Yeessss please trust me with artifacts of incredible power I promise I won't do anything nefarious or megalomaniacal yessssssss... But how did this start?
On Mars Christmas isn’t actually celebrated; News Years is celebrated courtesy of the Soviets (who we got a lot from).
However, due to my Earthly coworkers, I find myself roped into Christmas-related stuff.
Funny how that works out.
Anyways, this is way too early.
The driver and machine gunner got divorced. The machine gunner took the gun, while the driver brought in this "ammunition" hoe that'll go off at the slightest knock against her.
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I highly recommend the 76 Shermans. Sure, they may not come as easily as, say, the Tiger I, due to their reliance on softer factors (50 cal, reload, STAB, etc.) but they're still excellent in CQC.
5.0 US is solid, 2 vehicles.
5.3 US is solid, three vehicles + SPAA,
5.7 US is solid (though I don't use the T1E1 90 since I lucked into a crazy high K/D in the first few matches and can't bring myself to ruin it), 3-4 vehicles + uptiered SPAA if you're willing.
6.0 US... ehhh, without the T86 maybe not so great. It's okay. 2 vehicles.
6.3 US is meh, rather mid vehicles. It's serviceable. 4 vehicles.
6.7 is excellent. Maybe ignore the M26, though. 6 vehicles counting the rather pointless M26.
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I see.
With all the weaknesses though, is it really worth it?
Over a 76, I mean. M4A1 (76) is extremely good at only 0.3 higher, and the M6A1 is also excellent.
Rabbit person
+1Would’ve preferred metric units, but otherwise not bad.
It’s really getting annoying. It’s been days.
+3@Boeing727200F did you get into the paint again you pond beast
@Bugati87 can you please not cover things up? So far nothing has actually been covered up on the battlefield (terrain notwithstanding).
+1@Boeing727200F
I hope not…
Yeessss please trust me with artifacts of incredible power I promise I won't do anything nefarious or megalomaniacal yessssssss...
But how did this start?
@M109simp I mean I kept getting destroyed by missiles I couldn't see coming.
+180% of luggage keeps sliding off.
+210/10.
@M109simp Was getting bullied because of that.
+1Exterior looks kinda rough but interior is promising.
@RIGAM0RT1S hm
@TheRLAF capitalism.
Going to sleep and not waking up until the next day is over?
On Mars Christmas isn’t actually celebrated; News Years is celebrated courtesy of the Soviets (who we got a lot from).
However, due to my Earthly coworkers, I find myself roped into Christmas-related stuff.
Funny how that works out.
Anyways, this is way too early.
The GOAT
+1How very interesting. Seems I missed them by just over a year.
@Monarchii i didnt think id get this far aimless
@Boeing727200F Okay I just realized the day starts at UTC
@Boeing727200F tf is a Hes
grats
@Pakdaaircraftindustries The irony was it wasn't even a box.
It was... oddly pyramid shaped.
@Pakdaaircraftindustries Turns out, for once, it was actually a Tiger that time.
@LM0418 yeah man you got it
@Pakdaaircraftindustries Something about wanting to go to Mars.
I'm sure they'll turn up eventually.
@Pakdaaircraftindustries Shunted out by that breech, who has no concept of personal space.
The driver and machine gunner got divorced. The machine gunner took the gun, while the driver brought in this "ammunition" hoe that'll go off at the slightest knock against her.
@Boeing727200F THEIR THE ONE WHO DOESN'T WORK!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!!
bastrards
Good execution of the image but the joke gave me cancer
+9@TheLoadingGorilla I can no longer preach the glory of the T34.
@TheLoadingGorilla I want to tear apart the person who started that meme with meat hooks and iodine.
+3Fr I will go to war to defend 6.7 US.
+1Especially the T34.
Especially the T34.
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I highly recommend the 76 Shermans. Sure, they may not come as easily as, say, the Tiger I, due to their reliance on softer factors (50 cal, reload, STAB, etc.) but they're still excellent in CQC.
5.0 US is solid, 2 vehicles.
5.3 US is solid, three vehicles + SPAA,
5.7 US is solid (though I don't use the T1E1 90 since I lucked into a crazy high K/D in the first few matches and can't bring myself to ruin it), 3-4 vehicles + uptiered SPAA if you're willing.
6.0 US... ehhh, without the T86 maybe not so great. It's okay. 2 vehicles.
6.3 US is meh, rather mid vehicles. It's serviceable. 4 vehicles.
6.7 is excellent. Maybe ignore the M26, though. 6 vehicles counting the rather pointless M26.
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I see.
With all the weaknesses though, is it really worth it?
Over a 76, I mean. M4A1 (76) is extremely good at only 0.3 higher, and the M6A1 is also excellent.
@Pakdaaircraftindustries 0.3 lower.
I suppose the SA50 is, practically, 5.3 courtesy of no lineup. I've no idea if UK has a 4.7 lineup.
Isn't it basically just a crappier M4A4 SA50?
There's no way that engine works...
+2The wheels definitely don't, though.
@SILVERPANZER You must be so proud
+1I may be an idiot, but I'm not a big enough idiot to download something literally called "Trojan".
GUH
+1nice looking plane btw
NO DON'T-
+1Little shits
+2Firefly?
@avDude4 Insert industrial diesel engine start-up SFX
@jamesPLANESii Cooking themselves.
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Thank. Any remarks?
This website is so bloody broken
@Cuboidable …. Never buy ordinance from clowns…