@Brields95
.
I'm not one to take sides, but I do dislike claims made without adequate evidence. Can you provide explicit evidence that fortifies your assertion?
.
Additionally, @AircraftoftheRedStar , I don't see how that particular fable is applicable here. The essence of that story is the idea of constant, diligent work; it does not correspond with the current situation in which a long break was taken for real-life obligations.
.
Of course, his recent actions were nowhere near optimal, but it deviates from the argument at hand.
.
Both of you are clearly jumping the gun, evidently instigated by other individuals who also are making logical leaps.
@MemeLord21 @Bman01 @Ultra0
.
Reason he's making this is to let others build upon the frame as they see fit, clearly he builds what he wants to and is leaving the base frame for open source.
@randomusername
.
Eh, I'm not wrong in the fact that people were being sentimental. I don't care about who people are, I couldn't care less about someone's reputation. I simply have no obligation to deeply investigate the emotions and sentiment of people beyond what's given to me. So yes, I will only look at the tip of the iceberg, if that's what's presented and matters to most else.
.
The only reason a reply was given is because a select group of individuals seem to want to drag this issue on for a bloody month. None else. I have nothing against all involved, only the fact that it generates needless traffic in my feed bothers me.
.
Anyhow, welcome back. Hopefully, you've also gained at least something out of this, be it for the better or worse. I'll take my leave here.
I can't believe you actually figured it out. Rocket-based systems ATGMs in SP have suffered from insane accelerations and speeds that destroy maneuverability, I didn't know it was this elegant of a solution.
Hey! As someone who's in fairly regular contact with the devs, I'm here to give you some reasons as to why this is not happening (at least in the forseeable future).
First and foremost, the MP mod as of its current state is extremely bugged and is at a barebones functionality level. As it stands, it's as good as just watching others exist in the same map. Devs will not integrate a half-baked mod into the game.
Two, development is very difficult. Jundroo is a pretty small team and there simply isn't enough manpower to continue working on all their active games at the same time. For now, their prime developmental focus is SR2, which means extremely groundbreaking functionality for SP is unlikely.
Third, SP is very old at this point. We've moved along very far, but for SP was not built with multiplayer support in mind. This means the codebase for SP is just simply more difficult to work with- if anything, if SP2 is a thing, MP might come with it.
Fourth. Honestly, mobile users don't get to complain about mods- the SP app is straight up cheaper. If you want the heightened functionality, buy the PC version.
@Tang0five
.
Oh heck yes! It's as simple as using Overload and writing something in there- every platform has Overload. (A bit more than that, but oh well) If you're not well oriented with the system, I suggest you check out my online guide.
I just can't. This is the best humanoid walker I've ever seen in my time here on SP. It has so much preprogrammed functions, it's just... Wow. All the kudos for the effort.
Also, have you truly looked for every option in order to achieve said action? One thing I detest is uninformed people who simply complain whilst not trying hard enough to resolve their issues. I'm fairly certain it's still possible- I've seen a mobile build with custom thumbs recently.
.
Also, submit a uservoice or something, not complain on the forums. This isn't the place to do that. Get directly to the devs, not the community. Please do consider that devs have been working hard to push out this recent update.
@Linethesmarty A 2013 Macbook can run it fine. Maybe you're not considering the fact that SP builds can get extremely detailed. Remove the "extra blocks"? Funny of you to say something like that when it's clear you don't recognize craftsmanship. When builders reach a certain point there isn't anything called unecessary parts. Everything is purposeful and there for a reason.
@Brields95
.
Hey, what's with the open indication of hostility facilitated by the use of all caps? That aside, no, just that I dislike baseless slander, which is being done here with your previous comment. I never specified that I am entitled to an explanation.
However, as this is a public forum, you are held responsible for your actions and claims- and thus should be aware that personal opinions, when vocalized, become a means of affecting the general population. It is very much undesireable for public opinion to be swayed by baseless claims, which is why I am requesting supporting data on your end. You see, I like to form my opinions as objectively as possible, even if that means changing my original perception of things. That is, I want to see your side of the story.
Otherwise, I see no value in the aforementioned comment for the sake of discussion, to which you should take action to indicate it as so.
@Bob9998
.
Weird. My first "serious" build- one I built when I was not very well known, at bronze, was awarded with 50+ upvotes. Bronze users- more accurately, newer users- tend to lack apt building technique, which prevents them from making the quality builds that most (but not all) platinum builders do.
@Rickyjasper2
.
You're wrong. Reports all read. You're wrong if you think plats are immune from bans b/c they did dumb things, you haven't been around here enough to see one that stupid. I don't think silver is much of an "larger" user either, so that's that.
@WNP78
.
Will we potentially get variable assignment features? Also- is there a limit to the number of functions the system can process? This statement isn't evaluating properly, even when I manipulate the included inputs: ((((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)) - sqrt(pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 2) - ((96.177249*pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 4)+19614000* (Trim*10000*sin(Pitch*90))*pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 2))/1000000000000)))*1000000)/(9.807*pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 2)))
First of all, tank aren't underrated. They receive substantial amounts of upvotes. It's just that Bronze or Silver users are bronze and silver for a reason- their quality isn't high enough.
Most tanks are also replicas. If you aren't faithful enough to the real thing, you likely won't receive good feedback.
@EternalDarkness Cool, that's awesome. I was originally considering that option too, although I intentionally used detachers for the purpose of eliminating the process of having to go into ordnance tab and selecting the rockets. As I stated here:
The launcher uses ingame rockets, but they will not show up as usable for offensive capability (and therefore does not interfere with preexisting builds that use rockets as tank rounds).
Although, if it's something like an IFV I'd assume you don't use rockets on other areas of the vehicle... Just a little more for advocating the use of detachers: as an added plus, using detachers let you give a more "projectile-parabola" trajectory to the travel of the smoke grenades, giving them a slightly more authentic feel (which isn't possible to my knowledge without detachers.)
.
On a final note: thank you for being a nice member of the community and giving credit for what's just the concept. That made my day.
@ThomasRoderick It's not like I didn't know about that. Chaffs and flares don't create a large or somewhat lasting effect that visually masks a vehicle; they do work as a IR countermeasure, as certain types of irl smoke grenades do, but fail to give the visual effect most people want.
Yes, I know how ATGMs work, and most gun launched ATGM types (usually SACLOS) are operator guided, which make a visual masking effective, but with IR detection devices this protection is rendered useless as well. The only effective smoke grenades still in modern use are those that mask the vehicle visually, thermally, and disrupt its silhouette effectively.
If you so dislike how they listen to suggestions all the time, go start modding and become prominent enough to become a dev yourself and also snatch a job along the way. 2 devs out of the small team we have at Jundroo are community member-turned-devs.
Hey, not to be condescending, but:
That doesn't really line up, does it...
+24This is amazing. An stunning improvement over the original. Great successor!
+11- Your "fire truck" is okay, but has a couple details that are subpar in quality.
- Top builders often tag other users.
- Top builders have followers.
- "Every thing is working well" is not enough. Want upvotes? Go over the top.
- There's plenty of examples of random bronze users who hit it big on their first build. There just exist many counterexamples for your contention.
- Build better, not complain.
- Develop a building niche. Most top builders have some sort of niche they specialize in.
+11Imagine paying less and wanting equal treatment
+9Nobody broke rules, lol. It's just people being sentimental.
+8Cursed
+7Please make a readable post
+7ahhhh
@brians1209
+6.
Yeah, I'm in my senior year and I have to start getting ready for college applications- just a tad bit busy.
Report if you have been harassed, not complain on the forums.
+6@Rickyjasper2
+6.
That's not Jundroo's problem, that's Google's. Please stop.
It's not a bug. It's your design.
+6@Brields95
+5.
I'm not one to take sides, but I do dislike claims made without adequate evidence. Can you provide explicit evidence that fortifies your assertion?
.
Additionally, @AircraftoftheRedStar , I don't see how that particular fable is applicable here. The essence of that story is the idea of constant, diligent work; it does not correspond with the current situation in which a long break was taken for real-life obligations.
.
Of course, his recent actions were nowhere near optimal, but it deviates from the argument at hand.
.
Both of you are clearly jumping the gun, evidently instigated by other individuals who also are making logical leaps.
@MemeLord21 @Bman01 @Ultra0
+5.
Reason he's making this is to let others build upon the frame as they see fit, clearly he builds what he wants to and is leaving the base frame for open source.
No.
+5@randomusername
+5.
Eh, I'm not wrong in the fact that people were being sentimental. I don't care about who people are, I couldn't care less about someone's reputation. I simply have no obligation to deeply investigate the emotions and sentiment of people beyond what's given to me. So yes, I will only look at the tip of the iceberg, if that's what's presented and matters to most else.
.
The only reason a reply was given is because a select group of individuals seem to want to drag this issue on for a bloody month. None else. I have nothing against all involved, only the fact that it generates needless traffic in my feed bothers me.
.
Anyhow, welcome back. Hopefully, you've also gained at least something out of this, be it for the better or worse. I'll take my leave here.
There is no perfect build.
+5I can't believe you actually figured it out. Rocket-based systems ATGMs in SP have suffered from insane accelerations and speeds that destroy maneuverability, I didn't know it was this elegant of a solution.
+5Not sure if I'm not catching something, but:
Already in the game? The winch part? This was in from 1.8...
Also added in this update, 1.9? Am I the odd one out? This is under the view options button.
I'm not sure what you mean by height, but if it's altitude, it's already a Flight Data input added with 1.9...
Maybe you're a bit out of the loop.
+5Holy moly, thanks Andrew.
+5@SpiritusRaptor Always exploring the limits of game mechanics, I see. Although, this seems pretty darn cool to work with.
+5Hey! As someone who's in fairly regular contact with the devs, I'm here to give you some reasons as to why this is not happening (at least in the forseeable future).
First and foremost, the MP mod as of its current state is extremely bugged and is at a barebones functionality level. As it stands, it's as good as just watching others exist in the same map. Devs will not integrate a half-baked mod into the game.
Two, development is very difficult. Jundroo is a pretty small team and there simply isn't enough manpower to continue working on all their active games at the same time. For now, their prime developmental focus is SR2, which means extremely groundbreaking functionality for SP is unlikely.
Third, SP is very old at this point. We've moved along very far, but for SP was not built with multiplayer support in mind. This means the codebase for SP is just simply more difficult to work with- if anything, if SP2 is a thing, MP might come with it.
Fourth. Honestly, mobile users don't get to complain about mods- the SP app is straight up cheaper. If you want the heightened functionality, buy the PC version.
Thanks.
+4If you're making 5 a day they can't be of good quality.
+4@rainskaos
+4.
Use the script I provided in the comment below.
@Tang0five
+4.
Oh heck yes! It's as simple as using Overload and writing something in there- every platform has Overload. (A bit more than that, but oh well) If you're not well oriented with the system, I suggest you check out my online guide.
Well, ComplicatedPlanes has been a thing since forever.
+4I just can't. This is the best humanoid walker I've ever seen in my time here on SP. It has so much preprogrammed functions, it's just... Wow. All the kudos for the effort.
+4@Numbers
+4.
More XML modding = more ways to make the game better
@Random40
.
Set
input=clamp01(ceil(V - IAS))Set
+4Vto any speed limit you want in meters per second.No, it's done using DesignerSuite.
Also, have you truly looked for every option in order to achieve said action? One thing I detest is uninformed people who simply complain whilst not trying hard enough to resolve their issues. I'm fairly certain it's still possible- I've seen a mobile build with custom thumbs recently.
+4.
Also, submit a uservoice or something, not complain on the forums. This isn't the place to do that. Get directly to the devs, not the community. Please do consider that devs have been working hard to push out this recent update.
@Linethesmarty A 2013 Macbook can run it fine. Maybe you're not considering the fact that SP builds can get extremely detailed. Remove the "extra blocks"? Funny of you to say something like that when it's clear you don't recognize craftsmanship. When builders reach a certain point there isn't anything called unecessary parts. Everything is purposeful and there for a reason.
+4@Brields95
+3.
Hey, what's with the open indication of hostility facilitated by the use of all caps? That aside, no, just that I dislike baseless slander, which is being done here with your previous comment. I never specified that I am entitled to an explanation.
However, as this is a public forum, you are held responsible for your actions and claims- and thus should be aware that personal opinions, when vocalized, become a means of affecting the general population. It is very much undesireable for public opinion to be swayed by baseless claims, which is why I am requesting supporting data on your end. You see, I like to form my opinions as objectively as possible, even if that means changing my original perception of things. That is, I want to see your side of the story.
Otherwise, I see no value in the aforementioned comment for the sake of discussion, to which you should take action to indicate it as so.
@Bob9998
+3.
Weird. My first "serious" build- one I built when I was not very well known, at bronze, was awarded with 50+ upvotes. Bronze users- more accurately, newer users- tend to lack apt building technique, which prevents them from making the quality builds that most (but not all) platinum builders do.
You can't just expect people to be online.
+3@Rickyjasper2
+3.
You're wrong. Reports all read. You're wrong if you think plats are immune from bans b/c they did dumb things, you haven't been around here enough to see one that stupid. I don't think silver is much of an "larger" user either, so that's that.
@PositivePlanes
.
- That makes it look hideous
- That inflates your ammo count for no good reason
- They don't act like actual shell casings (look at how these tumble in the air)
+3@GeneralPatrick2
+3.
Keep in mind that each casing system will create an additional 2 parts for every shot of cannon ammo. That can stack quick.
@Stormfur
+3.
They've told us how you use them... Pretty darn well actually. I'll make a simplified guide though for those who aren't so sure, though.
It's from Gravatar, not SP servers.
+3@WNP78
+3.
Will we potentially get variable assignment features? Also- is there a limit to the number of functions the system can process? This statement isn't evaluating properly, even when I manipulate the included inputs:
((((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)) - sqrt(pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 2) - ((96.177249*pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 4)+19614000* (Trim*10000*sin(Pitch*90))*pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 2))/1000000000000)))*1000000)/(9.807*pow((Trim*10000*cos(Pitch*90)), 2)))@Gusti1301
+3.
It's not meant to fly high. I don't think you understand what this is.
@jamesPLANESii
+3.
Nah, I never learnt programming. Funky trees is my first exposure to it, really.
Hmmm.
+3First of all, tank aren't underrated. They receive substantial amounts of upvotes. It's just that Bronze or Silver users are bronze and silver for a reason- their quality isn't high enough.
+3Most tanks are also replicas. If you aren't faithful enough to the real thing, you likely won't receive good feedback.
@EternalDarkness Cool, that's awesome. I was originally considering that option too, although I intentionally used detachers for the purpose of eliminating the process of having to go into ordnance tab and selecting the rockets. As I stated here:
Although, if it's something like an IFV I'd assume you don't use rockets on other areas of the vehicle... Just a little more for advocating the use of detachers: as an added plus, using detachers let you give a more "projectile-parabola" trajectory to the travel of the smoke grenades, giving them a slightly more authentic feel (which isn't possible to my knowledge without detachers.)
+3.
On a final note: thank you for being a nice member of the community and giving credit for what's just the concept. That made my day.
xml modding is allowed of course
+3.
Sorry.
@ThomasRoderick It's not like I didn't know about that. Chaffs and flares don't create a large or somewhat lasting effect that visually masks a vehicle; they do work as a IR countermeasure, as certain types of irl smoke grenades do, but fail to give the visual effect most people want.
Yes, I know how ATGMs work, and most gun launched ATGM types (usually SACLOS) are operator guided, which make a visual masking effective, but with IR detection devices this protection is rendered useless as well. The only effective smoke grenades still in modern use are those that mask the vehicle visually, thermally, and disrupt its silhouette effectively.
+3An absolute mad lad
+3Haha. Desc in 30 minutes. Why not pre-write and copypaste?
+3- You're not helping
- If you so dislike how they listen to suggestions all the time, go start modding and become prominent enough to become a dev yourself and also snatch a job along the way. 2 devs out of the small team we have at Jundroo are community member-turned-devs.
+2Neat build, SR. Always nice to see things that aren't aircraft.
Great work on the 1919, could be a standalone build (where have I seen that before?).
+2