@parkrangerjerry not sure if it is still a thing, but you were able to substract detail from a drag model in a XML (I might confuse it with Unity modding) and scale down its weight.
Nice beginner craft.
Bit low on the fuel.
Handling is OK.
Not sure why strategic bomber has cannons, but its fine.
Bombs will fill better with lower fire delay, so you can properly "carpet bomb".
I'd recommend to use structural wings hack for more sturdy wings, but its optional.
@KnightOfRen it depends on how fast update will be reviewed by the Play Store.
I've once vated for the 1.5 month to just publish closed beta on my app.
@metaphysicalgnome, друже, дякую увагу, але я не впевненний що ще коли небуть щось створю в цій грі.
1. Я втратив майже всі навички.
2. Часу ледве вистачає на працю. В мене зараз 3 проекти на паузі, я вже мовчу про оновлення для моїх ігр на itch.io
3. Simple Rockets 2 виглядає набагато перспективніше, якщо туди додадуть більше фіч з SP то краще вже щось створювати там. Або почекати вже SP2.
@Cheese7352 you can use it for whatever reason you want. But there is plenty more up to date or simply better shassis that you can use. This one is outdated as hell.
@spectre118 No, it was'nt submitted for the ww1 challenge. Challenge ended 4 years ago, this plane was published 3.8 years ago. Calculate it.
This plane was built from my other save that was based on my other plane that was submited for ww1 challenge. There was some ubdate that messed up high level successor planes, that why you can see this one as successor to challenge.
@OverwatchgamingYT, yeah it was build on so much different game and engine version so I surprised it still even flies somehow =)
Also it is true that it wasn't stable enough from the very beginning.
Thanks for your feedback!
Guys, belive me or not, but YOU DO HAVE OBJECTIVES IN SIMPLE PLANES.
You have combat missions, racings, other challenges, even when you are playing sanbox there is goals that you determine for yourselfs! So why exactly there will be such a problem having objectives in SR2?!
Don't be afraid, you'll get sanbox mod for SR2, there is no real reason for it not to be implemented.
You asking why they putting so much effort in the new game? Because if you want to make something better, sometimes, you just need to start from the blank. There is plenty of issues in SP that MUST be reworked (air drag system, flat map, pointless calculations for every single part in your craft, e.t.c.)
From the wery first release version of SimplePlanes we all payd nothing for any update. SimplePlanes community is growing, but it is not enogh to mentain stable income, so how there is two ways: start selling updates as DLC and became 'indi' version of EA, or be nice guys and develop new game that actually will worth every cent we all will spend on it.
Do you really need more reasons?
@CDRxavier, if I remember correctly it can't work under water, but It can work inside block/fuselage part thought. But I highly recommend you to test it by yourself.
@jackattack4554 there was bullet calibre xml property, but now it obsolete and replaced with bulletScale propery. //Gosh, I hope I anderstood that comment correctly...
@Inuyasha8215 was it miss click? xD
@parkrangerjerry not sure if it is still a thing, but you were able to substract detail from a drag model in a XML (I might confuse it with Unity modding) and scale down its weight.
Nice beginner craft.
Bit low on the fuel.
Handling is OK.
Not sure why strategic bomber has cannons, but its fine.
Bombs will fill better with lower fire delay, so you can properly "carpet bomb".
I'd recommend to use structural wings hack for more sturdy wings, but its optional.
Welcome to the community =)
@DEVGRU1775 yes, of course.
+1Well done, @WNP78, what a legend!
+1@bunzaii33 there will be no ability to build anything in VR exclusive version, so every designer related feature will come to the regular game.
@TheLegendaryTea np =)
@ThatOneThiccPlaneStealer yep average replica looks from 5.5 years ago, welcome to the time travel.
p.s. it is not like I will manage to do better job today since I not played this game for so long.
+1@SpletzerAvion sorry, I can't even remember when I've launched SP last time.
But try searching country name you are interested in.
@DimitriIqbal91 np =) Nice plane.
+1@Alwaysplanes IDK if you just troll me. Look at the date, it was ended 4 years ago.
@AndrewGarrison, nah, you did amazing job in this interview. It is really entertaining to watch.
+7@KnightOfRen it depends on how fast update will be reviewed by the Play Store.
I've once vated for the 1.5 month to just publish closed beta on my app.
@metaphysicalgnome, друже, дякую увагу, але я не впевненний що ще коли небуть щось створю в цій грі.
1. Я втратив майже всі навички.
2. Часу ледве вистачає на працю. В мене зараз 3 проекти на паузі, я вже мовчу про оновлення для моїх ігр на itch.io
3. Simple Rockets 2 виглядає набагато перспективніше, якщо туди додадуть більше фіч з SP то краще вже щось створювати там. Або почекати вже SP2.
@Cheese7352 you can use it for whatever reason you want. But there is plenty more up to date or simply better shassis that you can use. This one is outdated as hell.
Congrats, you deserve every earned point =)
+3@Kyle123344 they can add them as option which will be disabled by default.
@spectre118 I described whole situation below, I dont know what to say more if you still did not got it.
@spectre118 No, it was'nt submitted for the ww1 challenge. Challenge ended 4 years ago, this plane was published 3.8 years ago. Calculate it.
This plane was built from my other save that was based on my other plane that was submited for ww1 challenge. There was some ubdate that messed up high level successor planes, that why you can see this one as successor to challenge.
@spectre118 did I somewhere stated that this plane somehow related to the first WW?
@ChrisETH, np =)
@ELITEGAMEZZZ, honestly I can't remember, try to searh for them, I'm not only one who made them.
@OverwatchgamingYT, yeah it was build on so much different game and engine version so I surprised it still even flies somehow =)
Also it is true that it wasn't stable enough from the very beginning.
Thanks for your feedback!
@Khashenzo, thank you =)
@Khashenzo, sorry, I really have no time for this.
@EdgeOfSzon please, use this link to browse and suggest any ideas for future updates.
@enzoBoeing757 yep, they made for it =)
@WarHawk95 omg, this meant to be an unleasted craft...
@Gestour nice =)
+1@ChallengerHellcat X-ray mod, apparently.
Thanks!
@Mumpsy @WahrscheinlichIch
Thanks guys!
+1@LancasterAce @Chancey21 @getorge
@CptJacobson yep =)
@Gurevich here you go
@YuraCat, hi, I'm ok. Currently I'm visiting VKSP every week, so I'm still there =)
@OC3LOT1142 your welcome =)
+1@DimaKosheleFF yep, it's back! =)
Eat all humans =)
@CRJ900Pilot and old, thanks, bro =)
@Nguyenhuuhao0101 yep, for sure. Here, grab it
@Nguyenhuuhao0101 sorry, pal, I can't find in the mods list here.
It is named Carrier in the mod menu, I hope this will help you to find it.
Guys, belive me or not, but YOU DO HAVE OBJECTIVES IN SIMPLE PLANES.
+11You have combat missions, racings, other challenges, even when you are playing sanbox there is goals that you determine for yourselfs! So why exactly there will be such a problem having objectives in SR2?!
Don't be afraid, you'll get sanbox mod for SR2, there is no real reason for it not to be implemented.
You asking why they putting so much effort in the new game? Because if you want to make something better, sometimes, you just need to start from the blank. There is plenty of issues in SP that MUST be reworked (air drag system, flat map, pointless calculations for every single part in your craft, e.t.c.)
From the wery first release version of SimplePlanes we all payd nothing for any update. SimplePlanes community is growing, but it is not enogh to mentain stable income, so how there is two ways: start selling updates as DLC and became 'indi' version of EA, or be nice guys and develop new game that actually will worth every cent we all will spend on it.
Do you really need more reasons?
@FastDan yep, it is.
+1@DEDSEC14 that because it is spaceSHIP xD
@CDRxavier, if I remember correctly it can't work under water, but It can work inside block/fuselage part thought. But I highly recommend you to test it by yourself.
@jackattack4554 there was bullet calibre xml property, but now it obsolete and replaced with bulletScale propery. //Gosh, I hope I anderstood that comment correctly...
@Dzeta8 sorry mate, too busy right now.
@VaderPlanesCompany thanks! =)
@FennVectorCWA thanks very very much!
@CDRxavier yep, loooong time before the wheels =)