There are 3 ways of doing this, from hard, to easy.
1. Let's start with the Hardest. Delete all high performance cost parts carefully. Do not delete the important ones (excluding texts). You can see how much a part costs in the aircraft info ("i" button on the designer menu).
2. This next one is medium. If you're pretty rich, this should be no problem. But I'd like to think otherwise. Get a much better device. Aircrafts will cause more lag the more parts it has due to all the calculations.
3. This is the easiest way. Tune all of your graphics down to the lowest available graphics. especially physics. Higher physics will cause more lag due to again, calculations.
If option 1 and option 3 didn't work, and you're too poor to get a new device, I suggest not flying it.
This is good, but not good enough.
In order to make an aircraft Supermaneuverable at least in SP is get an all moving elevator that can deflect to maybe 30°, and put the CoM slightly infront of the CoL. Get slow, and you should be able to do it. Although this has one problem. Stability. It's going to be super unstable, so I recommend making a simple, yet effective G-limiter. It's actually pretty simple. If you want it to have a maximum deflection angle of 30°, get 2 rotators, put the first rotator on 15°, same goes for the second, but put it on an activation group. Put them together, and boom, done.
Thrust vector has a goal of making the aircraft generally more stable and agile. Common user of the thrust vectoringtechnology is Russia with it's Su-27 successors and it's Su-57. It's also used by the F-22 Raptor and Harrier jets.
There are 3 types of thrust vectoring. VTOL, 2D, and 3D.
VTOL TVCs are Thrust Vectoring that are used by VTOL aircrafts, like the Harrier, and the F-35. This kind of thrust vectoring allows an aircraft to do what's knows as VIFF.
2D TVC are thrust vectoring that can move vertically. Usually the inputs for these thrust vectoring are Roll and Pitch. Such aircraft featuring 2D TVC is Su-37, F-15S/MTD, and the F-22 (note that the F-22 only has pitch for it's TVC input).
3D TVC is a thrust vectoring that can move both vertically and horizontally. Meaning that it can move in all directions (roll, yaw, and pitch). Such aircraft featuring 3D TVC are Su-35S, Su-57, and Su-30SM.
To learn more about TVC, click here
@deutschFELLA
for the records
this is not miku
there is a distinction between miku and fubuki, please do not group them into the same category (out of respect)
I enjoyed making em.
I would make them again just because of the fact I can make them my target practice
they're also really easy to pump out, the only problem being that it's hard to adjust the flight model with such limitation
Maybe try and make one yourself, instead of complaining.
This game isn't built around realism. Hence why the lack of realistic physics and material.
Asking and expecting people to make "realistic" creations in this game is like hiring a person who only does shit with Legos for Lockheed Martin Skunk Works. It's not impossible for said person to pull it off, but said person would really, extremely struggle to pull it off.
le fishe
god, Japanese trends can be weird sometimes lmao
I have been seeing alot of these things in my twitter feed and Idfk why it can be that popular
my theory, there's several reason's why this has a very, very slim chance of happening:
1. game ain't built around multiplayer, and cross platform multiplayer is a different kind of beast and it probably involves rewriting the code all over again
2. trying to go around this by saying that it's exclusive to pc is like saying "hey, mobile users, get out", politely
3. mods on mobile will never come back unless they decided to rewrite the code because some sort of google policy update thingy Idfk
I'm not saying it's impossible, it's very much possible but I'm just saying that it's very unlikely to happen
how to solve a problem:
step 1:
identify the problem
step 2:
study the problem
step 3:
try a method you know
step 4:
if it doesn't work, do either:
- look into people's builds and see how they do it
- ask
step 5:
profit
damn.
nice one
not to be annoying or anything, but it looks like a mash of multiple european fighters and a certain eastern fighter
and it's executed very epiquely
there's a thing called "Off Topic" tags so uh yeah
regardless, this place isn't really reddit or facebook or twitter, whatever the fuck do people use nowadays
this was originally a website for planes, for people to share their creations, ask for help, and stuff
we might not need a SimplePlanes 2, but SimplePlanes is outdated as fuck in terms of the physics engine if you've played Juno, you'll feel th major difference
if you're making a replica, I suggest using blueprints
each 2 values of fuselage block is 1m
match the length, height, and wingspan of the aircraft you want to replicate, then match the blueprint's size accordingly
for example: F-16 has a length of 15.06m, if we were to convert that to simpleplanes' length we need 3 fuselages with a length of 10 and 1 fuselage with a length of 0.12, then match the blueprint with the length, the wingspan, and the height, after which you can just follow the blueprint
maybe I should make a tutorial for this at some point
@flightdesigner
Dude.
Simply, cope.
After all, it's just internet points dude.
They have a rule, and you gotta stay with the rules. That's how challenges work, my guy.
Who cares about the prizes, all we gotta do is have fun. That's what these challenges are for. If you're always aiming for that number to go up and get you the damn medals, shame on you.
Sure, upvotes do give some satisfaction, but you can't forget that building and challenging yourself to the limit is what makes this game so addicting. So don't be childish, and start building.
There are 3 ways of doing this, from hard, to easy.
1. Let's start with the Hardest. Delete all high performance cost parts carefully. Do not delete the important ones (excluding texts). You can see how much a part costs in the aircraft info ("i" button on the designer menu).
2. This next one is medium. If you're pretty rich, this should be no problem. But I'd like to think otherwise. Get a much better device. Aircrafts will cause more lag the more parts it has due to all the calculations.
3. This is the easiest way. Tune all of your graphics down to the lowest available graphics. especially physics. Higher physics will cause more lag due to again, calculations.
If option 1 and option 3 didn't work, and you're too poor to get a new device, I suggest not flying it.
+4This is good, but not good enough.
+4In order to make an aircraft Supermaneuverable at least in SP is get an all moving elevator that can deflect to maybe 30°, and put the CoM slightly infront of the CoL. Get slow, and you should be able to do it. Although this has one problem. Stability. It's going to be super unstable, so I recommend making a simple, yet effective G-limiter. It's actually pretty simple. If you want it to have a maximum deflection angle of 30°, get 2 rotators, put the first rotator on 15°, same goes for the second, but put it on an activation group. Put them together, and boom, done.
Thrust vector has a goal of making the aircraft generally more stable and agile. Common user of the thrust vectoringtechnology is Russia with it's Su-27 successors and it's Su-57. It's also used by the F-22 Raptor and Harrier jets.
There are 3 types of thrust vectoring. VTOL, 2D, and 3D.
VTOL TVCs are Thrust Vectoring that are used by VTOL aircrafts, like the Harrier, and the F-35. This kind of thrust vectoring allows an aircraft to do what's knows as VIFF.
2D TVC are thrust vectoring that can move vertically. Usually the inputs for these thrust vectoring are Roll and Pitch. Such aircraft featuring 2D TVC is Su-37, F-15S/MTD, and the F-22 (note that the F-22 only has pitch for it's TVC input).
3D TVC is a thrust vectoring that can move both vertically and horizontally. Meaning that it can move in all directions (roll, yaw, and pitch). Such aircraft featuring 3D TVC are Su-35S, Su-57, and Su-30SM.
To learn more about TVC, click here
@deutschFELLA
+3for the records
this is not miku
there is a distinction between miku and fubuki, please do not group them into the same category (out of respect)
mostly jpop and a rather obscure Indonesian artist
+3honestly,
+3unno.
I enjoyed making em.
+3I would make them again just because of the fact I can make them my target practice
they're also really easy to pump out, the only problem being that it's hard to adjust the flight model with such limitation
@Aghsan22
very funny
no.
+3@Rjenteissussy
+3@Zhixunlin23
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@DatFiat126Fan19
+3@SuperSuperTheSylph
@Lem113
abso fucking lutely
+33 words
+3do it yourself
blud
+3Sometimes you gotta wonder why these changes are a thing
oo
+3not many people make the super sabre
updoot
@MrCOPTY
+3skill issue
fa-
+3my lawyers advised me to not finish this comment
k
+3will never happen to me cause
Idfk
Maybe try and make one yourself, instead of complaining.
+3This game isn't built around realism. Hence why the lack of realistic physics and material.
Asking and expecting people to make "realistic" creations in this game is like hiring a person who only does shit with Legos for Lockheed Martin Skunk Works. It's not impossible for said person to pull it off, but said person would really, extremely struggle to pull it off.
check the rules mydude
+3all I can say is
+3o7
good luck.
despite what it is Random is actually a unique nickname lol
+3le fishe
+3god, Japanese trends can be weird sometimes lmao
I have been seeing alot of these things in my twitter feed and Idfk why it can be that popular
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
+3understandable have a great day
@TheTomatoLover
I will kill you. This is a (satirical) threat.
+3hi yes hello welcome unknown person
+3I mean what's different from just building
+3can this be called a challenge anymore?
my theory, there's several reason's why this has a very, very slim chance of happening:
+31. game ain't built around multiplayer, and cross platform multiplayer is a different kind of beast and it probably involves rewriting the code all over again
2. trying to go around this by saying that it's exclusive to pc is like saying "hey, mobile users, get out", politely
3. mods on mobile will never come back unless they decided to rewrite the code because some sort of google policy update thingy Idfk
I'm not saying it's impossible, it's very much possible but I'm just saying that it's very unlikely to happen
how to solve a problem:
+3step 1:
identify the problem
step 2:
study the problem
step 3:
try a method you know
step 4:
if it doesn't work, do either:
- look into people's builds and see how they do it
- ask
step 5:
profit
yes, finally a good opponent to go against the vipor
+3A-10 bias.
+3you see em here and there among aviation fans. Because the moment they see an A-10, they think of the powerful guns,
which is not powerful.
so basically a way more complicated and inconvenient way of an auto aim.
+3that's stupid.
@sus232
+3yes.
liberation of gracemeria plays.
damn.
+3nice one
not to be annoying or anything, but it looks like a mash of multiple european fighters and a certain eastern fighter
and it's executed very epiquely
what in the belkan manufacturing is THAT
+3that does not look like an NEU fighter lmfao
there's many things, tbh
+3but the comment below explains it pretty well
@LinusTouchTips
+3most of the time you just point out the tiny little details that are missing or either don't make you comfortable looking at so
flying woman of death.
+3(she stings)
stop ffs
+3this is a site for planes
not for hates
there's a thing called "Off Topic" tags so uh yeah
+3regardless, this place isn't really reddit or facebook or twitter, whatever the fuck do people use nowadays
this was originally a website for planes, for people to share their creations, ask for help, and stuff
we might not need a SimplePlanes 2, but SimplePlanes is outdated as fuck in terms of the physics engine if you've played Juno, you'll feel th major difference
+3choodo ii. I have an attack helicopter ready.
+3if you're making a replica, I suggest using blueprints
+3each 2 values of fuselage block is 1m
match the length, height, and wingspan of the aircraft you want to replicate, then match the blueprint's size accordingly
for example: F-16 has a length of 15.06m, if we were to convert that to simpleplanes' length we need 3 fuselages with a length of 10 and 1 fuselage with a length of 0.12, then match the blueprint with the length, the wingspan, and the height, after which you can just follow the blueprint
maybe I should make a tutorial for this at some point
I'm mad that this thing is a tier II plane
+3it's at least a tier III plane tbh
but eh, whatever
updoot.
mod?
+3if not, devs please add this in the game it looks so cool
@OUGHTO
+3very funni original joke haha
I'm laughing so hard
el em a o I am laughing so hard
hahahahaha
tf am I doing
hm.
+3would be cool tbh
hm what if
+3smokeTrailOpacitywould be cool for something like a realistic rocket smoke on an AIM-120C/D or an AIM-9X
like, Idk, 80 nmi?
+3top view is good
+3side view however makes me aeugh
although I would give him (Griseo, not you) props for making that goddamn camo
Honestly, I wish.
+3@flightdesigner
+3Dude.
Simply, cope.
After all, it's just internet points dude.
They have a rule, and you gotta stay with the rules. That's how challenges work, my guy.
Who cares about the prizes, all we gotta do is have fun. That's what these challenges are for. If you're always aiming for that number to go up and get you the damn medals, shame on you.
Sure, upvotes do give some satisfaction, but you can't forget that building and challenging yourself to the limit is what makes this game so addicting. So don't be childish, and start building.