profile image

[Finn·Balor]The Devil's heart

4,319 Romantic  2.2 years ago
8,884 downloads
Auto Credit Based on Romantic's The Devil's hearts

The above is a twin-engine version
Today is January 1st, I wish you all a happy New Year!
Today, I will give this engine as a gift to you.
Name: TheDevil's Heart
Single shot maximum thrust 30t during normal work
Open the afterburner maximum thrust 40t
AG1 opens the afterburner
This engine also has a vector function
Here are photos





Use this engine casually, but if you want to put it on your work, please indicate that the engine comes from me: D

Removing its bracket will not be so heavy! ! !

Then, I am making this plane



90% completion

Thank you for your support!!!!

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor The Devil's hearts
  • Successors 5 airplane(s) +14 bonus
  • This plane has been featured
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 8.2ft (2.5m)
  • Length 31.5ft (9.6m)
  • Height 12.9ft (3.9m)
  • Empty Weight 335,524lbs (152,191kg)
  • Loaded Weight 512,775lbs (232,591kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.052
  • Wing Loading -439,839.3lbs/ft2 (-2,147,483.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
  • Drag Points 4009

Parts

  • Number of Parts 626
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    thank you

    3 months ago
  • Profile image
    7,617 FOXLOVER

    U enter on the hystory of SP

    8 months ago
  • Profile image

    Make one@og31S

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    591 og31S

    smh I could make a mobile-friendly one but too lazy

    +2 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,024 JetFly

    and that's how to get 2k in 25 days

    +3 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,319 Romantic

    @GeneralOliverVonBismarck No. . . I just finished the test today.

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Is plane finished @Romantic

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Can't wait for the plane!

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,876 Gameboy21

    Just to run this requires processing power. wow

    +2 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Hey does the plane use mods @Romantic

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,934 JediWolf

    @Roadrunner232 but I could use my Overload hax and build a podracer engine block!

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,934 JediWolf

    @Roadrunner232 wish I could but MOBILE player here sooo ;-;

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,319 Romantic

    @Tresinator Just make it with mod and parts

    +2 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,319 Romantic

    @Tresinator Hahaha,thank you for your compliment,brother.

    +2 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.6k AdlerSteiner

    romantic.

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    TEACH MEEEEEEEEEEEE please!@Romantic

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    This is just, the most beautiful engine I have ever seen and maybe will see, on SimplePlanes.com.

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,922 SuperSix

    So not a big surprise you can build a good

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,319 Romantic

    Yeah Im not a new player.@SuperSix

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,922 SuperSix

    I have a feeling this is not a new player at all

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LiamW at the very least make a variant of the design with a shallow v-tail, just for the lols.

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.2k LiamW

    I can’t say I’m an expert but I’ve done a lot of reading about it for an RC design. My verdict was that actively controlled split ailerons can be more stabilising for less weight and drag. They have less effect than a fully-moving rudder but the inherent instability of the aircraft aids maneuverability. You’ll also notice that many (if not most) publicised 6th gen concepts use split ailerons and thrust vectoring instead of fins. It’s all a matter of trade offs really @BogdanX

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,319 Romantic

    thanks!@Hexcorpz

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.7k Rub3n213

    Bruuuhhhhhh

    10/10

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.2k LiamW

    I’m actually not sure why fighter aircraft are still being designed with vertical fins. Since they are all fly-by-wire with no mechanical backup, there’s no safety difference between active and passive stabilisers. I guess it’s a political 'low risk' thing @BogdanX

    2.2 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments