Youve outdone yourself! In a good way! This is quite wonderful - I love the landing gear especially, and I see what you mean about trim. All in all lovely stuff, as Shakin Stevens was want to say.
PS. The trim is most definitely not inverted. It is the right way around.
Ok, I just read the argument you had with SD.
You got suplexed, intellectually speaking. Hard. Just whipped right up and over. I think you might have popped right out of your shoes.
You are most kind. Im a lot less prolific these days too. I guess two nippers, and full time employment do that to you. Im currently working on another biplane for the ww1 challenge, a sports car (because why not?) and an entry to Adlersteiners Luftwaffe Challenge. But the big man upstairs only knows when any of it will get finished. Tag me on your Scimitar, I’d love to see her! @Tang0five
Its ok. You made good points. I knew about the canopy hood - early mk1 Spits had the smaller hood too. I didnt know about the exhausts, though. Every days a school day! @WarHawk95
Right. Someones going to have to explain this to me. This must be a young guys thing that us old guys dont get.
Someone takes my Spit, chops out the cockpit, removes most of the details, repaints it and gets more downloads and upvotes than the original.
Thank god for autocredit.
I also find it frustrating to fine tune the angle on rotators etc. Is like the slider jumps a little each time I take my finger off. Although this might be a flaw indicative of the Apple touch screen, rather than something Jundroo can actually fix. I think the ability to physically type in the angle, speed, etc would fix a lot of issues. @jamesPLANESii
Roundels. Warpaint. Right-oh old bean. I was considering making this one an Aussie or Kiwi; you know, some colonial type...
As for keeping her flying and not crashing in a large fire ball, well, the secret is to have an articulating rotor head and just enough gyro stabilisation so that it dampens my ham fisted piloting, but doesnt completely immobilise her. That and swearing. Lots of swearing. @Tang0five
Whats the «in» group? Seriously, Ive been around here for 18 months or so and I cant say that Ive ever seen it, heard it or experienced it. I have, however met a bunch of sterling chaps whom I have come to hold in high esteem. The «in» crowd can go swing for all I care. Whoever they are... I really do think that you are setting too great a value on rank. @Spacedoge12345plane
Nah, I think I’ll let her be. If you want to make the prop alteration before you test her then great! But if not, no big deal. Her take off performance is marginal, due to her being over her safe take off weight, you see, but her flight performance is ok-ish, once you drop tanks and start using ordinance. I have two more entries in the works, too! Great challenge. @Dimkal
This is nice. The YA-9 competed against the YA-10 and lost. Partly because of politics, partly because of the advantages the YA-10 represented. I seem to remember that the engine placement on the 9 was frowned upon. Low in the airframe as they are, they are exposed to ground fire and debris ingestion. The podded engines in the 10 were looked upon as a better config for the CAS role.
Seriously, though, my plan was to balance this against my FM-2 Wildcat. It is supposed to roll like that because it needs to roll faster than my Wildcat. The main issue I have with her is that she is almost twice as heavy as an actual Zero. @BogdanX
Really good fun to zip around in. Just look out for the Blue Meanies.
+1Cool. Tag me when youre done? @DPSAircraftManufacturer
+1Youve outdone yourself! In a good way! This is quite wonderful - I love the landing gear especially, and I see what you mean about trim. All in all lovely stuff, as Shakin Stevens was want to say.
PS. The trim is most definitely not inverted. It is the right way around.
+1Pretty much. It wasnt planned that way, but it turned out ok-ish. @DPSAircraftManufacturer
+1Cheers! If I did this again I would focus on making her fly better. That and a wee bit mire detail. Glad you like her, though! @Texasfam04
+1@Stalinity @Spitfirelad05 @sexylips35
+1Many thanks, much appreciated!
Nice a*se...
+1Rocket interceptor with prone pilot. Instructions soon, but the wee man has a fever and lots of snot, so no time for me, Im affraid! @Tang0five
+1Ok, I just read the argument you had with SD.
+1You got suplexed, intellectually speaking. Hard. Just whipped right up and over. I think you might have popped right out of your shoes.
@EternalDarkness I think this thread needs to not be here.
+1I am in.
+1You are most kind. Im a lot less prolific these days too. I guess two nippers, and full time employment do that to you. Im currently working on another biplane for the ww1 challenge, a sports car (because why not?) and an entry to Adlersteiners Luftwaffe Challenge. But the big man upstairs only knows when any of it will get finished. Tag me on your Scimitar, I’d love to see her! @Tang0five
+1Very nice. You’ll be spotlighting me, soon enough.
+1Part count of the beast. Very nice SD!
+1Its ok. You made good points. I knew about the canopy hood - early mk1 Spits had the smaller hood too. I didnt know about the exhausts, though. Every days a school day! @WarHawk95
+1Right. Someones going to have to explain this to me. This must be a young guys thing that us old guys dont get.
+1Someone takes my Spit, chops out the cockpit, removes most of the details, repaints it and gets more downloads and upvotes than the original.
Thank god for autocredit.
I also find it frustrating to fine tune the angle on rotators etc. Is like the slider jumps a little each time I take my finger off. Although this might be a flaw indicative of the Apple touch screen, rather than something Jundroo can actually fix. I think the ability to physically type in the angle, speed, etc would fix a lot of issues. @jamesPLANESii
+1Thanks! Im glad you liked it. I have another on the way, too. @TheRussiansAreComing
+1Roundels. Warpaint. Right-oh old bean. I was considering making this one an Aussie or Kiwi; you know, some colonial type...
As for keeping her flying and not crashing in a large fire ball, well, the secret is to have an articulating rotor head and just enough gyro stabilisation so that it dampens my ham fisted piloting, but doesnt completely immobilise her. That and swearing. Lots of swearing. @Tang0five
+1I did, didnt I? :-D @JohnnyBoythePilot
+1God save the Queen. salutes
+1Hmmm. Ive never built a whirlybird before. I have also skipped the last couple of challenges you’ve put on. I guess Im in.
+1@VVarperro02 Gracias!
+1@PancakeAddiction thanks for the extremely rapid upvote!
+1@Phoza Cheers!
+1I would dearly love to see how tou do that curved roundel...
+1This build is just a-bloody-stounding! @RamboJutter
Whats the «in» group? Seriously, Ive been around here for 18 months or so and I cant say that Ive ever seen it, heard it or experienced it. I have, however met a bunch of sterling chaps whom I have come to hold in high esteem. The «in» crowd can go swing for all I care. Whoever they are... I really do think that you are setting too great a value on rank. @Spacedoge12345plane
+1It flies really nicely and I like the realism. Nothing to dislike here at all. A very nice kite, this. @EternalDarkness
+1@Sgtk Thanks for the spot!
+1Cheers! I’ve just finished a couple of naval variants. One war time and another post war. @Tang0five
+1This is really quite splendid. Lots of detail and accurate too!
+1Thanks matey. In the end I just gave up. This iPhone maxes out at around 700 parts. There are so many details I would have liked to add. @Tang0five
+1Crikey. This is a hot kite. Good job, old boy!
+1Abso - bloody - lutely wonderful!
+1France became independent from whom? @bang091
+1Nope. Im from Scotland. So basically whomever England are playing against. Nothing personal to my Southern friends, but it is what it is. @ChiChiWerx
+1Nah, I think I’ll let her be. If you want to make the prop alteration before you test her then great! But if not, no big deal. Her take off performance is marginal, due to her being over her safe take off weight, you see, but her flight performance is ok-ish, once you drop tanks and start using ordinance. I have two more entries in the works, too! Great challenge. @Dimkal
+1I think I have something to enter here... cool challenge.
+1This is nice. The YA-9 competed against the YA-10 and lost. Partly because of politics, partly because of the advantages the YA-10 represented. I seem to remember that the engine placement on the 9 was frowned upon. Low in the airframe as they are, they are exposed to ground fire and debris ingestion. The podded engines in the 10 were looked upon as a better config for the CAS role.
Very cool build!
+1«Sends planes to the gulag». I loled.
+1Oh stop. You’ll make me blush. @MrDoolittle
+1Thanks! Much appreciated.@mikoyanster
+1Seriously, though, my plan was to balance this against my FM-2 Wildcat. It is supposed to roll like that because it needs to roll faster than my Wildcat. The main issue I have with her is that she is almost twice as heavy as an actual Zero. @BogdanX
+1Yes, she could be doing with losing a few pounds... @AnoniMosu
+1This is very, very cool.
+1Very nice. Flies very well and looks stunning. And whats a couple of exploding ailerons between friends?
Tip top, old boy, tip top.
+1Very nice concept. I like this a lot.
+1Chuffin prawns! Lovely kite you have there, old chap!
+1Ok. Im in.
+1This is wonderful. Scottish, too, so it naturally is superior to everything else. Ever.
+1