CM SupremeDorian Comments

  • Introducing AutoModerator 2 months ago

    @GabrielFangster70 the automod cannot ban people or delete posts, it only reports things to the moderators

    +8
  • Why is this removed? Mods pls explain (part 2) 3.5 years ago

    I wasn't the person who removed it, however:


    1. It is a bit too far off-topic

    2. Yes, that is not specifically the swastika used by the Third Reich; however the description of the craft indicates it was used in a way that contradicts that. Here's the relevant quote from the description:

      Swastika: Represents loyalty to the Supreme Democracy Party (the longest ruling political party), Supreme Minister and Leftist Nazism (yeah I call it low key Nazism or Nazism with Krakabloan characteristics)


    +8
  • I Am No Longer A Moderator 3.7 years ago

    @Kangy You can (probably) expect to see more of me with Eternal gone. That said, most of the stuff I do has always been stuff you can't see, so it will always appear that I'm not around much.

    +8
  • BIsexual BI plane 4.0 years ago

    good to see this community still has a sense of humour. nice job

    +8
  • Why is there a VERY popular SP creator using obvious neo-Nazi symbols? 3.3 years ago

    @geek1love Through research, discussions amongst ourselves, and speaking with the involved party, we have determined that, while not unfounded, your assessment about this user's profile picture is incorrect. The user in question is from Russia, and the stuff in their profile picture is all Slavic symbology. We spoke to the user and they confirmed this, as well as the fact the text in the profile picture is also Slavic symbolism. A trusted Russian user we talked to gave us confirmation regarding that as well.
    The outline of a man, with a look resembling a "skinhead" with a knife, is based on a photo of them and has nothing to do with neo-nazism, as far as we can tell.


    In the future, if you have such concerns, please take them to a moderator in private, either by tagging one of us on an unlisted post, or, preferably, sending a direct message on Discord (you can find mine in my bio) instead of making a public forum post about it. As for the rest of the commenters here, I expect you all to conduct yourselves respectfully from here on out, as you have failed to do thus far.

    +7
  • New Moderator 3.7 years ago

    @pedro16797 there's something I want to say in response to that comment but site rules probably prevent me from saying it so to the mod server I go

    +7
  • . 4.6 years ago

    @RamboJutter @Strikefighter04 You raise a good point, so let me clarify: The rule specifically mentions that you can't have misleading thumbnails. An image of an anime girl can, for all intents and purposes, be considered the same as something like text. It should be pretty clear that said text/anime anime girl is not part of the build. Now, if they were trying to claim that the image of the anime girl is somehow in the build when it isn't, then it would be grounds for removal.

    +7
  • I'm 5 4.6 years ago

    @Wallaby @BuiltBionixInd10 I'm aware of the actual intent of this post, but the "I'm a toddler" part could easily go poorly for you in some other places. @Numbers I know about that, yes. There are some actual instances of that happening but I struggle to think of names off the top of my head.

    +7
  • MIND. BLOWN. 4.7 years ago

    you didn't know this?

    also bonus fact: it's called Jundroo because that's a nickname people used to call Andrew

    +7
  • We need to kick the new moderators 5.1 years ago

    None shall disrespect the almighty auto-mod

    +7
  • Introducing AutoModerator 2 months ago

    @GhostMach i am a former moderator for this website and a current moderator on its sister site, simplerockets.com. i have had a few months of experience with the automod at this point, so you can trust what i have to say. as stated, you don't have to be concerned about false bans as the automod does not perform moderation actions on its own, it only submits potentially problematic posts for manual review

    +6
  • Introducing AutoModerator 2 months ago

    @Rb2h not really. the automod doesn't remove content on its own, it requires manual action to be taken on the things it reports

    +6
  • New Moderators 2.8 years ago

    welcome to the cult

    +6
  • Im sneaky 3.7 years ago

    go to bed

    +6
  • The rules actually contradict themselves 4.6 years ago

    @NexusGaming Next time, don't look at Urban Dictionary for definitions. It is a place of satire.

    +6
  • . 4.6 years ago

    @RamboJutter

    where do we draw the line though

    I'm honestly not sure. Anything NSFW/suggestive or otherwise violates the rules is definitely a no-no, though. We'll just have to see how things go.

    +6
  • about BogdanX 4.7 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 For the record, I'd like to say that @Clory is correct, and he would know that because he's a moderator on the SR2 site, which has the exact same moderation tools. We cannot restore a deleted user's account; only Andrew can. We also cannot see an account's private information beyond basic IP-sharing logs. Please do not spread misinformation.

    +6
  • LSS-5 USS Freedom Destroyer 5.0 years ago

    Please update your description to include a list of changes made over the original post, as per this post.

    +6
  • New Rules & Update to Points System 5.0 years ago

    @LastManStanding I don't see how a moderator removing a post like we've always done means you don't have freedom

    +6
  • X-Wing 5.1 years ago

    @SledDriver Misinterpretation or not, there are still other occasions where you've been, let's just say, a bit less nice than the rules generally allow. While yes I may have misinterpreted what you said, no one else seems to agree that what you said was particularly "nice" so regardless I had to tell you off.

    +6
  • Omg it's cancerous what have I done... 5.1 years ago

    Looking a bit pale in the eye area there, @AndrewGarrison

    +6
  • I Graduated 5.1 years ago

    Congra-- wait, isn't middle school 11-13? In that case you were under 13 when you made your account, which would violate the terms of service, and some other stuff I'm too lazy to get into right now.

    +6
  • Credit Where Credit is Due 6.4 years ago

    I thought facebook was a bad joke?

    +6
  • Is this thing on...? 3 days ago

    @LunarEclipseSP oh my god I did not know about this and you've made my entire day. did you draw that badge yourself?

    +5
  • What happened to Default4? 3.0 years ago

    Temporarily banned. He'll be back in a couple of weeks.

    +5
  • bjac.co Lioness Mk.II ATV 3.5 years ago

    @X4JB Then you should re-read our rules, specifically the section about politics and religion. This applies to everyone. Fact or not, it was a very politically charged statement that served no purpose other than to provoke people that disagree with it.

    +5
  • Need a mod to fix this 3.5 years ago

    Automod removed it. Sorry about that, it doesn't violate any rules, but people spam reported it because of a certain flag being present.

    +5
  • I am planning to make comeback 3.5 years ago

    @CC1010 @Sparky6004 Pirating the game is not cause for a ban, or even a strike. When you pirate a game, however, you are putting yourself at some level of risk as the safety of illegal downloads is often far from guaranteed. What will result in action being taken against your account is promoting the use of pirated content or sending links to pirated content, which is against our Terms of Use.


    @Kakhikotchauri1 I recommend buying the game when you can, not only because of the above but also because just because you own the game on Google Play doesn't mean you legally own it on Steam. They are two different storefronts, on two different platforms, therefor you need to purchase both.

    +5
  • VRuilding Challenges 3.6 years ago

    this @pedro16797 person seems cool, though I don't think I've heard of him before

    +5
  • Why has Jundroo been hesitant? 4.1 years ago

    @ThatKindaWeeb It's not necessarily that they don't care about the game anymore, it's just that it would take away too much time and resources to update when they have other, higher priority things going on.

    +5
  • Small Site Update 4.5 years ago

    @rexrexThezion @Strucker I didn't think it would be necessary to make a post about it. I figured people would be able to see the new dropdown menu before making a forum post about their unlisted posts being "gone".

    +5
  • (Simpleplanes fastest walker) Charles the speedmachine v12.2 4.6 years ago

    I've probably seen those legs in my nightmares somewhere

    +5
  • SERIOUS IRL ISSUE WITH PICKLEHAUBE 5.1 years ago

    He has been IP banned.

    +5
  • Some thoughts. 5.1 years ago

    I want a pet octopus now

    +5
  • SimplePlanes - Subscriptions 5.1 years ago

    @JediWolf It's not a joke. A vote was held with the devs and moderators and everyone unanimously agreed that this was the proper way forward. Us moderators even get the Ultra subscription for free!

    +5
  • WORKING! Nuclear Bomb!!!! 5.1 years ago

    6/10 not enough radioactive fallout

    +5
  • Hello 5.1 years ago

    @Chancey21 @DuckMint Thanks for the advice. Those were all things I was planning on doing (though don't expect any decent builds from me anytime soon haha) but I do intend to be more active here than I was before now. :)

    +5
  • Hurricane Dorian 5.7 years ago

    I knew I shouldn't have dumped all that wind into the ocean.

    +5
  • is it illegal? 5.8 years ago

    If you see "free downloads" for any Jundroo games, report them to the developers.

    +5
  • SimplePlanes in the Future! 5.9 years ago

    '1000k' Everyone welcome @belugasub, inventer of new numbers! :p

    +5
  • Now I understand why nobody plays multiplayer (mini-rant) 6.0 years ago

    It's amazing but ruined by bad people

    This unfortunately describes most multiplayer games.

    +5
  • the problem of recognition of the effort of making the plane...... 3 days ago

    I understand the frustration, but please don't make posts ranting about this, especially not while calling out specific people.

    +4
  • Rules Clarification 28 days ago

    at the end of the day it's at the moderator's discretion, but typically it applies to low effort stuff that's not related to simpleplanes or aviation, and/or excessively inflammatory posts that are off topic and usually also low effort

    +4
  • Strike Record Page 2.8 years ago

    @JustLookingForFriends That shouldn't be happening! I don't think it's anything I can fix myself, so could you please send Jundroo an email? They should be able to help you. Sorry about that.

    +4
  • MAZ537 3.0 years ago

    @Bummer Of course, but a new user showing up with something like this deserves some attention. It is, after all, what the feature system is meant for.

    +4
  • MAZ537 3.0 years ago

    I believe this warrants being featured due to being such a high quality build for someone so new to the site. Nice work, keep it up.

    +4
  • Why are the SP Discord servers (and its users, incl mods) so crap ??? 3.0 years ago

    We are aware of some of the behaviour present in multiple unofficial community outlets, including SPBC, and it is something I personally would like to deal with in some way in the future; however it is beyond our direct jurisdiction as website moderators. I see a decent amount of distasteful or downright hateful things being said about certain groups of people, mainly transgender people and furries, and it makes me sad to see that a lot of this is just allowed to slip by. This is a game about building vehicles, people shouldn't ruin it for others just because they're being themselves.

    +4
  • Are politics allowed on the User's profile? 3.0 years ago

    It applies site-wide. Contrary to what's being said by @IceCraftGaming and @7, the current events in Ukraine are not an exception to this. We want this to be a place where most people can discuss aviation.

    +4
  • Egga chad 3.0 years ago

    Done

    +4
  • Dassault Mirage III C 3.3 years ago

    Featured because of WarHawk's challenge

    +4