254 LieutenantSOT Comments

  • My first fusalege build yesterday

    Thanks for the submission!

    +1
  • My first fusalege build yesterday

    I am checking it out now

    +1
  • C-2A Greyhound 8 days ago

    This is awesome! Great work :)

    +1
  • The Illuminator 8 days ago

    Speed: It was decently fast. Maybe 400 mph. Not too fast, not too slow
    Maneuverability: To say the least, everything was okay to control until I got to trying to turn. It spun out of control and crashed into the water. But it still is pretty easy to control
    Payload: 2 "Satans?" that freakin' scared the hell (no pun intended) out of me when I tried them. I blew up a Hellkasia with it... fun times XD
    Enjoyment?: I liked it for what it is. It flew okay and hit a target. I wish it were able to turn easier, but it flies so it's okay.
    Looks?: It looks really cool. I like the black underneath and the wheels that dissapear. The jets and the intakes add a sinister feel with the red and black mixed together... spooky
    Did it hit?: It hit the target, so cool! If the missile missed, it wouldn't have mattered anyways... would have killed everyone in a ten mile radius XD
    Overall? A decent Flying wing fighter to say. Takes off, lands, and leaves a crater. Thank you for the submission!

    +1
  • arcraft for air to air airplane challenge 9 days ago

    Other than that, here is the score:

    +1
  • Wobbly Wings, Hinges, and Pistons, oh, my! 10 days ago

    @edensk It worked splendidly. The plane's roll is a tad bit touchy and the yaw is like walking in high heels while drunk, but the wings do not wobble nearly as much as before. Thanks! It is posted on my account now

    +1
  • Wobbly Wings, Hinges, and Pistons, oh, my! 11 days ago

    @edensk okay, thank you!

    +1
  • Next Question: Bomb Bays? 13 days ago

    @PlanePlaneThe66373637 Ohhh okay. Thank you again! I am just now getting to work. This will be helpful

    +1
  • crewmate one month ago

    @Kernels

    ...You don't want to know... don't go into electrical...

    +1
  • Tracks? one month ago

    Lmao, train tracks. That'd be an interesting one

    +1
  • P-51 in 51 parts one month ago

    Cessna 337 Super Skymaster in 337 parts... or Cessna O-2 Skymaster in 2 parts
    Challenge... mwahahaha

    +1
  • Variable-sweep wing [TOURNAMENT] 2 months ago

    When I get Simple Planes again soon, I will do this... Mwhahahaha

    +1
  • SR-71 in 71 parts 2 months ago

    dun, dun, dun! Thx @Cabbage17

    +1
  • SR-71 in 71 parts 2 months ago

    Cessna O-2 in 100 Parts? XD

    +1
  • SR-71 in 71 parts 2 months ago

    This is Majestic

    +1
  • The Expeller Model 8 2 months ago

    Google Play Pass ran out, can't play SimplePlanes for a while... :(. Will get it ASAP

    +1
  • Ne-121 "Hipopotam" 5 hours ago

    Holy crap that thing was huge!

  • My first fusalege build 22 hours ago

    also, no CHAFF or flares. You added these to your design as well

  • My first fusalege build 22 hours ago

    I agree with Nexus. I will not grade this because it does not belong in WW1. But if you want to make another, I'm fine with that!
    Rules are:
    No jets or missiles
    Must be a biplane or more (triplane, quadplane, etcetera)

    I really do like this build, which is why I upvoted it, its just that it does not fit the parameters. If you want to build another one great! If you do not, I understand that as well. Sorry for the misunderstanding :(

  • I have returned 23 hours ago

    I wish you the best

  • Thunder Hawks Challenge Dos! (World War 1 Fighter, Bomber, or Airship) yesterday

    @Charris969 I am looking at it right now, thank you for the submission

  • Thunder Hawks Challenge Dos! (World War 1 Fighter, Bomber, or Airship) yesterday

    @NexusGaming if I cannot spotlight, I will give an extra 2 or 3 upvotes

  • Ne-121 "Hipopotam" yesterday

    @NexusGaming interesting. Great thought process! I didn't think of that

  • Ne-121 "Hipopotam" yesterday

    @NexusGaming sorry, had to do something real quick

  • Ne-121 "Hipopotam" yesterday

    Requirements: 10/10. It meets everything in the rules
    Looks: 5/10. It looks pretty boring, but it also looks unique
    Maneuverability/Speed: 8/10. For the speed, it feels super fast, especially for WW1, but it is also highly maneuverable. Really good
    Do I personally like it? I would say a 8/10. I wish it had machine guns, but I'm okay with that. It was nice to control and pretty fast too.
    Overall? I really think it was a great Biplane design. Great job
    Total points: 31/40
    A solid plane

  • Thunder Hawks Challenge Dos! (World War 1 Fighter, Bomber, or Airship) yesterday

    Sorry, here are the rewards:
    1st: 3 upvotes, a follow, and a spotlight if possible
    2nd: 2 upvotes and a follow
    3rd: 1 upvote and a follow
    4th and below: 1 upvote

  • Thunder Hawks Challenge Dos! (World War 1 Fighter, Bomber, or Airship) yesterday

    @Charris969 yes, you can do whatever so long as it does not have missiles or negative weight (unless it is an airship) thanks for joining!

  • An old project yesterday

    I made a flyable version, @NexusGaming. Hope you like it!

  • An Old Project Mk.II yesterday

    PS: Pull up gently... takes a while to gain speed, the prop will crash if you pull up too hard

  • Ne-121 "Hipopotam" yesterday

    I will test and judge in a minute

  • THA-X2 Blitzaeiter Mk.2 4 days ago

    Special thanks to @TheLegend69 for the propellers. I will make my own next time

  • THA-X2 Blitzaeiter Mk.2 4 days ago

    I will make a better one soon now that I have more knowledge. Figured I'd finish this one first

  • Incubus 4 days ago

    It flapped me into the water

  • Incubus 4 days ago

    XD

  • MIG Challenge 4 days ago

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/a2I7wq/MIG-35
    I believe this is your design, @Nathandaisy

  • MIG Challenge 4 days ago

    @Nathandaisy go to your design, copy the link and paste it in the comments

  • Thunder Hawks Challenge Uno! [CLOSED] 4 days ago

    So far:
    1st place: @TrojanAircraftSystems
    2nd place: @NexusGaming
    3rd place: @Jakeeeee
    These are the scores so far. Thank you all for the submissions! Jakeeeee found a really cool craft to revamp, Nexus had a really cool Flying Wing with overpowered A-A Missiles and some cool looks too. And finally, TrojanAircraftSystems had an amazing Flying wing fighter that can go Mach 2 and drop hell on the ground and the air. All of these designs were great, thank you all so much. And please, do not take offense from these rankings.

  • My first plane! 5 days ago

    This is awesome! Good luck!

  • TAS FB-33 “Arrowhead” fighter bomber 5 days ago

    Speed?: It was very fast. I pulled up and it got to 1450 mph
    Maneuverability?:It was surprisingly easy to maneuver, I looked inside it and it's really cool! Especially for a flying wing to be able to do that.
    Payload? It held 4 A-A missiles, 2 a-a cannons (Though it is overpowering against ground things too), 2 wing machine guns, and 1 big boom. Awesome that you were able to do that.
    Did I enjoy it?: I actually really liked this craft! It had a lot of simplicity, but it also worked really well.
    Overall: A really good Air or Ground attack Flying Wing. Thank you so much for the submission @TrojanAircraftSystems!

  • TAS FB-33 “Arrowhead” fighter bomber 5 days ago

    K, grading now

  • TAS FB-33 “Arrowhead” fighter bomber 5 days ago

    I will grade soon

  • TAS FB-33 “Arrowhead” fighter bomber 5 days ago

    Cool, thank you!

  • Thunder Hawks Challenge Uno! [CLOSED] 5 days ago

    @TrojanAircraftSystems thank you! I will grade in about an hour or so

  • Thunder Hawks Challenge Uno! [CLOSED] 5 days ago

    @NoobyMan123cba what's up?

  • Fulcrum 5 days ago

    That was not a Boom 25... XD. Great plane! That was fun to fly

  • THA-X3 Super Hawk 5 days ago

    Wait a minute-
    Sorry... it is way under the part count amount

  • Stealth Challenge 5 days ago

    My entry was submitted

  • Thunder Hawks Challenge Uno! [CLOSED] 5 days ago

    @TrojanAircraftSystems cool! Thanks

  • MIG Challenge 6 days ago

    @Planeacceleration k, thx!