They do that to reduce lag. What, you think having high poly doesn't make a game lag? If you're barely capable to run high physics with 400 parts, good luck playing high physics with high res terrains, because it's going to suck a lot.
Mobile?
No. You can't.
PC, Mac?
I don't actually know how, but it's probably go something like download, compress, move the file into the simpleplanes file, put it into the mods file, and activate it in SimplePlanes.
@AtomicCyclone
ah. That's normal.
When a wing that has a higher lift is in front of another wing, that front wing will have inverted pitch control effect. Which is why flaps pitch up aircrafts. In your aircraft's case, the wings you have the flaps on makes lesser lift than whatever the hell you have in front of that wing
@TechnoGraveD
For the nose pitch down, I recommend moving the center of mass, although, not too close to the center of lift. If it's behind the center of lift, it will be too unstable. If it's too close to the center of lift, it will pitch up and stall out very easily.
For the rolling to the right issue, recommend putting the center of mass, lift, and thrust in the absolute middle of the aircraft.
You can show these by clicking a button that has 3 circles and a triangle in the designer menu.
Well, it depends on how "Butter" you land. "Butter" landings are smooth landings that cause little to no shock to suspensions, causing the plane to bounce a bit.
Butter landings also depends on your approach, speed, and generally your skills.
Note that you also can't make the fuselage of your aircraft touch the ground.
@Bryan5
Yeah, no Sonic Boom and Sound Barriers are not the same.
Sonic Boom is a loud bang created by an object traveling at mach speed.
Simply put:
Sonic Boom is audio, while Sound Barrier is visual.
1- Neat Idea, although I much prefer sonic boom for mach stuff.
2- I agree about this.
3- I agree.
4- Not much of a tank guy, but given that many people asked, I'd say it'll be a fun addition.
5- I agree. Oh also, it'd be cool to make the jet engine noises louder.
6- Not possible. Unless google allows it again.
7- Again, not much of a tank guy, but it'll be kinda cool.
8- Hmm. Y e s.
9- I honestly don't think SimplePlanes need more weapons, but I do think the only weapon left that they need to add are Fox-2s.
10- I agree. Working with water unexperienced is extreme pain.
11- I agree. Wings should be a little more detailed. And the control surface customization should be a little more advanced.
12- Because they don't need to, people can just make it.
13- I kinda agree on this one. Although, people can make it.
14- I agree.
15- Hmm. I do not think that's possible.
16- Couldn't you just XML mod them?
17- Tell me you're just too lazy to make your own canopy...
18- Depends on what part it is.
19- That is very much guaranteed to be honest.
This is truly the ultimate suggestion forum.
Mobile SP sucked. Alot. I understand that it is caused by technical issues, but we need these things. Not all people are rich, y'know.
Also we need IR stuff. I've been asking this for a long time.
@TailessAce
wdym? couldn't you just save the part into a sub assembly and copy all the variables? it works for me when I tried it but I couldn't continue using it since it lags so much when I tried it. Oh also, if you downloaded the v1.1 part, it's not the optimal version, instead download the v1.2 part.
@Aaronrossdouglas22
Thank you! I did enjoyed the challenge, actually! Although there is some stuff that I didn't like, but the end of the challenge was near so I didn't have the time. Thank you for making the challenge though, and I'd like to enter again if you made another one!
Honestly, I agree with @BeastHunter. Why waste your account just because your phone broke? Besides, phones are replaceable anyway, unlike your life. Your progress are lost? Learn from mistakes, back up your creation next time. Don't take regrets first, take the lessons first.
@Mewmewcat
yes
Yoooooooooooo
C y x o ñ
can't type russian lmao so I did that
+1T, btw, this is gonna be another great one
@Bryan5
+1not exactly what I was looking for, but ok, thank you.
@Bryan5
+1like, missile locks on according to the cockpit's position, or the camera's position, Idk it's hard to explain
Wrong engine nozzle.
Yes, I am complaining about it.
@TechnoGraveD
+3well, duh. Get good.
what promotion?
+1F-15J has a conformal fuel tank?
...Ok.
+2Well, Idk. Engine usually does these things.
+1I recommend checking the Thrust/Weight of the aircraft.
They do that to reduce lag. What, you think having high poly doesn't make a game lag? If you're barely capable to run high physics with 400 parts, good luck playing high physics with high res terrains, because it's going to suck a lot.
+1@TechnoGraveD
+1I have never used SP PC, so Idk how. Ask someone who explains better.
mm
B O A T
jokes aside, it's pretty cool, ngl
+2Mobile?
+1No. You can't.
PC, Mac?
I don't actually know how, but it's probably go something like download, compress, move the file into the simpleplanes file, put it into the mods file, and activate it in SimplePlanes.
@AtomicCyclone
+1oh, uh, no I haven't downloaded anything lmao. Was too busy with my Typhoon.
@xNotDumb
lmfao.
@xNotDumb
Bruh.
Bruh.
Just bruh.
what is this, r/facepalm?
@xNotDumb
wdym?
@AtomicCyclone
yeah, sure why not. I prefer it to be unlisted though.
@AtomicCyclone
ah. That's normal.
When a wing that has a higher lift is in front of another wing, that front wing will have inverted pitch control effect. Which is why flaps pitch up aircrafts. In your aircraft's case, the wings you have the flaps on makes lesser lift than whatever the hell you have in front of that wing
@TechnoGraveD
+1For the nose pitch down, I recommend moving the center of mass, although, not too close to the center of lift. If it's behind the center of lift, it will be too unstable. If it's too close to the center of lift, it will pitch up and stall out very easily.
For the rolling to the right issue, recommend putting the center of mass, lift, and thrust in the absolute middle of the aircraft.
You can show these by clicking a button that has 3 circles and a triangle in the designer menu.
what- how does flap not work
Well, it depends on how "Butter" you land. "Butter" landings are smooth landings that cause little to no shock to suspensions, causing the plane to bounce a bit.
Butter landings also depends on your approach, speed, and generally your skills.
Note that you also can't make the fuselage of your aircraft touch the ground.
@IceSlayerAG
It's a common way to get tagged on creations when it's published.
Nope, I've tried it before, and if you wanted to do it, you'll have to use 2 wings.
Is that what I think it is? If yes, T.
yes but not recommended.
+1Please don't pirate.
@Bryan5
+2Yeah, no Sonic Boom and Sound Barriers are not the same.
Sonic Boom is a loud bang created by an object traveling at mach speed.
Simply put:
Sonic Boom is audio, while Sound Barrier is visual.
@Bryan5
+1oh well.
You still haven't asked my question
thought you meant the smoke thingy when you said sound barrier?
AAAAA MUST BE FROM AC7 DAMMIT
I must ask though, how do you give people 10 upvotes?
@Bryan5
+1I thought you meant the smokes or smth?
Then why do you ask when you can just make one?
Yep, certified lazy person.
1- Neat Idea, although I much prefer sonic boom for mach stuff.
+32- I agree about this.
3- I agree.
4- Not much of a tank guy, but given that many people asked, I'd say it'll be a fun addition.
5- I agree. Oh also, it'd be cool to make the jet engine noises louder.
6- Not possible. Unless google allows it again.
7- Again, not much of a tank guy, but it'll be kinda cool.
8- Hmm. Y e s.
9- I honestly don't think SimplePlanes need more weapons, but I do think the only weapon left that they need to add are Fox-2s.
10- I agree. Working with water unexperienced is extreme pain.
11- I agree. Wings should be a little more detailed. And the control surface customization should be a little more advanced.
12- Because they don't need to, people can just make it.
13- I kinda agree on this one. Although, people can make it.
14- I agree.
15- Hmm. I do not think that's possible.
16- Couldn't you just XML mod them?
17- Tell me you're just too lazy to make your own canopy...
18- Depends on what part it is.
19- That is very much guaranteed to be honest.
fuselage cutting.
+1lots, and lots of fuselage cutting.
Fuselage cutting. A lot, of fuselage cutting.
@AviationCat007
didn't I mention it in my forum post?
@AviationCat007
here
well, s#!t. I guess mine didn't make it lmao.
bruh?
why not just get good?
This is truly the ultimate suggestion forum.
+2Mobile SP sucked. Alot. I understand that it is caused by technical issues, but we need these things. Not all people are rich, y'know.
Also we need IR stuff. I've been asking this for a long time.
no.
+1@TailessAce
+1ahh, ok, I understand now
@TailessAce
maybe you forgot to resize it? No, not the text, the text area, the box thingy, it can be found at the bottom of the settings of the text.
@TailessAce
wdym? couldn't you just save the part into a sub assembly and copy all the variables? it works for me when I tried it but I couldn't continue using it since it lags so much when I tried it. Oh also, if you downloaded the v1.1 part, it's not the optimal version, instead download the v1.2 part.
@Korzalerke
+1ok lmao
@Korzalerke
+1wrong one, lmfao
boag
+3@TailessAce
Because you didn't read the tutorial, you're missing the variables.
rotators with some FT inputs.
Thank you, @GalacticaAsia! I realized my mistake and that was I put one of my fuselage's mass to 0. Goddamit. Thank you though!
+1@Aaronrossdouglas22
+1Thank you! I did enjoyed the challenge, actually! Although there is some stuff that I didn't like, but the end of the challenge was near so I didn't have the time. Thank you for making the challenge though, and I'd like to enter again if you made another one!
Honestly, I agree with @BeastHunter. Why waste your account just because your phone broke? Besides, phones are replaceable anyway, unlike your life. Your progress are lost? Learn from mistakes, back up your creation next time. Don't take regrets first, take the lessons first.
+4