Dude just build it.
A first plane isn't going to be glamourous. Focus on making something that flies well enough, and make sure you understand why it does.
@Erionh politics haven’t been mentioned in a while.
By that same argument you could say that laptop computers were created for schools because schools use them. I doubt they were. Just because something is used in a context does not mean it was made for that context. This isn’t difficult to comprehend.
@Erionh being all ages (in terms of content warning) does not make something a children’s game.
And so far as I am aware it was not made for schools, Jundroo just figured it could work as such.
@Erionh Calling it a children's game. It's all-ages with a strong bias towards teens and older. Actual children (12 and below) are notoriously bad at this game and a nuisance on the site.
@raftech256 Disgustingly intentional.
If by QOL you mean actually realistic physics, I agree. I want a plane that works well because it's designed well, not because it had to be XML modded since actually building realistic would give terrible performance (primarily in regards to top speed and range).
A sound barrier would be a good addition, even if it was incredibly difficult to work with.
@Solent I said the Yamato 20K, not the highest part count craft you can find.
The Yamato might run at like 1 fps, which is why I'm considering it.
I want to send you an image of a blown apart hand.
+2Goodness knows I already have one in mind.
Dude just build it.
+2A first plane isn't going to be glamourous. Focus on making something that flies well enough, and make sure you understand why it does.
Breaking news: Floating object invented that doesn't use propeller
@keiyronelleavgeek566 100x0.07= 7 you dolt
@V no
@TheMouse no
@keiyronelleavgeek566 St least 0.07
Damnit!
+1It was SpongeBob!
Alright placing my bets on the image.
+1Surely not a rick roll, right? Too uncreative.
Hmm... I'm gonna say... a picture of Franklin D. Roosevelt!
Oh shit she's alive
Someday...
+2setting cheese
+1I'm already loading traps as we speak
Damn, Mouse. I've been a more active poster.
+1Unfortunately because of this that carrier will have been your last.
@SPWithLizzie Reasonable.
I see?
I’ll have to look further into this later.
@Randomplayer nobody sells at that price, not as far as I’m aware anyhow.
Also, 500000 what?
@Erionh politics haven’t been mentioned in a while.
By that same argument you could say that laptop computers were created for schools because schools use them. I doubt they were. Just because something is used in a context does not mean it was made for that context. This isn’t difficult to comprehend.
I’m sure this would be very interesting if you actually explained what a surface normal is.
+2Needs a glossary.
@Erionh being all ages (in terms of content warning) does not make something a children’s game.
And so far as I am aware it was not made for schools, Jundroo just figured it could work as such.
@DeeganishCountryball understood. What type? Larger and older, or newer and smaller?
I’m not looking for joke answers. If you have nothing useful to say then don’t say anything at all.
@DeeganishCountryball is that your serious answer?
777 million to? What’s the range?
It’s the opposite, really.
I’ve teased many projects now sitting idle and unfinished.
Somebody please kill ShinyGemsBro for me.
Thank you.
whar
@raftech256 Quite the opposite.
@Convex Then you get nothing.
@Monarchii Look who's alive again
+1@THEOKPILOT Light, you're thinking of light.
@THEOKPILOT The drawing?
@THEOKPILOT From Graingy's catalogue or from another source?
@RepublicofWrightIsles Really wish he hadn't.
@Erionh Calling it a children's game. It's all-ages with a strong bias towards teens and older. Actual children (12 and below) are notoriously bad at this game and a nuisance on the site.
+2@raftech256 Disgustingly intentional.
@Erionh "Children's" is a tad demeaning, no?
+4@RB107 So lighter aircraft with more modern tech?
@F16xl Lighter modern aircraft, or older and less advanced larger aircraft?
@Liensis The first reason is an insult in the context of the second.
@RB107 By quality you mean...? Heavy 4th gen/affordable 5th?
@ARandomPlayer It is because he's an enormous...
Well, let's not get political here, eh?
10!
31/3/25
The narcissism jet.
+4I mean akin to the door gunners on the VR Gator 2.
That's fast
Is the rear gunner VR compatible?
@Boeing727200F I'll send that up.
If by QOL you mean actually realistic physics, I agree. I want a plane that works well because it's designed well, not because it had to be XML modded since actually building realistic would give terrible performance (primarily in regards to top speed and range).
+1A sound barrier would be a good addition, even if it was incredibly difficult to work with.
@Boeing727200F Is that your genuine answer?
1.3-1.4 billion USD per unit?
@Boeing727200F If you're not going to say anything helpful then don't say anything at all.
@X99STRIKER You'd buy a model airplane at best.
+2@Boeing727200F @F16xl @SuperSuperTheSylph You three are exceedingly unhelpful.
+1Unless SuperSuperTheSylph meant $50 Million range?