@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII
Look up "Standard Aircraft Characteristics". It can give you more specific performances of the aircraft.
If you want to make a very accurate replica however, look up NAVAIR manuals.
Also, if you have a drawing app with rulers, use the rulers, angle them at 90/0° and see if it's straight center right from the nose to tail.
Well, I used the one Blueprint that existed on the Wikipedia, and I had no problem. Also, for the size, if you're unsure, you can always ask somebody to measure it for you, or you can measure it yourself. Go to a museum, and ask whoever has power to measure the size of the F-16. It's a hard task, I would imagine so.
Also, for blueprints, check out the-blueprints.com. It's where I get my blueprints. I would warn you though, most blueprints are angled by like... 0.6° or somthin. It's really annoying.
Edit:
According to the unclassified document of "Characteristics Summary of the F-16C Block 32", the F-16C Blk 32 has a length of 49.3ft, height of 16.6ft, and a wingspan of 32.8ft. Compare it to the Wikipedia's (F-16C Blk 52) size data, the dimensions are equal if not very close to that of the declassified document. Length of 49.5ft, height of 16ft, and wingspan of 32.8ft. So rest assured, it is accurate. While not 100%, it's still accurate.
holup
you said your camera focus is at the right shoulder?
if yes, you gotta add more weight to the left shoulder until the camera is at the center
this is what caused the spin: assymetrical weight
it's basically where one part has more weight than the opposite part
orbit, chase, and fly by cameras are focused to the center of mass, and since your camera focus is to the right, the center of mass of your craft is on the right side
Can I use the aircrafts that is a real world aircraft but hasn't been entered to the challenge?
Because if so...
Operation "Sky Eye".
Aircraft in Operation: U-2D.
Objective: Spy the Enemy airbase for an upcoming attack. Fly at a level of 30,000 ft, turn back once you sense danger.
I'm gonna have to ask you to lower the thrust to weight ratio, or there'll be quite the decrease in points later.
If you want to make your aircraft faster without exceeding the max T/W Ratio, tune down the drags on the fuselage parts. The wings on the other hand, is already dragless.
@Igorsilvag
+1I'm making a cheap long endurance dron
hopefully that's going to solve some problems
@Dragoranos
+1eh better be safe than sorry
prepare the Tankgewehr
@Dragoranos
+1probably a neighbor malding over how good you are at getting informations
yes.
+1@SCPCalebkid
+1@Questionmark
@FalcoOne
+1@X99STRIKER
@MrOofington
@ZeroHours
+1what's wrong, original one?
I am a nerd
and I don't have a problem
what
+1is
going
on
why are you mixing 1990s technology with 2030s technology lmfao
also wb :D
@weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+1@shiwoshiwo2
@Bryan5
+1@JustWingIt
@Nerfaddict
God fucking damn that is good
+1also
+1mine's probably not gonna win but hey
more love for the tornadoh :)
@HuskyDynamics01
+1so by this rule an F/A-18 is allowed?
because yknow
it moves
goddamn
+1that's really good
my man the sea conqueror :D
+1No, that's just SP wheel physics.
+1They just barely have any grip whatsoever.
@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII
+1Look up "Standard Aircraft Characteristics". It can give you more specific performances of the aircraft.
If you want to make a very accurate replica however, look up NAVAIR manuals.
Also, if you have a drawing app with rulers, use the rulers, angle them at 90/0° and see if it's straight center right from the nose to tail.
Well, I used the one Blueprint that existed on the Wikipedia, and I had no problem. Also, for the size, if you're unsure, you can always ask somebody to measure it for you, or you can measure it yourself. Go to a museum, and ask whoever has power to measure the size of the F-16. It's a hard task, I would imagine so.
+1Also, for blueprints, check out the-blueprints.com. It's where I get my blueprints. I would warn you though, most blueprints are angled by like... 0.6° or somthin. It's really annoying.
Edit:
According to the unclassified document of "Characteristics Summary of the F-16C Block 32", the F-16C Blk 32 has a length of 49.3ft, height of 16.6ft, and a wingspan of 32.8ft. Compare it to the Wikipedia's (F-16C Blk 52) size data, the dimensions are equal if not very close to that of the declassified document. Length of 49.5ft, height of 16ft, and wingspan of 32.8ft. So rest assured, it is accurate. While not 100%, it's still accurate.
dam that's nice
+1holup
+1you said your camera focus is at the right shoulder?
if yes, you gotta add more weight to the left shoulder until the camera is at the center
this is what caused the spin: assymetrical weight
it's basically where one part has more weight than the opposite part
orbit, chase, and fly by cameras are focused to the center of mass, and since your camera focus is to the right, the center of mass of your craft is on the right side
What's up with people adding TVC to Morgans? It's already unstable enough, don't add more instability there.
+1@Panzerwaifu69
+1no no
it's fine :)
I would love to participate with my own concept, but I wouldn't have time Imma be honest
+1would require massive amounts of ft and auto aim systems, and also rotating cockpits
+1nice
+1we doin a hornet fight now, eh?
siuuuuuu
+1bagus juga bjir
@TRD
+1probably will be making a new one since my style has changed too much
wait I only got 11 days left
+1shit
@Rakoval500k
+1Correct me if I'm wrong, but it is a prototype, yes?
holy hell I didn't know the livery was that
+1god berkuts with blue burners and tvcs looks kinda good and kinda cursed at the same time
+1@ReinMcDeer
+1smoother tho
@DeveloperKorzalerke
+11. I mean I barely used the undo button so uh, yeagh.
2. Huh. That somehow never happened to me. Lucky.
man, wish I have the money for sr2
+1I don't wanna pirate sr2 the same way I pirated sp because dude, it's just not it
also sr2 bussin
cope
+1you suck
l + ratio
:troll:
not bad
+1might inspire me to make more gen 5s
keep the amazing work my dude
@ReinMcDeer
+1I think it should.
No. You can't do this to me. No, no!
+1Ohhhhh god noooo
the urge to enter like every challenge is very hard to be overcame
@SemiCollin
+1No. That's not what you call a Roll TVC.
Mountainous region that's actually... Plausible.
+1Some trees on it would be nice.
Not that I would be able to access it soon...
@Panzerwaifu69
+1I'm making my own :)
@Reworkable
+1Yay! Thank you so much!
I will proceed to participate because this sounds fun.
@Reworkable
+1:O
Really?
Wait.
+1August 1st?
Oh no.
@Itirv123
+1As long as you credit me, I don't mind.
jir nama kok sendal emak
+1ahem
+1the & symbol is looking at your eyes m8
@xNotDumb
+11. I'm lazy
2. Snowstone's battlefield
Can I use the aircrafts that is a real world aircraft but hasn't been entered to the challenge?
Because if so...
Operation "Sky Eye".
+1Aircraft in Operation: U-2D.
Objective: Spy the Enemy airbase for an upcoming attack. Fly at a level of 30,000 ft, turn back once you sense danger.
I'm gonna have to ask you to lower the thrust to weight ratio, or there'll be quite the decrease in points later.
+1If you want to make your aircraft faster without exceeding the max T/W Ratio, tune down the drags on the fuselage parts. The wings on the other hand, is already dragless.