Profile image

[WEBW] Boeing737-100 (50th)

21.9k HTPE  5.6 years ago

[Boeing737-100]

Fifty-two years after the birth of the first 737, the family continued to make Boeing the biggest maker of America's best-known airliners. Now is the time for the legendary half-century to rise again. Boeing 737-100, you should not spend your twilight years in a museum, but you should rise up and create Boeing mythology again, and use your passion to lead those who have reached an old age into the sky to experience the pleasure of flying again.

Flight photograph

Epilogue

As an established aviation company, Boeing has built many beautiful airliners--looking forward to the next hundred years of Boeing

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 3 airplane(s)
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 110.5ft (33.7m)
  • Length 100.5ft (30.6m)
  • Height 38.8ft (11.8m)
  • Empty Weight 85,791lbs (38,914kg)
  • Loaded Weight 112,693lbs (51,116kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.632
  • Wing Loading 18.4lbs/ft2 (89.7kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 6,132.0ft2 (569.7m2)
  • Drag Points 46237

Parts

  • Number of Parts 723
  • Control Surfaces 6
  • Performance Cost 3,880
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    147k Pilotmario

    @IndoMaja Of course.

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,448 IndoMaja

    @Pilotmario but still makes us avgeeks sad

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    147k Pilotmario

    @IndoMaja Yeah. As much as it pains me to say this as an aviation enthusiast, sometimes that is the best option.

    Airplanes are ultimately one of many tools we have, and once the tool is no longer of any value and cannot be practically repaired or refurbished to regain value, be it practical or sentimental, the tool should either be disposed of or recycled so its materials can be useful once more.

    Without reconstruction or some form of lifespan extension, aircraft which have exceeded their designed lifespan are worse than useless; they are death traps. A prime example is the MiG-21 in the 21st century; a good fighter in the early 60's, the MiG-21 is well past its prime and even when heavily upgraded, has a nasty habit of crashing.

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,448 IndoMaja

    @Pilotmario SCRAP!?!?!?

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    好啊

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.9k HTPE

    If you remove the outside culvert and add a fan, then this is bush Plane LOL@randomusername

    +1 5.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    724 MlgNoob

    Lol bush plane
    THIS IS AIRLINER LMAOOOOO

    5.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    哦谢谢@HTPE

    5.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.9k HTPE

    Imgbb.com@ChallengerHellcat

    5.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    你怎么加图片?用什么网站?@HTPE

    +1 5.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Cool @Abdooghanim6415

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Strikefighter04 yeah

    +1 5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Wait, are the last three pictures SimpleLandian Airlines? @HTPE

    5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Why is there a bush plane tag there?

    +2 5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Just wow it’s beautiful

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    8/8 Would do a backflip in again.

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    147k Pilotmario

    @LiamW lol

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.3k LiamW

    Tis' but a flesh wound @Pilotmario

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    147k Pilotmario

    glances at Aloha Airlines Flight 243

    I think it's best we keep them in museums when they get too old.

    Or scrap them, but that's a less honorable way to go I suppose.

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    52.5k Tang0five

    A minor point on what is a very nice build I feel. @Tessemi

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,695 Hdlcpr

    nice shape!!

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    776 Gvb2003

    Wish i could fly it im on android

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.1k destroyerP

    Jesus christ

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    125k BaconEggs

    I'm surprised no tsad users spotlighted this

    +3 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    没有驾驶舱差评

    +2 5.6 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments