54.4k CoolPeach Comments

  • Why the current system of our site is not fair. 6.4 years ago

    I’m going to be straight up honest here, sometimes you’ve just gotta toughen up and move on. If you care so much about the attention of your builds then maybe you should reconsider your priorities. I’ve experienced situations were I have builds that end up with less attention than others even though I put more work into them. Does that stop me though? No. In fact it makes me want to find better ways to build, it makes me build better and better. And instead of whinging about it, why don’t you find a solution to your “problem”? There’s no point complaining if you ain’t got some sort of fix for it. As of lately, the community’s lost a bit of that casual vibe it once had, nowadays there a far too many people who care about the number of upvotes on their builds. Just my two cents.

    +6
  • Northrop Grumman RQ-4B Global Hawk 6.4 years ago

    That’s another one (probably the MQ-9 Reaper), this one is purely for reconnaissance only
    @BossyMr

  • Yakovlev Yak-3 6.5 years ago

    Not at all, go right ahead
    @COENTHETESTPILOT

  • an invention that will change simpleplanes forever 6.5 years ago

    Honestly you’d be better off just telling us. Like others have said, nobody wants to sit there for ages with the chance that something might happen. Even then, having this thing running for around 15mins, I haven’t noticed anything interesting. Is it meant to change direction or what?

  • What was Simple Planes used be like? 6.5 years ago

    I wouldn’t call it a dark age, if anything were seeing some of the best builds this sites has ever seen. The overall build quality has increased substantially.

    +4
  • Fairey Swordfish Mk.I F.A.A. [W.5856] 6.5 years ago

    Um, I think I would’ve gotten the wing physics wrong if my plane did have a landing speed of 38mph...
    @randomusername

  • Announcing Winners (Bi-plane challenge) 6.5 years ago

    Brilliant challenge overall. I was forced to build something a bit different from usual but really enjoyed it nonetheless. Thank you for hosting it!

  • Does anybody know how to use the “F12 In-Game Screenshot Upload” Mod on Mac? 6.5 years ago

    Have you tried pressing the fn button + f12?

  • :( Built a low part count car and the Response was terrible 6.5 years ago

    Not everything you build gets good reception. Play the game for fun and not for upvotes or whatever.

    +9
  • How to get mods for mac 6.5 years ago

    Press “Shift+Command+G”. Then paste the thing below in there

  • How to get mods for mac 6.5 years ago

    Type this:
    ~/Library/Application Support/unity.Jundroo.SimplePlanes
    into Go To Folder and see if that works
    @Spacedoge12345plane

  • How to make money on SimplePlanes (possibility) 6.5 years ago

    No, I disagree with all of that. Every aspect of that is wrong. People build for the passion of building, not for the money.

    +13
  • How to get mods for mac 6.5 years ago

    No worries, just making sure others don’t spend ages trying to figure it out
    @Spacedoge12345plane

  • How to get mods for mac 6.5 years ago

    Some mods don’t have a steam workshop page. To get those mods first download the file from the website.
    Then go to :
    ~/Library/Application Support/unity.Jundroo.SimplePlanes
    In there, create a folder named Mods for which you can put the mod file into.

  • Can someone take my Creation Off the Spotlight? 6.5 years ago

    I think he means off the featured creations @EternalDarkness

    +1
  • [B&W] Junkers F 13 (Perfezione) 6.5 years ago

    I know it’s the windshield wiper, it’s very nice btw, its just I was reading your thing and it says VTOL UP is luggage compartment/luggage movement restrictor?
    @Winstonlharambe

    +3
  • [B&W] Junkers F 13 (Perfezione) 6.5 years ago

    I managed to download this and it runs quite well, better than some other crafts with lower part count. Anyways I decided to fly/test it. I see the door you talk about has increased drag, but at the speed this plane flies at it barely effects flight performance, I don’t see why (other than game issues) it shouldn’t just be on AG2. I’m not 100% certain on the flight chracteristics of this plane, but I’ve noticed that yaw stability is quite unstable, there’s lots of slip when in a roll and it’s hard to counter without yaw. Couldn’t get the engine on fire, not sure how that works (flew nose down from 20000ft at speeds excess of 500mph), although that might just be my incompetence. Not really sure what VTOL up does, all I saw was a block rotating on a rotator in the fuselage. Take off speed is closer to 100mph, 80 is slightly low. A useful tip for improving performance is to disable drag calculations (via xml/overload) on detail parts (e.g. Your corrugated fuselage pieces). Cosmetically, the fuselage is very nice, very well made, probably some of the best craftsmanship on the site. The wings however are messy and could do with improvements, specially towards the tips where the panelling geometry isn’t perfect and the airelon trailing edges are flat not sharp. Getting the wings right is much harder than you would think, it helps to preplan that stuff. Overall, it is a stunning build, it looks amazing and flies well, but there’s lots to improve on. I would be careful calling it perfect, nothing is ever perfect, there’s always something that could be improved. However, for the rank that you are, you certainly have more potential than many of us and given some time, you might become one of the best builders on the site.
    Soz for the slab of text
    @Winstonlharambe

    +3
  • [B&W] Junkers F 13 (Perfezione) 6.5 years ago

    You could’ve set the Luggage doors to AG2 only, then you free up the TRIM for actual trim. No need to use the trim slider if stuff is meant to simply open or close.
    @Winstonlharambe

    +1
  • [B&W] Junkers F 13 (Perfezione) 6.5 years ago

    Yeah, but his not the direct predecessor, so he doesn’t get anything :(
    @Winstonlharambe

    +1
  • [B&W] Junkers F 13 (Perfezione) 6.5 years ago

    Looks good, shame I cannot test it properly due to the number of parts. I’m surprised you didn’t have Bogan as a predecessor, seems he’ll get 0 points out of this...

    +3
  • “The P-51 Mustang of The Vietnam War” 6.5 years ago

    Yeah, I know your nozzles don’t effect the thrust in SP, but you should consider reversing the action because it’s more realistic that way.
    @ACEPILOT109

    +1
  • “The P-51 Mustang of The Vietnam War” 6.5 years ago

    Nah, they expand to let the an increased amount of exhaust through, you can read more about it on wiki.
    @ACEPILOT109

  • “The P-51 Mustang of The Vietnam War” 6.5 years ago

    Nice plane, but IIRC I’m pretty sure afterburners make the nozzles expand not contract

    +1
  • Northrop Grumman RQ-4B Global Hawk 6.5 years ago

    It’s a reconnaissance drone, not an
    attack drone
    @TitanIncorporated

    +1
  • Current SP Website Issues that Need Fix ASAP 6.5 years ago

    Yep, looks to be working again for me. Cheers!
    @AndrewGarrison

  • Val-22/B-22 Valka (Teaser+Bug) 6.5 years ago

    Andrew said that that would be fixed with the server restart tonight, nice bomber by the way!

    +1
  • Current SP Website Issues that Need Fix ASAP 6.5 years ago

    I’m still having issues uploading/downloading on Mac
    @AndrewGarrison

    +1
  • NEW UPLOAD/ DOWNLOAD ISSUE 6.5 years ago

    Huh, I’ve been having this problem too. I tried to download something from the website but it just said my internet wasn’t working, but clearly it was cause the SP site was loading

    +1
  • Everyone's dreaming of 1.8 6.5 years ago

    A lot of that stuff will remain a dream forever most likely. Some of it’s just not possible/not happening.

    +1
  • DRIVING NONSTOP ACROSS MAYWAR IN LANCIA [Car Destruction] 6.5 years ago

    No problem
    @Winstonlharambe

  • One Really Annoying Issue with Rotators And Resizable Wheels 6.5 years ago

    Yeah, a lot of the functional parts (rotators, pistons ect.) are very flimsy when under heavy loads. Like you could totally make LG that retracts via a piston, but then it 1.) cannot hold its own weight and 2.) will pop out under high g turns or something
    @randomusername

    +6
  • One Really Annoying Issue with Rotators And Resizable Wheels 6.5 years ago

    I think if you increase the weight on the wheels/rotators, it doesn’t wobble as much.

    +1
  • New Video ! 6.5 years ago

    Always enjoy these types of vids!

  • DRIVING NONSTOP ACROSS MAYWAR IN LANCIA [Car Destruction] 6.5 years ago

    Have you tried typing
    ~/Library/Application Support/unity.Jundroo.SimplePlanes
    into go to folder?
    I remember I had a lot of trouble getting it to work but I don’t remember what I had trouble with exactly
    @Winstonlharambe

    +1
  • DRIVING NONSTOP ACROSS MAYWAR IN LANCIA [Car Destruction] 6.5 years ago

    You can install mods on a Mac without it being on steam you know. You just need to go

    ~/Library
    /ApplicationSupport
    /unity.Jundroo.SimplePlanes
    And in there you create a folder called mods to put your mods in
    @Winstonlharambe

    +2
  • F/A-41N Voyager 6.5 years ago

    Yeah I spent a good day or two just trying to see what worked, realising that something was really off and the redoing the entire area again :/
    @LegnaK

  • F/A-41N Voyager 6.5 years ago

    Nice stuff, I’m currently build one of these too! The area rear of the engines is hella difficult, tons of concave shapes and super hard to get right. You’ve done a pretty nice rendition though.

    +1
  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 6.5 years ago

    Good to see you’re still alive XD
    @Johndfg

    +2
  • [Teaser] Junkers f 13 (I cannot bring myself to build another plane after this) 6.5 years ago

    Looks absolutely amazing, you two should be very proud of your creation!

    +2
  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 6.5 years ago

    Hahaha, he’s already shown his dislike of me wasting parts on the landing door text. I’m surprised he didn’t complain about anything else
    @F104Deathtrap

    +1
  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 6.5 years ago

    Lol, that image is from eBay, you could totally get it if you wanted to
    @ColonelStriker

  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 6.5 years ago

    ! [] (image link)
    No spaces in between
    @TheAmericanPilot

  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 6.5 years ago

    Is very naice, very beautiful thing
    @DuckMint

    +1
  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 6.5 years ago

    Cannot you press enter/return?
    @SuperSix

  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 6.5 years ago

    Yeah, after a while I realised that the speeds at the various altitudes were pretty good anyways. Though the climb speed is painfully slow, it kept the top speed of the plane down and extended the runway takeoff length. As for the lagginess, yeah I admit the type on the doors was perhaps overkill, and I was originally going to omit them, but then some people wanted to see them and I hadn’t gone over the 1500 part limit for this craft, so it was kind of a compromise but one that I was willing to make.
    @BogdanX

  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 6.5 years ago

    Just leave a line and then type
    - - - with no spaces in between
    @SuperSix

  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 6.5 years ago

    Oh, let me fix that real quick
    @Chancey21

    +1
  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 6.5 years ago

    Let me know what you think, I’d like some feedback on this build
    @Chancey21

  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 6.5 years ago

    Thanks, glad you liked it
    @Trainzo