2,176 Enthusiastic1planes Comments

  • Godzilla minus one 1.5 years ago

    How to fire the heat ray on mobile though

    +5
  • Godzilla minus one 1.5 years ago

    @Hiiamhere the fire button is there but it shows that there's no ammo in the heat ray button

    +3
  • J9W5 - MIKAMI 17 days ago

    Design: 8/10
    Speed: 7.4/10
    Armament: 6/10
    Realism: 8/10
    Features: 2/10
    Maneuverability: 6/10

    Overall 8/10 An all round great Aircraft! The dedication to making the description is staggering also!

    +2
  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 21 days ago

    @GeneralCorpInc both, I will rate according to the aircraft's Build and design and the Turning, I will rate BF-109s that turn like a screw lower because, well it doesn't really make all that sense

    +2
  • My First Plane! 22 days ago

    Welcome to the SP community son, nice build!

    +2
  • What I like about simpleplanes 1.4 years ago

    Simple planes for me, isn't a form of art, it's a canvas to make it, anything can be made with enough creativity and Hard work, if you don't like something, try something else, this game is a rare gem in sand box games, and I am thankful for that.

    +2
  • Sourai(WW2 FIGHTER CHALLENGE) yesterday

    Design: -
    Speed: 6/10
    Armament: 6/10
    Realism: 8/10
    Features: 3/10
    Maneuverability: 5/10
    Overall 7.1/10!

    +1
  • Ad Astra M-122 yesterday

    Design: 7/10
    Speed: 7/10
    Armament: 8/10
    Realism: 7/10
    Features: 4/10
    Maneuverability: 7/10
    Overall, 9/10! You Absolutely smashed it with this plane!

    +1
  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 10 days ago

    @BOSSentinel 3 submissions

    +1
  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 10 days ago

    @BOSSentinel editting the mass and drag scales is apart of xml, it's allowed

    +1
  • Seacyclone MK-46 (WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE) 14 days ago

    Design: 8/10
    Speed: 7/10
    Armament: 8/10
    Realism: 8.5/10
    Features: 6/10
    Maneuverability: 9/10

    Overall 9.2/10 , what an absolute masterpiece! I've never seen something so good!

    +1
  • Hutoufeng no.1.(Fictitious world war ii plane) 15 days ago

    Hey mate, what nickname can I call you? Because you're work is really good but praising it and saying your user is kinda confusing lol 😅😅

    +1
  • Petlyakov Pe-3 (WWII FIGTHER CHALLENGE) 15 days ago

    Design: N/A
    Speed: 6/10
    Armament: 6/10
    Realism: 7/10
    Features: 3/10
    Maneuverability: 6/10

    Overall 6/10, Very good recreation!

    +1
  • Hutoufeng no.1.(Fictitious world war ii plane) 16 days ago

    But also it really looks like a baby bf-109😅😅

    +1
  • Hutoufeng no.1.(Fictitious world war ii plane) 16 days ago

    Design: 8/10
    Speed: 7/10
    Armament: 6/10
    Realism: 8/10
    Features: 5/10
    Maneuverability: 7/10

    Overall 8.8/10, genuinely one of the more unique planes I've seen on this platform, you've done well sir

    +1
  • P-83 17 days ago

    Design:7/10
    Speed: 4/10
    Armament: 7/10
    Realism: 6/10
    Features: 9/10
    Maneuverability: 6/10

    Overall 7/10! Though due to the size of this chungus, I thought you accidentally posted a bomber instead 😅😅

    +1
  • [WW2 FIGHTER CHALLENGE] X-70B War Falcon 17 days ago

    Design: 5.5/10
    Speed: 8/10
    Armament: 7/10
    Realism: 2/10
    Features: 4/10
    Maneuverability: 6/10
    Slight downgrade...

    +1
  • [WW2 FIGHTER CHALLENGE] X-70A War Eagle 17 days ago

    Design: 5.5/10
    Speed: 7/10
    Armament: 7/10
    Realism: 3/10
    Features: 4/10
    Maneuverability: 7/10
    6/10 overall Quite an odd design...still very nice tho

    +1
  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 21 days ago

    @JohnbuildsPlanes304 yarnhub lol

    +1
  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 21 days ago

    @Mitterbin yep, fictional planes will be rated and accepted the same as replicas ^^

    +1
  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 21 days ago

    @Mitterbin I will let you know why you were disqualified ^^

    +1
  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 21 days ago

    If you want to ask me a question, you can do so here!

    +1
  • X-T.Panzerpard 2 [KE-RP] 25 days ago

    Goated tank good sir

    +1
  • [Fixed kinda] RDN-56N 25 days ago

    @Speedhuntress

    +1
  • Simple A-10 26 days ago

    Very good!

    +1
  • X-DR.XF-6A [Turbo war] 27 days ago

    Very good sir

    +1
  • Cronar C.1B Hornet Bomber one month ago

    @Technicalstrat the history comes from my novel/story thing I'm writing, I'm just putting it into my simple planes builds

    +1
  • Cronar C.1B Hornet Bomber one month ago

    @Mitterbin and thank you so much for all the Upvotes you put on my account!!!

    +1
  • Cronar C.1B Hornet Bomber one month ago

    @Mitterbin Lol i just made the description:p

    +1
  • Land Combat Vehicle Challenge one month ago

    Hii, I just made mine rn But unfortunately I couldn't make it a successor :( hopefully y'all could still check it out tho
    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/yo9BH9/TGT-TE-35T-85A

    +1
  • Vinzestahl F-54 Black Vulcan 2 months ago

    @mod hi hello can you make this build a predecessor of this one
    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/uAd79E/FGMD-Challenge

    +1
  • THE FICTIONAL CHALLENGE 3 months ago

    Why is the first stage so long? I bet most people that want to participate in this comp have already finished their work

    +1
  • Godzilla minus one 1.5 years ago

    @Hiiamhere oh it worked, incredible project btw, this is just immaculate, keep doing what you do, this stuff is amazing.

    +1
  • XP-51 8 hours ago

    @BOSSentinel if this design is supposed to be like this, then don't change it, but definitely upgrade the speed and armament

  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 14 hours ago

    Also build deadline is still august 12th

  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 14 hours ago

    Part limit is raised to 1500 to those who like be sophisticated in their builds

  • P-74 Twister yesterday

    Design: 7/10
    Speed: 7.3/10
    Armament: 5/10
    Realism: 8/10
    Features: 2/10
    Maneuverability: 3/10
    Overall 7.8/10! Definitely needs some improvement but it's still great!

  • (WW2 FIGHTER CHALLENGE) Zero yesterday

    Design: -
    Speed: 6/10
    Armament: 7/10
    Realism: 7.5/10
    Features: 2/10
    Maneuverability: 6/10
    Overall 7.7/10!

  • Densei(WW2 FIGHTER CHALLENGE) yesterday

    Design: 6.8/10
    Speed: 7/10
    Armament: 5/10
    Realism: 7.8/10
    Features: 3/10
    Maneuverability: 5/10
    Overall 7.6/10!

  • XP-51 yesterday

    Design: 6/10
    Speed: 4/10
    Armament: 3/10
    Realism: 5/10
    Features:2/10
    Maneuverability: 7/10
    Overall 6.2/10! Very well could be improved

  • Boeing P-26 'Peashooter' yesterday

    Design: -
    Speed: 6/10
    Armament: 4/10
    Realism: 9/10
    Features:8/10
    Maneuverability: 7/10
    Overall 7.8/10! Very nice paint job and realism!

  • Maxwell M.34 (WW2 FIGHTER CHALLENGE) 10 days ago

    Design: 7/10
    Speed: 5/10
    Armament: 3/10
    Realism: 8/10
    Features: 4/10
    Maneuverability: 4/10

    Overall 6.8/10, good plane but could very well be improved!

  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 11 days ago

    @RaptorAerospace I still can't see it tho

  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 11 days ago

    @RaptorAerospace mm, I get that, another person also posted their plane to this comp but it didn't want to show up

  • Seacyclone MK-46 (WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE) 14 days ago

    @GGEZXD13133 mmm, that would be great but my rectangular potato may not be able to handle it 😅😅

  • POX-002 hellburn 17 days ago

    Design: 6/10
    Speed: 7.5/10
    Armament: 3/10
    Realism: 7/10
    Features: 5/10
    Maneuverability: 5/10

    Overall 6/10 Definitely not bad, but it could be Improved!

  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 18 days ago

    Btw, if you violate a rule, your overall score will be reduced, but if you violate more than 2 rules, you are disqualified, but the thing is after you get disqualified, your disqualified submission gets reset, so you have a new submission attempt

  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 19 days ago

    @GabDaGamerSP nope

  • WW2 ERA FIGHTER CHALLENGE 19 days ago

    @GabDaGamerSP not necessarily cheating, but I wont be able to test it because I'm on mobile