Uh... that's not for KERP, (like, no drone can do more than surveillance before 1960, you not ahead of our time, you got futuristic thecnology at this point. Stop wanting to being most powerful country in term of vehicles capacity. Otgerwise, you have to accept an atrociously low reliability, like 5 to 10% reliability, for an abursdly high price...
@BOSKnight you definitly do. It doesn't mean your builds are amasing, but also commitment, strong sense of community, and even if you don't deserve it, we believe you rightfully got it as we like you as another member of our big SP familly
@BOSKnight you know even modern IR missiles struggles getting catch on props. don't make me spitt whole paragraphs about don't be futuristic when we aren't even modern.
@BOSKnight irl, flares began to be studied in 1959 only, we are in 1953, Republic of Spin got a few experimental flares, they were not sent to anyone for studies.
.
As for this fighter speed, even if there is a gap un 50years doesn't mean a 20 year gap is enough to use it. In the rp, the F-16 creation should be at least in 1963 instead of irl after 1970. If you continue that way, you'll create stealth aircraft before anyone get MRBMs XD
And these speeds are just unrealistic as hell. And Mach 2 top speed? At our RP time, only jets made simply for speed could get near or touch this speed. So a 17 years early F-16 wouldn't possibly pass 990 mph. I won't say anything for the cruise speed, i believe i said enough to let you understand it is not a rush to best weaponry the fastest, but only having fun playing our realistic roles...
@BOSKnight 20 years gap between reality and the rp, no specifications on the in-RP capacities, and nothing about experimental countermesures before putting in...
.
I cannot say it can be used in the rp...
It would be good to specify armor thickness, effective armor, weapons penetration powers and the RP weight otherwise it can be moved to play against the oponent. But great build.
@AviationLoverGEEK444 for now, none are on production. Gotta finish and see final specs and only then GCI Financial Bureau will be able to set a price and put it in production.
@AviationLoverGEEK444 like always XD what you want as the super bomb? Because can be explosive power, inciendiary, splash, cluster, guided, or even ground penetrator.
@BOSKnight even bigger, but well, let's say it is just a little bit too much for realism (without counting the fact that this same tank got more armor power than the Maus)
For the order:
The ADATS have no equivalent in technology, and would cost at least tens of millions to developpe and research and it'd take several years, and without insurance of convenient results. All i can give a try on is an early ATGM, but upgraded, or turned for pure air purpose. No technology enables mixed roles.
If it is fine by you, it might cost C$ 500 000 to C$ 700 000.
Only approval of @B1BLancer remains to be given. Then, i'll start right after the tank is done.
@BOSKnight ... buddy, at this era, only little bombs (100lbs at big most) can be used in this early cold war era like.
+1Uh... that's not for KERP, (like, no drone can do more than surveillance before 1960, you not ahead of our time, you got futuristic thecnology at this point. Stop wanting to being most powerful country in term of vehicles capacity. Otgerwise, you have to accept an atrociously low reliability, like 5 to 10% reliability, for an abursdly high price...
+1@LunarEclipseSP only very short range. Experimental, it is meant to be used like targets to train on for SADS and only 95km controllable range.
It can't use autopilots, cameras nor weapons. I am working on better drone ranges already, tho.
+1@keiyronelleavgeek566 fail. Next time maybe
+1Quite active it was. Here... fun but sad i missed the live show
+1T
+1@B1BLancer control from far away.
+1Amasing work... well, i've gotta make something good...
+1Sell was Worth the game at least (wish he is doing good)
+1@RepublicofWrightIsles i am 3 years older 😀
+1@BOSKnight you definitly do. It doesn't mean your builds are amasing, but also commitment, strong sense of community, and even if you don't deserve it, we believe you rightfully got it as we like you as another member of our big SP familly
+1@RepublicofWrightIsles you should had maintained yo mouth shut in facts...
+1@BOSKnight you know even modern IR missiles struggles getting catch on props. don't make me spitt whole paragraphs about don't be futuristic when we aren't even modern.
+1Aliens gonna be scared of us with this one
+1Srry but... that's almost not even a medium range...
+1But great to see you are getting real in-game datas.
@SuperSuperTheSylph 3:50
+1@LunarEclipseSP quite a precise description... did you witnessed something like that??
+1@B1BLancer then i will make a flying spear with swing-wing
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 then gotta wait, i didn't finish half of it. Only shape , engines and bomb bays are done.
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 you only want bodies?
+1@B1BLancer well, my bomber's faster but of our era
+1@SPWithLizzie yo scaring me rn :[
+1@B1BLancer a new place, new test area, new techs... hehehe... 🤤
+1@BOSKnight imma make my X-HeLoRaMBo way more powerful, dissuasive and useful than you B-1B
+1@B1BLancer like a kind of replica or smthg? If so, might be hard as hell... might try tho.
+1@BOSKnight irl, flares began to be studied in 1959 only, we are in 1953, Republic of Spin got a few experimental flares, they were not sent to anyone for studies.
+1.
As for this fighter speed, even if there is a gap un 50years doesn't mean a 20 year gap is enough to use it. In the rp, the F-16 creation should be at least in 1963 instead of irl after 1970. If you continue that way, you'll create stealth aircraft before anyone get MRBMs XD
And these speeds are just unrealistic as hell. And Mach 2 top speed? At our RP time, only jets made simply for speed could get near or touch this speed. So a 17 years early F-16 wouldn't possibly pass 990 mph. I won't say anything for the cruise speed, i believe i said enough to let you understand it is not a rush to best weaponry the fastest, but only having fun playing our realistic roles...
@BOSKnight 20 years gap between reality and the rp, no specifications on the in-RP capacities, and nothing about experimental countermesures before putting in...
+1.
I cannot say it can be used in the rp...
@cyberpunkchicken27 three! 🙋♂️
+1i see... well, my baby will be (literally) twice bigger.
+1It would be good to specify armor thickness, effective armor, weapons penetration powers and the RP weight otherwise it can be moved to play against the oponent. But great build.
+1Alright. I shall surprise you. But don't wait a multi-jet powered bomber. Wait an old fashioned bomber king of the new era!
+1@B1BLancer it will have the craziest capacity you'll ever see. Most dangerous bomber of the RP
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 for now, none are on production. Gotta finish and see final specs and only then GCI Financial Bureau will be able to set a price and put it in production.
+1@B1BLancer damn... my bomber dev is on since 5 years now? Damn...
+1@B1BLancer hehe
+1@keiyronelleavgeek566 and Tu-95 engines
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 max dimension, aircraft to carry it, and max weight.
+1Welcome? Or an alt?
+1I love the A-36. I litterally dogfighted Bf-109s with this babe
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 like always XD what you want as the super bomb? Because can be explosive power, inciendiary, splash, cluster, guided, or even ground penetrator.
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 depends if B1BLancer's ok for it and the characteristics
+1
+1TP-40 countra-propeller XD looks crazily good. Wish realism goes witg it 🤩
@B1BLancer i am getting specialised in stabilised canons of tanks
+1@BOSKnight alr. It will cost C$1.287.400.000
+1I put them in production right away.
@BOSKnight i got an idea of how to do it 🤩
+1@BOSKnight alright. Be precise in the turrets configurations you want.
One multipurpose and another specificly for anti-air?
+1@BOSKnight alright, i can do 2 of each. But the price will go up to around a million, you know?
And why do you precise the turret? I understood that. I meant once i finish my tank, the MBT-67/R0
+1@BOSKnight even bigger, but well, let's say it is just a little bit too much for realism (without counting the fact that this same tank got more armor power than the Maus)
For the order:
The ADATS have no equivalent in technology, and would cost at least tens of millions to developpe and research and it'd take several years, and without insurance of convenient results. All i can give a try on is an early ATGM, but upgraded, or turned for pure air purpose. No technology enables mixed roles.
If it is fine by you, it might cost C$ 500 000 to C$ 700 000.
Only approval of @B1BLancer remains to be given. Then, i'll start right after the tank is done.
+1@BOSKnight yo 150
+1@BOSKnight tgere is nothing anyone can say rn... we are in future era with this, we are not even modern anymore
+1