65.9k BMilan Comments

  • M1A2 Abrams 6.3 years ago

    @isaacmimy12 I wasn't using any blueprints when I built mine. I was only looking at my model Abrams I have at home and followed pure eyesight (that's why the size and shape of my Abrams is incorrect at many places)
    But I still find it very interesting that parts on your turret have the exact same numbers as parts on my turret.

  • M1A2 Abrams 6.3 years ago

    @Mobius1Cyka I did a little reserach and comparsion with my Abrams cuz the turret shaped looked very familiar. Well, some fuselages in the turret had the same sizes so much that it can't be just a considence (for example: one of the side panels have 3.7752 height and 0.25 width on one end and 4.7562 hight and 0.25 width on the other end, 2.5 lenght and -0.375 rise. exactly the same numbers what the same panel has on the turret of my Abrams; The front panel of the turret has 2.35 lenght, -1.38 rise and 0.625 run, again, exactly the same numbers as on the front panel of my Abrams' turret. These numbers are so random, it can't be a coincidence) However, many things are changed compared to my tank, plus the hull must have been built from scratch cuz that shows no resemblance to mine.
    In conclusion:
    he probably took my turret, heavily modified it and put it on his hull
    OR
    he took parts of my turret and used them for the building of his own turret

    But I'm not 100% sure but those numbers are really hard to be a coincidence, but there's a chance it's just a coincidence.

    It's a nice build anyways and there's a lotta effort in it for sure

  • Takswagen Behemoth Independence 6.3 years ago

    @TakicraftCorporation Ja ráér, nem kell siettetni, csak kérdeztem 😅

  • Pz.Kpfw. VI Tiger I. "131" (with Tracks 2 mod) 6.3 years ago

    @TheMitsuboshiBoi I never really planned to ever make a Porsche Tiger (that guy simply took my turret without asking and added a few stuff to make it look like a porsce tiger turret) but I don't really want to build a Porsche Tiger now, maybe in the future but not anytime soon

  • TC 60-100 FT Fibre [Tower Crane] 6.3 years ago

    How the heck did you add that upvote button and that "down to comments" button to the description?? Amazing work btw

  • Takicraft UM-4 Turul 6.3 years ago

    @AerialFighterSnakes I understood that reference

  • New Team Member 6.3 years ago

    @Bman01 I'd also add the CCTV mod from him, plus some of his weapon mods.

  • New Team Member 6.3 years ago

    @Bman01 Ah yes, Gestour would be great too! I was also thinking of Duckmint, he could spice up the vanilla map with some awesome stuff (new isands and more cool details to the existing ones etc.)

  • Bergepanzer VI "Bergetiger" (with Tracks 2 mod) 6.3 years ago

    @wonkapilot Here it is: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/8G9qr6/Pz-Kpfw-VI-Tiger-I-131-with-Tracks-2-mod

  • Tiger Ausf. H 6.3 years ago

    @D0g yep, my Tigers are around that number (even lower than that)

  • Tiger Ausf. H 6.3 years ago

    @D0g My track system (which is actually Minecraftpoweer's system, he just taught me how to make it) would add about ~200 parts to the build

  • Tiger Ausf. H 6.3 years ago

    It wasn't 10 meters long, only ~8.5 m, and no german tank ever had a camo like this, plus the drive wheels of the tracks were at the front end not the rear end. But apart from these it looks good.

  • Pz.Kpfw. VI Tiger I. "131" 6.3 years ago

    @TheAmericanPilot thanks sherlock, I know it has, I'm not blind.
    1. I answered to Adler like that cuz he sometimes tends to write troll comments and writes negative stuff without any constructive part (I'd accept his comment if he said something like "it had a camo but apart from that, the rest of the build is good, maybe a few more details there and there would be better, but I like xy part", so a normal critical comment where he states both the positive and negative part in my build so I know where to improve but I also get some inspiration to do so because Im not only told about mistakes but about positive stuff too)
    So I dont take comments like these seriously
    2. If I made the camo, that would add a lot more parts, so its better like this, more ppl can use it, if you look around my profile, I like to spare some details so that the build is made of less parts and more ppl can download it.

  • Bergepanzer VI "Bergetiger" (with Tracks 2 mod) 6.3 years ago

    @ThatAircraftCompany yea sure, but I can only help next week as Im not home currently

  • Bergepanzer VI "Bergetiger" (with Tracks 2 mod) 6.3 years ago

    @ThatAircraftCompany almost all of them. I haven't even read the instructions on the mod's original page, just downloaded it and kept trying and testing to see which one does what and I recommend doing this. Download this build and see for yourself what did I change and in what way 😉

  • Bergepanzer VI "Bergetiger" (with Tracks 2 mod) 6.3 years ago

    @Cashewisacoolcat We'll see. For now, I have a bunch of other projects to finish (check out my back from hiatus! post to see what projects I am working on at the moment)

  • Bergepanzer VI "Bergetiger" (with Tracks 2 mod) 6.3 years ago

    @TheAmericanPilot sry, I had to reupload it, screwed some stuff up, but it's good now (sry for the inconvenience)

  • Bergepanzer VI "Bergetiger" (with Tracks 2 mod) 6.3 years ago

    @TheAmericanPilot sry, I had to reupload it, I made the tracks wider to look better

  • Tracks 2 6.3 years ago

    Absolutely amazing!
    I tested it with my latest build, my Bergetiger, and it works perfectly, great job!

  • Bergepanzer VI "Bergetiger" 6.4 years ago

    @TheAmericanPilot

  • Sturmpz. VI "Sturmtiger" 6.4 years ago

    @Jim1the1Squid There's no muzzleflash, that's just the smoketrail of the missile

  • Sturmpz. VI "Sturmtiger" 6.4 years ago

    @Jim1the1Squid The projectile itself is just a simple unguided missile (with a boom 50 attached to it) I just modified its size and range with xml editing

  • Bergepanzer VI "Bergetiger" 6.4 years ago

    @LotterCrafts I know, but I only planned to build the Henschel variants

  • Back from hiatus! 6.4 years ago

    @Jim1the1Squid
    1. I know it's the museum version (don't worry, my build will be the ww2 version)
    2. I know it's a bit too close to the shore, but I wanted it to be close enough that the "35" on it's side is visible and legible so that ppl who are not that good in recognising ships can see the hull number and search it up

  • Back from hiatus! 6.4 years ago

    @Jim1the1Squid yep :D

  • USS Arizona (BB-39) (Updated) 6.4 years ago

    @Jim1the1Squid https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/964885/Back-from-hiatus give a closer look to the second picture in this post :)

  • Back from hiatus! 6.4 years ago

    @Awsomur none, it's all just photoshop. I just downloaded some materials to make the backgrounds (trees, ocean, sky, dirt etc. all different pictures) and then downloaded pictures of the vehicles and put them on the backgrounds.

  • AI Invasion Fleet 6.4 years ago

    @Jim1the1Squid No, there's no difference. It doesn't have any weapons and it's controls are all rigged so it can't do anything apart from it's original purpose:
    The big ships stay put, the landing crafts go straight forward

  • AI Invasion Fleet 6.4 years ago

    @Jim1the1Squid No because it has no weapons, it's just decoration/target, but it doesn't attack

  • USS Beast Pre 1.8 (1:1 Scale Replica) 6.4 years ago

    @NicePlanes Cool, I'm looking forward to see these improvements :)

  • USS Beast Pre 1.8 (1:1 Scale Replica) 6.4 years ago

    @NicePlanes what do you mean by improving?

  • Spinner-NG 6.4 years ago

    "Lófaszt, nehogy már, te vagy a blade runner"
    Nice build!

  • USS Beast Pre 1.8 (1:1 Scale Replica) 6.5 years ago

    @JDog3106 Outdated? I didn't notice. Not even after 5 ppl already commented it already, so thanks for notifiying sarcasm ;)

  • PAC AIFV Shifu 6.5 years ago

    Very good but... can it do the Wuxi Finger Hold? 🤔

  • B-17G “Lady Luck” 6.5 years ago

    @AltF4U yeah I know, I wrote this to Brields95 because he was complaining about how I didn't put a working link.

    Btw, you can put working links into the description:
    - Write a rectangular bracket "["
    - Write something inside it (e.g. "link", "link to the build", "click here!")
    - Close the rectangular bracket "]"
    - Write a regular bracket "("
    - Paste the link
    - Close the bracket ")"

    Dont write any spaces

    It should look like this:
    [Link to the origibal build] (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5FE6P3/B-17-Fortress-w-Incendiary-Canister)

    (With no space between the two brackets, write it all in one)

  • B-17G “Lady Luck” 6.5 years ago

    @Brields95 oh sorry, I didn't think that a ctrl+c, ctrl+v would be a hard job for some people but looks like I was wrong. Here, be happy:
    -->link to the original build<--

  • USS Arizona (BB-39) 6.5 years ago

    @Culydeath Glad to hear, have fun then!

  • USS Arizona (BB-39) 6.5 years ago

    @Culydeath I don't think so. With almost 1000 parts and a huge size, even my computer lags sometimes, so I doubt a mobile could easily run it, sry

    Edit:
    A user named Strolled commented earlier:
    "Runs surprisingly well on my iPad for that size and detail, good job!"

    And another user named FlyingSausage commented:
    "This thing works on my phone with no lag lmao"
    Maybe your mobile is worth a try too :)

  • Pz.Kpfw. VI Tiger I Bergepanzer 6.5 years ago

    @ChromeGamer25 There were Bergepanzers based on Panzer III and Panzer IV chassis too, Bergetiger wasn't the only field recovery vehicle the germans had. They built recovery vehicles on any chassis they found, these vehicles were't officially produced, they were normal tanks which were modified to be recovery vehicles by field engineers.
    There were many types of Bergepanzers:
    Bergepanzer III
    Bergepanzer IV
    Bergepanzer 38(t)
    Bergepanzer V Bergepanther
    Bergepanzer VI Bergetiger
    Bergepanzer T-34 (a bergepanzer based on a captured T-34)

    For the Bergetiger, it was almost certainly the result of a field rework. No official german document ever mentions the Bergetiger and only one was ever found (the one on the picture above, it was found abandoned in italy by the americans, the germans probably left it behind due to engine failure)

  • Tiger Tank 6.5 years ago

    @IgaoBrHueHue You can edit the description, just click/tap on the little down arrow next to the download counter, and then click/tap on edit. There you can edit the description :)

  • Pz.Kpfw. VI Tiger I Bergepanzer 6.5 years ago

    Nice work dude... now when I'll upload my version (which I have been workin on for a month now) people will think I copied you 😅
    Anyways, great job! :D

  • Takswagen Hussar GT 6.6 years ago

    @TakicraftCorporation Látom akkor te is televagy projektekkel.
    Nekem is van egy rakás amit vagy nem fejeztem még be vagy el se kezdtem:
    - A Tigris tank utolsó variánsa amit még nem építettem meg, a Bergetiger (ez már szinte teljesen kész van csak lusta vagyok megcsinálni a gifeket meg a screenshotokat a poszthoz)
    - Az Abrmams-em hídrakó változata (ez is már kvázi kész van csak ugyanaz van vele mint a tigrissel, nincs gif)
    - akarok csinálni egy sornyi posztot a Sherman tank összes variánsáról amit a 2. vh-ban használtak (minimum 20 de lehet h több) ugyanígy még egyéb 2. vh-s tankokat is megakarok: pz4, panther, t-34 stb. De ezek még csak tervben vannak
    - a bio-mban találasz egy listát még egyéb cuccokról is amik tervben vannak, ezek közül a 3 legfontosabb a BF-109 mert azt magyar lajstrommal csinálom meg, a gripen szintén magyar színeoben illetve a mávag héja ami pedig magától értetődően magyar
    - dolgozom még egy repülőgép anyahajón is
    - felakarom újítani a régi C-500as teherszállítómat, ezúttal teljes belsőtérrel, cockpittel meg minden, ugyanígy a B-200as bombázómat is.
    - van egy minigame ötletem is bár azt nem biztos hogy megcsinálom
    - akarok még egy avataros cuccot is építeni: egy tűz népe csatahajót
    És ezek csak azok amik most eszembejutottak, plusz a gépemen még van egy pár félkész projekt.
    Én nem annyira hallgatok másokra ha ilyesmiről van szó, és inkább csinálom amit én találok ki, csak sajnos időm nincs sok, de hogy nyáron kb 2-3 naponta fogok feltölteni valamit, az tuti biztos

  • Takswagen Hussar GT 6.6 years ago

    @TakicraftCorporation Ah értem. Am az lánctalpas sportkocsit amiben segítettem mikor töltöd fel? Vagy még nem készült el? (Már nagyon várom a végleges verziót mert nagyon király)

  • Takswagen Hussar GT 6.6 years ago

    A Huszár Gété jobb név lett volna, meg ha lett volna bajsza, meg matyó hímzés az oldalán meg egy tányér gulyás leves az anyós ülésen 😂
    Am nagyon fasza lett! Szép munka! 😀

  • Northrop Grumman B-2G Ghost Bomber 6.6 years ago

    @Akali Thanks :)

  • Mazastang dattmin 6.6 years ago

    @Sm10684 it's a slang for 'let me'
    https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lemme

  • Mazastang dattmin 6.6 years ago

    @Sm10684 I didn't check your other creations so I didn't know how many times you did it, and I didn't say you are too lazy to make your own creations, what I thought is that you are too lazy to press the create new aircraft button. I saw many new players who fall into this mistake, that they download a plane, use it a little, then they decide to build something but instead of clicking on start new aircraft, they just start building from that downloaded plane and poof, they get autocredited, and I thought you made this mistake too. I judged too early, I admit, I apologise for that.
    However, the autocredit system is still not broken, it was your mistake that your hauler got wrongly credited to something completely different.
    No hard feelings

  • Northrop Grumman B-2G Ghost Bomber 6.6 years ago

    Awesome build! Which map did you use for the thumbnail screenshots?