@OverlordPrime @stroller agreed, presentation matters
it will certainly make your build look more appealing and drive people into downloading it and trying it
.
not only that, the content of your post also makes a large difference
.
FYI, upvotes don't necessarily means its for good builds, its a way to show a respect for your hard work like how the "like" button works on YouTube videos
@TypicalBehavior911 i dont quite remember me having built a t-72..
or perhaps you saw my Sheridan mock up of the T-72, or was it even a T-72 i referenced to
.
anyway its nice to hear that my builds have inspired you to make your own, puts a smile to my face cuz' i know my skills are being appreciated which it didn't get as much appreciation in other places
@Yish42 yeah.. that also applies
but in a logic sense, the seat is the problem here
you don't see economy seat where you sit low near the floor, there must be a clearance underneath the seat itself
@DANIELCCCP wdym you dont have a GPU?
your CPU can work as a GPU, only at a slower rate, but I really doubt you dont have any GPU at all, unless you ate it on purpose
@Sockdragger i believe you can balance it out using the offset mass on the main rotor, i find it very useful, and not too tedious instead of editing the dead weight on fuselages
@LunarEclipseSP I agreed, I believe this aircraft is not underrated at all, everyone knows this aircraft
.
Yet this aircraft is less known here on this site
@ROUDS Go to designer mode (the place you make planes), click the eye icon, select blueprints tab, import picture of a screenshot of your build, now share the aircraft, and snap a picture of the blueprint
@MonsNotTheMonster The V shape isn't that easy to make, I gave out on making it and instead used a fuselage with curved on top corner and circular on bottom corner
That is, the best i can do and atleast it kind of.. matches with the blueprint
@xXLouisPlayzXx Ah.. that explains
+1It looks very good, great job !
+1The only thing is the fuselage length is a bit off.. or is it supposed to be like that
omg peak build 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
+1@OverlordPrime @stroller agreed, presentation matters
+1it will certainly make your build look more appealing and drive people into downloading it and trying it
.
not only that, the content of your post also makes a large difference
.
FYI, upvotes don't necessarily means its for good builds, its a way to show a respect for your hard work like how the "like" button works on YouTube videos
is that a bofors on a rat car ???????
+1holy damn
@TypicalBehavior911 i dont quite remember me having built a t-72..
+1or perhaps you saw my Sheridan mock up of the T-72, or was it even a T-72 i referenced to
.
anyway its nice to hear that my builds have inspired you to make your own, puts a smile to my face cuz' i know my skills are being appreciated which it didn't get as much appreciation in other places
love it !
+1the plane itself is beautiful, and you made it 2x more beautiful than it is !
@Yish42 yeah.. that also applies
+1but in a logic sense, the seat is the problem here
you don't see economy seat where you sit low near the floor, there must be a clearance underneath the seat itself
@DANIELCCCP wdym you dont have a GPU?
+1your CPU can work as a GPU, only at a slower rate, but I really doubt you dont have any GPU at all, unless you ate it on purpose
@Sockdragger i believe you can balance it out using the offset mass on the main rotor, i find it very useful, and not too tedious instead of editing the dead weight on fuselages
+1damn.. that part count though 😔
+1when bro grind for the "low tier T-80"
+1kewl, me wait
+1@BluesynVN neat, i love the old Malaysian Airlines livery, soothing as it is
+1@WinsWings i would call it a "plane"
+1y know.. bc its so narrow it looks 2D
@IMCI sure thing
+1@LettuceRob119 thank you
+1eats aggressively
can wi get dem bristol blenheim
+1me like the plane
i love the interior so much, too bad its part intensive for me to test it out
+1.
take my spotlight instead
@Monarchii yahh
+1bri'ish skinny tail bomber
+1@ALTMTR LOL did I? ☺️
+1@Yuoko ...
+1@Yuoko i mean nah, i wont do it
+1simply cuz there's lots of sturmtigers here that are good looking
@Yuoko oh no
+1@ThomasRoderick and her clothes, i believe
+1reference picture
@ChihiroFujisaki thank you🔥🔥
+1@LunarEclipseSP I agreed, I believe this aircraft is not underrated at all, everyone knows this aircraft
+1.
Yet this aircraft is less known here on this site
@IQinventory thank you
+1@LunarEclipseSP thank you, i appreciated that compliment !
+1@ROUDS no problem bro, also I love your build !
+1this deserves a spotlight
@Kerbango definitely
+1At last, finally someone made the Marder 1
+1@pancelvonat very well, i love the sound
+1the most accurate sounding JU-87 yet to be
@ROUDS your welcome
+1.
just making sure.. you do understand what i said, did you?
@ROUDS Go to designer mode (the place you make planes), click the eye icon, select blueprints tab, import picture of a screenshot of your build, now share the aircraft, and snap a picture of the blueprint
+1@LunarEclipseSP Thanks !
+1@LunarEclipseSP no no it does have cockpit, its just not that detailed as such
+1@LunarEclipseSP Well.. its not the best cockpit you'll see, but its decent enough
+1@MonsNotTheMonster The V shape isn't that easy to make, I gave out on making it and instead used a fuselage with curved on top corner and circular on bottom corner
+1That is, the best i can do and atleast it kind of.. matches with the blueprint
@ChaseRacliot man i was gon went to sleep by now lol
+1@Unwanted hell yea
+1@DJRianGamerTheHololiveFan
+1@Rjenteissussy
@M109simp
@SLSD11ph
+1@Zero0Two2
@MonsNotTheMonster
@Apollo018362
+1@BYardley
@YarisSedan
@Unwanted @blin1blyat @ChaseRacliot
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph elite ball knowledge
+1or maybe its more like a common ball knowledge
@SuperSuperTheSylph Damn finally someone gets it 🔥🔥🔥
+1@blin1blyat definitely
+1right now its on 400 parts, im trying to gatekeep it on 450, just like I said so
@SuperSuperTheSylph i hope so, it might or not might be the E variant but I'll consider it
+1