@Slmplyawesome
Sailboats seems fairly simple by looks but they are often too hungry for parts, even sometimes needing more parts than a typical gunned ship. It seems to me that the ship you're referring to is fairly small (a brig is still larger than the boat I made) but still needing square sails (which I haven't figured out how to properly simulate with rotators or some such), I still have to learn how to make the square sails work the same way as they do in real life. This is also the reason why I stopped building my first sail-ship, the square sails is mind-consuming work for sailships. Though, I still am interested in making a larger sailboat with square sails, lets just see next time I try. I cant make a promise for now, though.
@Itzarock
What I often do is to modify an existing fuselage then just copy it from anywhere (right click-drag for windows).
I suggest when trying to get a vanilla part from the parts menu, try modifying them first before copying them. In that way, it saves you the time of doing and redoing every parts that needs to be fixed.
@Billion0wonder. I am considering either finishing or remaking this but with lesser parts. The main problem with this build is that it consumes too many parts with the hull alone. I still need to add sails, decor and whatnot.
@X4JB.
If you mean subduing an opponent's reasoning, making him look like a fool and making my point proven, then you can say I won an argument. I am proud of it.
@X4JB
Damn, that just sounds like a superiority complex and high ego to me.
If it was indeed an unfinished build, you still gotta give the man props for finishing this in android. Not like you’d know anything about it, PC Master-Race bullshit my ass.
You gotta remember that getting featured lies in several things such as quality level, uniqueness (this is important) and even sometime due to the mod/dev’s (or anyone who features) likings. Don't act like a dick to someone just because ‘I had more upvotes’ or ‘I had a history of [better] nicer builds.’
Thats not proving a fucking point, thats proving that you overlook anyone’s effort just because they made [several] mistakes, and you’re a fucking dick to anyone who does the same just because you ‘didn't want it featured, the build is not perfect!!1!’
.
I rest my case and place my point.
@Walvis
righto
would uploading an 1850+ version as the public version of the build be allowed? The actual less-than-1850 build will be on description though.
Is that fine?
Aezakmi (pin)
@Ayanon
+1Yes. That's why you should do your part, hint hint.
noo:((@Ded
here before this blows up.
+1hollow fuselages, a lot of hollow fuselages.
I'll try
+1@Slmplyawesome
Sailboats seems fairly simple by looks but they are often too hungry for parts, even sometimes needing more parts than a typical gunned ship. It seems to me that the ship you're referring to is fairly small (a brig is still larger than the boat I made) but still needing square sails (which I haven't figured out how to properly simulate with rotators or some such), I still have to learn how to make the square sails work the same way as they do in real life. This is also the reason why I stopped building my first sail-ship, the square sails is mind-consuming work for sailships. Though, I still am interested in making a larger sailboat with square sails, lets just see next time I try. I cant make a promise for now, though.
844 parts for this is basically dark magic.
+2@JustDragon
+1shh, we don’t talk about it
Here comes the 'this is bad, anime = cringe' guys and the 'shut up anime hater, did not ask for your opinion' guys
I've already called out both of your sides so can't you guys just do the shut and appreciate the effort made for a build?
+3All the meme comments aside, this is awesome.
+1Thank you :D
@Suubk27
+1Thank you :))))
@CR929thenewSPplayer
thank you :)))
@Inuyasha8215
+1Thank you, Inu :))))
Got featured (and reached Platinum), thank you!
-09/15/22
@BMilan
+1Tag was requested
@YourLocalPerson
Thank you :)))
@YubukiShimada
+2foreshadowing
We should make Japanese boats sometime.
+1Pin
I love how this was a Cleveland build predecessor
next level realism.
@Itzarock
What I often do is to modify an existing fuselage then just copy it from anywhere (right click-drag for windows).
I suggest when trying to get a vanilla part from the parts menu, try modifying them first before copying them. In that way, it saves you the time of doing and redoing every parts that needs to be fixed.
I suggest disabling the drag next time so it wouldn't perform like a 1k-part build.
still good though.
@ColonelCanada. For having an anime pfp?
+3This is awesome. Thank you for this.
+1@Billion0wonder. I am considering either finishing or remaking this but with lesser parts. The main problem with this build is that it consumes too many parts with the hull alone. I still need to add sails, decor and whatnot.
Someone finally did the Platypus aircraft, rejoice
+2does it have unlimited flares
thank you! @realSavageMan
when they say A-10s can't kill planes.
+8capable of burning Mondstadt down.
+4this can be handy in case someone builds a complete working humanoid figure.
+2funky
Congratulations for Gold
tldw : I didn't hit USS Tiny, shooting starts at 2:15
edit: calculated the distance, it's around 26.5km instead of 24.5km
@Sableric
sorry, bloodlust
in addition to being indestructible, fumos also now incorporate stealth
+1@CharlesDeGaulle
+1I am interested in them, Ill try my best in the future
@CharlesDeGaulle
+1You dont know how long Bearn has been in my planned ships, 5months+ already
.
But yes, someday, I will do her.
@Vincent
+1could I ask for this craft to be a successor of this challenge?
Thank you.
@BMilan
+2@BeastHunter
Tags were requested.
first time I'll ask this
+1Tag me
This is very inspiring.
+1Why make a wrecking ball when it can be the wrecking ball
+1@X4JB.
+5If you mean subduing an opponent's reasoning, making him look like a fool and making my point proven, then you can say I won an argument. I am proud of it.
We're still awaiting your counter-argument regarding ours, @X4JB. I guess it just proves our point, after all?
+1@X4JB
+5Damn, that just sounds like a superiority complex and high ego to me.
If it was indeed an unfinished build, you still gotta give the man props for finishing this in android. Not like you’d know anything about it, PC Master-Race bullshit my ass.
You gotta remember that getting featured lies in several things such as quality level, uniqueness (this is important) and even sometime due to the mod/dev’s (or anyone who features) likings. Don't act like a dick to someone just because ‘I had more upvotes’ or ‘I had a history of [better] nicer builds.’
Thats not proving a fucking point, thats proving that you overlook anyone’s effort just because they made [several] mistakes, and you’re a fucking dick to anyone who does the same just because you ‘didn't want it featured, the build is not perfect!!1!’
.
I rest my case and place my point.
@Walvis
understood, cheers.
@Walvis
righto
would uploading an 1850+ version as the public version of the build be allowed? The actual less-than-1850 build will be on description though.
Is that fine?
@Buddy2
thank you.