hey mate not sure if you'll see this, but this work is absolutely awesome. The aiming system just blew my mind, btw Im building an APC recently and i wanna ask would you be okay with me using your brilliant code on the turret? I will tag you then
@SPWithLizzie well i didnt find that, the information about this jet is just a little, all i know about ts is its engine is actually inverted, which mean the exhaust is in front of the engine, like this
@RestlessGalaxies yeah i can imagine that the price and Maintenance complexity of the engine wouldnt be that friendly, tbh my original design was add numerous grids inside the front nozzle to control the direction of air stream, and of course those thing might be a lot of unpredictable issues in reality
i think symmetrical 3BSD will be very cool, but the position of the two engines might be a bit awkward, you know the engine's exhaust must be around the mass center of the aircraft, so the aircraft wont flip forward or backward when doing VTOL. However, the exhaust is at the rear of the engine, which means the engine must be in the first half of the aircraft, and i think ts might cause a weight distribution issue or sth else...?
@ToeTips oh i get wat you saying, thats a pretty good idea, but I don’t think it could save the X32, its engine is positioned too far forward, and there seems to be no reasonable place for a second intake. I like X32 very much, it has numerous unique designs, but its engine layout is just absolutely bad. If really need to fix it, I think its the same idea as the Harrier, use a high bypass ratio engine and extend the section between the fan and the compressor to let the aircraft take off with cold air
@ToeTips im not sure what you mean intake on top, like the F35B?
And I don’t think the main intake designs of the Harrier and the F-35B can be combined, because the Harriers Pegasus engine is a "high-bypass-ratio" engine that needs to generate enough cold air for the front nozzles to take off vertically. ts requires a big intake, which isn’t ideal for stealth design I think
Its kinda hard to tell how to do it, but i got some tips here. First, always remember to edit the partCollisionResponse to false, second, make sure the connect between parts and shock is clear, each shock should only connent with two parts, third, i suggest you to add torque arm to assist the shock connection. I have modded a F-35 with custom LG, you can refer to This
@MobileBuilder21 i think i can do the weapon bays, but Due to the way the parts were initially put together, it will be hard for me to add finer details like serrated edges. And im not good at edit Labels, so i think you need to do the decals by urself. Furthermore, if you want the cockpit, the canopy wont be able to open and close, the reason is the same as previous. The only i can do is add the cockpit interiors and weapon bays because with so many changes, building a brand new aircraft would be better in every way
@HESA appreciate it mate, your works are great as well<3
hey mate not sure if you'll see this, but this work is absolutely awesome. The aiming system just blew my mind, btw Im building an APC recently and i wanna ask would you be okay with me using your brilliant code on the turret? I will tag you then
+1Finally someone made this
AG1 to autoaim
@Boeing727200F thats weird, lock range should between 1nm~3nm
@Boeing727200F not an English main🥀
@SPWithLizzie Turret space program frfr
@MobileBuilder21 ofcourse theres a missile inside, using actually fins to guild need too much coding
@MobileBuilder21 wat?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 rocket booster×6
@SPWithLizzie bruh didnt see that💔🥀
@SPWithLizzie yeah but really creative
@SPWithLizzie well i didnt find that, the information about this jet is just a little, all i know about ts is its engine is actually inverted, which mean the exhaust is in front of the engine, like this
Up intake and VTOL!!??
check This and This out bro
@SPWithLizzie of course? Wdym
I actually not sure whether that call AC Motor or not, but ChatGPT said it is so it is👍
@PhantomBoltSP You mean LOSAT?
@Rb2h bruh i swear i already fixed it once, ts sht sucks
+1Would be better if AG radar can see further, the speed will be much faster then
Beautiful ❤️🔥
Nice job🔥
+1Cool
dam ts looks very cool
@ivansheppard853gmail i turned it off
@RestlessGalaxies yeah i can imagine that the price and Maintenance complexity of the engine wouldnt be that friendly, tbh my original design was add numerous grids inside the front nozzle to control the direction of air stream, and of course those thing might be a lot of unpredictable issues in reality
i think symmetrical 3BSD will be very cool, but the position of the two engines might be a bit awkward, you know the engine's exhaust must be around the mass center of the aircraft, so the aircraft wont flip forward or backward when doing VTOL. However, the exhaust is at the rear of the engine, which means the engine must be in the first half of the aircraft, and i think ts might cause a weight distribution issue or sth else...?
@ToeTips oh i get wat you saying, thats a pretty good idea, but I don’t think it could save the X32, its engine is positioned too far forward, and there seems to be no reasonable place for a second intake. I like X32 very much, it has numerous unique designs, but its engine layout is just absolutely bad. If really need to fix it, I think its the same idea as the Harrier, use a high bypass ratio engine and extend the section between the fan and the compressor to let the aircraft take off with cold air
+1@CaptainNoble thx man<3
@ToeTips im not sure what you mean intake on top, like the F35B?
And I don’t think the main intake designs of the Harrier and the F-35B can be combined, because the Harriers Pegasus engine is a "high-bypass-ratio" engine that needs to generate enough cold air for the front nozzles to take off vertically. ts requires a big intake, which isn’t ideal for stealth design I think
Only 380 parts❓🤯 Nice job btw💋
+1@SPWithLizzie thanks for the compliment bro😭🙏❤️
Massive upgrade, nice👍
@UnguidedCylinder thx <3
+1@lazerguidedmissile dk man i prefer to make a brand new one
Man 250 parts seems a bit too little
The hull design is very creative nice👍
+1@AtlasMilitaryIndustries thx <3
dang she looks awesome but 3400 parts 💀
@crazyplaness can you help me add the successor tag to the Seaplane Challenge? thanks you very much
@BOSKnight sure, but who should i ask
@BOSKnight idk why the successor tag is gone, and it seems like Dorian didn't see my message, just letting you know that the ts is for the Challenge
@dekanii thx <3
+2@SuperSuperTheSylph fr
+1@SupremeDorian can you please help me add the successor tag to the Seaplane Challenge? thanks you very much
+2Its kinda hard to tell how to do it, but i got some tips here. First, always remember to edit the partCollisionResponse to false, second, make sure the connect between parts and shock is clear, each shock should only connent with two parts, third, i suggest you to add torque arm to assist the shock connection. I have modded a F-35 with custom LG, you can refer to This
Pretty good!
@Goofylobster i dont think its work, tag only work in comment not description
Beautiful😍
+1@MobileBuilder21 i think i can do the weapon bays, but Due to the way the parts were initially put together, it will be hard for me to add finer details like serrated edges. And im not good at edit Labels, so i think you need to do the decals by urself. Furthermore, if you want the cockpit, the canopy wont be able to open and close, the reason is the same as previous. The only i can do is add the cockpit interiors and weapon bays because with so many changes, building a brand new aircraft would be better in every way
@MobileBuilder21 oh yea almost forgot, i have nearly finish it, i can give you tomorrow
@lazerguidedmissile good idea, i think i can make one