@TemporaryReplacement, Hopefully you don't mind me using the code used in this build for other creations. If I were to decide to upload, I will credit you.
@TemporaryReplacement. Something like this is rare, quite possibly non-existent in the site. As someone who likes to build ships rather than other else, this is quite a treat as the code for the anti-aircraft can also be used for surface combat with a bit of tweaks.
@MrSilverWolf.
Honest question, did you even know what the full context was all about?
I know this is probably the least favourable place to talk about this but there currently isn't any better. We were not merely arguing over something petty nor are we attacking/harassing someone just because we felt like it, but rather, we were trying to stop the 'bullshit' he's doing. A lot of people are tired of what he's up to (or had been up to). As BMilan has previously mentioned in his now-deleted comment explaining the situation, WCAC has had a track record of stealing, rule breakings and other misbehaviors. In addition, this has still happened even after being called out. HE IS a repeat offender.
Among other things, here is a list of things he's done on the site:
-Stealing without credit and auto-credit bypass (see Section 1)
-Mutual point-begging (upvote yours = upvote mine. See Section 2)
-Misleading thumbnail (Section 3)
-Post re-upload without changes (Section 4)
-Mass tagging (Section 5)
There are only a few things he has done in which he received little to no repercussions, a summary of sorts. I am trying to speak for everyone who he managed to rip off. This is NOT hate speech against WCAC, this is NOT meant to be harassment, nor is it defamation. This is meant for you, SilverWolf, to learn the context before hastily giving probable strikes and temporary bans. I know that this should no longer be talked about but we, and the other people who he manages to upset, some of whom wishes to remain anonymous, would probably agree to the accusations given above. I already am well-aware that this constitutes a strike but given the circumstances, I would gladly receive one.
Very nice, simple and clean plugin, though I have a change request if possible. Could the boat dock's terrain be lowered so that watercrafts can be as close to it (almost touching)?
@LunchBox. That's what I have in mind too. But to be honest, I'm just quite disappointed OP changed the rules because someone wants to basically reupload a plane with a different colour scheme. And no, I am not worried about it.
@Samflugzeugpanzer
I am not willing to dive into the lore too much, there's too much to read so I made it vague and easier to understand for the common user. If you meant the dates, I plan to leave it to your own imagination
@Kendog84
I'm too lazy to actually develop a ship damage model since it can be really difficult for larger, way more detailed builds. Though it's actually very decent that you come up with ways of building how to make one. I could sort of use these info for myself next time I tried to do something similar (again).
.
It's also fun to see that SP physics still works as it is lol.
@TemporaryReplacement, Surely. Though if you were to try, please do tag me in a post. If ever, I could help you with suggestions.
+1Do you plan on creating surface combat-focused modified ships, as well as larger vessels in the future?
+1@TemporaryReplacement, Hopefully you don't mind me using the code used in this build for other creations. If I were to decide to upload, I will credit you.
+1@TemporaryReplacement. Something like this is rare, quite possibly non-existent in the site. As someone who likes to build ships rather than other else, this is quite a treat as the code for the anti-aircraft can also be used for surface combat with a bit of tweaks.
Thank you.
@Boeig, Stating another example is not an argument. This video is way too off-topic and not even slightly related to SimplePlanes.
+1It would be nice to credit me with the whole build.
@MrSilverWolf.
+10Honest question, did you even know what the full context was all about?
I know this is probably the least favourable place to talk about this but there currently isn't any better.
We were not merely arguing over something petty nor are we attacking/harassing someone just because we felt like it, but rather, we were trying to stop the 'bullshit' he's doing. A lot of people are tired of what he's up to (or had been up to). As BMilan has previously mentioned in his now-deleted comment explaining the situation, WCAC has had a track record of stealing, rule breakings and other misbehaviors. In addition, this has still happened even after being called out. HE IS a repeat offender.
Among other things, here is a list of things he's done on the site:
-Stealing without credit and auto-credit bypass (see Section 1)
-Mutual point-begging (upvote yours = upvote mine. See Section 2)
-Misleading thumbnail (Section 3)
-Post re-upload without changes (Section 4)
-Mass tagging (Section 5)
There are only a few things he has done in which he received little to no repercussions, a summary of sorts. I am trying to speak for everyone who he managed to rip off. This is NOT hate speech against WCAC, this is NOT meant to be harassment, nor is it defamation. This is meant for you, SilverWolf, to learn the context before hastily giving probable strikes and temporary bans. I know that this should no longer be talked about but we, and the other people who he manages to upset, some of whom wishes to remain anonymous, would probably agree to the accusations given above. I already am well-aware that this constitutes a strike but given the circumstances, I would gladly receive one.
*Section 1 (wasn't credit from Pancelvonat's Vehicle Pack)
Case1 & Case2
*Section 2 (A strike was given for this)
(WCAC birthday post & An archived post regarding the matter)
*Section 3
(Makima post & a removed one)
*Section 4
(Original & Re-upload)
*Section 5
(WCAC Birthday post)
These are only a few, more could follow when warranted.
I now knight you to boatmanship.
+1@Majakalona, You gotta dig deep for that. I'd give a cookie for it 🍪
+2Very nice, simple and clean plugin, though I have a change request if possible. Could the boat dock's terrain be lowered so that watercrafts can be as close to it (almost touching)?
@LunchBox. That's what I have in mind too. But to be honest, I'm just quite disappointed OP changed the rules because someone wants to basically reupload a plane with a different colour scheme. And no, I am not worried about it.
+1@MrCOPTY, Wasn't the focus of the challenge around Biplanes? I don't wanna be that guy but not because someone asked, doesn't mean you already should.
+1Why were triplanes allowed? I guess you might as well call it as a multiplane aircraft challenge.
+3I don't really wanna join as a competitor but I wanna participate.
+1my entry
Congratulations for Gold.
+1Funky
+1@Tanglednebula19 It is a part of the SeaTraffic Mod
angry spiky violent lady
We've been trying to reach you about your car's extended warranty.
+3what went wrong?
Fastest fingers in the whole Southern East Asia
+2@CharlesDeGaulle
Thank you very much :))
not first, not pog
+1@typeZERO
Azusa's halo is a pretty beautiful imo, I actually planned to use Kisaki's but I have skill issue doing her's.
I used the vanity quote due to her EX skill animation line.
+1(Now I'm sad that I forgot to add a Peroro plushie somewhere onboard)
@typeZERO
Cuteness solves a cold heart
(Im glad someone gets a reference I made lol)
In case you missed it, there is a PDF file for the ship regarding its specifications and controls (in-game)
click here
EDIT
THIRD PLACE
Thank you !
@Samflugzeugpanzer
+1I am not willing to dive into the lore too much, there's too much to read so I made it vague and easier to understand for the common user. If you meant the dates, I plan to leave it to your own imagination
@Graingy
It took me like a couple of hours to get your point lol
I guess I actually needed that breakfast.
@Randomplayer
13,000 as far as I remember
Does this participate in the dreadnaught challenge?
+1@IDNSatyaSlebew
It does, need to sacrifice though since its basically my Platinum build.
Proud of both ships, though.
@MrShenanigansSP
+1precisely.
Really, really nice. I like it.
+1@SPAircraftOfficial
the wheels are limited to a specific rate, which limits the maximum speed of the vehicle.
+1@YeetDoctor
it gets to be pinned on top of the front page of the site for a set amount of days.
Also, bragging rights.
AG2 activates both payload doors and the Roll TVC
other than that, very good.
+2@JustMiko
+2similar reason as to why the Americans did.
Since the link of the map is broken for some reason, I summoned my old device which has the original .spmod file and uploaded it on my own.
Click here to download.
+4@Fineilldoitmyself
+1awesome, glad I helped :))
Does this have the buoyancy technique you mentioned? looks great btw.
+1@Fineilldoitmyself
+1Sure, no problem.
@YubukiShimada
+4Kind of ironic, I was trying to be hit lol.
@Kendog84
That would be great. If you want to, I could help by giving ideas if you're willing to add me on Discord (Silence#3424)
@Kendog84
+1I'm too lazy to actually develop a ship damage model since it can be really difficult for larger, way more detailed builds. Though it's actually very decent that you come up with ways of building how to make one. I could sort of use these info for myself next time I tried to do something similar (again).
.
It's also fun to see that SP physics still works as it is lol.
I was experimenting with the same idea using torpedoes back then, you could say I think this is very nice of you to make.
+2Where is Taihou
+1I am not first and therefore will sulk in the corner (pin)
I am not crying ;(
@DatRoadTrainGuy19
+1there were mistakes, I took it down after realizing it
@JustDragon
+3He is, I am forcing him to finish like three ships
I am not asking, I am telling him