@SupremeDorian im confused, you cant add something to your build in the picture as thats against the rules (I fully agree with this), but you can add a picture of a girl that isnt in your build to the picture and thats fine? eh? Surely its the same rule.
Don't use mirroring. I build the fuselage then 1 wing and copy just the wing over by making sure it only has 1 connection point to the fuselage then clicking copy over button. Much more reliable than mirror which sometimes duplicates parts.
@mikoyanster wheels it is. Can you post the command for the limiting pitch as well as the picture, when i type what i see it doesnt work so no doubt i have a space wrong or something.
@Shemes213 yep :) apart from the "space" bit and the "ship" bit lol. The german designs of this era where innovative due to desperation, so I thought this fit in.
@mikoyanster next question (sorry), can it be a flying boat or does it have to have wheels? (im not bothered either way, just thinking if its a flying boat i can save parts on custom U/C)
@mikoyanster Well I should have read the rules before building, got my gunship flying but its now 1200parts so im out for now =) Will have to build something else.
@Subnerdica yeah its all good, its good to think that it made over 30 people want to go out of their way to give it an upvote, when you think about it thats good going.
@QuickNils well they worked when I built it... another case of broken by game making connections again. Normally it only breaks 1 control surface though not all 4...
@SPairforce id suggest building with more parts and details, 100part builds dont get much in the way of votes. Have a look at my oldest builds, then compare to the new stuff.
@Tang0five to be fair the fuselage wasn't so bad, I started with a 2x2 paneled section I have as a sub assembly then just extended the front and back. The roundels on the other hand where a time consuming process... not only having to bend them around the shape of the wing but also split them for the ailerons. I'm over the moon with how it turned out though.
@BagelPlane they are fun to build and fly so I'm not that bothered. I did wonder the same thing when I posted my previous build but you know what, it doesnt matter as long as someone enjoys it :)
@Jerba well that worked, colour me surprised. Thanks. All i had to do was detach them and reattach them. Strange as like i said they where added sections...
@F104Deathtrap fair enough, I may attempt another ww1 build at somepoint then. I don't know about the concept artist, I just fudge between existing aircraft 😃
@F104Deathtrap lol thanks, it wasn't a cry for upvotes, just seems strange that every time I go to ww1 era aircraft they get less attention than others. Thanks though.
@Numbers yet the majority of aircraft on the front page have the beta and have done rather well... people are saying that its also because its fictional, all my builds are now fictional after all the silly comments on the replicas. I will consider all this further, it was fun to build so not the end of the world anyway.
@Tang0five certainly seems that way, in a way it was your brisfit that inspired me to build this. I think builds are getting a lot less votes at present (unless they are massive and by low point users)
@Dad try this dudes creations, I agree with what your saying in regards to some seriously under rated builders. Shame people over 100k (for instance) cant do anything other than spotlight, would be cool if we had a bit on our pages where we could point people at upcoming builders or something.
@BogdanX thanks, I like spartan decor as well but I enjoy forming camo patterns. This was an experiment really, my last plain looking scheme flopped, so thought would try something flashy by comparison.
@Hedero aw man thats not meant to happen... I will fix it.
@CreeperOfTheFortress well its certainly different.
@SupremeDorian im confused, you cant add something to your build in the picture as thats against the rules (I fully agree with this), but you can add a picture of a girl that isnt in your build to the picture and thats fine? eh? Surely its the same rule.
@CreeperOfTheFortress mirror part instead of mirror the whole build
Don't use mirroring. I build the fuselage then 1 wing and copy just the wing over by making sure it only has 1 connection point to the fuselage then clicking copy over button. Much more reliable than mirror which sometimes duplicates parts.
@Hedero funny you say that, it was going to be a beriev flying boat ground attack aircraft before Mik said it needs wheels :)
@FeatherWing what do you need?
@MrVaultech thanks for clearing that up, I'd never heard of them.
@PointlessWhyshouldi @rexrexThezion So you were right, I can't use the word weasel... who would have thought it.
@mikoyanster wheels it is. Can you post the command for the limiting pitch as well as the picture, when i type what i see it doesnt work so no doubt i have a space wrong or something.
@Shemes213 thanks for the upvote, feel free to check out my other builds, there are certainly plenty to view :p
@Shemes213 yep :) apart from the "space" bit and the "ship" bit lol. The german designs of this era where innovative due to desperation, so I thought this fit in.
@TMach5 thanks :)
@mikoyanster next question (sorry), can it be a flying boat or does it have to have wheels? (im not bothered either way, just thinking if its a flying boat i can save parts on custom U/C)
@mikoyanster Well I should have read the rules before building, got my gunship flying but its now 1200parts so im out for now =) Will have to build something else.
@Subnerdica yeah its all good, its good to think that it made over 30 people want to go out of their way to give it an upvote, when you think about it thats good going.
@PANZERDOG I posted 3 builds in 10 days :) I was having fun with them hence spending time on them.
@NightmareCorporation thanks for the link, its climbed faster for upvotes than my previous builds :)
@Pita ok I will take a look. Thanks
@mikoyanster just out of curiosity, is there a standard way to get an aircraft to create an autonomous circling system? I've not seen one before
@QuickNils well they worked when I built it... another case of broken by game making connections again. Normally it only breaks 1 control surface though not all 4...
@SPairforce id suggest building with more parts and details, 100part builds dont get much in the way of votes. Have a look at my oldest builds, then compare to the new stuff.
@KnightOfRen thanks :) I did a usaf version as well.
@KnightOfRen I can still download it on my phone even though it doesn't have the beta, dont know what you use to play sp.
@Blue0Bull thanks :) glad you like it.
@Tang0five to be fair the fuselage wasn't so bad, I started with a 2x2 paneled section I have as a sub assembly then just extended the front and back. The roundels on the other hand where a time consuming process... not only having to bend them around the shape of the wing but also split them for the ailerons. I'm over the moon with how it turned out though.
@BagelPlane they are fun to build and fly so I'm not that bothered. I did wonder the same thing when I posted my previous build but you know what, it doesnt matter as long as someone enjoys it :)
@Jerba well that worked, colour me surprised. Thanks. All i had to do was detach them and reattach them. Strange as like i said they where added sections...
@rexzion they are connected, they where additions to the original part by clicking add section.
@Type2volkswagen yeah its been trickling in, normally I get 1-2 days and thats it.
@RedBaronBR strange, it works fine on my s10 mobile, no lag or anything. Most of the drag is on 1 part so its not doing loads of calculations either.
@50CalChicken I don't make that type of plane, why don't you ask someone who makes airliners and then scale it to your needs?
@F104Deathtrap fair enough, I may attempt another ww1 build at somepoint then. I don't know about the concept artist, I just fudge between existing aircraft 😃
@F104Deathtrap lol thanks, it wasn't a cry for upvotes, just seems strange that every time I go to ww1 era aircraft they get less attention than others. Thanks though.
@Numbers yet the majority of aircraft on the front page have the beta and have done rather well... people are saying that its also because its fictional, all my builds are now fictional after all the silly comments on the replicas. I will consider all this further, it was fun to build so not the end of the world anyway.
@FireFast212 not really, not for a 1000part build.
@Tang0five certainly seems that way, in a way it was your brisfit that inspired me to build this. I think builds are getting a lot less votes at present (unless they are massive and by low point users)
@Revan13152 I'm confused, they are just standard engines, i don't even know if yiu can change their sound?
@Luca2004 reduce the number in the formula I gave you.
My dad has a Yamaha from the 70s in about this condition =)
@Dad try this dudes creations, I agree with what your saying in regards to some seriously under rated builders. Shame people over 100k (for instance) cant do anything other than spotlight, would be cool if we had a bit on our pages where we could point people at upcoming builders or something.
@FireFast212 I don't really have much time at present to do much. You have this tutorial, why don't you give it a go?
@Kreep2knight as in a vtol nozzle? If so you also need a vtol engine
@SimpleJets yes, yes I can. No idea when as I have a load of projects on the go, but thanks for bringing that to my attention.
@WarHawk95 the fuselage is, the rest not so much.
have you got fuel on it?
@eternaldarkness any chance you can work your magic and link this as a successor to this please.
@BogdanX thanks, I like spartan decor as well but I enjoy forming camo patterns. This was an experiment really, my last plain looking scheme flopped, so thought would try something flashy by comparison.
exactly what deathtrap said, well the second bit anyway, have a look at some of my flying wings, you can nick the shrunk parts if you want.
@toxicgamer88 Thanks =) I do like to play with liveries and camo etc. Sometimes it drives me nuts though...