@GotovoYaTut I haven't downloaded any of the challenge entries yet (to give a fair comparison when testing them), but I'll be sure to give you some tips once I try this out!
I also recently have become quite proficient at running through the entire main trench of Blue Glacial Park with both the Wasp and the Pigpen at sustained speeds of over 450 knots.
One that I thought was amusing was a dogfight I had with the AI probably close to a year and a half ago. I shot down the first plane but then had a collision with the second one, which knocked out both of our engines. There was then about a 3 minute gliding dogfight between us, which ended with me shooting the AI down a few feet above the ground right before pancaking in right next to him.
You get upvotes by posting things that people will choose to upvote. Usually this means either builds that they like, or builds that they think are high quality.
One thing I've noticed is that it doesn't seem to activate if your primary cockpit is a flight computer, for whatever reason. I was messing around with it a while ago and the new Pigpen (which uses a flight computer) was not able to activate it, though the old one was, under the same conditions and in the same location.
@SyntheticL I believe Artemis I is traveling slower for better efficiency (and more time for experiments and capsule testing, since they aren't really in a hurry anyway).
My prayers for the families and friends of those lost.
Not only have we lost six (possibly seven, it's still unclear exactly how many were aboard Texas Raiders) valiant aircrew, we've also lost two extraordinarily historic aircraft. Texas Raiders had the fifth most operational time in military service out of all 12,731 B-17s built, and Kingcobra N6763 was both one of only three flying P-63s in the world and the sole surviving P-63F out of the two built. The P-63F model is now extinct, and there will no doubt be significant repercussions into the remainder of airworthy B-17s around the world, especially as this came so soon after the Nine-O-Nine crash.
If you're making a missile equipped with a realistic nuclear warhead, plutonium (specifically Pu-239) would be the best option. It is cheaper and easier to produce than uranium (specifically weapons-grade U-235). Polonium's half-life is too short to be used for any military purposes (weapons need to be manufactured and stored before they are used, after all), and Oganesson has a half-life estimated to be less than a millisecond (and is also far, far too unstable to be produced in any quantity sufficient for weapons use). Radium would in theory result in a more radioactive "dirty bomb"-type missile, but would be a very poor choice for weapons due to its extremely high cost.
The Quest VR version of SimplePlanes includes the Wright Isles, Krakabloa archipelago, Sky Park City, and Snowstone island. It does not include Maywar or the kraken, since the Quest is an Android-based device and it has many of the same limitations of other Android devices. It is possible, though, that Maywar/kraken may be added in the future, but this is not certain.
@Planebuilder2122 Well, since there's several variables involved it would probably just be easiest to use this thing I just made that's just the radar with all of the variables you need :)
Not how it works. The problem isn't that Jundroo doesn't want to run code on Android/iOS, it's that Apple/Google don't allow third-party code like SP mods to be run on their devices.
@TheSeventh By pitch I was referring to the pitch of the entire aircraft (nose up/down), not the pitch of the blades. The tail rotor doesn't control the elevation of the nose.
Try telling her how you're feeling, and how her actions are making you feel. Don't immediately confront her with "what you're doing is wrong", instead try and tell her about how her actions have affected you.
If she's not willing to have that talk... well, then you to end the relationship right there. It sucks, but if she isn't willing to care about and take steps to fix the effects her actions are having on you, then that's not a relationship anymore, and it's time to let go of her regardless of how she might react. Giving her time won't help anything if she isn't willing to listen to you in the first place. It's a hard decision to make (especially if she reacts emotionally to it), but you've got to do it.
Keep in mind that you are not at fault in this situation, so don't let her blame you for anything (as she probably will). You've done nothing wrong here.
Most importantly, don't give up on yourself. Your life is worth more than this. Stay strong, brother.
Bypassing the auto credit system is a direct violation of the site rules.
If you are circumventing the predecessor/successor system, then you will be banned. Never upload a successor as an original design; give credit to the designer of its predecessor.
Regardless of how much time and effort you put into modifying a build, in the end it still started as someone else's build, and you must credit them for that. Additionally, I find the claim that "AUTO CREDIT BRINGS DOWN UPVOTES WHEN YOU SHARE" to be, quite frankly, laughable. People don't choose to upvote something based on whether it is modified from someone else's build or not. People upvote stuff they like, and stuff they think is good.
@ZeroRaven87 Basically post a plane (that meets the rules) as a successor to this post.
@GotovoYaTut I haven't downloaded any of the challenge entries yet (to give a fair comparison when testing them), but I'll be sure to give you some tips once I try this out!
+1Very nice!
I also recently have become quite proficient at running through the entire main trench of Blue Glacial Park with both the Wasp and the Pigpen at sustained speeds of over 450 knots.
One that I thought was amusing was a dogfight I had with the AI probably close to a year and a half ago. I shot down the first plane but then had a collision with the second one, which knocked out both of our engines. There was then about a 3 minute gliding dogfight between us, which ended with me shooting the AI down a few feet above the ground right before pancaking in right next to him.
+1You get upvotes by posting things that people will choose to upvote. Usually this means either builds that they like, or builds that they think are high quality.
+2@GotovoYaTut Absolutely!
+2One thing I've noticed is that it doesn't seem to activate if your primary cockpit is a flight computer, for whatever reason. I was messing around with it a while ago and the new Pigpen (which uses a flight computer) was not able to activate it, though the old one was, under the same conditions and in the same location.
+5@SyntheticL I believe Artemis I is traveling slower for better efficiency (and more time for experiments and capsule testing, since they aren't really in a hurry anyway).
+2@dogooman1 Beashooter
+1My prayers for the families and friends of those lost.
Not only have we lost six (possibly seven, it's still unclear exactly how many were aboard Texas Raiders) valiant aircrew, we've also lost two extraordinarily historic aircraft. Texas Raiders had the fifth most operational time in military service out of all 12,731 B-17s built, and Kingcobra N6763 was both one of only three flying P-63s in the world and the sole surviving P-63F out of the two built. The P-63F model is now extinct, and there will no doubt be significant repercussions into the remainder of airworthy B-17s around the world, especially as this came so soon after the Nine-O-Nine crash.
+9If you're making a missile equipped with a realistic nuclear warhead, plutonium (specifically Pu-239) would be the best option. It is cheaper and easier to produce than uranium (specifically weapons-grade U-235). Polonium's half-life is too short to be used for any military purposes (weapons need to be manufactured and stored before they are used, after all), and Oganesson has a half-life estimated to be less than a millisecond (and is also far, far too unstable to be produced in any quantity sufficient for weapons use). Radium would in theory result in a more radioactive "dirty bomb"-type missile, but would be a very poor choice for weapons due to its extremely high cost.
+1The Quest VR version of SimplePlanes includes the Wright Isles, Krakabloa archipelago, Sky Park City, and Snowstone island. It does not include Maywar or the kraken, since the Quest is an Android-based device and it has many of the same limitations of other Android devices. It is possible, though, that Maywar/kraken may be added in the future, but this is not certain.
Roses are red, violets are blue.
+2I don't think your joke worked, I'm just kind of confu'e
@Mlancer Doesn't matter when it was started, if you get it done before December and it fits the rules, it counts!
Likely the internet connection. I've had that happen a few times in the past.
+1Sorry, minimum for the challenge is 200 parts.
Sorry, minimum for the challenge is 200 parts.
This is unbelievable, even for you!
+1Accurate.
Not me.
It looks so happy
+2I love it
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/198926/PINNED-Markdown-Formatting
+2@Mondayhater ...Why, exactly, have I been tagged on this? I don't recall requesting a tag.
Edit: I see you have deleted the original comment tagging me. That's interesting.
No
Sorry, minimum for the challenge is 200 parts.
💀
+2That guy has so much good stuff.
His editing skills are unbelievable too.
+2<span style="color: var(- - level of information body-text);">
+1That P-40 looks awesome! I'd be glad to help test it if you want.
@Planebuilder2122 Well, since there's several variables involved it would probably just be easiest to use this thing I just made that's just the radar with all of the variables you need :)
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Sf2sqX/Variable-Range-Radar
+1@Planebuilder2122 Sure, go ahead! I'd appreciate credit though.
+1Sorry, minimum for the challenge is 200 parts. Also, this entry doesn't seem to be a completed build?
+1MiG-17
+1Not how it works. The problem isn't that Jundroo doesn't want to run code on Android/iOS, it's that Apple/Google don't allow third-party code like SP mods to be run on their devices.
+7@Mondayhater All entries will be rated/judged once the challenge deadline has arrived.
@beenz Aw yeah
+3@TheSeventh By pitch I was referring to the pitch of the entire aircraft (nose up/down), not the pitch of the blades. The tail rotor doesn't control the elevation of the nose.
Increase suspension damper and/or decrease spring strength.
Increase suspension damper and/or decrease spring strength.
+1@JustDragon yay
+1Already possible using either hinge rotators or just not
Wing-2wings.The tail rotor (even on real helicopters) doesn't have any control over pitch, so I'm not sure why you're wanting this.
+1As a former mobile-player myself, absolutely would recommend upgrading to the PC version.
+1No, not (currently) possible.
+1Try telling her how you're feeling, and how her actions are making you feel. Don't immediately confront her with "what you're doing is wrong", instead try and tell her about how her actions have affected you.
If she's not willing to have that talk... well, then you to end the relationship right there. It sucks, but if she isn't willing to care about and take steps to fix the effects her actions are having on you, then that's not a relationship anymore, and it's time to let go of her regardless of how she might react. Giving her time won't help anything if she isn't willing to listen to you in the first place. It's a hard decision to make (especially if she reacts emotionally to it), but you've got to do it.
Keep in mind that you are not at fault in this situation, so don't let her blame you for anything (as she probably will). You've done nothing wrong here.
Most importantly, don't give up on yourself. Your life is worth more than this. Stay strong, brother.
+3@JustDragon Very true, it's actually quite good. It doesn't sink into mud since it's so light.
Ok but seriously this is actually MudRunner's equivalent of the Pigeon. Smol pickup boi who like to flip.
+1@JustDragon rip
I'm sure they'll get to it sooner or later. Thanks for letting me know though!
+1Does anyone else see everything after the description in italics?
Bypassing the auto credit system is a direct violation of the site rules.
Regardless of how much time and effort you put into modifying a build, in the end it still started as someone else's build, and you must credit them for that. Additionally, I find the claim that "AUTO CREDIT BRINGS DOWN UPVOTES WHEN YOU SHARE" to be, quite frankly, laughable. People don't choose to upvote something based on whether it is modified from someone else's build or not. People upvote stuff they like, and stuff they think is good.
+3