145k RamboJutter Comments

  • Dassault Mirage 2000C 10 months ago

    @ainanen I've had a look around your build and for all that I like the plane there are a few failings in my eyes. Please don't take this personally but you may want to consider the following: 1) on this game extreme accuracy would entail a lot more smoothness and general tidyness than this has, mby change that to just "replica" (Saves getting people's backs up, we all start somewhere and develop, this is by no means a bad build but it isn't extremely accurate, 2) use all 3 screenshots you can with angles that actually show the build, 3) research roundels ratios, they are normally 3:2:1 for HAF or French air force, yours are a bit off, 4) use the overlay mod if your going for an extremely accurate replica, this shows where your build deviates substantially from the real thing (I built mine prior to this mod release and it's even worse lol), 4) have a better look at the camo, from the top it doesn't really work, the mirage is a difficult beasty due to curves but you can get a more realistic scheme with a bit of thought. That's just my thoughts, again I typed this to try and assist, you obviously put a lot of effort in and should be credited as such, if you consider the above and apply it to the next build it will be better again.

    +13
  • The SimplePlanes Etiquette #1: Using other's creation. one month ago

    I thought the whole point of the game was for you to share your build? The game allows other people to alter it to suit their interests (but you get the credit for original build). Who cares if someone alters your build as long as they dont circumvent the credit system?

    +9
  • Grammar police pls stop 1.5 years ago

    @jamesPLANESii Some people just do not appreciate the importance of correct grammar or spelling. If we didnt help them just think of the long term affect on the English language, we would devolve into nothing but groups of illiterate mobile apes.

    +7
  • Grammar police pls stop 1.5 years ago

    *criticising

    +7
  • I have something to say. 1.7 years ago

    I only got half way down, but I see where you are going with this and agree with the sentiment.

    +7
  • INSENSITIVE MODERATORS 1.7 years ago

    Aw, cries. I don't think sp is the place to air your issues though. Ps mods try their hardest to help maintain the rules yadayada five them a break

    +7
  • BAC Attacker II 4.6 one year ago

    @RAF1 @yoshicraze @TheFantasticTyphoon yep, I tried to bring together a number of different aircraft, the fin is from an f-8 corsair, cockpit from a typhoon, f16 inspired rear and gripen inspired wings

    +6
  • Supermarine Spitfire Mk Ia 1.3 years ago

    The fuselage looks good but those wings are pretty poor, the trailing edge is made up of a flat wing next to a curved fus section? Just curious why you did this rather than use custom surfaces and a nice smooth wing shape?

    +6
  • Petition to limit users to ONE FORUM POST PER DAY 1.7 years ago

    Aw but I like reading the "teaser" followed by the "bad mods" and finally the "I'm leaving" posts.... or maybe I don't... hmm

    +6
  • The storm is on its way 1.1 years ago

    Who's is the heli then? Btw it doesn't hurt you personally when you use the normal credit system to show people who'd builds you are using, if anything it helps people see your additions

    +5
  • Do Y'all wanna see this? 1.2 years ago

    If the photos weren't in the dark we night actually be able to see it... :)

    +5
  • [B&W] Junkers F 13 (Perfezione) 1.2 years ago

    @Winstonlharambe so ive finally had a chance to download this and to be fair i was slightly disappointed, you have put so much effort into the looks but the functionallity is, to be frank, aweful. 1) no rudder? 2) no trim on elevator 3) no effort to make it anywhere near neutral for controls 4) ailerons clash with the wing and the rotators are not at the same angle, a part appears on full throws, 5) Aeilerons and fin are square edges and not in keeping with the rest of the build, 6) rear wheel yaw controls are stuck, 7) your cameras on the seats are visible, it takes 2 seconds to nudge them into the seats, 8) it wallows about when flying as if the fin doesnt have a large enough wing panel in it etc.etc. now all of the above are easily solveable, it seems such a shame to have such a detailed build let down by such simple things... I hope that you take this on board as constructive critisism and your next build will be better for it.

    +5
  • Why Can't I See Underwater? 1.3 years ago

    Mby they don't want you to sea the little fish with big teeth lurking just below the surface?

    +5
  • What are the points for? 1.4 years ago

    Fun. Nothing to buy. Just for giggles.

    +5
  • The site is as popular as it was over 3 years ago. 1.4 years ago

    It doesn't help that the website is so useless, it's constantly coming up with errors and struggles with upvotes or comments

    +5
  • Alright. Here’s the deal... 1.7 years ago

    @Spacedoge12345plane over-rated? Explain plix, I thought the whole point in upvotes was to vote for what you like?
    not vote for a build just because the person is a low rank etc..

    +5
  • Guess the plane 10 months ago

    F53 underwing pylons where not fitted to f6s or f2 etc as far as I know. Oh hints... hmm it's like thunder but different.

    +4
  • things about this game that really aNNOy mE! 1.2 years ago

    What about the fuselage cones that resize the wrong way when you attach them to fuselage cones which are not round...

    +4
  • Jet engines connected to hinges not getting air! 1.2 years ago

    I've managed no probs, usually just attach the inlet to the engine then the front of the inlet to the hinge. Have a look a my fairey p75 to see how I've done it

    +4
  • If SimplePlanes was made by EA 1.5 years ago

    Not to mention the game wouldn't work, the servers would be ran by ea and be down all the time, the game would evolve to imitate it's competitor and satisfy kids that are too young to meet the age restrictions... etc

    +4
  • Mods won't work.(Solved.) 1.6 years ago

    Aw I thought this was about @tully2001, I was going to suggest offering him biscuits :)

    +4
  • Short Stirling mk3 1.7 years ago

    Holy cow man, that looks epic. Now if only we could teach you how to make wings ;p I love the Stirling, I made a wooden model of it a few years back even. @tang0five you seen this?

    +4
  • Dassault-Bréguet Alphajet (Édition Patrouille de France) 1.7 years ago

    So what about mentioning that this is Zandgard's build and you added some colours to it?

    +4
  • Definitely should have aborted..... 24 days ago

    Right on the centre line, plenty of runway left and you can walk away from it :)

    +3
  • (Simp)le Planes User Update: 3/9/2020 one month ago

    Oooh 1 of 21, I'm elite :)

    +3
  • We should have the ability to remove successors that other people have made a blatant ripoff of 11 months ago

    Almost as bad as when someone just adds a gazillion guns on your semirealistic build... ;)

    +3
  • One year ago 1.1 years ago

    And you still havnt actually rated the planes submitted or decided your competition which ended ages ago, shame on you.

    +3
  • F-104 cult 1.1 years ago

    We need loads as they keep crashing... right @F104Deathtrap

    +3
  • Piper Cherokee 1.2 years ago

    You should have put it in EternalDarkness' competition.

    +3
  • [B&W] Junkers F 13 (Perfezione) 1.2 years ago

    @Winstonlharambe it just looks so out of proportion, massive wing but tiny tail and fin (which itself is not pretty in design), please don't take this the wrong way, it's the plane itself I don't like not your build.

    +3
  • It's heartbreaking 1.3 years ago

    Upvotes are pretty random, some things get loads of votes even with massive construction flaws, others are awesome and get very few votes, it's just the way it is.

    +3
  • its cancelled. 1.4 years ago

    What's cancelled??

    +3
  • MK-19 Attack Eagle 1.5 years ago

    Erm those wings will hit the floor before the wheels if u are taking off or landing vertically (whole point of vtol)

    +3
  • Bristol M1 (fixed) 1.5 years ago

    Looks nice but the gloss paint spoils it for me.

    +3
  • ospray 4 W fixed 1.6 years ago

    A Chinook had an affair with an osprey, 9 months later this appeared.

    +3
  • New Lockheed Martin F-22 coming soon! 1.7 years ago

    Aw no teaser pics

    +3
  • What is the service ceiling of a moth 1.7 years ago

    Unlimited, they are aiming for the sun after all.

    +3
  • Fastest time for a successor? 1.7 years ago

    About 15mins for some noob re-colour with 20 more guns...

    +3
  • Col problem 1.8 years ago

    It's usually a wing hadnt attached when copied over. Or not copied over at all (x-ray mod is useful for finding stuff like that)

    +3
  • Rant about "Sorry for inactivity" posts 1.8 years ago

    You have more upvotes for a rant than I get for most of my builds, must be a higher quality rant :)

    +3
  • Overload V1.0: Some much-needed attention 1.8 years ago

    some one give this guy a medal. without overload i couldnt build on this game.

    +3
  • So What you guys think of my B-29 Enola Homosexual 28 days ago

    I agree with bog, plus in the 40s gay meant happy, not the same connotations as current language

    +2
  • What annoys you the most about the SP website? one month ago

    Undecided competitions... loads of time wasted building for a contest the the creator cant be bothered to judge...

    +2
  • OUTDATED: Input System Explanation & Tutorial ("Funky Trees") [SP 1.9] 3 months ago

    @MattEpic we had that before V<200 etc.

    +2
  • RJ-Leduc "Rene" F1 4 months ago

    @Mumpsy well I was going to make the wholenise section ejectable, but like the f111 but sp physics annoyed me so I reverted to a standard system:)

    +2
  • Thanksgiving Challenge 4 months ago

    @weebabyseamus just a suggestion; wouldnt it be better if you actually judged each entry rather than relying on upvotes? The upvote system is biased as high ranking (high follower count) players have a larger fan base to upvote their builds than the lower ranking players... just a thought.

    +2
  • RJ-AVRO Vulcan GR1 3.0 5 months ago

    @DeezDucks I'll have to look into that when I get back home, I don't tend to use rudder as sp mechanics seem to not like yaw and just gives me either a judder or roll. Thanks for the input though.

    +2
  • Anyone wonder what ive been working on? =) 7 months ago

    @Chancey21 good job it's ground to ground then :)

    +2
  • BAE Cyclone F-1 4.1 8 months ago

    @Tang0five no doubt, I heard it was going to be vtol and carrier capable right up until the government changed their mind for the 3rd time....

    +2
  • 'Sopwith' Duck MK1 (beluga sub entry) 1.2 10 months ago

    @X4JB it's not a rudder it's his tail :)

    +2