@BellKitsu well, there's this one :)
M.Corp is simply a convenient backstory for builds, so I don't have to worry about nations and weather they could have realistically had the thing I'm making.
@AdvisedPotato @Griffon1 use a rotator. Time it precisely to counter the retraction of the landing gear. Works for wing landing gear only, as the others retract into their own housing.
@ForwardUntoDawn well, now you know. I'm hoping to see this implemented on your future builds. If you need any tips on how to make it work, ping me on Discord.
Acceleration is a bit hard. You should have reduced drag and power. Other than that, very nice bird, especially for the part count. I enjoyed playing with it.
@Alanthelegendaryfighter if there are any, you should be able to see them on your home page, above your bio. The ones from old system, which you can't see, aren't relevant anymore.
@WiFly monkey see - monkey do. Download things, see how they are made, do the same, repeat. Also, don't be afraid to fail. Not all projects get finished, which is not a reason not to start an ambitious one.
The shape and flight model are great, but the build is unfinished and there's z fighting (colors glitching) on control surfaces. I think it can be properly finished with an hour or so of work.
@Blaize1380 not bad in terms of proportion, but you should also have the shape in mind. Most higher quality blueprints also provide cross sections. On f-109, bottom corners are mostly "smooth", and canopy has sloped sides and hard corners.
@Blaize1380 yaw is vey powerful. Maybe even too powerful. Pitch is a bit weak. But let's take it one step at the time. Your biggest issue currently is the proportion.
It's nice, though I suggest investing some effort into proportion. Wingspan is far too big. I advise trying to build a replica. Even if it fails, it'll give you experience for making more realistic planes.
@parkrangerjerry @LieutenantSOT the wing was made for the revamp of the predecessor. I might not post that one, it's just a quick revamp to test the new options.
Every game must run out of updates at some point. I can't envision any further major gamechangers like fuselage cutting. However, this community has managed to keep making great content for a year between updates. I don't think we'll get bored of it anytime soon.
Besides, this update will allow users with lower end devices to produce great builds, and will make the learning curve a lot less steap for new guys.
I agree with CoolPeach. Purpose of stock builds is to teach new builders what is possible in this game, and they should range in complexity from the ugly and boring Kicking Fish to sculpted builds like the new Mustang, and should demonstrate various building methods and options like funky trees. Besides, potatoes that can't run 300 parts are usually old phones which are getting pretty rare. Most newer low end devices can handle over 500.
@Tookan it doesn't have a name yet.
@Novaxomix don't look at the size. Number of parts is what causes lag. Especially mechanical parts, like wheels and rotators.
@Novaxomix it can be done with more recent parts and features. Back when this was made, it was impossible.
@ChrisPy thanks.
@BellKitsu nah, I don't mind. Not everyone can be creative, and plagiarism is the highest form of flattery XD
@KnightOfRen thanks.
@BellKitsu well, there's this one :)
M.Corp is simply a convenient backstory for builds, so I don't have to worry about nations and weather they could have realistically had the thing I'm making.
@CrimsonOnigiri thank you.
+1Very nice recap. Congratulations on all the achievements, and happy SP birthday.
+6Just opt out of beta. Devs have been notified of this problem, and hopefully it will be remedied in the next beta.
It's a bit rough around the edges, but fun to fly. Very nice for the part count.
@AdvisedPotato @Griffon1 use a rotator. Time it precisely to counter the retraction of the landing gear. Works for wing landing gear only, as the others retract into their own housing.
+2@GeneralOliverVonBismarck it's an obsolete project that isn't worth upgrading to 1.11. I'm keeping it around as a testbed for various things.
@ForwardUntoDawn well, now you know. I'm hoping to see this implemented on your future builds. If you need any tips on how to make it work, ping me on Discord.
+1Acceleration is a bit hard. You should have reduced drag and power. Other than that, very nice bird, especially for the part count. I enjoyed playing with it.
+2@Halphas I hope you'll find the time. Good luck with the research.
It's good to see you back. I can't wait to see what you'll do with the new fuselage slicing.
+2@MrShenanigans I'm glad you like it.
@WolfHunter9111 original Jackhammer. I've made the one that comes as stock on Jundroo request by adding a mortar turret.
+1I have had a custom made dummy to simullate human proportions for years. His name is Sammy.
+9@Sergio666 you're welcome :)
+5@Alanthelegendaryfighter if there are any, you should be able to see them on your home page, above your bio. The ones from old system, which you can't see, aren't relevant anymore.
@Kingmjm0000 thanks.
@Kingmjm0000 no worries mate. Just enjoy the build. I'm not a moderator anymore, as you can see, and I don't care if you're copying my builds :)
@Lerkov1991 that's unlikely. My builds are of the fictional M.Corp brand, not national, and never replicas.
@WiFly of course.
@WiFly literally copy each piece individually, then play with it a bit.
@WiFly downlead it, and make an exact same one next to it.
@WiFly monkey see - monkey do. Download things, see how they are made, do the same, repeat. Also, don't be afraid to fail. Not all projects get finished, which is not a reason not to start an ambitious one.
+1The shape and flight model are great, but the build is unfinished and there's z fighting (colors glitching) on control surfaces. I think it can be properly finished with an hour or so of work.
+2Congratulations.
I suggest finding me on Discord if you wanna chat. It's a lot handier.
@Blaize1380 more or less. It was a bit boring.
@Pnicks15 looks good.
@Usaf5745 I don't mind.
@Blaize1380 not bad in terms of proportion, but you should also have the shape in mind. Most higher quality blueprints also provide cross sections. On f-109, bottom corners are mostly "smooth", and canopy has sloped sides and hard corners.
@Pnicks15 that's the spirit!
+1@Blaize1380 my advice is still to try to build a replica. Download blueprints and try to follow them ingame.
@Blaize1380 yaw is vey powerful. Maybe even too powerful. Pitch is a bit weak. But let's take it one step at the time. Your biggest issue currently is the proportion.
It's nice, though I suggest investing some effort into proportion. Wingspan is far too big. I advise trying to build a replica. Even if it fails, it'll give you experience for making more realistic planes.
@Blaize1380 I don't really have one. Some people find it interesting.
@Blaize1380 I'm not leaving lol
+1@Blaize1380 nah, it's fine.
@Blaize1380 I was indeed. But not anymore :)
@LieutenantSOT I'm glad I helped :)
+1@parkrangerjerry @LieutenantSOT the wing was made for the revamp of the predecessor. I might not post that one, it's just a quick revamp to test the new options.
+1@RussianAce add "run", differentiate root and tip width, and you can have any wing shape you want.
+2You should have used flight computer instead of the cockpit block. It doesn't have a camera, and can be easily hidden.
Every game must run out of updates at some point. I can't envision any further major gamechangers like fuselage cutting. However, this community has managed to keep making great content for a year between updates. I don't think we'll get bored of it anytime soon.
+2Besides, this update will allow users with lower end devices to produce great builds, and will make the learning curve a lot less steap for new guys.
I agree with CoolPeach. Purpose of stock builds is to teach new builders what is possible in this game, and they should range in complexity from the ugly and boring Kicking Fish to sculpted builds like the new Mustang, and should demonstrate various building methods and options like funky trees. Besides, potatoes that can't run 300 parts are usually old phones which are getting pretty rare. Most newer low end devices can handle over 500.
+2