Profile image

MJ-3A 'Cardinal'

69.5k Thecatbaron  4.0 years ago

Welcome to the MJ-3A 'Cardinal' !!!

So... this one has got an interesting story. The MJ-3A was originally designed in the 1930s as a fighter plane. The Airframe was famous for its reliability and the plane was known for its maneuverability. Service continued through the 40s as the design was converted into a spotter plane for naval vessels. This float variant was called the 'Heron'. The plane became famous for its services and even today many survive and are used in airshows to entertain the masses.

Flight

The Cardinal is an aerobatic plane derived from a fighter, it has a phenomenal roll rate due to its 4 large ailerons. It also has a pretty tight turning circle. Stall speed is 65 kts and top speed is 200 kts (at sea level).

Features

Funky Cockpit w/ opening canopy (AG1)

Simulated fixed gear suspension

Aerobatic Smoke

Pictures!


This picture provided by MisterT.

Alternate variants

Armed Variant

Heron Variant

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 4 airplane(s) +24 bonus
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 30.1ft (9.2m)
  • Length 27.0ft (8.2m)
  • Height 12.1ft (3.7m)
  • Empty Weight 5,597lbs (2,538kg)
  • Loaded Weight 7,050lbs (3,197kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.106
  • Wing Loading 6.2lbs/ft2 (30.4kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,130.9ft2 (105.1m2)
  • Drag Points 1611

Parts

  • Number of Parts 773
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 2,768
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    689 Hafidz333

    Before flying it, you must use the best song for aerobatics

    1.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,790 Liquidfox01

    I absolutely love the look of the "Heron" variation although its too many parts for my potato phone...beautiful nonetheless

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,336 Stanmich

    I actually used this plane while testing smoothing for fuselage blocks.

    3.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,336 Stanmich

    Color me surprised. The cardinal is so well constructed, and with so few parts! I am thoroughly impressed!

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.8k ChiChiWerx

    @BogdanX, you are correct in that, generally, most aircraft, especially older aircraft using cables and pulleys instead of hydraulics, do “fly” the control surface into equilibrium to achieve the trim effect. There’s a good discussion here, in the Smithsonian Institute’s Air & Space magazine article on the subject. But...not so fast! There are exceptions to most, if not all, things, and this is no exception, so to speak. There is something known as an “antiservo tab”, which looks a lot like a conventional trim tab, but it’s function and purpose is different than what a trim tab does. An antiservo tab actually prevents a control service from being moved too abruptly, helping to prevent pitch excursions which may result in a loss of control. These will generally move automatically with primary control input, i.e., pull back on the yoke, elevator/stabilator moves up and antiservo tab moves further up, helping to increase control loading and deaden the input to a degree. But that’s the vast exception to trim tabs, and, in fact, isn’t really a trim tab at all, more of an opposite trim tab, or “antiservo” tab and would not have a separate trim control, instead working automatically opposite to any yoke inputs. So, yes, I would agree with your assessment that the trim tab is probably opposite from how it would be arranged IRL and if it was meant to be an antiservo tab, it’s controls probably aren’t how they would be set up IRL. However, I blame myself; I test flew this build prior to release and never pointed it out. Control deflection wasn’t initially as great as it is now (increasing the throws was one of my recommendations to the catbaron), and the surface actually cleverly blends into the checkerboard paint scheme, so I totally missed it. My mistake. That’s what I think about the trim tabs on this build, though it’s a minor mistake, and I do like the rest of the build a good deal.

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.5k Thecatbaron

    Thanks! @Amazjul

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    712 Amazjul

    Damn this is beautiful! I love biplanes and this is just so awesome to fly.

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.5k Thecatbaron

    thanks guys! @Wi1dSk7 @sheepsblood

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,327 Wi1dSk7

    This game is listed as a flight-sim because of builds like this. Thank you catbaron

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    20.2k MAINE

    Beautiful aircraft. Touchy on the roll axis but, whatever. AWESOME AWESOME AWESOME Build

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.5k Thecatbaron

    yehaw! @Omel

    +1 4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.8k MrTyTheGreat

    The wobbly camera combined with the detailed cockpit and wonderful flight characteristics makes this plane by-far one of the most realistic and fun planes I've ever flown in this game!

    +1 4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.5k Thecatbaron

    thanks! @Mumpsy

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    74.3k Mumpsy

    That is very pretty! Great build.

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    'Heron' I like that name.

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.5k Thecatbaron

    thanks! @NakAk @jborra

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,259 NakAk

    How the heck did I forget to updoot this... wonderful job!

    +1 4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.6k Urocyon

    NICE!

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.5k Thecatbaron

    There are links at the end of the description :/ @Wi1dSk7

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,327 Wi1dSk7

    Amazing! When can we have the Heron variant?

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,341 Davisplanez

    funky

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    152k MAHADI

    @Thecatbaron np

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.8k SyntheticL

    neat

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.5k Thecatbaron

    Thanks! @MAHADI

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    120k belugasub

    Ah yes let's whip on a 109 canopy.
    .
    10/10 would 1930s again

    4.0 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments