@AWESOMENESS360 ACTUALLY you noob...
.
The F-22 was superior! Just because the dumb YF-23 was faster, had the same maneuverability, better Stealth figure, more unique, longer range, larger and overall having more weapons. Ugh, so pitiful
.
This is a joke btw. I agree with you
I love the F-22 a lot and want to fly it in the Air Force, but the YF-23 had better specs. The only reason it lost was because Northrop decided not to fly at the show-off for it. And therefore didn't catch any attention. And the thrust-vectoring was seen as better anyways. Either way, I think both could have fared well
@edensk I'm not referring to G-LOC (G-Force Induced Loss of Conciousness). I'm referring to the phenomena during WW2 where dive bombers would crash because of control surfaces locking up at high speeds, which is why until 1947 it was thought that surpassing the speed of sound was impossible
@WarHawk95 oh, thanks!
Before the "Fighter" Designation was used, P for Pursuit was used until the first purely jet aircraft were created. I just did some research and yes, you are correct, it should be XF, not XP. My bad
@MrGreen okay, thanks!
And of course! I'm going to build the tank, but I'm on mobile, so no real tracks, sorry. Is it okay if I use a jet engine just for sound effects?
Okay, I don't have a great knowledge on tanks, so please educate me.
.
I have designed a tank based on the Mark V from World War One, but with the addition of a top turret, a Turbo-Hybrid Turbine Engine, and 3 20mm autoloading autocannons.
Technically, it is called a landship, but in modern terms, would it just be a heavy tank?
The THI is mainly meant for Air/slightly sea superiority, but maintains a ground force. So only one tank design is there to take up all the roles
@Diver how does this refer to an amount of sides? A circle is defined by only one specified line connecting to itself to make a perfect connection.
At that point, it mine as well just be a singular line segment
So, infinite, 1, none, it all is the same
.
If anything, it is a paradox. An unexplainable variable that cannot change no matter what way you look at it. I like referring to circle/spheres as a simple explanation of what paradoxes are (they always come back to the same spot), and it LITERALLY is one.
I don't like considering Spheres/circles as shapes as they are fundamentals of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th dimensions, and maybe even further if the platonic are relative.
Under this point (pun not intended), a circle is a continuous line intersecting. A circle cannot be made unless either an infinite amount of sides connect it, or a single line is able to bend around and connect to itself, like bending the 1st dimension
Inside and outside is not necessarily a "side"
.
In this stance, are you referring to a side as a flat plane that connects to another one at a point?
Or do you literally mean side as in "dark side, light side?"
@MrGreen as you press take screenshot on the 3rd photo, there is a split second where you can press it again and take another one. You could theoretically take 100 screenshots
@WarHawk95 will do
Also, Tea on el
Russian Raptornt@AWESOMENESS360 ACTUALLY you noob...
.
The F-22 was superior! Just because the dumb YF-23 was faster, had the same maneuverability, better Stealth figure, more unique, longer range, larger and overall having more weapons. Ugh, so pitiful
.
This is a joke btw. I agree with you
I love the F-22 a lot and want to fly it in the Air Force, but the YF-23 had better specs. The only reason it lost was because Northrop decided not to fly at the show-off for it. And therefore didn't catch any attention. And the thrust-vectoring was seen as better anyways. Either way, I think both could have fared well
@WarHawk95 and thank you so much!
@edensk it's related to pressure though, yeah?
IAS is based on the pressure in the Pitot tube
@WarHawk95 and thank you too. That was my bad
@edensk OHHH. Okay, thank you!
@MrGreen okay, thanks
@rexzion would you like to join?
@rexzion indeed
@edensk I forgot what it was called, though. Sorry
@edensk I'm not referring to G-LOC (G-Force Induced Loss of Conciousness). I'm referring to the phenomena during WW2 where dive bombers would crash because of control surfaces locking up at high speeds, which is why until 1947 it was thought that surpassing the speed of sound was impossible
@WarHawk95 oh, thanks!
Before the "Fighter" Designation was used, P for Pursuit was used until the first purely jet aircraft were created. I just did some research and yes, you are correct, it should be XF, not XP. My bad
@MrGreen okay, thanks!
And of course! I'm going to build the tank, but I'm on mobile, so no real tracks, sorry. Is it okay if I use a jet engine just for sound effects?
Also, you might want to pin the scoreboard
Okay, I don't have a great knowledge on tanks, so please educate me.
.
I have designed a tank based on the Mark V from World War One, but with the addition of a top turret, a Turbo-Hybrid Turbine Engine, and 3 20mm autoloading autocannons.
Technically, it is called a landship, but in modern terms, would it just be a heavy tank?
The THI is mainly meant for Air/slightly sea superiority, but maintains a ground force. So only one tank design is there to take up all the roles
@WiiHoldingTheMini done
Wait... I'm going to increase it to 18
@PapaWii extended
@WiiHoldingTheMini lmao, yeah. I'm an American, but I've been using Meters a lot lmao
@WiiHoldingTheMini what's up?
@WiiHoldingTheMini yup
And awesome! Thanks for joining, m8
@WiiHoldingTheMini indeed, however, the first Supersonic planes were not in service yet lol
@PapaWii
Please comment if you are in the challenge
DEADLINE: JULY 30th
@XAircraftManufacturer they've mentioned multiple times that it is not posted. It looks like a Douglas DC-4, though
And thx btw
@PapaWii lmao, I can add more! I only used this one because it shows the most of the aircraft
Thanks! @TatsuTheDemonLord
@PapaWii what was it missing? Out of curiosity
And thank you so much, m8! You've helped me a lot
Thanks! @MiiWini
@BogdanX Thank you!
Thanks! @Hawker180hurricane
I hope this makes up for my crappy builds I've made as of late lmao
@PapaKernels
Thank you!
@YoDudeChase thanks! XD
I need to nudge it a tad better, but I think it is my best looking aircraft this far
Yes
@Diver how does this refer to an amount of sides? A circle is defined by only one specified line connecting to itself to make a perfect connection.
At that point, it mine as well just be a singular line segment
So, infinite, 1, none, it all is the same
.
If anything, it is a paradox. An unexplainable variable that cannot change no matter what way you look at it. I like referring to circle/spheres as a simple explanation of what paradoxes are (they always come back to the same spot), and it LITERALLY is one.
I don't like considering Spheres/circles as shapes as they are fundamentals of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th dimensions, and maybe even further if the platonic are relative.
Under this point (pun not intended), a circle is a continuous line intersecting. A circle cannot be made unless either an infinite amount of sides connect it, or a single line is able to bend around and connect to itself, like bending the 1st dimension
Inside and outside is not necessarily a "side"
.
In this stance, are you referring to a side as a flat plane that connects to another one at a point?
Or do you literally mean side as in "dark side, light side?"
It also has my first trim flap... aww, yeah
.
This will be for BogdanX's 333 challenge. Another hint...
@Bismarcksurvivor100 yeah, lol :(
@TMach5 yeah, agreed. He's said that he is stuck with school too, but he managed to find a mod that intrigues him enough to want to come back
@Bismarcksurvivor100 the challenge has been closed
@MrGreen as you press take screenshot on the 3rd photo, there is a split second where you can press it again and take another one. You could theoretically take 100 screenshots
Thanks! @CursedMikeWazowski @NINJ4PRO
Thanks! @Thecatbaron