it's a bit smaller than the real plane. also you can improve the performance by making sure that CoM and CoL are in the same Y-axis and reducing distance between them a little bit.
lot's of issues on this plane.
1. too fast and too agile for a big plane.
2. aesthetic flaps don't work on the left wing
3. normal flaps can reduce lift as well as giving lift which is unreal
4. front LG door doesn't close
@ZWLenning @Treadmill103 @RicardoAs1515
@Grob0s0VBRa @MufazzalPasha @Mumpsy
+1@SimplyPlain @Hedero @DarthAbhinav
@mikoyanster @CrazyCatZe @Rambojutter
man I gotta make a simple plane soon
lucky first upvote! yay!
+1@Sadboye12 no problem!!
+1This is EPIC!!!
@CrazyCatZe even at lowest settings?
@Thueerra I get it. no problem! but please mention that in the description next time, that would help.
+1@mikoyanster no problem! And THANKS for entering!
@BigChunguss nP!
@MrSilverWolf but there was a mandatory "Weaponry" rating for all the entries. if no weapons, then it's zero.
@MrSilverWolf oh
looks Awesome!!
@MrSilverWolf sighs. what happened to him? yes, it was a prototype but the specs include 4 cannons on the nose.
@MrSilverWolf also, take a look at this - Wiki
@MrSilverWolf but he tagged fighter. so if no weapons, then how is it a fighter?
Congrats! You are the winner of this challenge!!
+2@Hedero Indeed! Thanks for entering!!
looks Fabulous!
+1it looks so Awesome but why is the performance not so good?
RATING
Looks : 9.5/10 pts.
Performance : 8.75/10 pts.
Details : 9.5/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.5/10 pts.
Functionality : 9/10 pts.
Bonus : 9.55/10 (Cockpit)
OVERALL RATING : 9.3/10
RATING
Looks : 9.35/10 pts.
Performance : 9.4/10 pts.
Details : 9.4/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.5/10 pts.
Functionality : 9.45/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 9.42/10
+1RATING
Looks : 9.45/10 pts.
Performance : 9/10 pts.
Details : 9.45/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.45/10 pts.
Functionality : 9.45/10 pts.
Bonus : 9.15/10 (Nuke)
OVERALL RATING : 9.33/10
RATING
Looks : 9.35/10 pts.
Performance : 9.25/10 pts.
Details : 9.4/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.35/10 pts.
Functionality : 9.4/10 pts.
Bonus : 9/10 (Landing Gears)
OVERALL RATING : 9.3/10
@destroyerP Thomas going Cyberpunk!
+3also, learn FT codes for LG doors. that will improve functionality. use the bottom lair of the wing for flaps, not the top one.
it's a bit smaller than the real plane. also you can improve the performance by making sure that CoM and CoL are in the same Y-axis and reducing distance between them a little bit.
RATING
Looks : 9.25/10 pts.
Performance : 8.75/10 pts.
Details : 9.15/10 pts.
Weaponry : 8.5/10 pts.
Functionality : 8/10 pts.
Bonus : 9/10 (Livery)
OVERALL RATING : 8.78/10
right wing's ailerons are unattached. and left wing's aesthetic aileron is inverted. always remember to check your planes right before uploading.
RATING
Looks : 9.15/10 pts.
Performance : 9.35/10 pts.
Details : 9/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.25/10 pts.
Functionality : 8.75/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 9.1/10
what sort of monstrosity is this?!!
The Henschel 294 missiles were guided by radio, not automatically. Check radio guided missile method here - FW Ta-251 Falke
RATING
Looks : 8.5/10 pts.
Performance : 8/10 pts.
Details : 8.5/10 pts.
Weaponry : 8/10 pts.
Functionality : 8/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 8.2/10
RATING
Looks : 8/10 pts.
Performance : 8/10 pts.
Details : 8.5/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9/10 pts.
Functionality : 8/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 8.3/10
+2RATING
Looks : 9.35/10 pts.
Performance : 8.85/10 pts.
Details : 9.4/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9/10 pts.
Functionality : 9/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 9.12/10
lot's of issues on this plane.
1. too fast and too agile for a big plane.
2. aesthetic flaps don't work on the left wing
3. normal flaps can reduce lift as well as giving lift which is unreal
4. front LG door doesn't close
RATING
Looks : 8.75/10 pts.
Performance : 7/10 pts.
Details : 8.85/10 pts.
Weaponry : 6.5/10 pts.
Functionality : 5/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 7.22/10
Brilliant!!
RATING
Looks : 9.25/10 pts.
Performance : 9.15/10 pts.
Details : 9.25/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.25/10 pts.
Functionality : 9/10 pts.
Bonus : 9.35/10 (Landing Gears)
OVERALL RATING : 9.21/10
As good as expected!
RATING
Looks : 9/10 pts.
Performance : 9.1/10 pts.
Details : 9.15/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9/10 pts.
Functionality : 9.15/10 pts.
Bonus : 9.25/10 (Landing Gears)
OVERALL RATING : 9.11/10
RATING
Looks : 8.75/10 pts.
Performance : 9.35/10 pts.
Details : 9.15/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.25/10 pts.
Functionality : 9/10 pts.
Bonus : 9/10 (Landing Gears)
OVERALL RATING : 9.1/10
@Thueerra hatches and bomb bay doors can not be compared with control surfaces. because control surfaces are aerodynamic.
+1RATING
Looks : 8.5/10 pts.
Performance : 8.15/10 pts.
Details : 7.5/10 pts.
Weaponry : 8.5/10 pts.
Functionality : 7/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 7.93/10
RATING
Looks : 8.35/10 pts.
Performance : 8.5/10 pts.
Details : 8.25/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.25/10 pts.
Functionality : 7.25/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 8.32/10
+3RATING
Looks : 8.25/10 pts.
Performance : 9/10 pts.
Details : 8/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9/10 pts.
Functionality : 7.5/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 8.35/10
+3this camo is Amazing than all other of your camos!
@DarthAbhinav XD, Marvelous job on the performance!