@Tang0five it is indeed, I went through some of my older builds and found the p100, that shape is awesome hence a modern jet version :) look forward to seeing your build.
@asteroidbook345 when you change the direction of rotation the props move backwards or forwards (not the engine, just the props) and thats what isnt in line, the engines themselves have exactly the same co-ords.
@asteroidbook345 good spot, since i copied them from 1 side to the other they should line up..... it flies fine though and they dont fall off so no idea why it shows that.
@Dimkal yeah I wanted something pointy to match the plane, the sr71 has a pointy cockpit so I made something similar, a round cockpit just looked out of place. Rudder was an oversight... oops
@Mmdben bit this isn't one of those planes and it has massive advantages. I hate gear that clashes with doors, this fixes that perfectly, horses for courses and all that.
@Mmdben I disagree, if this was say, a ground attack aircraft or a trainer then I could understand how there would be a conflict between auto gear and flight operability, but, this is a high speed/altitude interceptor. The only time it's going slow is for take off or landing, if it's flying low what's the point of the stealth design?
@NANOMAN no it doesn't :p it lets me sequence rotation and opening/shutting of doors. If your landing at high speed you've got it wrong, if it retracts before your airborne you have overstressed the undercarriage due to speed I.e. you have got it wrong.
@BogdanX thanks bog, it was more like the German f104 zero length launcher, the 104 needed tanks to keep it airborne long enough hence there addition. I did ponder removing them for a second set of sidewinders but I thought that was ott on armament. This link has some nice details and a video.
@DOX they finished their UK display season early to go on tour in America, so they probs wouldn't have been available for Malta anyway was what I meant.
@BlackhattAircraft easy, I have a list of unfinished builds that I dip into, most only have a couple of hours work left on them so at present I'm reducing the list a bit :) I built most of the unfinished stuff when I was off work for a bit.
@ChiChiWerx well your marines got harriers and the usaf got Canberras so I thought your navy was feeling left out :) mainly I wanted to build a skull for the tail and that lead me to the usn.
@harits I wouldn't have thought so, it's not much different to the f106 dart, the engines don't solely rely on forced air input they have a suction effect (hence fod being a bother), so even if the leading edge of the wing had a negative pressure build up sue to manoevering the engine will still be sucking air from above and to the side. If anything the engine intakes reduce fod problems as they are higher up and partially protected. Have a look also at the avro 707 which had a top mounted intake.
@FairFireFight lol I'm British and in the 50s and 60s the British aircraft industry came up with so many whacky concepts I find it hard to have my builds as anything but British, tag or fleet air arm.
@Leviatham you need to upload them to something like discord, right click on the image and copy the link, then put 
@Tang0five quite probably, was looking at some aa missile batteries at Sunderland aircraft museum.
@Caat2 lol a few months ago they did
@gispet thanks =) An old one this.
@Thecatbaron I've made loads of planes with cockpits :) this is my first for a while though, they add so many parts...
@Megamonster thanks :) bit of everything really, usually start with a real aircraft and just sort of build my own from there.
@Tang0five it is indeed, I went through some of my older builds and found the p100, that shape is awesome hence a modern jet version :) look forward to seeing your build.
@Trainzo it's looks nice, I havnt had a chance to fly it yet, cockpit instrument layout looks great (and v time consuming)
@EternalDarkness it was named after the Spartan general :) where is the place? Google didn't recognise the name..
@asteroidbook345 when you change the direction of rotation the props move backwards or forwards (not the engine, just the props) and thats what isnt in line, the engines themselves have exactly the same co-ords.
@asteroidbook345 good spot, since i copied them from 1 side to the other they should line up..... it flies fine though and they dont fall off so no idea why it shows that.
@Caden313 sorry had to re-post it, forgot to delete a random block that was hanging around outside the build....
@CRJ900Pilot I was going to do boat but decided to go for wat instead.
@Trainzo thanks again trainzo, glad you like it.
@ChiChiWerx good man, bombs or strafing? I have no luck with bomb timings I always end up straddling the target (or missing completely)
@Dimkal yeah I wanted something pointy to match the plane, the sr71 has a pointy cockpit so I made something similar, a round cockpit just looked out of place. Rudder was an oversight... oops
@EternalDarkness yep, Google polikarpov i153 :)
@Tang0five thanks :) I use a couple of small flotation bars hidden in the float, let's me be more flexible on floating position etc
@TheFantasticTyphoon Thanks =)
@Armyguy1534 help yourself.
@Mmdben bit this isn't one of those planes and it has massive advantages. I hate gear that clashes with doors, this fixes that perfectly, horses for courses and all that.
@Mmdben I disagree, if this was say, a ground attack aircraft or a trainer then I could understand how there would be a conflict between auto gear and flight operability, but, this is a high speed/altitude interceptor. The only time it's going slow is for take off or landing, if it's flying low what's the point of the stealth design?
@NANOMAN no it doesn't :p it lets me sequence rotation and opening/shutting of doors. If your landing at high speed you've got it wrong, if it retracts before your airborne you have overstressed the undercarriage due to speed I.e. you have got it wrong.
@JamesBoA @Chancey21 @Armyguy1534
@Syabil @Mmdben @ACEPILOT109
@FairFireFight what do you mean black circle? It's got hollow ducts from the intake to the engine itself.
@BogdanX thanks bog, it was more like the German f104 zero length launcher, the 104 needed tanks to keep it airborne long enough hence there addition. I did ponder removing them for a second set of sidewinders but I thought that was ott on armament. This link has some nice details and a video.
@DOX they finished their UK display season early to go on tour in America, so they probs wouldn't have been available for Malta anyway was what I meant.
Reds are in America anyway arnt they?
RESULTS:
1 IIII
2 I
3 I
4 III
5
6
7 I
8 IIII
9 VIII
@Mmdben that's what I thought :)
@jamesPLANESii well I've done it in the colour scheme of your country :) the link to the build is below the pics.
@Mmdben I had to attach them to something that wasn't going to get altered :)
@Mmdben they retract the black panels that give the effect of wheel bays.
@Mmdben Thanks =) thanks for looking at my older builds as well, its a shame that they are just gathering dust.
@ChiChiWerx maritime air to air refuelling and / or naval reconnaissance (similar sort of variation that a p3 has.)
just make them yourself, or copy some mechanisms other people use (or get a device not on ios...) =)
@ChiChiWerx not quite Westland Wyvern, always wanted to build one of those =)
@Trainzo @ThomasRoderick @FairFireFight thanks for the comments and upvotes.
@BlackhattAircraft easy, I have a list of unfinished builds that I dip into, most only have a couple of hours work left on them so at present I'm reducing the list a bit :) I built most of the unfinished stuff when I was off work for a bit.
@ChiChiWerx well your marines got harriers and the usaf got Canberras so I thought your navy was feeling left out :) mainly I wanted to build a skull for the tail and that lead me to the usn.
@harits I wouldn't have thought so, it's not much different to the f106 dart, the engines don't solely rely on forced air input they have a suction effect (hence fod being a bother), so even if the leading edge of the wing had a negative pressure build up sue to manoevering the engine will still be sucking air from above and to the side. If anything the engine intakes reduce fod problems as they are higher up and partially protected. Have a look also at the avro 707 which had a top mounted intake.
@FairFireFight lol I'm British and in the 50s and 60s the British aircraft industry came up with so many whacky concepts I find it hard to have my builds as anything but British, tag or fleet air arm.
@FairFireFight It says royal navy on it....
@belugasub here's a forum post I made explaining how to do camo
@Leviatham you need to upload them to something like discord, right click on the image and copy the link, then put 
@BlackhattAircraft thanks :) dllama and ChiChiWerx have given me an idea for how to synchronise undercarriage so I'll have a play with that next.
@Itamar3553 thanks :)
@ChiChiWerx no worries, it turned out well in the end I think.
@Minecraftpoweer @Roswell thanks for the comments, glad you liked it.
@MethaManAircraft yep, the British f101 :)