@WiFly monkey see - monkey do. Download things, see how they are made, do the same, repeat. Also, don't be afraid to fail. Not all projects get finished, which is not a reason not to start an ambitious one.
The shape and flight model are great, but the build is unfinished and there's z fighting (colors glitching) on control surfaces. I think it can be properly finished with an hour or so of work.
@Blaize1380 not bad in terms of proportion, but you should also have the shape in mind. Most higher quality blueprints also provide cross sections. On f-109, bottom corners are mostly "smooth", and canopy has sloped sides and hard corners.
@Blaize1380 yaw is vey powerful. Maybe even too powerful. Pitch is a bit weak. But let's take it one step at the time. Your biggest issue currently is the proportion.
It's nice, though I suggest investing some effort into proportion. Wingspan is far too big. I advise trying to build a replica. Even if it fails, it'll give you experience for making more realistic planes.
@parkrangerjerry @LieutenantSOT the wing was made for the revamp of the predecessor. I might not post that one, it's just a quick revamp to test the new options.
Every game must run out of updates at some point. I can't envision any further major gamechangers like fuselage cutting. However, this community has managed to keep making great content for a year between updates. I don't think we'll get bored of it anytime soon.
Besides, this update will allow users with lower end devices to produce great builds, and will make the learning curve a lot less steap for new guys.
I agree with CoolPeach. Purpose of stock builds is to teach new builders what is possible in this game, and they should range in complexity from the ugly and boring Kicking Fish to sculpted builds like the new Mustang, and should demonstrate various building methods and options like funky trees. Besides, potatoes that can't run 300 parts are usually old phones which are getting pretty rare. Most newer low end devices can handle over 500.
While the ship looks very nice, idea of having two different calibers of big guns is awful. Such system was used on large warships until HMS Dreadnought introduced uniform main battery. When you have two sets of similar guns with different ballistic properties, it creates confusion with fire control, as you're not sure which splashes are from which guns and can't appropriately adjust fire.
@jimmyje it has been said a number of times that SPVR won't support building, but only using the builds. Thus, all of the parts and features are coming to SimplePlanes as update 1.11, so that they can be used on the future builds.
What changes did you make to the original? Reposting builds without major modifications is against the rules. A moderator will probably remove this build. I encourage you to make some changes, like making a new weapon system for it or adding interior, and post again.
@DaVinci all these parts are coming for non-VR version. You can't build in VR, so all the parts need to be available in the base game Then you take a craft from the base game and play with it in VR if you have VR.
@Tookan more than before. Quit a bit of time has been freed up by not having to deal with reports, successor link requests, and other stuff. I have a few builds awaiting update parts.
@WiFly of course.
@WiFly literally copy each piece individually, then play with it a bit.
@WiFly downlead it, and make an exact same one next to it.
@WiFly monkey see - monkey do. Download things, see how they are made, do the same, repeat. Also, don't be afraid to fail. Not all projects get finished, which is not a reason not to start an ambitious one.
+1The shape and flight model are great, but the build is unfinished and there's z fighting (colors glitching) on control surfaces. I think it can be properly finished with an hour or so of work.
+2Congratulations.
I suggest finding me on Discord if you wanna chat. It's a lot handier.
@Blaize1380 more or less. It was a bit boring.
@Pnicks15 looks good.
@Usaf5745 I don't mind.
@Blaize1380 not bad in terms of proportion, but you should also have the shape in mind. Most higher quality blueprints also provide cross sections. On f-109, bottom corners are mostly "smooth", and canopy has sloped sides and hard corners.
@Pnicks15 that's the spirit!
+1@Blaize1380 my advice is still to try to build a replica. Download blueprints and try to follow them ingame.
@Blaize1380 yaw is vey powerful. Maybe even too powerful. Pitch is a bit weak. But let's take it one step at the time. Your biggest issue currently is the proportion.
It's nice, though I suggest investing some effort into proportion. Wingspan is far too big. I advise trying to build a replica. Even if it fails, it'll give you experience for making more realistic planes.
@Blaize1380 I don't really have one. Some people find it interesting.
@Blaize1380 I'm not leaving lol
+1@Blaize1380 nah, it's fine.
@Blaize1380 I was indeed. But not anymore :)
@LieutenantSOT I'm glad I helped :)
+1@parkrangerjerry @LieutenantSOT the wing was made for the revamp of the predecessor. I might not post that one, it's just a quick revamp to test the new options.
+1@RussianAce add "run", differentiate root and tip width, and you can have any wing shape you want.
+2You should have used flight computer instead of the cockpit block. It doesn't have a camera, and can be easily hidden.
Every game must run out of updates at some point. I can't envision any further major gamechangers like fuselage cutting. However, this community has managed to keep making great content for a year between updates. I don't think we'll get bored of it anytime soon.
+2Besides, this update will allow users with lower end devices to produce great builds, and will make the learning curve a lot less steap for new guys.
I agree with CoolPeach. Purpose of stock builds is to teach new builders what is possible in this game, and they should range in complexity from the ugly and boring Kicking Fish to sculpted builds like the new Mustang, and should demonstrate various building methods and options like funky trees. Besides, potatoes that can't run 300 parts are usually old phones which are getting pretty rare. Most newer low end devices can handle over 500.
+2@tsampoy I did it first but you did it better :)
+1While the ship looks very nice, idea of having two different calibers of big guns is awful. Such system was used on large warships until HMS Dreadnought introduced uniform main battery. When you have two sets of similar guns with different ballistic properties, it creates confusion with fire control, as you're not sure which splashes are from which guns and can't appropriately adjust fire.
+3Try
+1Pitch - IAS/x. Adjust "x" as needed, smaller number reduces reduction of elevator deflection less as the speed increases.@Skylerr your tag must have failed. I'm still here.
Welcome back :)
It should have been wider. 10-1 beam to length ratio looks a bit odd. Other than that, very nice boat.
+1@21212123 I have used some tricks to reduce part count.
@SimpleHelper thanks :)
@Strucker have someone else do it.
@Strucker very well. Have the server owner submit the new description via DM on Discord.
+2@jimmyje it has been said a number of times that SPVR won't support building, but only using the builds. Thus, all of the parts and features are coming to SimplePlanes as update 1.11, so that they can be used on the future builds.
+8@sharkysSPacc it wouldn't fly. Or it would require a complex input on a set of jets to artificially simulate lift.
@sharkysSPacc not having any wings seems to break the calculation, as it tries to divide with zero.
@sharkysSPacc unfortunately, since I'm no longer a moderator, I can't do that. @Vincent can, or @DeezDucks.
You guys forgot to pin this. I almost missed it.
+8@DeezDucks congratulations, and good luck.
+5@JuanNotAnAlt hi
@JuanNotAnAlt hi. How may I help you?
@Clutch nope.
Good idea. If the new parts work the way I expect them to work, it will be possible to simulate the gun perfectly,
+2That's the one that makes everyone at Dakar rally disappointed when it shows up, because it's gonna win again?
+1What changes did you make to the original? Reposting builds without major modifications is against the rules. A moderator will probably remove this build. I encourage you to make some changes, like making a new weapon system for it or adding interior, and post again.
@DaVinci all these parts are coming for non-VR version. You can't build in VR, so all the parts need to be available in the base game Then you take a craft from the base game and play with it in VR if you have VR.
+3@Chillybaconface I'm back to building stuff. My current builds all need parts that will come with the update, so I'm not posting yet.
+1@Tookan more than before. Quit a bit of time has been freed up by not having to deal with reports, successor link requests, and other stuff. I have a few builds awaiting update parts.
+1