Just a few criticisms. First, the wing roundel is facing the wrong way. The top most point of the star should be pointed forward. The tips of the props need to either be painted yellow or white. The wheels are also way too shiny. There is also some collisions on the landing gear when retracting and extending. Other than that that this is pretty nice.
SP isnt really a good choice for trying to accurately simulate aircraft. Perhaps the best thing SP would be good for would be giving a rough estimate of CG, CoL, and CoT.
@EternalDarkness I have a build that hasn’t been posted yet. When I do post it can you spotlight that and either my Boeing Quiet Bird and/or IS-2 biplane?
P.S. thanks for running this challenge. I needed an excuse to build this and I had a lot of fun building it!
I think an e100 build would be an interesting challenge, especially with those side skirts. If you can pull it off well it could turn out amazing. If you need I can make the running gear once I've settled on how I'm going to build tank suspension in the future.
@ThunderNova well I don’t know about that enter line. That seems very odd. But to put in pics, first you need to get the url of an image. To do that I upload my pics to discord. Once they are there I have the option to “open original”. This opens a tab that has just the pic in it. Copy that url and paste it between the parentheses of ! [ t x t ] (url goes here) but without the spaces
im Debating on wether or not to do a dilapidated paint scheme or a pristine one. Do you think a dilapidated one would be harder to make look impressive?
Looks good
flys pretty good too.
@Supernovaboss504 I can spread my 5 hours over a week or easily. 5 hours is just the total number of "man hours".
Coming to steam, yeah or nah?
@Baby lol ur definition of almost done is VASTLY different from mine.
you: almost done = 30min later
me: almost done = 5 hours later
well that was quick.
the rotors should be angled to either side. Other than that pretty kewl.
kewl
@EternalDarkness it's a land based point defence interceptor. I had a feeling it would be stretching your definition. SPAA it is then!
would a natter be an acceptable entry?
@P0TET0Z eeeyyyyy
@CRJ900Pilot Np
So is this what you wanted @CRJ900Pilot ?
@sheepsblood eh I’ve seen worse. There wasn’t as much effort in the flight model as there would have normally.
@AerialFighterSnakes it’s those composite structures my dood.
@EternalDarkness owO. Thks btw.
@EternalDarkness this one plz
@WIZARD2017 the v-3 mortar/cannon that was bombed by lancaster's using the grand slam bomb.
@WIZARD2017 except it did/does exist and you can find pics of it with a quick google search??
no custom gear?
lol "poor part efficiency". Aint' seen nuthin yet!
Yeah i've found that a good tank is always a little parts heavy.
Just a few criticisms. First, the wing roundel is facing the wrong way. The top most point of the star should be pointed forward. The tips of the props need to either be painted yellow or white. The wheels are also way too shiny. There is also some collisions on the landing gear when retracting and extending. Other than that that this is pretty nice.
I was wondering if someone was going to try this. Nice.
SP isnt really a good choice for trying to accurately simulate aircraft. Perhaps the best thing SP would be good for would be giving a rough estimate of CG, CoL, and CoT.
yus
@EternalDarkness I have a build that hasn’t been posted yet. When I do post it can you spotlight that and either my Boeing Quiet Bird and/or IS-2 biplane?
P.S. thanks for running this challenge. I needed an excuse to build this and I had a lot of fun building it!
wow thats a lot of parts
Rip. Just checked it out looks kewl m8. Keep up the good work!
I think an e100 build would be an interesting challenge, especially with those side skirts. If you can pull it off well it could turn out amazing. If you need I can make the running gear once I've settled on how I'm going to build tank suspension in the future.
@SuperSix lol. All ur frustration will be worth it.
@SuperSix it was kinda bs I know
@SuperSix lol. VK 36.01 (H)
@SuperSix nope. its a honest to god tank. Its not a Tank destroyer or SPG or APC or none of that jazz.
@SuperSix it is german, and it is a tank (not a tdor spg)
@InternationalAircraftCompany nope
@SuperSix mmmm nope!
@Rub3n213 @Minecraftpoweer @SuperSix ur soooooooo close...
@CRJ900Pilot do you still want the bush camo?
@CRJ900Pilot ill see what I can do.
@ThunderNova well I don’t know about that enter line. That seems very odd. But to put in pics, first you need to get the url of an image. To do that I upload my pics to discord. Once they are there I have the option to “open original”. This opens a tab that has just the pic in it. Copy that url and paste it between the parentheses of ! [ t x t ] (url goes here) but without the spaces
@ThunderNova Honestly I just wrote the description. As for the pics, do you not know how to insert pics into descriptions?
Hey m8 look on the front page next to this post ;)
@BlackhattAircraft aka fat fingers
@Chancey21 i know. Im making one rn and its already got about twice as many parts as yours! Lol.
@DerekSP thank
im Debating on wether or not to do a dilapidated paint scheme or a pristine one. Do you think a dilapidated one would be harder to make look impressive?
@HistoricBirds if you dont mind hit that little upvote button on the zwilling comment just so I can count the votes easier.
@randomusername well buckaroo that's not quite what any of choices were now were they ;)
Or a BIG bomber
@TitanIncorporated To be honest I dont think its possible for anyone to do it. Ask around the forums I guess.
@TitanIncorporated on inspection I can't figure out how to turn the control surfaces on an off with an Ag group. Sorry I can't help you.