@MrSilverWolf.
Honest question, did you even know what the full context was all about?
I know this is probably the least favourable place to talk about this but there currently isn't any better. We were not merely arguing over something petty nor are we attacking/harassing someone just because we felt like it, but rather, we were trying to stop the 'bullshit' he's doing. A lot of people are tired of what he's up to (or had been up to). As BMilan has previously mentioned in his now-deleted comment explaining the situation, WCAC has had a track record of stealing, rule breakings and other misbehaviors. In addition, this has still happened even after being called out. HE IS a repeat offender.
Among other things, here is a list of things he's done on the site:
-Stealing without credit and auto-credit bypass (see Section 1)
-Mutual point-begging (upvote yours = upvote mine. See Section 2)
-Misleading thumbnail (Section 3)
-Post re-upload without changes (Section 4)
-Mass tagging (Section 5)
There are only a few things he has done in which he received little to no repercussions, a summary of sorts. I am trying to speak for everyone who he managed to rip off. This is NOT hate speech against WCAC, this is NOT meant to be harassment, nor is it defamation. This is meant for you, SilverWolf, to learn the context before hastily giving probable strikes and temporary bans. I know that this should no longer be talked about but we, and the other people who he manages to upset, some of whom wishes to remain anonymous, would probably agree to the accusations given above. I already am well-aware that this constitutes a strike but given the circumstances, I would gladly receive one.
@X4JB.
If you mean subduing an opponent's reasoning, making him look like a fool and making my point proven, then you can say I won an argument. I am proud of it.
@X4JB
Damn, that just sounds like a superiority complex and high ego to me.
If it was indeed an unfinished build, you still gotta give the man props for finishing this in android. Not like you’d know anything about it, PC Master-Race bullshit my ass.
You gotta remember that getting featured lies in several things such as quality level, uniqueness (this is important) and even sometime due to the mod/dev’s (or anyone who features) likings. Don't act like a dick to someone just because ‘I had more upvotes’ or ‘I had a history of [better] nicer builds.’
Thats not proving a fucking point, thats proving that you overlook anyone’s effort just because they made [several] mistakes, and you’re a fucking dick to anyone who does the same just because you ‘didn't want it featured, the build is not perfect!!1!’
.
I rest my case and place my point.
@WAR122, I get your point, but I would rather not call someone's work a mistake just because you're too wishful for it to be available on android. Also, op already considered android users as op already mentioned that it isn't mobile-friendly, either that he meant part count or due to the mod itself.
@WAR122, it is not op's problem if you (or some people) cannot play his work, if you want to play op's craft, find ways for yourself. If you see using other mods as 'mistakes', you should reconsider commenting because you sound rude right now.
@TemporaryReplacement, Hopefully you don't mind me using the code used in this build for other creations. If I were to decide to upload, I will credit you.
@LunchBox. That's what I have in mind too. But to be honest, I'm just quite disappointed OP changed the rules because someone wants to basically reupload a plane with a different colour scheme. And no, I am not worried about it.
I just watched an advert for an SP calculator and it wasn't a mistake.
+14this should be considered as a world-wide, high-level, security threat
+11@MrSilverWolf.
+10Honest question, did you even know what the full context was all about?
I know this is probably the least favourable place to talk about this but there currently isn't any better.
We were not merely arguing over something petty nor are we attacking/harassing someone just because we felt like it, but rather, we were trying to stop the 'bullshit' he's doing. A lot of people are tired of what he's up to (or had been up to). As BMilan has previously mentioned in his now-deleted comment explaining the situation, WCAC has had a track record of stealing, rule breakings and other misbehaviors. In addition, this has still happened even after being called out. HE IS a repeat offender.
Among other things, here is a list of things he's done on the site:
-Stealing without credit and auto-credit bypass (see Section 1)
-Mutual point-begging (upvote yours = upvote mine. See Section 2)
-Misleading thumbnail (Section 3)
-Post re-upload without changes (Section 4)
-Mass tagging (Section 5)
There are only a few things he has done in which he received little to no repercussions, a summary of sorts. I am trying to speak for everyone who he managed to rip off. This is NOT hate speech against WCAC, this is NOT meant to be harassment, nor is it defamation. This is meant for you, SilverWolf, to learn the context before hastily giving probable strikes and temporary bans. I know that this should no longer be talked about but we, and the other people who he manages to upset, some of whom wishes to remain anonymous, would probably agree to the accusations given above. I already am well-aware that this constitutes a strike but given the circumstances, I would gladly receive one.
*Section 1 (wasn't credit from Pancelvonat's Vehicle Pack)
Case1 & Case2
*Section 2 (A strike was given for this)
(WCAC birthday post & An archived post regarding the matter)
*Section 3
(Makima post & a removed one)
*Section 4
(Original & Re-upload)
*Section 5
(WCAC Birthday post)
These are only a few, more could follow when warranted.
when they say A-10s can't kill planes.
+8that's a skinny model you have there.
+6@X4JB.
+5If you mean subduing an opponent's reasoning, making him look like a fool and making my point proven, then you can say I won an argument. I am proud of it.
@X4JB
+5Damn, that just sounds like a superiority complex and high ego to me.
If it was indeed an unfinished build, you still gotta give the man props for finishing this in android. Not like you’d know anything about it, PC Master-Race bullshit my ass.
You gotta remember that getting featured lies in several things such as quality level, uniqueness (this is important) and even sometime due to the mod/dev’s (or anyone who features) likings. Don't act like a dick to someone just because ‘I had more upvotes’ or ‘I had a history of [better] nicer builds.’
Thats not proving a fucking point, thats proving that you overlook anyone’s effort just because they made [several] mistakes, and you’re a fucking dick to anyone who does the same just because you ‘didn't want it featured, the build is not perfect!!1!’
.
I rest my case and place my point.
Since the link of the map is broken for some reason, I summoned my old device which has the original .spmod file and uploaded it on my own.
Click here to download.
+4@YubukiShimada
+4Kind of ironic, I was trying to be hit lol.
capable of burning Mondstadt down.
+4sexy bow flare
+4Remember me, when you get to the top.
+4Why were triplanes allowed? I guess you might as well call it as a multiplane aircraft challenge.
+3Here comes the 'this is bad, anime = cringe' guys and the 'shut up anime hater, did not ask for your opinion' guys
I've already called out both of your sides so can't you guys just do the shut and appreciate the effort made for a build?
+3@ColonelCanada. For having an anime pfp?
+3probably the most detailed ship by effort made and functionality, very cool.
+3@WAR122, I get your point, but I would rather not call someone's work a mistake just because you're too wishful for it to be available on android. Also, op already considered android users as op already mentioned that it isn't mobile-friendly, either that he meant part count or due to the mod itself.
+3@WAR122, it is not op's problem if you (or some people) cannot play his work, if you want to play op's craft, find ways for yourself. If you see using other mods as 'mistakes', you should reconsider commenting because you sound rude right now.
+3an actual A5M that actually looks an A5M, nice
+3@Majakalona, You gotta dig deep for that. I'd give a cookie for it 🍪
+2Fastest fingers in the whole Southern East Asia
+2AG2 activates both payload doors and the Roll TVC
other than that, very good.
+2@JustMiko
+2similar reason as to why the Americans did.
I was experimenting with the same idea using torpedoes back then, you could say I think this is very nice of you to make.
+2844 parts for this is basically dark magic.
+2@YubukiShimada
+2foreshadowing
Someone finally did the Platypus aircraft, rejoice
+2this can be handy in case someone builds a complete working humanoid figure.
+2@BMilan
+2@BeastHunter
Tags were requested.
@CharlesDeGaulle
+2@Juno
@Dathcha
+2French Technology
@BeastHunter
+2@Titaninfernal1
@Shimamurahougetsu
Is that a flying Dinghy
+2my potato laptop will be in the Danger Zone trying to run this.
+2Flying suitcase
+2Happens to me often. This is prolly due to a lot of tracers spawned or something.
+2@BlinIndustry, as long as it does not break 700-1000 part limit
+2I can hear Mittsies' Vitality
+2very neat
and @Evolutiondestroyer , ya like Suzutsuki too, eh?
+2an Azur Lane Player i see. Thanks @RAF12fan!
Main Fleet > Mutsu- Amagi (flagship)- Nagato (ringed)
Vanguard > Leander (ringed) - Ajax - Belfast (ringed)
find me on EN Server, Washington 'ShiroNekou' and is mostly at Room5 o/
+22k parts :(
+2@TemporaryReplacement. Alright, I'd add you. Cheers.
+1Really interesting projects you've been working on recently. If you don't mind me asking, do you have a Discord account?
+1@TemporaryReplacement, Surely. Though if you were to try, please do tag me in a post. If ever, I could help you with suggestions.
+1Do you plan on creating surface combat-focused modified ships, as well as larger vessels in the future?
+1@TemporaryReplacement, Hopefully you don't mind me using the code used in this build for other creations. If I were to decide to upload, I will credit you.
+1@Boeig, Stating another example is not an argument. This video is way too off-topic and not even slightly related to SimplePlanes.
+1I now knight you to boatmanship.
+1@LunchBox. That's what I have in mind too. But to be honest, I'm just quite disappointed OP changed the rules because someone wants to basically reupload a plane with a different colour scheme. And no, I am not worried about it.
+1@MrCOPTY, Wasn't the focus of the challenge around Biplanes? I don't wanna be that guy but not because someone asked, doesn't mean you already should.
+1