@destroyerP into a command vessel of a river flotilla at best. It's far too small for a frigate (typically 120-150m in length). In my opinion, it's a nice sightseeing river boat. It could, of course, use some more work.
I believe those rules are in place to provide excuse for removing content that doesn't break other rules, but it's still wrong. Let's say someone says you have very ugly mustache on your post. And keeps insisting that you have ugly mustache. It's not bad enough to be harassment, but you are bothered by it. So mods could remove it if you insist, or if they are annoyed enough by it.
@Ajforever51 it performs pretty well. I don't like takeoff and landing performance (too easy to hit the ground with a prop), but the rest is good. Details are well fitted. Great job.
Hmm, it's a bit out of proportion (canopy too far forward, wings too wide), but still, details land it an upvote (they are amazing). Remind me to test it tomorrow. If I like how it flies, I'll also give a spotlight. Can't test right now.
Looking at it, it reminds me more of a Fairey Firefly than of P-40, due to proportions. Which I like a lot.
@ESIOTROT121 bull is under quite some stress these days. I believe that both of you are wrong, both being stubborn like mules.
I have read your conversation on the chat (most of it), and I have a few notes on behaviour of both sides.
- "General" channel is for everything, including builds;
- I believe you acted the way you did because Bull once told you to go to an appropriate channel, and you wanted to get even;
- He reacted too aggressively, resorting to a kick without it being necessary;
- He "yelled" at you (used capslock).
You should both apologize to one another, in my opinion.
@KerlonceauxIndustries put them on detachers. They'll launch only on LaunchWeapons if you set detachers to AG9, but you can adjust the launch strength.
Not bad, but pretty basic. Why don't you invest time you spend on three builds a day into one build? You could have added custom control surfaces to this plane, and support cables, more detailed landing gear. Maybe even interior. Oh yes, and a paint job. Believe me, things like that pay off. You get ten times more upvotes for three times the work. And you get people telling you you are amazing.
@Othawne nope. Plates work as one rod. You use plates for the look. You go like this: Hinge, leafs, hinge, block, hinge, leafs, hinge, shock. First hinge and the shock are attached to the chassis. Shock should be horizontal.
@Othawne lemme help you: sure, go ahead :)
Put a rotator on one end, two rotators in the middle, a rotator on the other end, a shock on one end rotator, and a block in the middle (between the middle rotators) to attach the axle to.
@FENRIRpapapa no problem. It's a very nice plane. It could use some improvements (mostly detailing) on tail and wings though.
@FasterThanLight sure
@Mostly no problem
@Dankson420 I'm glad to hear that. What scenario?
@destroyerP into a command vessel of a river flotilla at best. It's far too small for a frigate (typically 120-150m in length). In my opinion, it's a nice sightseeing river boat. It could, of course, use some more work.
@JakeTheDogg I wasn't planning on Armata, but I guess it kinda turned out that way. Thanks.
Sure. It would give a bit of background to your builds.
Nice. Inspired by my Delta class river patrol vessel?
@CommanderSword sure
@Mastergamer117 no problem. I'm glad you like it.
Since you are stuck with low number of parts, I suggest going for advanced sculpting and good performance.
@RodWan no problem
Very nice
What version of Soya is this? I know it had many upgrades, most of them affecting the appearance of the ship.
I believe those rules are in place to provide excuse for removing content that doesn't break other rules, but it's still wrong. Let's say someone says you have very ugly mustache on your post. And keeps insisting that you have ugly mustache. It's not bad enough to be harassment, but you are bothered by it. So mods could remove it if you insist, or if they are annoyed enough by it.
Probably the best you can make with scrap parts. Great description. Good job.
@Alienbeef0421 Hey, it's a canopy that fits a cockpit under it. Any other solution would prevent me from adding a cockpit to Dingo.
@Kimcotupan15 that's nice to know. I'm glad my plane inspired you.
Lol, it reminds me of my Dingo :)
@TheNightmare811 I didn't. Give me your mail and I'll contact you instead. Hangouts sometimes bugs like that.
Very well done. You got yourself a new follower.
+3That's nice. The plane looks very cute. Here's a homework for ya, make it on SP :)
Is this solved? If not, maybe I can help.
@DestinyAviation not fair! He came after I upvoted :)
@Razor1790 thanks
Lol, only platinums upvote this
@Ajforever51 no problem
@DerekSP no problem
Here you go
@DerekSP can you tag me in 10-15h (I should be active then) if nobody else answers? I have already turned my laptop off for the night.
@Ajforever51 it performs pretty well. I don't like takeoff and landing performance (too easy to hit the ground with a prop), but the rest is good. Details are well fitted. Great job.
@Johndfg no problem.
It is like @Feanor said. Smaller input gives much quicker response from the engine, and you multiply the power to compensate for input.
Probably the most accurate replica I've ever seen on SP. Great job.
Hmm, it's a bit out of proportion (canopy too far forward, wings too wide), but still, details land it an upvote (they are amazing). Remind me to test it tomorrow. If I like how it flies, I'll also give a spotlight. Can't test right now.
Looking at it, it reminds me more of a Fairey Firefly than of P-40, due to proportions. Which I like a lot.
Maybe add a few pictures in description? If I download this, my laptop will melt, and I'd like to have a better look.
@ESIOTROT121 bull is under quite some stress these days. I believe that both of you are wrong, both being stubborn like mules.
I have read your conversation on the chat (most of it), and I have a few notes on behaviour of both sides.
- "General" channel is for everything, including builds;
- I believe you acted the way you did because Bull once told you to go to an appropriate channel, and you wanted to get even;
- He reacted too aggressively, resorting to a kick without it being necessary;
- He "yelled" at you (used capslock).
You should both apologize to one another, in my opinion.
@Blue0Bull
@Minecraft543 I'm making a TBM truck. It's pretty much done, but I have to finish some details and write a description.
+1@TheNightmare811 Yes, but the voting was inconclusive due to some unrelated stuff. I'll suggest you again soon.
@KerlonceauxIndustries put them on detachers. They'll launch only on LaunchWeapons if you set detachers to AG9, but you can adjust the launch strength.
Not bad, but pretty basic. Why don't you invest time you spend on three builds a day into one build? You could have added custom control surfaces to this plane, and support cables, more detailed landing gear. Maybe even interior. Oh yes, and a paint job. Believe me, things like that pay off. You get ten times more upvotes for three times the work. And you get people telling you you are amazing.
That happens when SP server is offline. It can be offline for maintenance, site update, and a number of other reasons. It's nothing unusual.
@GermanWarMachine that would almost be as much work as making a new ship.
That would be very interesting. I'm sure @BlazeInfinity would make a Japanese destroyer from the WW2, and put it in the race :)
It's pretty cute. There are resemblances to T-4. But you could have made cockpit blend with the plane's back.
Nice plane. But ailerons are glitching through the wing. Again.
@Othawne no problem. Here's the diagram.
@Othawne nope. Plates work as one rod. You use plates for the look. You go like this: Hinge, leafs, hinge, block, hinge, leafs, hinge, shock. First hinge and the shock are attached to the chassis. Shock should be horizontal.
@phanps I don't like to tag peeps. It seems like begging for upvotes. If it's good, you'll see it on the front page.
@Othawne lemme help you: sure, go ahead :)
Put a rotator on one end, two rotators in the middle, a rotator on the other end, a shock on one end rotator, and a block in the middle (between the middle rotators) to attach the axle to.