16.8k SilverStar Comments

  • {TEASER} REALISTIC AIRBUS A320neo (Progress Showcase) 4 days ago

    To be honest that looks very nice ! Does the lighting stripes change in function of which switches are activated ? I don't remember how it works on the real one

  • why do people legit get banned in this website? 4 days ago

    Some people think it's fun to break rules.

    +3
  • Why does my plane keep tilting(FIXED) 4 days ago

    Check collisions also, it might cause conflicts that would create torque or something

  • Engine Efficiency Ratings 4 days ago

    Interesting but.... I mean.... Sometimes there is no axis caption... Even no units - which makes that not very useful

    +1
  • Risso's creation showcase 5 days ago

    Looks like you used the Tone generator mod for some builds of this video right ?
    You should try to use multiple blocks and experience different sound mixings until you find something good

  • SimplePLANEs V2.0 5 days ago

    The official simple plane

    +1
  • Flying Waterscoop: Southeast Asian's For Everything Tools 16 days ago

    This thing is getting 38 upvotes

  • when you're AFK in SimplePlanes 23 days ago

    @KSB24 You can look about my forum about tires grip. It's not the ultimate solution but maybe it could help.
    I don't use a lot of your creations, however I see that you develop a lot of technologies which are really advanced, and most of the time I'm surprised, well done for that

    +1
  • Mil Mi-26T2V ‘HALO’ 24 days ago

    This is a good build overall, but I think flying could be better. The Tail rotor is violent, it is pulling up to 1.4G (0.4G horizontal), there is several ways to make it smoother. The winch is actually not very powerful like you said, but I have tried to transport things in it and it works well. Maybe a magnet on the back wall would be great to attach vehicles, because the ground magnets can't attach on wheels.

    +5
  • AC-130 Cargo one month ago

    @EasyMaster Okay, in the xml properties there is an attribute hide base so the engine itself diseappear but you still have the propeller. Well I was just talking about that for sound.

  • SimplePlanes Multiplayer one month ago

    @HellFireKoder What is the procedure to ban someone who steal crafts in SimplePlanes Multplayer ?

  • Dang some of players that tuning cars doesn't know this one month ago

    Is it really better than scaled beacon lights ?

    +1
  • [Closed] Seaplane Challenge! one month ago

    @BOSKnight So If my seaplane float I earn ten ?

  • [Closed] Seaplane Challenge! one month ago

    @BOSKnight What criteria will you look at to evaluate the creations?

  • [Closed] Seaplane Challenge! one month ago

    @BOSKnight I think you misunderstood my question. I asked about evaluation criterias.
    By the way I only see one other challenge on your profile. So no, lying doesn't makes you experienced.

  • CRUZEIRO CRS-121 one month ago

    This is a cool design, but the maneuverability is poor, also it can't glide

  • AC-130 Cargo one month ago

    Not bad, just a question, why using standard prop engine instead of the turboprop engine ?

  • Daso rafale one month ago

    @Blackmyer808 Well on your aircraft the center of mass (CoM) is too much pushed forward, you have to reduce the gap between the center of lift (CoL) and the CoM, but keep the CoM at the front of the CoL. It will make it more maneuverable.
    Putting slats have no useful aerodynamic effect in SP, you can forget them, or you can make them only for "looks".
    For the control surfaces, don't deflect them at an angle greater than their stall angle (Flat bottom: max 27°, semi: max 17°, symetrical: 14°).
    And if you use control surfaces integrated to wings, add the control surfaces on your main wing, not with a separate wing, it's more efficient.

  • Daso rafale one month ago

    @Blackmyer808 Do you want some advices for your future builds ?

    +1
  • Daso rafale one month ago

    The exterior looking is not that bad but the flight model makes it almost impossible to fly, and not capable of gliding.

    +1
  • [Closed] Seaplane Challenge! one month ago

    What are the judgment criterias ?? Looks like you don't have much experience in the game so I wonder how you will be able to judge...
    I mean, it doesn't mean that a 100k user is making a very good build that it should be first...

  • Solent Scout I one month ago

    @Solent I'm on high physics settings, maybe it has to do something with it...

  • Tupolev Tu-144SST (Prototype-001) one month ago

    I really like the startup procedure on this build, which looks accurate. However it doesn't simulate the RPM when the engines are started so you don't know their status.
    The exterior looking is good. But the flight model is kinda poor ; the engines are too much powerful, the brakes too. It can fly slower than an airliner which is not really possible with this type of wing.

    +1
  • Solent Scout I one month ago

    @Solent Just report him, he did the same thing on one of my builds.
    Anyway, nice build there, If I'm not wrong one of the spoilers is moving in the wrong direction, probably because mirroring. And one suspension tend to be less strong, maybe for the same reason. But it flies well otherwise.

  • B-47E Stratojet 2 months ago

    Good looking build, however it is quite heavy on the roll axis but still maneuverable, the Trim for pitch axis is not very appropriate for low speeds. The flaps seems to have no aerodynamic effect. But eh, it flies.
    Also next time you could edit the brake force of the wheels so it doesn't project the pilot on the dashboard lol.

    +1
  • Bell 47G 2 months ago

    Looking very nice, but controls with the sort of gyro makes it kinda hard to fly like a real helicopter.
    Next time think about making gyro settings of the rotor 0 !

    +1
  • Twirl 2 months ago

    "This 777-300 has remained on the ground at Wright International Airport since several months, departure date is unknown"

  • Albatros D.Va 2 months ago

    Very nice build, good job.

    +1
  • Ford Tri Motor 2 months ago

    Nice build, too bad the wings parts are oversized compared to the fuselages wings. For info, if you rescale the wing parts (for example 0.1,0.1,0.1), they keep their original virtual wing area.

    +1
  • Next build!! 2 months ago

    @Mitterbin Don't want to be bad but there is certainly a lot of fighters which are looking better

  • SimpleTablet Ultra 2 months ago

    @N5 SP in SP

  • Why not? 2 months ago

    what

  • Next build!! 2 months ago

    A Typhoon that wants to compete with the N.1500 Griffon.

  • SimpleTablet Ultra 2 months ago

    Does it have play store ?
    .....
    ..
    you see where I'm going with this

  • ATR 72-600 2 months ago

    Really nice build, I really like how it fits in this livery. Flight performance is almost perfect there. I would just say that it breaks a bit too hard. But overall, nice job !!

  • Bro just money shifted 2 months ago

    Imagine if you have a random chance of shifting bad

    +1
  • GOOD NEWS!!! 2 months ago

    The dacia sandero !!!

  • I kept my promise on the Floppy disk thing... 2 months ago

    what about running SP on this old computer ?

  • Flying Aerial Tramway [57 Parts] 3 months ago

    I still have one of these from the 60s

  • Semedian Birdin OrC50A "Silver Dragon" 3 months ago

    @SemedianIndustries it feels like it destabilize the craft in some situations...
    Great ornithopter though.

    +2
  • Semedian Birdin OrC50A "Silver Dragon" 3 months ago

    How to disable the tail movement ?

  • 208 CARAVAN FLOAT 3 months ago

    This is a great looking plane, nicely done, I really like it.
    Because this is an unfinished project, I will share my thoughts on this build:
    For me flight characteristics are not bad, but it has a lot of inertia on the roll axis, I don't really know why. The flaps doesn't seem to do anything though. And It can't glide far (glide ratio around 4, drag issue)...
    Gears are inverted with the Landing Gear input. In addition, the main gear gets out before the gear doors are open.
    If I remember correctly, the sort of paddles at the back of the floats can be lowered (by rotation) when you're on the water, so they're fully underwater and have a great yaw authority. But I don't think it's synced with the gear. You could put wings in them so they will provide a good force in the water I think, as it is denser than air.
    The flight computer or something is maybe located a bit too low, which gives a weird orbit view...
    But overall it's good, I'm looking forward for the finished product !

    +2
  • BAe 146-300 / Avro RJ100 3 months ago

    Nice looking build, however flight performance is poor. Ailerons only get their max efficiency around 70% instead of 100%, and elevators are too much effective. The aircraft has too much power and too much drag.

  • MiG-15 3 months ago

    Nice build

  • He 212 A-2 3 months ago

    Nice looking build. Maybe Roll is too much sensitive ?

    +1
  • Blue Box? 3 months ago

    You can choose the AI status only when spawning one.

    +1
  • How do I make a stablizer code to eliminate any unwanted pitch 3 months ago

    Maybe... That would be better to make your planes stable ?

  • Prerunner truck or somethin 3 months ago

    Looks cool !
    I think you can make "false headlights" which will not produce lighting in place of the real ones, and put some sorts of rally lights or light bar on the front or on the roof...

    +1
  • NEW INSTRUMENTS, CHARTS, AND PLANES 3 months ago

    I remember reading your first post. By the way I guess that you are french ?