Profile image

M-MBT.Löwenhart AMFK1A1 [KE-RP]

4,025 AugustVonMartis  2 days ago
Auto Credit Based on AugustVonMartis's Hull.Lowenhart AMFK13X7 [KE-RP]

Löwenhart Medium Main Battle Tank
Designed and manufactured by the corporation AMFK.


Armament

Main Gun:
- C15.5cm/45cal MK-III — 155mm smoothbore cannon
- Autoloader reload time: 1.0 second (reliability 42.5%. The accuracy is 57.5%)
- Ammunition types:
- APHECR — muzzle velocity: 875 m/s
- HESH — muzzle velocity: 800 m/s
- APFSDS (155/100/35mm) — muzzle velocity: 1,750 m/s
- Depression:
- Vertical: +30° / -2°
- Horizontal: +180° / -180°

Secondary Armament:
- C3.5cm/42.85cal MK-III — 35mm autocannon
- Ammunition: AP
- Rate of fire: 10 rounds/sec (0.1s between shots)
- Muzzle velocity: 950 m/s
- Coaxial HMG:
- Options: 15mm or 12.7mm
- Rate of fire: 1,800 RPM

Commander's Independent Weapon Station (CIWS):
- C5cm/55cal MK-II
- Supports various types of 50×420mm to 50×500mm ammunition
- Rate of fire: 0.8s between shots
- Optional upgrade: 20mm Remote Gun turret with 50mm grenade launcher by Overlord prime’s turret

Additional Weaponry:
- Optional secondary turret (same as CIWS or other compatible types)


Mobility

Engine:
- AMFK Kraftblock V16-MF1200HE
- Output: 1,200 horsepower
- Fuel: Multi-fuel compatible

Speed:
- Maximum (on-road): 52 km/h
- Maximum (off-road): 28 km/h


Crew

  • Commander
  • Driver
  • Gunner
  • Radioman
  • Loader

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Hull.Lowenhart AMFK13X7 [KE-RP]
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 16.5ft (5.0m)
  • Length 49.0ft (14.9m)
  • Height 18.7ft (5.7m)
  • Empty Weight 168,545lbs (76,450kg)
  • Loaded Weight 176,140lbs (79,896kg)

Performance

  • Wing Loading N/A
  • Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
  • Drag Points 13675

Parts

  • Number of Parts 333
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 1,708
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    WIP
    Front plate thickness: 85mm at a 84 degree angle

    Middle front plate thickness: 165mm at 68 degrees
    Lower front plate thickness: 100mm at a 45 degree angle + 60mm plate
    Upper side thickness: 85mm at 0 degrees
    Lower side thickness: 70mm at 0 degrees
    Side armour plates thickness: 20mm at 0 degrees
    Upper rear thickness: 40mm at 10 degrees
    Lower rear thickness: 50mm at 0 degrees
    Hull roof armor: 35MM at 0 degrees
    Hull floor armor: 35MM at 0 degrees

    Gun mask: 240mm
    Turret front cheek armor: mm
    Turret mantlet armor: mm
    Turret middle and rear cheek armor: mm
    Turret rear armor: 50mm

    Pinned 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    currently have 2,500 units available for sale.
    Price: $3,000,000 ~ 4,800,000
    Package: comes with 2 months maintenanc

    Pinned 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    Okay, A2 will be released faster than I expected (well, there's nothing to work on there)

    2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @GeneralCorpInc Well, if I don't die and make A2, then I'll stick to realism as much as possible for me.

    2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @GeneralCorpInc yeeea

    2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @AugustVonMartis yea, relatively gud 👍

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @GeneralCorpInc Is this better?

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @GeneralCorpInc Something like an analogue MBT-70 (And yes, that second of reloading is from there)

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @GeneralCorpInc I will change the projectile speeds in A2 (namely in SP)

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @AugustVonMartis it is an MBT, heavy tank, or anti-tank?

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @GeneralCorpInc I'll take that into account next time (and yes, those 2000 are just a mistake)

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    1s reload time for a 155mm... do you understand that it is faster than what a heavy anti-air canon Autoloader would take to reload? Without counting the faft of the 155mm shells being way, WAY heavier XD welp.
    .
    I wouldn't want to be in that turret for sure x)
    .
    For the weight, i can say nothing as i see no datas about armor...
    .
    But yea, except speed for such a weight, even for 1200hp, it's high forward, we won't say anything for backward, still 50% realistic for our tech.
    .
    Why so low?
    .
    The ammos VELOCITIES! Even High velocity rounds can't reach 2000m/s, so a 155mm apfsds, i won't need to explain, right?
    .
    And for shells that have no discading sabot, the accuracy is low because of aerodynamics over 1200m/s. So accuracy for shells without DS and over 1200m/s goes way below, like 60% sadly...

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSSentinel How much should I reduce the armor thickness value?

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image
    35.8k BOSSentinel

    @AugustVonMartis I was talking in another post… but, it does matter.

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image
    35.8k BOSSentinel

    @AugustVonMartis Yes. It kinda does… the power armor, is in very limited numbers <10K

    +2 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSSentinel Well, considering that there is power armor here in the 1950s, maybe this is not a big problem.

    2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSSentinel umm... I should reduce these values, right?

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSSentinel So wait, where does it say anything about the reliability of the automatic loader?

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image
    35.8k BOSSentinel

    @AugustVonMartis That.. is uhhh, more than the Maus btw…

    +2 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSSentinel 6. What is the lower front plate thickness?
    Answer:
    The lower front plate (LFP) is 80% of the main frontal armor, equivalent to 480–520 mm RHAe KE, reinforced with modular spaced armor to resist mine and close-range RPG threats.

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    . What is the upper front plate thickness?
    Answer:
    The upper front plate (UFP) is equivalent to 100% of the armor baseline, which corresponds to approximately 600–650 mm RHAe against KE threats and over 850 mm RHAe versus chemical energy (HEAT) projectiles,

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image
    1. How reliable is the 35mm cannon?
      Answer:
      The C3.5cm/42.85cal MK-III autocannon is reliable, rated for over 25,000 rounds between failures.
    2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSSentinel reliability 65%. The accuracy is 80% is this normal?

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image

    @BOSSentinel Well, I made a "little" mistake, we'll fix it

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image
    35.8k BOSSentinel

    @AugustVonMartis… did you read the comments of my MBT-70? The reliability, is 68%. The accuracy, is 87%

    +1 2 days ago
  • Log in to see more comments