Personally I never watch videos.
Videos are complimentary. They shouldn't be the only teaser at least. They take longer to view and you need headphones (and, presumably, faster internet) to watch.
Meanwhile you can flip through forums basically anywhere.
Because a lot of people here and on such other games are terminally online and perhaps don't deal with feelings of loneliness in the most healthy manner.
I'm no psychologist, but to spend a lot of time here you need to be, well, not exactly normal, so probably don't go through the typical life path that otherwise addresses ("addresses") the issues leading to such obsessions.
Now, it should be clarified that the extent of this can vary.
A female character in an anime style is one thing, but inserting them continuously and to an unreasonable extent (e.g. an entire military force consisting of conventionally attractive 20-something or younger girls) definitely tells me this isn't a case of statistical probability of female combatants.
Obviously anthropomorphizing machines and other things like this demonstrates this undeniably. Admit it, you want to date (or worse) the machine/nation state/concept because you are horrifically, horrifically starved of the affection of others. Or, rather, can't just put up with not having certain relationships in a way that doesn't show.
So instead the world ends up with nonsensical crosses of interests and attractions.
Like tanks? Like girls?
Boom. Tank girls.
Like, not even vaguely feminine sentient war machines, no, things specifically tailored to fulfill the "girl" part of this and all that implies.
And the world is no better of for them.
Believe it or not, the trees in this gif are a flat image with some shader trickery!
So... we could get Super Mario 64 trees? Sick.
The river does seem a bit too steep ("bit"), but I reckon it's probably too late for that. And intentional, of course.
I assume the rivers are functional, and things float. Do they have currents? Or does the slope cause things to flow downhill?
Also the ability to select parts so that they can't be autoconnected to would be super useful too.
YES.
The WASD rotation needs a touch up. It's convenient in theory, but as it currently works you can't actually use it without majorly messing up your connections.
@PlaneFlightX It's common knowledge around here that you are a freak.
Your "building technique" is "transporting actual airframes into the game via portal, scrapping them, and reassembling them in your desired shape". It's the only explanation.
the video quality makes it 3x as good
+5It looks like something jeb would come up with if he was a weapons designer instead of an astronaut
+5Can't say I know you, but welcome back regardless.
+4@HuskyDynamics01 Indeed. Get the decartilager.
+4@GabrielFangster70 Good lord and I thought MY attention span was bad
+4@HuskyDynamics01 You lock them by locking the fuck in is what you do
+4To everyone seeing this in your Jetstream:
+4Suffer.
@HuskyDynamics01 Husky-type behaviour
+4That shit will not float
+4With or without calculator?
+4@AverageCASenjoyer Weed
+4Hm.
+4Needs more guns.
Every time you pull shit like this I care less and less about your opinion.
+4@LM0418 Why do you care? Why do you get to dictate what's worthy?
+4Why don't you shut the fuck up and ignore me like I ignore you?
😾
+4->Modern MBT
->Looks inside
->Tank closer to the death of Hitler than the modern day
@LM0418 Okay, listen here jackass. I don't talk about you, you don't talk about me.
+4And I really don't appreciate you taking that last comment completely out of context.
Personally I never watch videos.
+4Videos are complimentary. They shouldn't be the only teaser at least. They take longer to view and you need headphones (and, presumably, faster internet) to watch.
Meanwhile you can flip through forums basically anywhere.
I've been asked by one MS-088 to send along a message:
How or why an MS unit saw this post, I cannot discern.
+4@YarisHatchback It's probably something to do with the giant fucking monsters attacking the pacific rim starting 2013.
+4Because a lot of people here and on such other games are terminally online and perhaps don't deal with feelings of loneliness in the most healthy manner.
+4I'm no psychologist, but to spend a lot of time here you need to be, well, not exactly normal, so probably don't go through the typical life path that otherwise addresses ("addresses") the issues leading to such obsessions.
Now, it should be clarified that the extent of this can vary.
A female character in an anime style is one thing, but inserting them continuously and to an unreasonable extent (e.g. an entire military force consisting of conventionally attractive 20-something or younger girls) definitely tells me this isn't a case of statistical probability of female combatants.
Obviously anthropomorphizing machines and other things like this demonstrates this undeniably. Admit it, you want to date (or worse) the machine/nation state/concept because you are horrifically, horrifically starved of the affection of others. Or, rather, can't just put up with not having certain relationships in a way that doesn't show.
So instead the world ends up with nonsensical crosses of interests and attractions.
Like tanks? Like girls?
Boom. Tank girls.
Like, not even vaguely feminine sentient war machines, no, things specifically tailored to fulfill the "girl" part of this and all that implies.
And the world is no better of for them.
Okay, okay, no need to shout.
+4Remember that there are two legacy propellers.
Another one!
+4Amen.
+4@LunarEclipseSP Another one bites the dust!
+4So... we could get Super Mario 64 trees? Sick.
The river does seem a bit too steep ("bit"), but I reckon it's probably too late for that. And intentional, of course.
+4I assume the rivers are functional, and things float. Do they have currents? Or does the slope cause things to flow downhill?
@SchmooveBrain Your highschool experiences sound like they’d be very profitable for the psychiatric industry.
+41: Different word.
+42: This isn't the UK.
You can be tried as an adult.
+4Just kidding, you won't get a trial.
@SupremeDorian The Style HTML attribute is a pathway to many visuals some consider to be... unnatural.
+4@jamesPLANESii
YES.
+4The WASD rotation needs a touch up. It's convenient in theory, but as it currently works you can't actually use it without majorly messing up your connections.
I cannot imagine how it would be considered against the rules. It’s your own audience. If it were posted on your main they’d see it anyways.
+4Why is your font so weird
+4How many crayons of labour did this take?
+4You know how many aircraft become known as Widow-Makers because they crash a lot?
+4This one gets that reputation from springlock failures.
@Erionh "Children's" is a tad demeaning, no?
+4The narcissism jet.
+4Haha as if anyone would want to steal something I've made
+4Maybe I'm just paranoid, but I sense low-poly anime girl with this one...
+4@LunarEclipseSP This woman gets it
+4@PlaneFlightX It's common knowledge around here that you are a freak.
+4Your "building technique" is "transporting actual airframes into the game via portal, scrapping them, and reassembling them in your desired shape". It's the only explanation.
Two-factor definitely sounds like a good addition as an option, especially those who may be victims of trolling.
+4MA!
+4THE SIMPLEPLANES USERS ARE DOWN BAD AGAIN!
@SheriffHackdogMCPE Insert video of soldiers throwing sticks at drones
+4@TheMouse Care to spill the cheese balls?
+4@jamesPLANESii Wait, whar?
@KSB24 Dang you were born in 2400? What's the future like?
🪤
+4I’m sorry but you’re not allowed to buy people anymore
+4@SILVERPANZER Go fly a bush plane over Snowstone I dare you.
+4Things to do in Florida:
+41: Leave
tf
+4@LunarEclipseSP That name’s a mouthful
+4