30.5k SnoWFLakE0s Comments

  • Forum posted way too soon 3 months ago

    Hey, not to be condescending, but:

    Prevent getting so much attention
    Make more forum posts

    That doesn't really line up, does it...

    +24
  • B-17 Flying Fortress 2 months ago

    This is amazing. An stunning improvement over the original. Great successor!

    +11
  • About The Posts 5 months ago

    1. Your "fire truck" is okay, but has a couple details that are subpar in quality.
    2. Top builders often tag other users.
    3. Top builders have followers.
    4. "Every thing is working well" is not enough. Want upvotes? Go over the top.
    5. There's plenty of examples of random bronze users who hit it big on their first build. There just exist many counterexamples for your contention.
    6. Build better, not complain.
    7. Develop a building niche. Most top builders have some sort of niche they specialize in.

    +11
  • JUSTICE FOR MOBILE USERS 8 days ago

    Imagine paying less and wanting equal treatment

    +9
  • Welcome back randomusername 4 months ago

    what the rules are on this website

    Nobody broke rules, lol. It's just people being sentimental.

    +8
  • Reporting politics 5 months ago

    Please make a readable post
    ahhhh

    +7
  • Can you TeAcH me Funky Trees? 21 days ago

    @brians1209
    .
    Yeah, I'm in my senior year and I have to start getting ready for college applications- just a tad bit busy.

    +6
  • Please look into the crusader s comments 3 months ago

    Report if you have been harassed, not complain on the forums.

    +6
  • New SP Beta with bug fix for Chromebook players 5 months ago

    @Rickyjasper2
    .
    That's not Jundroo's problem, that's Google's. Please stop.

    +6
  • Wost bug ever 5 months ago

    It's not a bug. It's your design.

    +6
  • what happened To SpiritusRaptors account!? 12 days ago

    @Brields95
    .
    I'm not one to take sides, but I do dislike claims made without adequate evidence. Can you provide explicit evidence that fortifies your assertion?
    .
    Additionally, @AircraftoftheRedStar , I don't see how that particular fable is applicable here. The essence of that story is the idea of constant, diligent work; it does not correspond with the current situation in which a long break was taken for real-life obligations.
    .
    Of course, his recent actions were nowhere near optimal, but it deviates from the argument at hand.
    .
    Both of you are clearly jumping the gun, evidently instigated by other individuals who also are making logical leaps.

    +5
  • Transition of SP humanoid frame one month ago

    @MemeLord21 @Bman01 @Ultra0
    .
    Reason he's making this is to let others build upon the frame as they see fit, clearly he builds what he wants to and is leaving the base frame for open source.

    +5
  • Best Video-Editing Software? 2 months ago

    lag free
    Chromebook

    No.

    +5
  • Welcome back randomusername 4 months ago

    @randomusername
    .
    Eh, I'm not wrong in the fact that people were being sentimental. I don't care about who people are, I couldn't care less about someone's reputation. I simply have no obligation to deeply investigate the emotions and sentiment of people beyond what's given to me. So yes, I will only look at the tip of the iceberg, if that's what's presented and matters to most else.
    .
    The only reason a reply was given is because a select group of individuals seem to want to drag this issue on for a bloody month. None else. I have nothing against all involved, only the fact that it generates needless traffic in my feed bothers me.
    .
    Anyhow, welcome back. Hopefully, you've also gained at least something out of this, be it for the better or worse. I'll take my leave here.

    +5
  • How to make a perfect build ? 4 months ago

    There is no perfect build.

    +5
  • Guided Missile 5 months ago

    I can't believe you actually figured it out. Rocket-based systems ATGMs in SP have suffered from insane accelerations and speeds that destroy maneuverability, I didn't know it was this elegant of a solution.

    +5
  • Ideas for next update (2.0 or 1.10) 6 months ago

    Not sure if I'm not catching something, but:

    Cables and Pulleys

    Already in the game? The winch part? This was in from 1.8...

    In Game Multi-Select
    In Game Blueprint Creations

    Also added in this update, 1.9? Am I the odd one out? This is under the view options button.

    Height Variable (Hf or Hm (metric and US))

    I'm not sure what you mean by height, but if it's altitude, it's already a Flight Data input added with 1.9...

    Maybe you're a bit out of the loop.

    +5
  • New Beta - Version 1.9.100 (Steam today - Mobile soon) 6 months ago

    Switched Cannon projectile velocity to m/s. Also displays ft/s.

    Holy moly, thanks Andrew.

    +5
  • Glider - fly by cable (winch) 1.1 years ago

    @SpiritusRaptor Always exploring the limits of game mechanics, I see. Although, this seems pretty darn cool to work with.

    +5
  • Getting Multiplayer as an update one month ago

    Hey! As someone who's in fairly regular contact with the devs, I'm here to give you some reasons as to why this is not happening (at least in the forseeable future).

    First and foremost, the MP mod as of its current state is extremely bugged and is at a barebones functionality level. As it stands, it's as good as just watching others exist in the same map. Devs will not integrate a half-baked mod into the game.

    Two, development is very difficult. Jundroo is a pretty small team and there simply isn't enough manpower to continue working on all their active games at the same time. For now, their prime developmental focus is SR2, which means extremely groundbreaking functionality for SP is unlikely.

    Third, SP is very old at this point. We've moved along very far, but for SP was not built with multiplayer support in mind. This means the codebase for SP is just simply more difficult to work with- if anything, if SP2 is a thing, MP might come with it.

    Fourth. Honestly, mobile users don't get to complain about mods- the SP app is straight up cheaper. If you want the heightened functionality, buy the PC version.

    Thanks.

    +4
  • Isn’t it sad when your most amount of planes per day is reached? 2 months ago

    If you're making 5 a day they can't be of good quality.

    +4
  • Realistic Case Ejection for Cannons 3 months ago

    @rainskaos
    .
    Use the script I provided in the comment below.

    +4
  • Funky Trees Challenge 3 months ago

    @Tang0five
    .
    Oh heck yes! It's as simple as using Overload and writing something in there- every platform has Overload. (A bit more than that, but oh well) If you're not well oriented with the system, I suggest you check out my online guide.

    +4
  • Please change the name of this game... 3 months ago

    Well, ComplicatedPlanes has been a thing since forever.

    +4
  • linu - ver - 1.1 3 months ago

    I just can't. This is the best humanoid walker I've ever seen in my time here on SP. It has so much preprogrammed functions, it's just... Wow. All the kudos for the effort.

    +4
  • New forum tag: Funky Trees 4 months ago

    @Numbers
    .
    More XML modding = more ways to make the game better

    +4
  • IAS indicator in funky trees 5 months ago

    @Random40
    .
    Set input = clamp01(ceil(V - IAS))

    Set V to any speed limit you want in meters per second.

    +4
  • Ok, this needs to be made because it Is NOT fair for us mobile users. 5 months ago

    a mod that CarnationRed made a while ago

    No, it's done using DesignerSuite.

    Also, have you truly looked for every option in order to achieve said action? One thing I detest is uninformed people who simply complain whilst not trying hard enough to resolve their issues. I'm fairly certain it's still possible- I've seen a mobile build with custom thumbs recently.
    .
    Also, submit a uservoice or something, not complain on the forums. This isn't the place to do that. Get directly to the devs, not the community. Please do consider that devs have been working hard to push out this recent update.

    +4
  • Advanced Destroyer-Whisper 11 months ago

    @Linethesmarty A 2013 Macbook can run it fine. Maybe you're not considering the fact that SP builds can get extremely detailed. Remove the "extra blocks"? Funny of you to say something like that when it's clear you don't recognize craftsmanship. When builders reach a certain point there isn't anything called unecessary parts. Everything is purposeful and there for a reason.

    +4
  • what happened To SpiritusRaptors account!? 11 days ago

    @Brields95
    .
    Hey, what's with the open indication of hostility facilitated by the use of all caps? That aside, no, just that I dislike baseless slander, which is being done here with your previous comment. I never specified that I am entitled to an explanation.
    However, as this is a public forum, you are held responsible for your actions and claims- and thus should be aware that personal opinions, when vocalized, become a means of affecting the general population. It is very much undesireable for public opinion to be swayed by baseless claims, which is why I am requesting supporting data on your end. You see, I like to form my opinions as objectively as possible, even if that means changing my original perception of things. That is, I want to see your side of the story.
    Otherwise, I see no value in the aforementioned comment for the sake of discussion, to which you should take action to indicate it as so.

    +3
  • Change the points system one month ago

    @Bob9998
    .
    Weird. My first "serious" build- one I built when I was not very well known, at bronze, was awarded with 50+ upvotes. Bronze users- more accurately, newer users- tend to lack apt building technique, which prevents them from making the quality builds that most (but not all) platinum builders do.

    +3
  • my complaint 2 months ago

    You can't just expect people to be online.

    +3
  • Please look into the crusader s comments 3 months ago

    @Rickyjasper2
    .
    You're wrong. Reports all read. You're wrong if you think plats are immune from bans b/c they did dumb things, you haven't been around here enough to see one that stupid. I don't think silver is much of an "larger" user either, so that's that.

    +3
  • Realistic Case Ejection for Cannons 3 months ago

    @PositivePlanes
    .

    1. That makes it look hideous
    2. That inflates your ammo count for no good reason
    3. They don't act like actual shell casings (look at how these tumble in the air)

    +3
  • Realistic Case Ejection for Cannons 3 months ago

    @GeneralPatrick2
    .
    Keep in mind that each casing system will create an additional 2 parts for every shot of cannon ammo. That can stack quick.

    +3
  • Beta 1.9.202 4 months ago

    @Stormfur
    .
    They've told us how you use them... Pretty darn well actually. I'll make a simplified guide though for those who aren't so sure, though.

    +3
  • Some random pics from ancient simpleplanes 4 months ago

    the pfp did not change for some reason

    It's from Gravatar, not SP servers.

    +3
  • Funky Trees! 5 months ago

    @WNP78
    .
    Will we potentially get variable assignment features? Also- is there a limit to the number of functions the system can process? This statement isn't evaluating properly, even when I manipulate the included inputs:
    ((((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)) - sqrt(pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 2) - ((96.177249*pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 4)+19614000* (Trim*10000*sin(Pitch*90))*pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 2))/1000000000000)))*1000000)/(9.807*pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 2)))

    +3
  • CH KM Caspian Sea Monster 5 months ago

    @Gusti1301
    .
    It's not meant to fly high. I don't think you understand what this is.

    +3
  • Hydraulic Cranes: Procedural Input Demonstration 5 months ago

    @jamesPLANESii
    .
    Nah, I never learnt programming. Funky trees is my first exposure to it, really.

    +3
  • Screamthrower 5 months ago

    electromagnetic sound waves

    Hmmm.

    +3
  • Is tank always underrated in simpleplane? 11 months ago

    First of all, tank aren't underrated. They receive substantial amounts of upvotes. It's just that Bronze or Silver users are bronze and silver for a reason- their quality isn't high enough.
    Most tanks are also replicas. If you aren't faithful enough to the real thing, you likely won't receive good feedback.

    +3
  • Functional 70mm Smoke Launcher (No Mods) 11 months ago

    @EternalDarkness Cool, that's awesome. I was originally considering that option too, although I intentionally used detachers for the purpose of eliminating the process of having to go into ordnance tab and selecting the rockets. As I stated here:

    The launcher uses ingame rockets, but they will not show up as usable for offensive capability (and therefore does not interfere with preexisting builds that use rockets as tank rounds).

    Although, if it's something like an IFV I'd assume you don't use rockets on other areas of the vehicle... Just a little more for advocating the use of detachers: as an added plus, using detachers let you give a more "projectile-parabola" trajectory to the travel of the smoke grenades, giving them a slightly more authentic feel (which isn't possible to my knowledge without detachers.)
    .
    On a final note: thank you for being a nice member of the community and giving credit for what's just the concept. That made my day.

    +3
  • Area 51 Challenge [Closed] 11 months ago

    (xml modding is allowed off course)

    xml modding is allowed of course
    .
    Sorry.

    +3
  • Functional 70mm Smoke Launcher (No Mods) one year ago

    @ThomasRoderick It's not like I didn't know about that. Chaffs and flares don't create a large or somewhat lasting effect that visually masks a vehicle; they do work as a IR countermeasure, as certain types of irl smoke grenades do, but fail to give the visual effect most people want.

    Yes, I know how ATGMs work, and most gun launched ATGM types (usually SACLOS) are operator guided, which make a visual masking effective, but with IR detection devices this protection is rendered useless as well. The only effective smoke grenades still in modern use are those that mask the vehicle visually, thermally, and disrupt its silhouette effectively.

    +3
  • Fiverr one year ago

    An absolute mad lad

    +3
  • XMH-10 Multipurpose Hull 1.1 years ago

    Haha. Desc in 30 minutes. Why not pre-write and copypaste?

    +3
  • Predictions about next update 16 days ago

    1. You're not helping
    2. If you so dislike how they listen to suggestions all the time, go start modding and become prominent enough to become a dev yourself and also snatch a job along the way. 2 devs out of the small team we have at Jundroo are community member-turned-devs.

    +2
  • LCVP (Higgins) - Pacific War Challenge! one month ago

    Neat build, SR. Always nice to see things that aren't aircraft.

    Great work on the 1919, could be a standalone build (where have I seen that before?).

    +2