@Alisuchanka looking at how you can switch modes for the tail gunner makes me feel building the Boulton Paul Defiant on my own is going to be even more difficult than i thought.
@WinsWings my builds are kinda... Between Cheap/Simple and High Quality/complex rating so it takes a minimum of 1 week for 1 whole plane, and maybe even more so with a special function for the Defiant. So i think ill back off.
Is the Boulton Paul Defiant on this list too? Its the only unusual thing it has for this type is how it has a turret as its main gun.
.
.
.
Oh nvm deadline is june 15th, i was thinking rhe aircraft may take 2 weeks to build.
@Galland aight, ill just do it wuth a blueprint then and adjust the existing details (gunpods, landing gears) to match up the one in the blueprint ill be using.
@1114117483 i am reminded of how my older model phone decided to boot loop itself, abd made me lost quite a bit of progress of my Supermarine Spiteful over half a year ago.
@ThomasRoderick basicly made a spawn location near USS Tiny Two fleet, then repawned there with the quadcopter and land it on USS Tiny Two flight deck, before making another spawn location.
@Bellcat im not exactly good at making roundels, aswell as detailing the cockpit, so i just downloaded a "Sub-assembly" in the website. And just basicly did the cockpit interiors with the necessary gauges and controls.
-"Rebuilding an existing creation is the goal of this challenge, this means you may completely start from scratch as long as you retain the original design / layout. (Engine, cockpit, wing, etc, placement stays the same."
By mean wing, do you mean the actual wing part or just the model by using fuselages? Because if its the former, the rebuild of my A8K has a different Wing Part method from the old one
so idk if that will still count as "remaster".
@Walvis sorry, what i meant was. Converting my build into a predecessor of this post might mess something up with its cockpit canopy functions. Could it be mentioned instead?
@Walvis Im rebuilding my Kawanishi A8K from my first years of replica building back then. But the one i have already has a cockpit and the "non-firstperson" cockpit part one. Can i mention it instead? As it might mess something up.
Hmm, i think i just have the right prototype aircraft i have for this challenge. Its still being built, but lets say its inspired from the P-39 Airocobra
@AndrewGarrison oh no i never noticed this issue until now! Thank you for pointing it out. Im thinking on fixing it on the already complete version, but without the livery, antenna, Anti-glare, and exhaust. It goes down to 347 parts, but question is, is it okay to reupload that one when it had alot of changes (flight physics wise) from this post's version?
@jamesPLANESii are we talking about this build or historical? If its the former, my Mk.IX i actually turns faster than this MesserSpit Mk.IX.
If its the latter... It was a Mk.V, but yeh they outperformed both of them thanks to the Bf-109's DB605A engine and thr Spitifire' elliptical wing design and being "married" into one one lol.
@Alisuchanka looking at how you can switch modes for the tail gunner makes me feel building the Boulton Paul Defiant on my own is going to be even more difficult than i thought.
+1Never knew such design exist lol
+3Huh, is this the "experimental" upcoming Japanese Stealth fighter, F-X/F-3 or something?
Oh no, im gonna be on the next video
+2@sam1333 take it as a compliment. This build of yours is worthy of respect for replica builders like soem of us here.
+2Hope your builds in the future become as good and simple as mine :D
+1@teddyone02 loud turboprop noises
+1August 10th deadline... Enough for me to build 2 aircrafts.... Though is it possible to make 2 entries though? (a P-47D and a Defiant)
@WinsWings my builds are kinda... Between Cheap/Simple and High Quality/complex rating so it takes a minimum of 1 week for 1 whole plane, and maybe even more so with a special function for the Defiant. So i think ill back off.
@TheDesignate i think you should add another rule where existing builds doesnt count (Otherwise ill submit my F4U-4B on this) lol.
+1Is the Boulton Paul Defiant on this list too? Its the only unusual thing it has for this type is how it has a turret as its main gun.
.
.
.
Oh nvm deadline is june 15th, i was thinking rhe aircraft may take 2 weeks to build.
Tbh i never heard of ravenfield until now. It was more "hey this aircraft actually looks cool." And here i am now finally building my own.
You really had to crack a joke in there huh? Lol
+1@Galland aight, ill just do it wuth a blueprint then and adjust the existing details (gunpods, landing gears) to match up the one in the blueprint ill be using.
+1@Galland alright, though id like it if you provide me the blueprint you used to perfectly match the "dimensions" of this original post.
+1Nah i wont so rest assured. In fact the repaint actually looks cooler.
+2@PilotBug oh that. Sadly no, but you can assisn one as a spawn location though.
+1@PilotBug this is only a file download for the aircraft, not thr spawn location so no.
Hey @galland, want me to rebuild the wings of this thing like the ones in my Fw190A8 and so?
+1@1114117483 i am reminded of how my older model phone decided to boot loop itself, abd made me lost quite a bit of progress of my Supermarine Spiteful over half a year ago.
+1@Hazerz La-5F from Ash Arms
@Unrealgaming wait, again? weird, the last time i checked, it works fine on the catapult.
Edit: apparently it only explodes when you outright choose the USS Beast catapult spawn location, not when you attach it on the move.
@EternalDarkness i think this build shows how flexible your fuselage Slicing Wings technique are in terms of making paint schemes.
@JustMiko
@BogdanX ill try it in my upcoming Wyvern S.4 build
+1@BogdanX im kind of the type who wants to leave no gap possible in the build, but i understand why. Its just it bugs me personally speaking.
@Rompuss62 you sure its not your phone? because it works fine for mw and most likely to others aswell.
<<<Previous Build
<<<Previous Build
<<<Previous Build
@Tsuchiisan my mind couldnt imagine how, id there a video guide of properly doing it?
@ThomasRoderick basicly made a spawn location near USS Tiny Two fleet, then repawned there with the quadcopter and land it on USS Tiny Two flight deck, before making another spawn location.
+1@Unrealgaming ah, thanks for finding it out. Ill make a link on this post for the fixed version.
@Bellcat im not exactly good at making roundels, aswell as detailing the cockpit, so i just downloaded a "Sub-assembly" in the website. And just basicly did the cockpit interiors with the necessary gauges and controls.
+2@FeatherWing i think he meant the horizontal stabilizers, not the vertical stabilizers lol
@LarryTad heres the build btw, your turn on making its internal beautiful :)
+1@IceCraftGaming imagine getting your comment pinned lol
+2@Vincent can you kindly modify the successor to @Walvis remaster challenge pls? Thanks.
+1@Walvis hmm i kinda have a question on this one
-"Rebuilding an existing creation is the goal of this challenge, this means you may completely start from scratch as long as you retain the original design / layout. (Engine, cockpit, wing, etc, placement stays the same."
By mean wing, do you mean the actual wing part or just the model by using fuselages? Because if its the former, the rebuild of my A8K has a different Wing Part method from the old one
so idk if that will still count as "remaster".
Man, thanks to this new technique, all of my builds after my Fw 190 A-8 build have this kind of wings now.
+3@Walvis do you know anyone who i could ask to change it to?
@Walvis sorry, what i meant was. Converting my build into a predecessor of this post might mess something up with its cockpit canopy functions. Could it be mentioned instead?
@Walvis Im rebuilding my Kawanishi A8K from my first years of replica building back then. But the one i have already has a cockpit and the "non-firstperson" cockpit part one. Can i mention it instead? As it might mess something up.
Hmm, i think i just have the right prototype aircraft i have for this challenge. Its still being built, but lets say its inspired from the P-39 Airocobra
+1@AndrewGarisson
My god i never noticed that!! Andrew Garrison already pointed it out to me and i never knew about it until just now.
+1@AndrewGarrison oh no i never noticed this issue until now! Thank you for pointing it out. Im thinking on fixing it on the already complete version, but without the livery, antenna, Anti-glare, and exhaust. It goes down to 347 parts, but question is, is it okay to reupload that one when it had alot of changes (flight physics wise) from this post's version?
Finally!! a Veltro with the new Fuselage Slicing Wings!!!
.
Edit:No wait its not! I was convinced it was lmao
@jamesPLANESii are we talking about this build or historical? If its the former, my Mk.IX i actually turns faster than this MesserSpit Mk.IX.
If its the latter... It was a Mk.V, but yeh they outperformed both of them thanks to the Bf-109's DB605A engine and thr Spitifire' elliptical wing design and being "married" into one one lol.
@Fliegerkerlchen is that the Merlin Engine, it better not be the Griffin one.