@Stormfur I believe you should prove yourself in the subject before appointing yourself a judge of it. Your challenge seems to be about ironclad warships, yet I don't see any on your profile.
Your post has been removed as it defies the whole purpose of the point system. People are supposed to earn their points, not have them "for free". This is, in that context, worse than begging for upvotes.
@AeroplaneBuilder I'm not a developer, but I think it was simply easier to implement that feature to both public and unlisted mods. There probably isn't enough benefit of allowing unlisted mods to users without enough points for devs to bother implementing it.
Sorry for spamming your comment section @PlanesOfOld.
@rickyho188 best way to learn is by taking apart existing builds that have them and seeing how they are made. You can also join Builders chat through a link in my bio and ask people there.
Since George H. W. Bush was a prominent political figure, I can't leave this post up. It has a high potential of developing a political debate. Also, this isn't a news site or Facebook. This is not an SP related announcement and not an SP related flashback. Only fitting tag is off-topic.
You have a color menu on the right side of your screen. Using it is pretty intuitive. You can select different color templates, select a desired color, and apply it to the part.
I would have placed rudder on "roll" for use with mouse-as-joystick for more accurate control, as "roll" input is not needed for ailerons. I have done that while testing this build (changing both cosmetic rudder and the real one to roll), and the the plane was far more controllable. Other than that, nice build. I like it.
@Strikefighter04 Smooth Designer background that I have active at all times glitched. It's supposed to be around the build and be invisible to the screenshot camera, but it showed up back there. I found it amusing, so I kept it.
@Kimcotupan15 it should lag like 800 part build due to drag being disabled on many parts. If you can run 800 parts, you can run this. I'm glad you like how it looks.
It's a bit complex. If we look kill to loss ratio, F-15 is the best. However, F-15s are always up against pilots with inferior training, and often only come in after air defences were all destroyed. It is somewhat sensitive, very expensive to maintain, and it requires huge logistical network just to keep it flying. I would settle for a compromise between cutting edge technology and ruggedness, Su-27 series. It has proven its capability against F-15 in many mock dogfights with crews of equal experience, requires far less maintenance, and while being a very capable fighter, Su-27 also covers roles of attacker and bomber. And, most importantly, Su-27 is prettier :P
@CRJ900Pilot for a proper Boom25 gun, I suggest you talk to Leehopard. Or just steal the gun from my latest ship and put it in a different fuselage cover. It has 10 Boom25s with muzzle flash. Of course, credit in description is needed for such a difficult-to-make part.
@CRJ900Pilot this is a monowheel taildragger, like most gliders, except that it drags two tails. Tails need to be off the ground for the front to go up, which is also a characteristic of draggers. Tricycles rise the nose first. Another characteristic of taildraggers is that front wheels are the main gear (front wheel here), while on tricycles rear wheels bear the bulk of the load.
@Onedream I did take inspiration for letters from your destroyer. They take far fewer parts than my old ones. I think I'll be using this style from now on. I'm glad you like the boat.
@Mostly it would be a rubber-like coating to prevent slipping. I just found wood-like color to be a better contrast to the gray hull than dark bluish gray.
@F104Deathtrap leave it be. This post doesn't harm you in any way. Everyone has a right to an opinion here, and if you don't like certain opinions, look the other way. I don't like posts of this kind either, but rules are rules.
You should add a few pictures to description. Many of us are not able to enjoy this great ship in game, as it is too big, so we'd like to at least see its features on pictures.
@Stormfur I believe you should prove yourself in the subject before appointing yourself a judge of it. Your challenge seems to be about ironclad warships, yet I don't see any on your profile.
+1Could you give this post some context? It looks like pointless spam.
+1Your post has been removed as it defies the whole purpose of the point system. People are supposed to earn their points, not have them "for free". This is, in that context, worse than begging for upvotes.
+1@RamboJutter now it has a proper name.
+1@PlanesOfOld ok.
+1@AeroplaneBuilder I'm not a developer, but I think it was simply easier to implement that feature to both public and unlisted mods. There probably isn't enough benefit of allowing unlisted mods to users without enough points for devs to bother implementing it.
+1Sorry for spamming your comment section @PlanesOfOld.
@PlanesOfOld but airfoil for WW1 planes is so easy...
+1@AeroplaneBuilder points refresh every half an hour, if I remember correctly. That's why they are often a bit late.
+1Plank wings alert!!! Still, great build. I'll have to test it later.
+1@rickyho188 best way to learn is by taking apart existing builds that have them and seeing how they are made. You can also join Builders chat through a link in my bio and ask people there.
+1@Strikefighter04 you tell me... This is the fifth "RIP George Bush" post I've had to remove today.
+1Since George H. W. Bush was a prominent political figure, I can't leave this post up. It has a high potential of developing a political debate. Also, this isn't a news site or Facebook. This is not an SP related announcement and not an SP related flashback. Only fitting tag is off-topic.
+1I live in Serbia and I've never heard of it. Strange...
+1I'd make it, but it's not really my style.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
+1@Dllama4 I thought everyone forgot about thisbuild. I almost did, and I'm the guy who made it. Thanks :)
+1Upload the build as unlisted and provide a link. That way, we can check it and see what is wrong.
+1No. PC version of the game is different from Android version.
+1You have to disable all mods, log in inside the game, reenable mods, load the build again, and upload.
+1You have a color menu on the right side of your screen. Using it is pretty intuitive. You can select different color templates, select a desired color, and apply it to the part.
+1This site uses markdown. You can google it.
+1First :)
+1@NightfallFlyers I'm glad you like it buddy.
+1@KRAYTEK999 thank you for the few you gave :)
+1@Kerbango nice pics m8.
+1@Spitfirelad05 thanks :)
+1I would have placed rudder on "roll" for use with mouse-as-joystick for more accurate control, as "roll" input is not needed for ailerons. I have done that while testing this build (changing both cosmetic rudder and the real one to roll), and the the plane was far more controllable. Other than that, nice build. I like it.
+1@Strikefighter04 Smooth Designer background that I have active at all times glitched. It's supposed to be around the build and be invisible to the screenshot camera, but it showed up back there. I found it amusing, so I kept it.
+1@QingyuZhou thanks :)
+1@PlanesOfOld no problem. But you ought to start using custom airfoils. These are unsuitable for your level.
+1@CALVIN232 why don't you just block them? Also, can't you remove comments from your own posts yourself? I'm pretty sure Andrew added that option.
+1@Kimcotupan15 not as much. If you use calculateDrag = "False", drag is not calculated for that part, reducing processing power needed to run s build.
+1This is basically a ducted propfan engine with a cockpit. I like it.
+1@Kimcotupan15 it should lag like 800 part build due to drag being disabled on many parts. If you can run 800 parts, you can run this. I'm glad you like how it looks.
+1It's a bit complex. If we look kill to loss ratio, F-15 is the best. However, F-15s are always up against pilots with inferior training, and often only come in after air defences were all destroyed. It is somewhat sensitive, very expensive to maintain, and it requires huge logistical network just to keep it flying. I would settle for a compromise between cutting edge technology and ruggedness, Su-27 series. It has proven its capability against F-15 in many mock dogfights with crews of equal experience, requires far less maintenance, and while being a very capable fighter, Su-27 also covers roles of attacker and bomber. And, most importantly, Su-27 is prettier :P
+1@CRJ900Pilot for a proper Boom25 gun, I suggest you talk to Leehopard. Or just steal the gun from my latest ship and put it in a different fuselage cover. It has 10 Boom25s with muzzle flash. Of course, credit in description is needed for such a difficult-to-make part.
+1It is very cute. Build more :)
+1Meh... It was a meme because Mi-26 has the biggest cargo capacity of all helicopters ever produced. But we'll see, I guess.
+1@CRJ900Pilot this is a monowheel taildragger, like most gliders, except that it drags two tails. Tails need to be off the ground for the front to go up, which is also a characteristic of draggers. Tricycles rise the nose first. Another characteristic of taildraggers is that front wheels are the main gear (front wheel here), while on tricycles rear wheels bear the bulk of the load.
+1@Onedream I did take inspiration for letters from your destroyer. They take far fewer parts than my old ones. I think I'll be using this style from now on. I'm glad you like the boat.
+1@Dllama4 thanks mate.
+1@Mostly it would be a rubber-like coating to prevent slipping. I just found wood-like color to be a better contrast to the gray hull than dark bluish gray.
+1@F104Deathtrap leave it be. This post doesn't harm you in any way. Everyone has a right to an opinion here, and if you don't like certain opinions, look the other way. I don't like posts of this kind either, but rules are rules.
+1@Tully2001 @ChiChiWerx @Mod @Aeroman77 thanks guys.
+1@GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD builds deleted by user are completely removed from the site. There's no way to bring it back.
+1@randomusername he's blind to the wae. We've been showing it to him for a while now, but he keeps going the wrong wae.
+1Delph, are you ok? You made something not abstract :)
+1@Phantom051 you can contact developers through the contact button at the bottom of the page.
+1selfDestructTimer = "x" is what you are looking for. Just replace x with a number of seconds to self destruction.
+1You should add a few pictures to description. Many of us are not able to enjoy this great ship in game, as it is too big, so we'd like to at least see its features on pictures.
+1Nice design, good choice of armament and low part count. ood job.
+1